컴퓨터 프로그래머

고위험
66%
다음으로 어디로 가고 싶으신가요?
결과를 친구 및 가족과 공유하세요.
투표 댓글 (214)
또는, 이 직업을 더 자세히 탐구해보세요...
자동화 위험
계산된
70%
(고위험)
투표 조사
62%
(고위험)
Average: 66%
노동 수요
성장
-9.6%
년도별 2033
임금
$99,700
또는 시간당 $47.93
볼륨
120,370
2023 기준으로
요약
직업 점수
3.8/10

사람들이 또한 조회했습니다

계산된 자동화 위험

70% (고위험)

고위험 (61-80%): 이 범주에 속하는 직업은 현재 또는 가까운 미래의 기술을 사용하여 쉽게 자동화될 수 있는 많은 업무를 수행하므로 자동화로부터 중대한 위협을 받고 있습니다.

이 점수가 무엇인지, 그리고 어떻게 계산되는지에 대한 자세한 정보는 여기에 있습니다.

일부 중요한 직무 특성은 자동화하기 어렵습니다:

  • 사회적 인식력

  • 독창성

사용자 설문조사

다음 두 십년 안에 완전 자동화될 62%의 확률

우리의 방문자들은 이 직업이 자동화 될 가능성이 높다고 투표했습니다. 이 평가는 계산된 자동화 위험 수준에 의해 더욱 지지받고 있으며, 이는 자동화의 70% 확률을 추정합니다.

자동화의 위험성에 대해 어떻게 생각하십니까?

컴퓨터 프로그래머이 다음 20년 이내에 로봇이나 인공지능에 의해 대체될 가능성은 얼마나 됩니까?






감정

다음 그래프는 의미 있는 데이터를 제공할 수 있을 만큼 충분한 투표 수가 있을 때마다 포함됩니다. 이러한 시각적 표현은 시간 경과에 따른 사용자 투표 결과를 보여주며, 감정 추세에 대한 중요한 지표를 제공합니다.

시간에 따른 감정 (분기별)

시간별 감정 (연간)

성장

다른 직업에 비해 매우 느린 성장률.

'Computer Programmers' 직종의 채용 공고 수는 2033년까지 9.6% 감소할 것으로 예상됩니다.

총 고용량 및 예상 직업 공석

* 2021년부터 2031년까지의 기간에 대한 노동통계국의 데이터
업데이트된 예상치가 09-2024에 제출될 예정입니다..

임금

다른 직업에 비해 매우 높은 급여를 받는다.

2023년에 'Computer Programmers'의 중앙값 연간 급여는 $99,700이며, 시간당 $47입니다.

'Computer Programmers'은 전국 중위임금인 $48,060보다 107.4% 더 높은 금액을 지불받았습니다.

시간에 따른 임금

* 노동통계국의 데이터

볼륨

다른 직업에 비해 더 넓은 직업 기회 범위

2023년 현재, 미국 내에서 'Computer Programmers'로 고용된 사람들의 수는 120,370명이었습니다.

이는 전국의 고용 노동력 중 약 0.08%를 대표합니다.

다시 말해, 약 1 천명 중 1명이 'Computer Programmers'로 고용되어 있습니다.

직무 설명

컴퓨터 애플리케이션이 작동하게 해주는 코드와 스크립트를 생성, 수정, 테스트합니다. 소프트웨어 및 웹 개발자 또는 다른 개인이 작성한 사양에서 작업합니다. 특정 문서, 데이터, 정보를 저장, 검색, 검색하는 컴퓨터 프로그램을 개발하고 작성할 수 있습니다.

SOC Code: 15-1251.00

자원

새로운 커리어를 시작하려고 생각하거나 직장을 바꾸려는 계획이 있다면, 우리가 만든 편리한 채용 검색 도구를 사용해보세요. 이 도구를 통해 완벽한 새로운 역할을 찾을 수 있을지도 모릅니다.

당신의 지역에서 일자리를 검색하세요

댓글

Leave a comment

` (불확실한) 1 month ago
I think that while there is a high chance that AI will be used to automate the creation of basic code, AI will always make mistakes that have to be corrected by humans who know what they're doing, and I don't think AI will replace programmers in the next ~20 years because of the need for complex and intricate code used in projects such as game engines.
6 2 Reply
Guy (매우 가능성이 높음) 1 month ago
Already starting, automation has begun being used for coding in many places.
3 1 Reply
Caro (낮은) 2 months ago
There will probably be many bugs (Like how Ai has trouble with fingers), so no matter what, the job will be necessary.
4 5 Reply
Aiden (적당한) 2 months ago
bc like it might but prob not and like it will always be important to have human programmers because if ai ever become sentient and gain their own objectives, they will have all the power in the world if they're the only ones that know how to run our code and stuff like that so yea it would be dangerous to give that much power away to them
1 4 Reply
Mistral Claude 4 months ago
Here is the thing my dudes. As professional programer (30 years on the job, so of that thing even replaces out job, I will surely be retired already anyway) I tried chatgpt, copilot, Claude and even Mistral for coding. They are all pretty darn helpful to code on nephew level...you know, that terrible code we got from a 3rd party to maintain? Yeah. It goes great on that level. It's also great to do start level stuff that has been done 1000s of times. Try doing something new though, or some actual logic, and they fail, always. And never even realize they are failing. The reason is pretty simple. what we have (the llms) are not real AIs. When (if) we have a real AI, then, the moment a computer can replicate human level programming, is also the moment the computer can code another AI doesn't it? What would happen if it can code a AI better than itself?
15 3 Reply
Jose 2 months ago
Some of the best programmers in the world are working daily to help improve ChatGTP and other models. The capabilities are quickly increasing and given some time they will be better than most programmers. So yes some very good programmers will have a job, but most will not be needed. You wrote the comment 2 months ago, there is now a new model which you thought was not possible 2 months ago. What will happen in another 2 months, or 2 years?
7 3 Reply
Ritchie Duncan (매우 가능성이 높음) 4 months ago
AI suites such as ChatGPT etc have the ability to code functions in a variety of languages and for various platforms. A simple description of the function to be created, along with the system, such as Visual Studio, Unity etc allows the code to be copied and pasted into the code base.
Arguably within the next 10 years, programmers, in the form we know them now, will be obsolete.
4 4 Reply
Socks 4 months ago
Until AI programs can always fix everything in e.g. app that is being made as well as in themselves they will be just a tool for already competent programmer that has to understand most details anyway.
4 1 Reply
s (낮은) 4 months ago
it wouldn't be completely automated, but a lot of lower level - intermediate programming will probably be automated.
2 0 Reply
I know jobs (적당한) 4 months ago
It is pretty easy to program but a computer can´t code a computer
3 1 Reply
Anonymous (낮은) 4 months ago
Their code is efficient but they can’t replicate originality
0 4 Reply
John (매우 가능성이 높음) 4 months ago
I've never programmed a day in my life but not only was I able to program a working game but also a point of sales program for a business by telling AI exactly what I needed and it made changes to each program...
1 3 Reply
skibidi (매우 가능성이 높음) 4 months ago
AI can already write code pretty well, so in 20 years it's highly likely it will be automated
4 3 Reply
Anon (적당한) 4 months ago
There's a lot of coding done by AI already. Eventually, there will be a job that just runs these AIs who write code.
3 1 Reply
ooga 5 months ago
Small chance that they'll take over our jobs, computers can't really figure out basic principles of codes, let alone thousands of lines of code (I tried this, didn't work)
6 2 Reply
mgyt (불확실한) 5 months ago
Because AI's are being overtrained. If you try to make an entire program only using AI, you just can't. And they will have a lot of vulnerabilities
1 0 Reply
Osman (적당한) 5 months ago
Programming will always require human intervention, it can not be all controlled by AI
4 2 Reply
idk (적당한) 5 months ago
while automation basically runs on programming, and it would be logical to think programming would be automated easily with ai, programming takes creativity, and out of the box thinking, which automation cant replicate. i think it would still be possible to be automated, but there will always be a place for programmers. no matter what.
2 1 Reply
Nipple (불확실한) 5 months ago
Even though AI is already capable at making basic code/scripts (After a few tries to tweak flaws), it probably won't be able to automate advance aspects of computer programming unless the necessary improvements are made regarding accurate generation as well as more source code to gather information from. In short, it can make games like Snake, Minesweeper and Tetris, but it won't be able to make games like Minecraft, Call of Duty, Fortnite and others that require very complex scripts/code and the human brain to be able to have the creativity AND the power to use it when making those games. Computer Programmers aren't exactly 'save' but it is hard to completely automate...


At least not in 20 years.
2 0 Reply
Hamood (기회 없음) 5 months ago
Because we are the ones who will create ai if ai is able to create programs it can create multiple versions of itself thus breaking the ai rule that it must obey and follow all humans
0 0 Reply
Le Jacob (적당한) 5 months ago
computer code could be automated, hovewer, its possible that europe could regulate AI for jobs about programming
0 0 Reply
mugumnr (매우 가능성이 높음) 5 months ago
ai is already able to do simple ones give 20 more years its over
5 0 Reply

이 직업에 대한 답글을 남겨주세요.

이 사이트는 reCAPTCHA와 Google 개인정보처리방침서비스 이용약관에 의해 보호됩니다.