Flugbegleiter

Geringes Risiko
32%
Wohin möchten Sie als Nächstes gehen?
Teilen Sie Ihre Ergebnisse mit Freunden und Familie.
Oder erkunden Sie diesen Beruf ausführlicher...
AUTOMATISIERUNGSRISIKO
BERECHNET
38%
(Geringes Risiko)
UMFRAGE
26%
(Geringes Risiko)
Average: 32%
ARBEITSNACHFRAGE
WACHSTUM
9,9%
bis zum Jahr 2033
LÖHNE
68.370 $
oder 32,87 $ pro Stunde
Volumen
126.020
ab dem 2023
ZUSAMMENFASSUNG
ARBEITSPUNKTZAHL
7,3/10

Personen haben sich auch angesehen

Berechnetes Automatisierungsrisiko

38% (Geringes Risiko)

Geringes Risiko (21-40%): Jobs auf dieser Ebene haben ein begrenztes Risiko der Automatisierung, da sie eine Mischung aus technischen und menschenzentrierten Fähigkeiten erfordern.

Weitere Informationen darüber, was dieser Wert ist und wie er berechnet wird, sind verfügbar hier.

Einige sehr wichtige Eigenschaften des Jobs sind schwer zu automatisieren:

  • Enge Arbeitsfläche, Unbequeme Positionen

  • Anderen helfen und für sie sorgen

Einige ziemlich wichtige Eigenschaften des Jobs sind schwer zu automatisieren:

  • Soziale Wahrnehmungsfähigkeit

  • Überzeugung

Benutzerumfrage

26% Chance auf vollständige Automatisierung in den nächsten zwei Jahrzehnten

Unsere Besucher haben abgestimmt, dass es eine geringe Chance gibt, dass dieser Beruf automatisiert wird. Diese Einschätzung wird weiterhin durch das berechnete Automatisierungsrisiko unterstützt, welches eine 38% Chance der Automatisierung schätzt.

Was denken Sie, ist das Risiko der Automatisierung?

Wie hoch ist die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass Flugbegleiter in den nächsten 20 Jahren durch Roboter oder künstliche Intelligenz ersetzt wird?






Gefühl

Das folgende Diagramm wird überall dort eingefügt, wo eine beträchtliche Anzahl von Stimmen vorliegt, um aussagekräftige Daten darzustellen. Diese visuellen Darstellungen zeigen die Ergebnisse von Nutzerumfragen im Laufe der Zeit und geben einen wichtigen Hinweis auf Stimmungstrends.

Gefühlslage über die Zeit (jährlich)

Wachstum

Sehr schnelles Wachstum im Vergleich zu anderen Berufen

Die Anzahl der 'Flight Attendants' Stellenangebote wird voraussichtlich um 9,9% bis 2033 steigen.

Gesamtbeschäftigung und geschätzte Stellenangebote

* Daten des Bureau of Labor Statistics für den Zeitraum zwischen 2021 und 2031
Aktualisierte Prognosen sind fällig 09-2024.

Löhne

Hoch bezahlt im Vergleich zu anderen Berufen

Im Jahr 2023 betrug das mittlere Jahresgehalt für 'Flight Attendants' 68.370 $, oder 32 $ pro Stunde.

'Flight Attendants' wurden 42,3% höher bezahlt als der nationale Medianlohn, der bei 48.060 $ lag.

Löhne über die Zeit

* Daten vom Bureau of Labor Statistics

Volumen

Größeres Spektrum an Arbeitsmöglichkeiten im Vergleich zu anderen Berufen

Ab dem 2023 waren 126.020 Personen als 'Flight Attendants' in den Vereinigten Staaten beschäftigt.

Dies entspricht etwa 0,08% der erwerbstätigen Bevölkerung im ganzen Land.

Anders ausgedrückt, ist etwa 1 von 1 Tausend Personen als 'Flight Attendants' beschäftigt.

Stellenbeschreibung

Überwachen Sie die Sicherheit der Flugzeugkabine. Bieten Sie Dienstleistungen für Fluggäste an, erklären Sie Sicherheitsinformationen, servieren Sie Speisen und Getränke und reagieren Sie auf Notfälle.

SOC Code: 53-2031.00

Ressourcen

Wenn Sie darüber nachdenken, eine neue Karriere zu beginnen oder den Job zu wechseln, haben wir ein praktisches Tool für die Jobsuche erstellt, das Ihnen möglicherweise dabei hilft, die perfekte neue Rolle zu finden.

Suchen Sie Jobs in Ihrer lokalen Umgebung

Kommentare

Leave a comment

annie (Keine Chance) 27 days ago
because companies wont be willing to pay for that amount of robots and the maintenince that is needed on them, real people would be cheaper
0 0 Reply
Anonymous (Höchstwahrscheinlich) 8 months ago
You automate the plane to give instructions during turbulence and emergencies. Ease passengers into by updating the seats, rows, and overhead panels with attendants still onboard. From a safety perspective what is 2 attendants per class going to do for 20+ people, nothing other than give instruction and help 1 or 2 women and children. After introducing passengers to those improvements kick it up a notch and introduce 1 robot attendant for every 1 human attendant. This robot would initially be programmed to serve drinks and snacks. You would order it prior to the flight and on your phone or TV during the flight. Now that you have safety and procedures programmed right in to the plane and passengers have interacted with it over the last 10 years with a few iterations to their programming over time and passengers have been able to be served by a robot, the in cabin experience can now be fully automated. You could even design the robots to be smaller in size to fit more than two attendants in the class. Ultimately decreasing burnout by human staff, boarding times, the time it takes to get to the customer, etc.
0 1 Reply
PK (Keine Chance) 10 months ago
FAA requires a crew member 1 for every 50. Flight attendant position is based on safety and security designated by FAA not customer service!!!
2 0 Reply
tony (Niedrig) 1 year ago
You're still going to need human intervention in an emergency. There are too many changes on a moments notice during flight to completely trust it to AI.
2 0 Reply
Philip (Unsicher) 1 year ago
I think aspects of the job could be automated but parts of the job won't be
0 0 Reply
Sofie (Höchstwahrscheinlich) 2 years ago
Humans can decide quicker in an emergency situation, but robots can take a while.

Plus, robots can't do such things as CPR or use a first aid kit, for example. So, it's pretty risky.
0 0 Reply
h (Niedrig) 2 years ago
AI and robots could mess up emergencies and need a connection to stay "alive"
1 0 Reply
A flight attendant (Niedrig) 2 years ago
By federal law (FAA), there needs to be 1 flight attendant per 50 seats on a plane. The number can never decrease even with robots. Good luck getting those robots to handle medical emergencies or breaking up fights between ignorant passengers or helping all you ungrateful passengers evacuate during an emergency in 90 seconds or less with no ability of rational thought LOL
0 0 Reply
Collin Tredo (Niedrig) 3 years ago
This job requires a friendly human face, people will be less comfortable having to talk to and trust a robot/AI when they get on a plane.
0 0 Reply
A (Keine Chance) 3 years ago
Flight attendants use their knowledge to solve a situation given the surprise factor... it’s impossible to programme a robot that knows how to act in front of a surprise factor situation.

And by the way flight attendants are there to save u not to make u happy.

First priority is safety the If it’s possible the service time will come.
0 0 Reply
Spiros (Keine Chance) 3 years ago
Flight attendants are there for one specific reason: safety. For this, human presence is important
0 0 Reply
Erebus (Niedrig) 3 years ago
It involves emotional labour which only a human is capable of.
0 0 Reply
JP (Mäßig) 4 years ago
With the global pandemic focusing minds on the amount of human contact passengers have on flights, I could see cabin crew being reduced in number to improve safety, with a Purser and assistant at each end of the aircraft being supplemented by robots which would handle more of the non-emergency workload. Robots would reduce the expense of accommodating cabin crew at destinations and would be able to clean the cabin autonomously using UV lights to disinfect the cabin air and surfaces.
0 0 Reply
A flight attendant (Keine Chance) 4 years ago
Will absolutely not happen. What most do not realize is that flight attendants are on board for safety. It's just not something that can be replaced by robots.
1 0 Reply
Ebork (Höchstwahrscheinlich) 4 years ago
Flight attendants make or break flying. They'll be robots soon enough.
0 0 Reply
Izme;-; 3 years ago
I think that is wrong you see robots can also break easy, if there is a drunk passenger or causing harm robots can break with their wires. In medical procedures or any emergency humans would be faster than the robots having to mechanically bend down taking longer than humans.
0 0 Reply
THM 4 years ago
Flight attendants make your flying safe you ignorant.
1 0 Reply
JD (Höchstwahrscheinlich) 5 years ago
With the lousy customer service and the awfully attitudes these "air stewards(esses)" possess nowadays, I wouldn't be surprised that a machine will end up doing their job not only more quickly and efficiently, but for little to no cost of maintenance on said droids compared to paying salaries w/ benefits, retirement, etc & dealing with greedy unions, to people who don't do their job properly and are not even qualified to in the first place.

Given the recent horrific experiences passengers had to endure from these "flight attendants", I see machines replacing these incompetent humans in the future. It'll save the airlines plenty of revenue and avoid lawsuits and having to pay these poorly trained service attendants for mediocre to dismal services provided.

The only ones to blame would be the flight attendants themselves, because a machine did a better job than they ever would.
0 1 Reply
MC 1 year ago
JD I don't know what airline you have been flying on. I have been involved in the airline industry for over forty years, have traveled on numerous air carriers, and have never experienced what you have described in terms of lacking flight attendant professionalism, training, emergency, and medical preparedness.

I have witnessed a decline in the manners and decorum of the passengers traveling. Possibly, the added stress to passengers of airport safety procedures has taken a toll on their nerves. I remember when friends and family could accompany passengers to the gate. Now, the seats are packed in like sardines in a can.

Airline competition made the way for no-frills service and more passengers in smaller seats on airplanes. This has taken a toll on everyone's stress levels. Still, I see friendly FAs who are doing their best to accommodate everyone onboard and assuage those who are already frazzled by the time they take their seats.

A robot may make the dispersion of in-flight commodities easier but it can never take care of all of the emergencies that FAs are trained to handle, the medical emergencies, the duplicate and other seating problems, the myriad of human interactions that FA's handle, unaccompanied children, wheelchair passengers, interaction with cockpit and ground staff, etc., etc. the list goes on, not even considering a major emergency like a hijack incident.

You have vastly underestimated the uber-selective hiring, initial and ongoing training that FAs have. Did you know that they have to take FAA-mandated emergency testing yearly on every airplane which they are qualified to work and pass the test with a 90-100% grade. This includes physical testing in airplane simulators., first aide, resuscitation and cardio procedures etc.

If you see an FA behaving in the unprofessional manner you have described, you should write a letter to the airline about that employee.
1 0 Reply
GG 5 years ago
JD deserves the most awful flying experiences after the rudeness he showcased here.
1 0 Reply
Karen 5 years ago
When you have a heart attack on the plane who’s going to administer first aid to you? A robot? A flight attendant is there to save your ass not kiss it and their customer service is based on your attitude. It goes both ways
1 0 Reply
Eternity 4 years ago
With COVID, it would be ideal if airlines used robots instead. We'd rather not use flight attendant "services".
0 0 Reply
Ordinary Internet User 5 years ago
They will hire some flight attendants for those situations.
For example,
Today : 10 human flight attendants
Future: 1-3 human flight attendants, 7+ robot flight attendants.
Capish? :P
0 0 Reply

Hinterlassen Sie eine Antwort zu diesem Beruf

Diese Seite ist durch reCAPTCHA geschützt und die Google Datenschutzbestimmungen und Nutzungsbedingungen gelten.