Übersicht
Automatisierungsrisiko
2. Benutzerumfrage
3. Wachstum
4. Löhne
5. Volumen
Beschreibung
Ressourcen
Kommentare

Flugbegleiter

AUTOMATISIERUNGSRISIKO
BERECHNET
38%
Risikostufe
UMFRAGE
39%
Basierend auf 418 Stimmen
ARBEITSNACHFRAGE
WACHSTUM
20,8%
bis zum Jahr 2032
LÖHNE
63.760 $
oder 30,65 $ pro Stunde
Volumen
108.480
ab dem 2022
ZUSAMMENFASSUNG
ARBEITSPUNKTZAHL
6,7/10

Möchten Sie diese Zusammenfassung auf Ihrer Website? Einbettungscode:

Abstimmen
Kommentare (22)

Automatisierungsrisiko

38% (Geringes Risiko)

Geringes Risiko (21-40%): Jobs auf dieser Ebene haben ein begrenztes Risiko der Automatisierung, da sie eine Mischung aus technischen und menschenzentrierten Fähigkeiten erfordern.

Weitere Informationen darüber, was dieser Wert ist und wie er berechnet wird, sind verfügbar hier.

Einige sehr wichtige Eigenschaften des Jobs sind schwer zu automatisieren:

  • Enge Arbeitsfläche, Unbequeme Positionen

  • Anderen helfen und für sie sorgen

Einige ziemlich wichtige Eigenschaften des Jobs sind schwer zu automatisieren:

  • Soziale Wahrnehmungsfähigkeit

  • Überzeugung

Benutzerumfrage

39% Chance auf vollständige Automatisierung in den nächsten zwei Jahrzehnten

Unsere Besucher haben abgestimmt, dass es eine geringe Chance gibt, dass dieser Beruf automatisiert wird. Diese Einschätzung wird weiterhin durch das berechnete Automatisierungsrisiko unterstützt, welches eine 38% Chance der Automatisierung schätzt.

Was denken Sie, ist das Risiko der Automatisierung?

Wie hoch ist die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass Flugbegleiter in den nächsten 20 Jahren durch Roboter oder künstliche Intelligenz ersetzt wird?






Gefühl

Die folgenden Grafik(en) werden überall dort eingefügt, wo es eine erhebliche Anzahl von Stimmen gibt, um aussagekräftige Daten zu liefern. Diese visuellen Darstellungen zeigen die Ergebnisse von Nutzerumfragen über die Zeit und liefern einen bedeutenden Hinweis auf Stimmungstrends.

Gefühlslage über die Zeit (jährlich)

Wachstum

Sehr schnelles Wachstum im Vergleich zu anderen Berufen

Die Anzahl der 'Flight Attendants' Stellenangebote wird voraussichtlich um 20,8% bis 2032 steigen.

Gesamtbeschäftigung und geschätzte Stellenangebote

* Daten des Bureau of Labor Statistics für den Zeitraum zwischen 2021 und 2031
Aktualisierte Prognosen sind fällig 09-2023.

Löhne

Hoch bezahlt im Vergleich zu anderen Berufen

Im Jahr 2022 betrug das mittlere Jahresgehalt für 'Flight Attendants' 63.760 $, oder 30 $ pro Stunde.

'Flight Attendants' wurden 37,7% höher bezahlt als der nationale Medianlohn, der bei 46.310 $ lag.

Löhne über die Zeit

* Daten vom Bureau of Labor Statistics

Volumen

Größeres Spektrum an Arbeitsmöglichkeiten im Vergleich zu anderen Berufen

Ab dem 2022 waren 108.480 Personen als 'Flight Attendants' in den Vereinigten Staaten beschäftigt.

Dies entspricht etwa 0,07% der erwerbstätigen Bevölkerung im ganzen Land.

Anders ausgedrückt, ist etwa 1 von 1 Tausend Personen als 'Flight Attendants' beschäftigt.

Stellenbeschreibung

Überwachen Sie die Sicherheit der Flugzeugkabine. Bieten Sie Dienstleistungen für Fluggäste an, erklären Sie Sicherheitsinformationen, servieren Sie Speisen und Getränke und reagieren Sie auf Notfälle.

SOC Code: 53-2031.00

Ressourcen

Wenn Sie darüber nachdenken, eine neue Karriere zu beginnen oder den Job zu wechseln, haben wir ein praktisches Tool für die Jobsuche erstellt, das Ihnen möglicherweise dabei hilft, die perfekte neue Rolle zu finden.

Suchen Sie Jobs in Ihrer lokalen Umgebung

Kommentare

Hinterlassen Sie einen Kommentar

Anonymous (Höchstwahrscheinlich) sagt
You automate the plane to give instructions during turbulence and emergencies. Ease passengers into by updating the seats, rows, and overhead panels with attendants still onboard. From a safety perspective what is 2 attendants per class going to do for 20+ people, nothing other than give instruction and help 1 or 2 women and children. After introducing passengers to those improvements kick it up a notch and introduce 1 robot attendant for every 1 human attendant. This robot would initially be programmed to serve drinks and snacks. You would order it prior to the flight and on your phone or TV during the flight. Now that you have safety and procedures programmed right in to the plane and passengers have interacted with it over the last 10 years with a few iterations to their programming over time and passengers have been able to be served by a robot, the in cabin experience can now be fully automated. You could even design the robots to be smaller in size to fit more than two attendants in the class. Ultimately decreasing burnout by human staff, boarding times, the time it takes to get to the customer, etc.
Mar 23, 2024 at 12:38
PK (Keine Chance) sagt
FAA requires a crew member 1 for every 50. Flight attendant position is based on safety and security designated by FAA not customer service!!!
Jan 29, 2024 at 02:41
tony (Niedrig) sagt
You're still going to need human intervention in an emergency. There are too many changes on a moments notice during flight to completely trust it to AI.
Jun 02, 2023 at 08:39
Philip (Unsicher) sagt
I think aspects of the job could be automated but parts of the job won't be
May 12, 2023 at 06:40
Sofie (Höchstwahrscheinlich) sagt
Humans can decide quicker in an emergency situation, but robots can take a while.

Plus, robots can't do such things as CPR or use a first aid kit, for example. So, it's pretty risky.
Aug 08, 2022 at 06:37
h (Niedrig) sagt
AI and robots could mess up emergencies and need a connection to stay "alive"
Dec 31, 2021 at 01:27
A flight attendant (Niedrig) sagt
By federal law (FAA), there needs to be 1 flight attendant per 50 seats on a plane. The number can never decrease even with robots. Good luck getting those robots to handle medical emergencies or breaking up fights between ignorant passengers or helping all you ungrateful passengers evacuate during an emergency in 90 seconds or less with no ability of rational thought LOL
Dec 06, 2021 at 04:31
Collin Tredo (Niedrig) sagt
This job requires a friendly human face, people will be less comfortable having to talk to and trust a robot/AI when they get on a plane.
May 17, 2021 at 05:00
A (Keine Chance) sagt
Flight attendants use their knowledge to solve a situation given the surprise factor... it’s impossible to programme a robot that knows how to act in front of a surprise factor situation.

And by the way flight attendants are there to save u not to make u happy.

First priority is safety the If it’s possible the service time will come.
Apr 10, 2021 at 10:07
Spiros (Keine Chance) sagt
Flight attendants are there for one specific reason: safety. For this, human presence is important
Apr 10, 2021 at 01:55
Erebus (Niedrig) sagt
It involves emotional labour which only a human is capable of.
Mar 24, 2021 at 05:52
JP (Mäßig) sagt
With the global pandemic focusing minds on the amount of human contact passengers have on flights, I could see cabin crew being reduced in number to improve safety, with a Purser and assistant at each end of the aircraft being supplemented by robots which would handle more of the non-emergency workload. Robots would reduce the expense of accommodating cabin crew at destinations and would be able to clean the cabin autonomously using UV lights to disinfect the cabin air and surfaces.
Aug 02, 2020 at 04:53
A flight attendant (Keine Chance) sagt
Will absolutely not happen. What most do not realize is that flight attendants are on board for safety. It's just not something that can be replaced by robots.
Jul 22, 2020 at 08:27
Ebork (Höchstwahrscheinlich) sagt
Flight attendants make or break flying. They'll be robots soon enough.
Jan 03, 2020 at 11:48
THM sagt
Flight attendants make your flying safe you ignorant.
Jun 27, 2020 at 09:20
Izme;-; sagt
I think that is wrong you see robots can also break easy, if there is a drunk passenger or causing harm robots can break with their wires. In medical procedures or any emergency humans would be faster than the robots having to mechanically bend down taking longer than humans.
Mar 31, 2021 at 08:21
JD (Höchstwahrscheinlich) sagt
With the lousy customer service and the awfully attitudes these "air stewards(esses)" possess nowadays, I wouldn't be surprised that a machine will end up doing their job not only more quickly and efficiently, but for little to no cost of maintenance on said droids compared to paying salaries w/ benefits, retirement, etc & dealing with greedy unions, to people who don't do their job properly and are not even qualified to in the first place.

Given the recent horrific experiences passengers had to endure from these "flight attendants", I see machines replacing these incompetent humans in the future. It'll save the airlines plenty of revenue and avoid lawsuits and having to pay these poorly trained service attendants for mediocre to dismal services provided.

The only ones to blame would be the flight attendants themselves, because a machine did a better job than they ever would.
Apr 20, 2019 at 05:36
Karen sagt
When you have a heart attack on the plane who’s going to administer first aid to you? A robot? A flight attendant is there to save your ass not kiss it and their customer service is based on your attitude. It goes both ways
May 05, 2019 at 06:17
GG sagt
JD deserves the most awful flying experiences after the rudeness he showcased here.
May 09, 2019 at 04:11
MC sagt
JD I don't know what airline you have been flying on. I have been involved in the airline industry for over forty years, have traveled on numerous air carriers, and have never experienced what you have described in terms of lacking flight attendant professionalism, training, emergency, and medical preparedness.

I have witnessed a decline in the manners and decorum of the passengers traveling. Possibly, the added stress to passengers of airport safety procedures has taken a toll on their nerves. I remember when friends and family could accompany passengers to the gate. Now, the seats are packed in like sardines in a can.

Airline competition made the way for no-frills service and more passengers in smaller seats on airplanes. This has taken a toll on everyone's stress levels. Still, I see friendly FAs who are doing their best to accommodate everyone onboard and assuage those who are already frazzled by the time they take their seats.

A robot may make the dispersion of in-flight commodities easier but it can never take care of all of the emergencies that FAs are trained to handle, the medical emergencies, the duplicate and other seating problems, the myriad of human interactions that FA's handle, unaccompanied children, wheelchair passengers, interaction with cockpit and ground staff, etc., etc. the list goes on, not even considering a major emergency like a hijack incident.

You have vastly underestimated the uber-selective hiring, initial and ongoing training that FAs have. Did you know that they have to take FAA-mandated emergency testing yearly on every airplane which they are qualified to work and pass the test with a 90-100% grade. This includes physical testing in airplane simulators., first aide, resuscitation and cardio procedures etc.

If you see an FA behaving in the unprofessional manner you have described, you should write a letter to the airline about that employee.
Jul 16, 2023 at 10:31

Hinterlassen Sie eine Antwort zu diesem Beruf

Diese Seite ist durch reCAPTCHA geschützt und die Google Datenschutzbestimmungen und Nutzungsbedingungen gelten.

Personen haben sich auch angesehen

Rechtsanwälte
Computerprogrammierer
Schauspieler
Flugkapitäne, Copiloten und Flugingenieure
Grafikdesigner