Verkehrspiloten

Mäßiges Risiko
47%
Wohin möchten Sie als Nächstes gehen?
Teilen Sie Ihre Ergebnisse mit Freunden und Familie.
Oder erkunden Sie diesen Beruf ausführlicher...
AUTOMATISIERUNGSRISIKO
BERECHNET
55%
(Mäßiges Risiko)
UMFRAGE
39%
(Geringes Risiko)
Average: 47%
ARBEITSNACHFRAGE
WACHSTUM
5,7%
bis zum Jahr 2033
LÖHNE
113.080 $
oder 54,36 $ pro Stunde
Volumen
52.750
ab dem 2023
ZUSAMMENFASSUNG
ARBEITSPUNKTZAHL
6,2/10

Personen haben sich auch angesehen

Berechnetes Automatisierungsrisiko

55% (Mäßiges Risiko)

Mäßiges Risiko (41-60%): Berufe mit einem mäßigen Automatisierungsrisiko beinhalten in der Regel Routineaufgaben, erfordern jedoch immer noch ein gewisses menschliches Urteilsvermögen und Interaktion.

Weitere Informationen darüber, was dieser Wert ist und wie er berechnet wird, sind verfügbar hier.

Einige ziemlich wichtige Eigenschaften des Jobs sind schwer zu automatisieren:

  • Enge Arbeitsfläche, Unbequeme Positionen

  • Manuelle Geschicklichkeit

  • Fingerfertigkeit

  • Anderen helfen und für sie sorgen

  • Soziale Wahrnehmungsfähigkeit

Benutzerumfrage

39% Chance auf vollständige Automatisierung in den nächsten zwei Jahrzehnten

Unsere Besucher haben abgestimmt, dass es eine geringe Chance gibt, dass dieser Beruf automatisiert wird. Allerdings deutet das von uns erzeugte Automatisierungsrisikoniveau auf eine höhere Chance der Automatisierung hin: 55% Chance auf Automatisierung.

Was denken Sie, ist das Risiko der Automatisierung?

Wie hoch ist die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass Verkehrspiloten in den nächsten 20 Jahren durch Roboter oder künstliche Intelligenz ersetzt wird?






Gefühl

Das folgende Diagramm wird überall dort eingefügt, wo eine beträchtliche Anzahl von Stimmen vorliegt, um aussagekräftige Daten darzustellen. Diese visuellen Darstellungen zeigen die Ergebnisse von Nutzerumfragen im Laufe der Zeit und geben einen wichtigen Hinweis auf Stimmungstrends.

Gefühlslage über die Zeit (vierteljährlich)

Gefühlslage über die Zeit (jährlich)

Wachstum

Schnelles Wachstum im Vergleich zu anderen Berufen

Die Anzahl der 'Commercial Pilots' Stellenangebote wird voraussichtlich um 5,7% bis 2033 steigen.

Gesamtbeschäftigung und geschätzte Stellenangebote

* Daten des Bureau of Labor Statistics für den Zeitraum zwischen 2023 und 2033
Aktualisierte Prognosen sind fällig 09-2025.

Löhne

Sehr hoch bezahlt im Vergleich zu anderen Berufen

Im Jahr 2023 betrug das mittlere Jahresgehalt für 'Commercial Pilots' 113.080 $, oder 54 $ pro Stunde.

'Commercial Pilots' wurden 135,3% höher bezahlt als der nationale Medianlohn, der bei 48.060 $ lag.

Löhne über die Zeit

* Daten vom Bureau of Labor Statistics

Volumen

Mäßiges Spektrum an Arbeitsmöglichkeiten im Vergleich zu anderen Berufen

Ab dem 2023 waren 52.750 Personen als 'Commercial Pilots' in den Vereinigten Staaten beschäftigt.

Dies entspricht etwa < 0,001% der erwerbstätigen Bevölkerung im ganzen Land.

Anders ausgedrückt, ist etwa 1 von 2 Tausend Personen als 'Commercial Pilots' beschäftigt.

Stellenbeschreibung

Steuern und navigieren Sie den Flug von Starrflügel-Flugzeugen auf nicht planmäßigen Luftverkehrsrouten oder Hubschraubern. Erfordert ein kommerzielles Pilotenzertifikat. Beinhaltet Charterpiloten mit ähnlicher Zertifizierung sowie Luftrettungs- und Rundflugpiloten. Ausgenommen sind regionale, nationale und internationale Linienpiloten.

SOC Code: 53-2012.00

Ressourcen

Suchen Sie Jobs in Ihrer lokalen Umgebung

Wenn Sie darüber nachdenken, eine neue Karriere zu beginnen oder den Job zu wechseln, haben wir ein praktisches Tool für die Jobsuche erstellt, das Ihnen möglicherweise dabei hilft, die perfekte neue Rolle zu finden.

Suchen Sie Jobs in Ihrer lokalen Umgebung

Kommentare

Leave a comment

Luca (Niedrig) 20 days ago
requires human interference in accidents and emergencies
have to be 1000% reliable in order to not cause problems
can scare public away
0 0 Reply
Felipe (Niedrig) 22 days ago
Simple. The pilot is the hierarchy within the system. Today, AI can indeed perform even complex tasks, but you can never trust an AI 100% to pilot an airplane. The critical factor is simple: if there is any change or problem with the aircraft, a pilot can act quickly by not strictly following airline protocols. Following protocols 100% does not always guarantee safety.

Examples like TACA Flight 110, where a Boeing 737-300 lost both engines, show this. Instead of following the manual and returning, the pilots landed on the grass ahead, which was the right decision. This applies to many situations. In the case of United Airlines Flight 232, it's another example. Following the correct protocols isn't always the right choice and can sometimes prevent worse tragedies.

In the United case, let's suppose an AI is in command and the plane loses all three hydraulic systems. The company's manual doesn't cover a situation where all engines are lost. At that moment, what would the AI do? Even if it follows the tower controller's voice commands correctly, it’s impossible to determine the flight's fate because there's no human inside. However, this isn't to say that following protocols is always wrong. It’s just a reminder to follow protocols, but if you ever need to break them, it should be in a life-or-death situation.
2 0 Reply
Furry Racoon Cat (Mäßig) 1 month ago
With autopilot becoming more prevalent and the rise of autonomous navigation systems, there is a chance that pilots could be replaced.
0 2 Reply
Joe (Keine Chance) 2 months ago
Pilots cannot be replaced by AI since there are many skills that AI can't possess like complex decision making and most passengers wouldn't trust AI to operate their aircraft. 20 years from now, many of the newer planes that fly nowadays will still be flying in 2040. Another consideration is the single pilot operation, which is the primary focus right now which will not likely happen before the 2040s. Pilots have minimal risk of being automated.
2 1 Reply
Stirling Martin (Niedrig) 2 months ago
Cybersecurity could make this impossible.
0 1 Reply
Ron Hounslow (Keine Chance) 2 months ago
All large commercial aircraft currently in production and coming off the production line today need two pilots for operation during crucial stages of flight. It will take a decade plus plus for the regulatory requirement to change,

Many of those airframes are going to be in service for the next fifteen to twenty years plus.

What you may see in the next decade or so is a reduction in the number of pilots required by the industry overall if single pilot in the cruise becomes allowable on Long Haul Flights.
1 1 Reply
do not want to say (Niedrig) 2 months ago
because eve with ai there will be thousand of plane in the sky at one time and one miscalculation from the ai on a plane can cause it to crash
0 1 Reply
EK1934 (Unsicher) 3 months ago
The thing is, it will take a long time to develop and for AI to get approved by the FAA
1 1 Reply
Miles (Niedrig) 3 months ago
commercial pilots have some instances of ai but commercial pilots take years of training naps and skills to complete
And ai would need to learn a lot of controls and would need precise management one small move and the ai is done.
0 1 Reply
Mani salah (Niedrig) 4 months ago
The artificial intllegence can't replace the human's emotion and it's way of thinking in some situations and must be supervised by a trained and experienced pilot
3 1 Reply
Aranyak Maitra (Mäßig) 5 months ago
The development of automated and remote flying technology for military equipment can be a game changer for civil aviation industry. Automation has already reduced the number of pilots from 3 to 2.
1 5 Reply
Luke (Keine Chance) 5 months ago
Pilots can do things robots can't. Somtimes you can't follow the rules and need to break them. Think about the gimli glider. The pilot had no landing gear, he was way too high and way too fast. He did a side slip menuveur, only able to be completed in glider aircraft. It was a risky move but it would have to be done if they wanted to land. They succeded by breaking the rules and testing the limits. That is somthing that can nevery be done by a robot.
9 0 Reply
Lucas 5 months ago
true
2 0 Reply
someone (Niedrig) 6 months ago
because there is still going to be someone watching over the ai to make sure it doesn't make mistakes and also someone needs to take over in an emergency
0 0 Reply
Mohammad 5 months ago
That is true but i don't think the AI will move to commercial planes any time soon, but for military planes, they will take 90% for sure soon
0 0 Reply
Lisa (Unsicher) 7 months ago
This one is tricky! I do not doubt AI could learn to proficiently drive a plane, though I do doubt if they're reliable in terms of safety. I foresee companies using this to cut costs, only to receive public outcry in return. I think the real question here is: Do we want artificial intelligence driving our planes?
2 0 Reply
Matheus (Niedrig) 8 months ago
The competent regulatory body, (FAA) is VERY conservative. So even if we had the technology, I doubt that they would allow autonomous commercial planes.
In this case, regulation is the hold-up, not the technology.
2 0 Reply
Hayden (Keine Chance) 9 months ago
I am training to become a pilot. Knowing how complicated everything is and how many things can go wrong, I would never step foot on an AI-flown plane. What will AI do when an emergency that it hasn't been programmed for occurs? If you go look through the history of incidents, you'll find that there are way more complicated issues than a simple engine failure that can occur. Not to mention the concern of hacking.
1 2 Reply
Not important 7 months ago
Remember that AI is able to think. It's not like a random program that runs to control the plane. AI will have ALL the information on the internet. So, it is difficult for you but not for AI.

And mind you, most plane accidents happen due to pilot error. :) AI can eliminate that.
0 5 Reply
Lisa 7 months ago
I'm not sure if the term "think" would be best for the situation. I say AI uses logic and percentile to decide what is best, based off of what humans have done before. Looking at the success rates, artificial intelligence picks out which route is safest and goes with it.

I agree with you, although there are some concerns with how AI could work in unique emergencies that have never occurred in the past, and how AI would work with the human crew members.
6 0 Reply
Ryan (Keine Chance) 9 months ago
It's already dangerous enough as it is so I don't think it'll be wise to let AI take control of planes, especially with all its faults. Maybe in 50 years at least.
0 2 Reply
Anonymous 5 months ago
You are in more danger driving your car to work then taking a flight to Chicago.
0 0 Reply
.. 8 months ago
planes are the single safest form of transportation there is but i agree it will take atleast 50 yrs
0 1 Reply
asdf (Niedrig) 9 months ago
people don't trust em
0 0 Reply
Bao Nam (Keine Chance) 9 months ago
Because flying airplanes is very hard to do, if done not correctly, the plane could crash, the A.I is smart but some times the A.I will have errors that cannot be fixed. I think just that.
2 0 Reply
Sina (Keine Chance) 10 months ago
A human being is required to accept legal responsibility
1 0 Reply

Hinterlassen Sie eine Antwort zu diesem Beruf

Diese Seite ist durch reCAPTCHA geschützt und die Google Datenschutzbestimmungen und Nutzungsbedingungen gelten.