초등학교 교사, 특수 교육을 제외하고

Mike (낮은)이 말합니다.

Even with technology, someone still has to be there to facilitate learning for the kids. Additionally, disciplinary actions must be employed for those who goof off or don't show interest in learning.

Ket Autor (불확실한)이 말합니다.

The interaction of teacher and student is very important in learning. There may be an advantage of it (robotics) but there are lots of disadvantages.

1. Students may not have the opportunity to bond with their teacher, since teachers are our second parent in school,
2. Let's always bare in mind that robots are being manipulated by man, meaning authentic learning from an authentic human is really needed because of it's experiences being shared to students.

Sofia (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

Robots can never take a teacher's job. I think that people are too paranoid about this AI/robotics madness.

Kait (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

You need humans to teach humans lol

Homokiné Czövek Henrietta (적당한)이 말합니다.

Even with technology, there is a need for a teacher who makes learning easier.

mfleh mfleh이 말합니다.

Even with technology, there needs to be a teacher to facilitate the learning.

Jamalia이 말합니다.

For me, interaction with the teacher personally is still the best way of learning process. We may use technologies as our references.

Aaron 이 말합니다.

Khan Academy and MOOC's are the future of education. AI can easily determine if young people are learning. At least in my opinion.

Aaron (매우 가능성이 높음)이 말합니다.

With the internet it's possible to have education entirely online. Tablets, smart phones etc. etc. Khan academy for example.

National Teacher Shortage Crisis (불확실한)이 말합니다.

There's a national teacher shortage. 50% of all new teachers are projected to leave the profession within their first 5 years. Experienced teachers are running from the profession and fewer every year are entering it. This is a national crisis everyone's ignoring. Eventually it will sink in and people will start looking for solutions. In our current culture, that solution certainly doesn't lean towards incentivizing new teachers to enter and stay in the profession. What do you do to fix this problem? The answer that's easy, that causes the least disruption, that requires the least change in the system, that is cost effective, is automation. What seems more likely? Drastic cultural and systematic change, or people like Mark Zuckerberg, who have literally said they are investing in the development of these educational technologies, actually taking advantage of new market and filling the demand with automation?

Janice Reid (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

Even with technology, there needs to be a teacher to facilitate the learning.