Pilotes de ligne, copilotes et ingénieurs de vol

65% (Haut Risque)

Risque Élevé (61-80%) : Les emplois dans cette catégorie font face à une menace significative de l'automatisation, car beaucoup de leurs tâches peuvent être facilement automatisées en utilisant les technologies actuelles ou proches du futur.

Plus d'informations sur ce que représente ce score et comment il est calculé sont disponibles ici.

Sondage utilisateur

Sentiment

Le graphique suivant est inclus chaque fois qu'il y a un nombre substantiel de votes pour rendre les données significatives. Ces représentations visuelles affichent les résultats des sondages utilisateurs au fil du temps, fournissant une indication significative des tendances de sentiment.

Salaires

Très bien rémunéré par rapport à d'autres professions

En 2023, le salaire annuel médian pour 'Airline Pilots, Copilots, and Flight Engineers' était de 219 140 $, soit 105 $ par heure.

'Airline Pilots, Copilots, and Flight Engineers' ont été payés 356,0% de plus que le salaire médian national, qui était de 48 060 $

Salaires au fil du temps

Commentaires

Leave a comment

John (Faible) 20 days ago

A computer can only do so many algorithms. Let's say a situation happens and the computer/AI is there to slove the problem and it does.... but what happens when the problem is outside of the box and the algorithm doesn't know what to do. This is where is can turn catastrophic. This is where pilots come in to play and think outside the box plus their fighting for their lives so they will do everything to get home to their families and their passengers also.

20 years it will start with cargo flights.

Another 10 years after maybe commercial flights.

If an accident happens like where two planes go down due to MCAS designed by boeing. This probably set it back years for automation.

Look at Sully landing on the Hudson can a computer do that?

Miracle on the Hudson that was down to skill and knowledge and a brilliant Captain and First Office.

1 0 Reply

Mason Braswelle (Aucune chance) 2 months ago

The amount of things pilots have to do in order to ensure safe flights is astounding, not to mention that if something were to go wrong, what would the robot even do?

1 0 Reply

Jeremy (Faible) 3 months ago

Although the actual flight operation can be managed by AI, there is always the chance that the AI will fail at controlling the plane. Also there is always different situations for landing and takeoff, AI won't always be able to predict and maneuver the next move.

1 0 Reply

rorik 4 months ago

consider that nothing manufactured by humans are perfect, with such a reality, you cannot assume that a robot/ai could do it's job flawlessly. there are ethical decisions in emergencies that must be made in the cockpit that an ai simply cannot do. furthermore, redundancy is a core value in aviation, and until human manufacturing is perfect (arguably wont ever be), a pilot will always be needed in the cockpit as a form of redundancy in case the manufactured systems malfunction.

1 0 Reply

dan (Faible) 4 months ago

ask yourself this question, how would you feel if the most beloved person to you was on a plane controlled by a robot that could be hacked, glitch, or malfunction

0 0 Reply

Anonymous 5 months ago

The technology exists, but is it socially acceptable? It’s similar to how self driving cars have been a thing since the late 90s (couldn’t believe it either), and have become more mainstream in the last few years. Pilots will probably lose their jobs when people become comfortable flying in fully autonomous aircraft. However, emergencies can still happen, so it will probably take even longer for machines to take over.

1 1 Reply

bob (Très probable) 6 months ago

1 word autopilot

1 4 Reply

L 4 months ago

Who said that an autopilot is more reliable than a human captain?

0 0 Reply

Anonymous (Modéré) 6 months ago

Because pilots even today have a sizeable portion of the piloting during flight cut out for them with autopilot and it is already so trustworthy and efficient that they can sleep around a half hour while autopilot is on before being woken up by an alarm. Though this is balanced out by takeoff and landing which is much more tricky to automate and there is still the need for pilot input during emergencies

0 1 Reply

LBFEBNL (Modéré) 6 months ago

If wanted, the aircraft manufacturer could easily develop a computer to follow all the instructions that pilots need to follow too, like taxiing, departure (still needs human help), cruising (already taken over by autopilot but still needs human help if an emergency happens), and landing.

That is for the pilot. For the co-pilot, it is highly likely because the A.I. doesn't need to do all the instructions; they just do half of it, and the rest the pilot will handle.

For the flight engineer, I think it has a lower chance of getting replaced by A.I. or some sort of computer.

But this is overall just my opinion.

0 1 Reply

p 5 months ago

flight engineers arent a thing anymore... they havent been very common since like 90s

1 0 Reply

James (Modéré) 6 months ago

Yeah the 64% chance scares my freind who is a pilot

0 1 Reply

criag (Aucune chance) 6 months ago

There are many airlines that want soft, silky landings and not slammy, hard, ai- landings

1 0 Reply

Josh (Faible) 6 months ago

It is a very complex job that requires concentration and multitasking of witch a robot can't di

1 0 Reply

1 5 months ago

although i agree a robot cant do everything a pilot has to do robots are still much better at multitasking than humans ever will be

0 0 Reply

. (Faible) 10 months ago

you will always need humans incase something happened. its possible but not in the next 20 years

0 0 Reply

Luca (Très probable) 1 year ago

Automated flight is already a well-established reality, the pilot on board serves only to reassure passengers who are not yet accustomed to the idea of a completely automated flight.

0 1 Reply

Oxtin Poss 7 months ago

We are no where near completely autonomous flight. We barely have self-driving cars, which are normally confined to certain parameters. There are so many variables and things that could go wrong, that it simply isn’t viable yet.

1 0 Reply

boo (Faible) 1 year ago

Automation has the ability to control events in a certain context, and wouldn't be able to handle an emergency or malfunction, considering the usual age of aircraft computers.

0 0 Reply

Harry (Faible) 1 year ago

Landing and take off needs accurate readings and a lot of man power we also need to understand the runway so it my not be

0 0 Reply

KickinTyres (Faible) 1 year ago

The public's perception of safety is intrinsically connected to having human pilots in the cockpit.

0 0 Reply

Ayden (Aucune chance) 1 year ago

New plane can fly it self but they still need pilot or co pilot to make sure nothing is going wrong especially when it is landing

0 0 Reply

Alneez (Modéré) 1 year ago

Airbus Project Dragonfly

0 0 Reply

C.L.M. (Aucune chance) 1 year ago

It is not a technological issue, it is a sociological, legislative, and regulatory one.

People are too anxious to get on a plane without another human being up front with their life and safety on the line. This will be even more true as we move through the inevitable accidents during automation of ground transportation. At least that's what I heard as an FAA research scientist working on future drone airspace research projects.

0 0 Reply