Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates

40%

Vote

Comments (5)

Analysis

Will "Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates" be replaced by AI & Robots?

Based on the 2013 study it's unclear if this occupation will be replaced by robots/AI. However, workers can take comfort in the results from our poll, which only shows a 29% chance of automation within the next 2 decades.

Automation Risk Level

Start worrying

or 40% probability of automation

Projected Growth

1%

by 2024

People Employed

28,670

as of 2019

Median Annual Wage

$136,910

or $65.82 hourly

Compare

Most likely

Least likely

How this compares with other jobs: 277 out of 707

Cast Your Vote

Highly likely
Likely
Could go either way
Small chance
No chance

How likely do you think this occupation will be taken over by robots/AI within the next 20 years?

People Employed (US)

Median Annual Wage (US)

Job description

Arbitrate, advise, adjudicate, or administer justice in a court of law. May sentence defendant in criminal cases according to government statutes or sentencing guidelines. May determine liability of defendant in civil cases. May perform wedding ceremonies.

SOC Code: 23-1023

If you're thinking of starting a new career, or looking to change jobs, we've created a handy job search tool which might just help you land that perfect new role.

Search jobs in your local area

Have your say

Nadya on Graphic Designers

Zach on Financial Managers

E Suresh RAJ on Architectural and Engineering Managers

Michael (Very Likely) on Property, Real Estate, and Community Association Managers

Breh on Medical Assistants

Comments

K (Small chance) says

small chance because when judges will be automated then lawyer need to be automated

Sep 05, 2020 at 09:11 AM

Darp (No chance) says

Why are you argumenting the percentage with the grey area of the job? It's
an argument for why they won't be replaced in my opinion. Just imagine a drug dealer and a
person having the drug because they believe it would help their dying grandmother, how can they both serve the same sentance for possesion?

Jan 29, 2020 at 07:48 PM

Judgemental (Highly likely) says

Judges are people who have prejudices based upon experience and are unconsciously biased. The same case tried by all judges would never produce the same outcome. It’s a flawed system, and a lottery. Good luck to those who are innocent and falsely accused.

Sep 23, 2019 at 08:32 PM

jac says

judges dont just follow laws. they change laws and base decisions on moral grey area and circumstance. perhaps traffic court will have robot judges but i doubt we will ever see a robot in federal or supreme courts. mercy, compassion, and social understanding should never be expected from a machine.

May 28, 2019 at 10:45 PM

Elliott (Highly likely) says

Laws are very easy to interpret, I'm very sure the Internet already has the answer to 99.9% of all questions regarding whether something should be categorized as a felony or not. The United States has made up its mind on almost everything, I don't think judges really use their imagination to do this job, they just follow instructions as guided in the rules book.That's why I think the chances are much higher than 40%.

That's why I think the judges' probability of automation is closer to 95% than 40%, much like the accountants.

Apr 21, 2019 at 10:34 AM

Legal Services (Extremely unlikely) says

Laws by definition are not very easy to interpret. Hence the necessity to have lawyers and Judges deliberate in court over the interpretation of different laws and Acts and is why, for example, in Australia we have the Acts Interpretation Act.

I agree with jac. I think it's highly unlikely Judges will be replaced by robots/A.I. anytime in the near or distant future if at all not only because of the complicated nature of what their jobs entails, secondly, the human touch required to do so as jac touched upon and, thirdly, because on a deeper, more philosophical but also more tantamount level, to do so would, essentially, be surrendering our core and fundamental power as human beings to govern our own kind. If we were to hand over judiciary powers and control to A.I. we would effectively be putting mankind on the bench forever. It would tear the core fabric of our humanity and everything the human race has achieved thus far in all antiquity and hopes to achieve in all future and for those reasons and more, I believe, simply could not and would not ever happen.

So, realistically, I think the automation risk level of this particular category should be reassessed to almost zero because anyone in their right mind with any semblance of logic and understanding of the justice system couldn't possibly surmise that it could realistically be awarded a percentile score that such could happen higher than that.

Aug 06, 2019 at 10:25 AM