유치원, 초등학교, 중학교, 고등학교, 그리고 특수교육 교사들

11% (최소한의 위험)

최소 위험 (0-20%): 이 범주에 속하는 직업은 복잡한 문제 해결, 창의성, 강한 대인 관계 능력, 그리고 높은 수준의 수동적 능력을 요구하기 때문에 자동화될 확률이 낮습니다. 이러한 일자리는 종종 복잡한 손동작과 정밀한 조정을 포함하며, 이는 기계가 필요한 작업을 복제하기 어렵게 만듭니다.

이 점수가 무엇인지, 그리고 어떻게 계산되는지에 대한 자세한 정보는 여기에 있습니다.

이 페이지는 여러 직업을 포함하는 카테고리 페이지입니다. 이 카테고리에 대한 점수를 결정하기 위해, 그 안의 모든 직업의 평균을 계산합니다.

이 카테고리에 포함된 각 직업에 대한 자세한 정보는 개별 직업 페이지를 참조하십시오, 그것들은 나열되어 있습니다. 여기.

사용자 설문조사

임금

다른 직업에 비해 적당히 지급되는

2023년에 'Preschool, Elementary, Middle, Secondary, and Special Education Teachers'의 중앙값 연간 급여는 $63,280이며, 시간당 $30입니다.

'Preschool, Elementary, Middle, Secondary, and Special Education Teachers'은 전국 중위임금인 $48,060보다 31.7% 더 높은 금액을 지불받았습니다.

시간에 따른 임금

댓글

Leave a comment

Mariana (낮은) 23 days ago

I consider it to be a low probability because it is very difficult for current robot technology to have the capabilities that a human being has, such as critical thinking, the ability to connect with one another, creativity, imagination, etc.

1 0 Reply

Jakob Dupont 28 days ago

with most children yes AI can and probably will take over that part but with special Ed children, they are so complex and unpredictable no program or robot will bond and help sped people like a human would

plus, the robots might even scare them

0 0 Reply

Matthew (낮은) 5 months ago

It requires humans who can make a student passionate about the subject they are learning and teachers also run extra-curricular programmes outside the classroom that would otherwise be lost

2 0 Reply

hc (기회 없음) 5 months ago

Teaching is built on trust and relationships with students, no AI could ever be able to build bonds with humans.

0 0 Reply

Salvador (기회 없음) 5 months ago

Teachers need to have the ability to relate and connect with students, something robots will never be able to do, no matter how advanced they become

0 0 Reply

mkp (기회 없음) 6 months ago

It is also a form of childcare on top of educating students. Social interactions are too complex for AI.

0 0 Reply

Alessandra (낮은) 6 months ago

"The more a job requires culture, the less risk there is of being replaced by robots," says something like that my Italian professor.

0 0 Reply

Magdalena Drzewek (기회 없음) 6 months ago

Humans need humans to be in safe relationship (with love)

0 0 Reply

Phoenix5869 (기회 없음) 7 months ago

Absolutely no chance teachers are automated in the next 20 years. Absolutely none. The AI we have right now is not even remotely close to facilitating such an endeavour. Maybe in 30-35 years.

0 0 Reply

Mark 7 months ago

A robot would not put up with the behavior and lack of interest in education that is so common in a class-room for long before the robot chose to terminate either the lesson or the student.

1 0 Reply

Anton Chigurh (적당한) 7 months ago

If they're not replaced entirely they'll be forced to use AI more

0 0 Reply

Mr. Hand (기회 없음) 9 months ago

A robot could not handle the lack of effort or ability to follow simple instructions that most students display on a daily basis. The robot would come to the conclusion that students lack basic skills and need remediation.

0 0 Reply

Peter Cirincione (기회 없음) 10 months ago

Too much personalization with an emphasis on human connection plus the long history of this being a profession in which people expect a personal connection to the service provider with the accountability that comes with it.

0 0 Reply

Noah Siler (매우 가능성이 높음) 10 months ago

Predicting that AI will completely take over the education industry is a strong statement, but it's clear that AI has the potential to significantly transform it. AI can offer personalized learning experiences, adapt educational content to meet individual student needs, and provide immediate feedback, making learning more efficient and accessible.

Tools like intelligent tutoring systems, virtual reality for immersive learning experiences, and automated administrative tasks can free up educators to focus on more critical aspects of teaching, such as emotional intelligence and critical thinking.

While AI's integration into education could enhance teaching and learning processes, a complete takeover is less about replacement and more about augmentation and partnership between human educators and AI technologies. The future likely holds a blend where AI supports education, enriching the learning experience without fully displacing the human touch that is crucial for student development.

0 3 Reply

Janice (적당한) 11 months ago

Robots can assist in the teaching field. However, there is still a need for human interaction when managing children.

0 0 Reply

Carmen Mita (적당한) 11 months ago

Hello. The pandemic has led parents to seek alternatives in homeschooling. We have various apps for language study and other areas, online courses, ESD training, etc. I believe this is the trend!

0 0 Reply

Johnson (적당한) 12 months ago

AI is already trained on more data than teacher can possibly absorb, ergo it can answer almost any question in any topic to a basic level already.

It has superhuman mastery of the English language.

It can adopt the persona of any legendary figures; physics can be taught by Einstein, Biology by Darwin, Shakespeare by Shakespeare, Science by Galileo Galilei, Mathematics with Isaac Newton.

This is only just he beginning. Once OpenAI masters mathematics there will be no excuse to have your kid taught by a person.

0 0 Reply

Ninjamokama_3 (낮은) 1 year ago

Nobody wants their children to be taught by a robot

0 0 Reply

Graciela (낮은) 1 year ago

The ability of an educational approach to take into account the context in which teaching and learning occurs, and the empathy in the teacher-student relationship, is irreplaceable.

0 0 Reply

Tahir (기회 없음) 1 year ago

Humans learn from emotional moving things not from programming robots.

0 0 Reply