개요
자동화 위험
2. 사용자 설문조사
3. 성장
4. 임금
5. 볼륨
설명
자원
댓글

기계 공학자

낮은 위험
31%
다음으로 어디로 가고 싶으신가요?
결과를 친구 및 가족과 공유하세요.
투표 댓글 (40)
또는, 이 직업을 더 자세히 탐구해보세요...
자동화 위험
계산된
30%
(낮은 위험)
투표 조사
31%
(낮은 위험)
Average: 31%
노동 수요
성장
11.0%
년도별 2033
임금
$99,510
또는 시간당 $47.84
볼륨
281,290
2023 기준으로
요약
직업 점수
7.9/10

사람들이 또한 조회했습니다

컴퓨터 프로그래머
변호사들
웹 개발자
그래픽 디자이너
회계사와 감사원

계산된 자동화 위험

30% (낮은 위험)

저위험 (21-40%): 이 수준의 직업은 기술적인 능력과 인간 중심의 기술을 모두 요구하기 때문에 자동화 위험이 제한적입니다.

이 점수가 무엇인지, 그리고 어떻게 계산되는지에 대한 자세한 정보는 여기에 있습니다.

일부 중요한 직무 특성은 자동화하기 어렵습니다:

  • 독창성

  • 설득

사용자 설문조사

다음 두 십년 안에 완전 자동화될 31%의 확률

우리의 방문자들은 이 직업이 자동화될 가능성이 낮다고 투표했습니다. 이 평가는 계산된 자동화 위험 수준에 의해 더욱 지지받고 있으며, 이는 자동화의 30% 확률을 추정합니다.

자동화의 위험성에 대해 어떻게 생각하십니까?

기계 공학자이 다음 20년 이내에 로봇이나 인공지능에 의해 대체될 가능성은 얼마나 됩니까?






감정

다음 그래프는 의미 있는 데이터를 제공할 수 있을 만큼 충분한 투표 수가 있을 때마다 포함됩니다. 이러한 시각적 표현은 시간 경과에 따른 사용자 투표 결과를 보여주며, 감정 추세에 대한 중요한 지표를 제공합니다.

시간에 따른 감정 (분기별)

시간별 감정 (연간)

성장

다른 직업에 비해 매우 빠른 성장

'Mechanical Engineers' 직업 분야의 공석은 2033년까지 11.0% 증가할 것으로 예상됩니다.

총 고용량 및 예상 직업 공석

* 2021년부터 2031년까지의 기간에 대한 노동통계국의 데이터
업데이트된 예상치가 09-2024에 제출될 예정입니다..

임금

다른 직업에 비해 매우 높은 급여를 받는다.

2023년에 'Mechanical Engineers'의 중앙값 연간 급여는 $99,510이며, 시간당 $47입니다.

'Mechanical Engineers'은 전국 중위임금인 $48,060보다 107.1% 더 높은 금액을 지불받았습니다.

시간에 따른 임금

* 노동통계국의 데이터

볼륨

다른 직업에 비해 더 넓은 직업 기회 범위

2023년 현재, 미국 내에서 'Mechanical Engineers'로 고용된 사람들의 수는 281,290명이었습니다.

이는 전국의 고용 노동력 중 약 0.19%를 대표합니다.

다시 말해, 약 539명 중 1명이 'Mechanical Engineers'로 고용되어 있습니다.

직무 설명

도구, 엔진, 기계 및 기타 기계적으로 작동하는 장비의 계획 및 설계에 관한 엔지니어링 업무를 수행합니다. 중앙 난방, 가스, 물 및 증기 시스템과 같은 장비의 설치, 운영, 유지 보수 및 수리를 감독합니다.

SOC Code: 17-2141.00

자원

당신의 지역에서 일자리를 검색하세요

새로운 커리어를 시작하려고 생각하거나 직장을 바꾸려는 계획이 있다면, 우리가 만든 편리한 채용 검색 도구를 사용해보세요. 이 도구를 통해 완벽한 새로운 역할을 찾을 수 있을지도 모릅니다.

당신의 지역에서 일자리를 검색하세요

댓글

Leave a comment

John (In college and worked in some factorys) (낮은) 1 month ago
I think some mechanical engineers will get replaced by the gain in efficiency that other engineers get form AI, a total AI/Robot taking of the job is not in the foreseeable future.
0 0 Reply
Arthur Schroeder (기회 없음) 3 months ago
It’s a very hard job and very complicated and I don’t think robots are automating that any time soon…
0 0 Reply
Gavin (기회 없음) 6 months ago
Artificial intelligence does not have the creativity needed or the ability to fully understand some of the problems people go through throughout the world.
1 0 Reply
Raúl (기회 없음) 6 months ago
I think it has no chance because cars can have rust or other problems a robot can't understand and deal whit them.
3 0 Reply
Congo (기회 없음) 6 months ago
Simply in this area of engineering there is no chance of robot or AI taking it. Maybe in the long run yes, but there is still a pretty long way of developing AI to substitute a mechanical engineer, for now and 1 or 2 decades is impossible. Maybe in the third decade or fourth but with a lot of funding and a lot of training. Because you need to think that to be able to make an AI/robot that can surpass or substitute a human it will need to be only focused on this area, not pretty cost-effective, for the AI industries.
0 0 Reply
Cooper Johnston (기회 없음) 7 months ago
there is no robot that can replicate the human thought process and thinking
0 0 Reply
Burke (기회 없음) 10 months ago
Mechanical Engineering, like all disciplines of engineering, requires the ability to make difficult ethical decisions regarding systems that affect all of society. This is something that not even the most advanced generalized AI of the future is capable of doing.

Engineering is also a profession, which means that its members set the standards for who can be called an engineer and take responsibility for their decisions. AI cannot make decisions in light of the weight of their actions. It is a tool, not a person, which ultimately undermines any semblance of accountability that is necessary for engineering to be a respectable and societally beneficial profession.
1 0 Reply
Michal (기회 없음) 1 year ago
I believe mechanical engineering to be far too interdisciplinary (design, manufacturing, economics) to be fully automated a whole. I see AI taking over or speeding up certain specific tasks that mechanical engineers are burdened with, never their entire role.
1 0 Reply
Ninjamokama_3 (낮은) 1 year ago
There are way too many human aspects about engineering. It's next to impossible for AI to automate, let alone replace, every aspect of an engineer's job
0 0 Reply
John F. Sutton (낮은) 1 year ago
This is a sometimes tough job and would be hard to automate for good reason such as:

1. Fixing stuff, this is complicated as it could literally be anything that could be broken about something.
2. Complexity, the more complex a job is, the more unlikely this job will be taken, this job is hard and absurdly complex sometimes.
3. Problems, this job can cause lots of issues with AI and it is the communication and bugs/viruses that could occur, the cost of these robots would be nuts and it would be hard to afford these machines.
4. Design, AI is a complex work of coding, there is one problem, how would they make the design of there robots that won't screw up how they work, they have to be just right to mimic a person and that would be hard to do.
1 0 Reply
C (낮은) 1 year ago
Since Mechanical Engineering has to deal with problems beyond reasonable thinking and has to create something entirely new and possibly unrelated to any previous topic, AI could help but never replace a mechanical engineer
0 0 Reply
dhaarini (불확실한) 1 year ago
no trained machine has ever come too close to designing any whole equipment. but certainly, I feel there are specific jobs that could be automated like pressure, stress, strain detection and analysis
0 0 Reply
d (기회 없음) 1 year ago
The prompt is "next 20 years". No chance. There are so many industrial and mechanical problems that have yet to be solved, and AI right now simply trains on what's already been done and can then piece it together using predictions. Decent for language, OK but not great for art, horrible for design if you are actually trying to tackle a novel challenge. And if it's not novel... then what's the point? Just google it.
0 0 Reply
b (낮은) 1 year ago
because we make the robot
0 0 Reply
Cyril (적당한) 1 year ago
As I said. It will certainly take over some tasks that are simple. So it reduce the need for so many ppl, but still the engineers are needed to decide what to do, or to revise AIs work
1 0 Reply
ben (불확실한) 1 year ago
some tasks can and some tasks cannot be automated by ai, such as critical thinking and originality.
0 0 Reply
Thomas (낮은) 1 year ago
I am a maintenance enginner and I just don't see how AI would have the eye for detail or precision to do certain tasks that I do. Yes, robots mounted on an assembly line are one thing, so are surgical robots, but I work on many machines, each of which is completely different from the other. The amount of outside the box thinking that we use for problem solving, is what I think AI will struggle with. I guess the day that a robot can fix any other robot under any set of circumstances, is the day I lose my job.
0 0 Reply
Jon Branch (적당한) 1 year ago
While many aspects of the job will be automated, these automations will serve to aid ME’s not replace them.
0 0 Reply
Nathan McDougall (낮은) 1 year ago
Because, Mechanicinisms are really complicated. I know that robots and A.I. are also really complicated, and may be capable, but the chances of them succeeding are really low, so why put something in a position power and authority when we know they will most likely fail.
0 0 Reply
George Smiley (적당한) 1 year ago
Speaking from the point of view of a simulations engineer who build mathematical models using finite element analysis, I think automation will at first assist simulations engineers but will eventually replace them as it learns best practices for how to overcome convergence issues or nonsensical results.
0 0 Reply
Gavin 6 months ago
I think ai will eventually replace parts of every profession but there are many there are things that just can’t be taught to something that cannot feel. It’s impossible to know what pain is if you’ve never experienced it. It’s impossible to understand the feelings of others if you have never felt. It’s impossible to know how to make someone’s life easier if you have no life.

Imagine you live your life in black and white from the moment you’re born to the time you’re 16. During this time you’re taught everything there is to know about color. You could talk about color for hours yet you still wouldn’t truly understand what color is until you actually see it. Now imagine that this is a friend of yours and you’re trying to explain the color yellow to them. You might tell them that yellow is a sunny day and energy or electricity, that it’s happiness or something else that you associate with the color yellow. Your friend will most likely not think of sunny days and electricity being similar in anyway and probably be very confused. Your friend represents ai and its ability to understand human wants, needs, and the way people live their lives. Making these three things easier to access or do are one of the main purposes of this job. Also there’s the whole ethical debate because it’s set to be as productive as it can, and eventually humanity gets in the way of that and it has to get rid of us
1 0 Reply

이 직업에 대한 답글을 남겨주세요.

이 사이트는 reCAPTCHA와 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 이용약관에 의해 보호됩니다.