그래픽 디자이너

anonymous (낮은) 11 days ago

because graphic design requires good creativity, something robots dont have

1 0 Reply

Crazy (적당한) 2 months ago

It's undeniably possible. Rapidly improving, despite many efforts. By 20 years, I believe that generative "art" will be able to imitate a style perfectly, given proper instruction.

1 5 Reply

Steve (낮은) 3 months ago

High barrier of entry, high returns and low maintenance career after about 15,000 hours.

3 2 Reply

79_sketches (불확실한) 5 months ago

A couple of years ago this was less than 5%. It is scary to see this advance in just 2 years

4 2 Reply

Anonymous message (불확실한) 10 months ago

It involves designing, which might make it unpredictable. Coding involves a set of rules. If you remember the rules, you can write code easily.

But that's not the case with designing. Though designing has rules, it's not as rigid as coding.

4 11 Reply

Jake (불확실한) 10 months ago

AI, at its current stages, can only replicate patterns it sees in the images and text it’s given. It isn’t capable of the knowledge behind the design choices in Graphic Design. AI doesn’t understand anatomy, color theory, or other aspects of art. However, this doesn’t mean that it can’t in the future, and it certainly doesn’t mean it can’t fool us into thinking it knows what it’s doing.

14 2 Reply

Max (매우 가능성이 높음) 10 months ago

AI has shown that it is increasingly capable of creating art when given instructions, which will make being a graphic designer an unnecessary position in the coming decades.

5 20 Reply

h 10 months ago

Just no. AI art looks and will always look awful and soulless. People who say "ohhh its ai it'll look better in the future" just dont know how AI works. AI isnt gonna replace ANY creative processes, EVER.

26 7 Reply

skibidi (적당한) 10 months ago

AI keeps getting better with graphic design in general. Just look at things like Sora by OpenAI or the Microsoft Bing Image Creator, and then think about what that'll look like in a couple of years.

4 3 Reply

nyah (낮은) 10 months ago

motion graphics is too perfect to replicate

7 2 Reply

Azazel (낮은) 10 months ago

Looking that artist fight back against artificial intelligence by making Anti-AI Flitters that seems to lower the risk not to mention what you put as a reason for 34% risk which is that It's hard to automate Originality, fine arts.etc not to mention that every single artist have their own style even in the umbrella terms, for example you can't say style in Toilet Bound Hanako kun is the same as one in Blue Exorcist.etc.
In short: Even if hard it in theory could be possible, but I'm more for making that AI + Artist combo to help people with drawing.

8 2 Reply

Ravi j (불확실한) 10 months ago

I mean we can't say anything at this moment the a.i design are polish n all but it fails in communicating the message of the design, need a human to assist n monitor.

1 1 Reply

Bee (불확실한) 12 months ago

Hard to say, because AI is doing a pretty good job at creating art. However, it still has a way to go with hands and the CGI look a lot of the art it creates has.

3 5 Reply

Tvrbo (적당한) 12 months ago

It is more likely that designers will use artificial intelligence as a tool, as there are things that artificial intelligence will not be able to do, such as creating a completely original and coherent branding system.

2 1 Reply

josh (매우 가능성이 높음) 12 months ago

its easy to train ai on boring corporate designs

3 2 Reply

Nikkolas (매우 가능성이 높음) 12 months ago

There's already a viral video out right now about a graphic designer who has 8 years of experience being made redundant by ai...

3 6 Reply

Bob (적당한) 12 months ago

Due to the rise of generative AI, companies will be incentivized to use AI databases that are relevant to what they do in order to cut costs. While some demand for graphic designers may still exist for more creativity demanding areas, I believe it won't be enough to answer an increasing supply of out-of-job graphic designers

0 1 Reply

marvin jakata (적당한) 1 year ago

i would say moderate because in as much as AI is coming there still will need that using touch combined with it but then also the market might become too overcrowded with more and more people coming into the design space.

0 1 Reply

Wil 1 year ago

Clients will not pay designers handsomely because 90 percent of the work will be done with Ai tools such as Dalle 3. Small adjustments takes minutes in photoshop and can be done in-house by almost anyone.

1 1 Reply

Sponge Bob Squarepants (불확실한) 1 year ago

20 years is a long time. Would you have expected this AI boom twenty years ago? Who knows how fast AI will develop in the future. Imagine showing someone SORA twenty years ago. They would be in disbelief.

Graphic design is too broad of a term in my opinion. There's logo design, web design, package design, wayfinding design, branding, mobile design, t-shirt design, print design, poster design, and much more.

Digital art and illustrations I think are already under threat. When the art being generated is general and the boundaries of art are more forgiving, then the general nature of AI will thrive. But for more exacting work like logo design, web design, and package design, AI struggles from my experience.

I have played around with Adobe's built-in AI tools for Illustrator and Photoshop. While they're cool to play with, I often find myself wasting time playing prompt engineering, when I could have created something on my own faster. If I as a designer don't have patience to prompt-engineer my way into a design, I'm certain clients won't either.

There's also levels to graphic design. Maybe AI will get rid of the bad designers and the bad clients! But the precise, custom, unique work that many clients look for is hard to replace.

Lastly, being a graphic designer is more than just the technical skills. It's about directing a vision for the design. Even if AI is 100% perfect, it may not understand the client's needs.

2 1 Reply