전기 공학자

John dough이 말합니다.

The key aspects AI robots can't take from electrical engineer's role are the diversity of the profession, creativity in designing, and social perceptiveness. Although, the last aspect is one even electrical engineers lack, with many at varying levels. An bright electrical engineer possessing high creativity and social perceptiveness will be very hard to replace.

ezkha이 말합니다.

I think we should be able to (and must) prevent robots/AIs to become competent in electrical engineering, and thus achieving self replication. There are many uncertainties and possible consequences if the other route is taken instead.

On the other hand, since AIs have a chance to replace software engineering (and maybe also become efficient in cyber security and other CS domains), the ability for it to program itself might be slightly less risky, provided material/physical restrictions for performing certain actions are in place. At least compared to its potential benefits.

Worst case scenario is to have an SCP-079 that causes a massive physical threat to humanity to be unleashed (e.g. takedown of hospitals or containment breach of an darned un-killable XK-scenario hostile reptile being), but at least it isn't the physical threat itself.

Wyan Francis (낮은)이 말합니다.

I’m not sure for certain, I’m just using my own opinionated logic. EE has to do with wiring and building circuits, which AI itself is created on. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying that in the future AI won’t be able to do so, but in the near future I don’t think so.

Flo이 말합니다.

Electrical engineers must use more and more AI to improve their productivity. They even should organize small events to diffuse knowledge among their peers, in order to use technology the best way possible. And this, always keeping in mind the upcoming developments and the future challenges of the organization they work for. They should use AI while adapting the way they do their job to stay useful and in a leading position.

Flo이 말합니다.

Electrical engineers must use more and more AI to improve their productivity. They even should organize small events to diffuse knowledge among their peers, in order to use technology the best way possible. And this, always keepind in mind the upcoming developments and the future challenges of the organization they work for. They should use AI while adapting the way they do their job to stay useful and in a leading position.

Ninjamokama_3 (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

Unless they make robots that are flexible, durable and reliable enough and have developed enough conciousness to replace human labour and thinking, this is going to be a no for me.

Matt (낮은)이 말합니다.

Electrical engineers would be required in the short-medium time frame of AI development to design, manufacture & maintain infrastructure for AI development.

Jose이 말합니다.

Honestly, I'm an electrical engineer and what I see in AI is that it will simply boost your productivity, but in the short to medium term, I find it very unlikely that it will replace us. I myself use AI tools and I know they make mistakes. On the other hand, you have a lot of human interaction, when talking with operators, distributors, customers, and coordinating all of that. AI is very good, for example, when consulting regulations, but the day an AI can call a subcontractor, understand that Manolo had to leave the construction site because his wife got sick, and that this will cause a delay, then call the customer and explain it and reorganize the entire schedule, we will be talking about an AI that will be capable of doing everything a human does and we will be talking about a very different society.
I am quite skeptical. Only time will tell.

cum dump (낮은)이 말합니다.

At a Master's/PhD level, electrical engineers will always be needed. Even if drafting can easily become fully automated.

Peter (불확실한)이 말합니다.

Electrical engineers are the precursors of automation, it is inherent to this profession. The electric grid for example is mostly operated by itself, but always will be necessary for humans to assess for risks and plan and manage improvements, act when a fault occurs, etc.

Lovro (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

This is the job that takes away other jobs. Not vice versa

Bela Szabo (낮은)이 말합니다.

Who will be programming the AIs if the electrical engineers are left? I say they will be more than ever.

Josh이 말합니다.

I've seen AI do some amazing things when it comes to placement, routing, clock tree synthesis, and fault corrections. Its only a matter of time, and probably sooner than most people think, before AI replaces anyone working on VLSI stuff

Steven (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

Electricals Engineers are inherent to the process of automatization.

Ferenc Kiss (불확실한)이 말합니다.

Because an electrical engineer needs to invent a machine, which can invent better machine than humans or other engineers can. This can pertain to software as well, instead of machines. And if this happens, the profession of electrical engineering may become obsolete and superfluous.

Laurentiu Duma (낮은)이 말합니다.

Somebody must develop new electrical systems (and find strange failures)

Jake (낮은)이 말합니다.

Engineering takes intellect not yet accomplished by AI.

Tomcat (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

Somebody must repair and maintain those robots

valian이 말합니다.

dude they make robots