技术撰稿人

自动化风险
计算出的
79%
风险等级
投票
54%
根据 312 票的投票结果
劳动力需求
增长
5.5%
到2032年
工资
$79,960
或每小时 $38.44
体积
48,620
截至 2022
摘要
工作评分
4.7/10

想在您的网站上显示这个摘要吗?嵌入代码:

自动化风险

79% (高风险)

高风险(61-80%):这个类别的工作面临着来自自动化的重大威胁,因为他们的许多任务可以使用当前或近期的技术轻松自动化。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

我们还没有找到这份工作的任何重要特质是无法被轻易自动化的。

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内,实现全自动化的可能性为54%

我们的访客投票表示,他们不确定这个职业是否会被自动化。 然而,我们生成的自动化风险等级表明自动化的可能性要高得多:有79%的机会会被自动化。

你认为自动化的风险是什么?

技术撰稿人在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大?






情感

以下图表会在有大量投票数据可以呈现有意义的数据时包含在内。这些视觉表示显示了用户投票结果随时间的变化,提供了对情绪趋势的重要指示。

随着时间(每年)的情绪变化

增长

相对于其他职业,呈现适度增长

预计"Technical Writers"的工作空缺数量将在2032内增长5.5%

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据,该数据涵盖了从2021到2031的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2023到期.

工资

相对于其他职业来说薪酬高

在2022,'Technical Writers'的年度中位数工资为$79,960,或每小时$38。

'Technical Writers'的薪资比全国中位工资高72.7%,全国中位工资为$46,310。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比,工作机会的适中范围。

截至2022,在美国有48,620人被雇佣为'Technical Writers'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约< 0.001%

换句话说,大约每3 千人中就有1人被雇佣为“Technical Writers”。

工作描述

编写技术资料,如设备手册,附录,或操作和维护说明。可能会协助进行版面设计工作。

SOC Code: 27-3042.00

资源

如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯,或者想要换工作,我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具,它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

评论

留下评论

Steve (极有可能)说
Explaining, proofreading, summarizing, are all jobs that even ChatGPT4.0 can do well. Once LLMs are available in local versions that don't reveal confidential info to the public, and have advanced a bit, technical writing will be generated mostly on-the-fly from user questions.

Curating and organizing the information to feed to the AI, and checking their output for accuracy, may be one of the few jobs left to tech writers.
Mar 12, 2024 at 04:23 下午
joe mama (极有可能)说
obviously any one can write technical descriptions of stuff by explaining it to chatgpt and asking it to write that in technical terms
Feb 11, 2024 at 09:39 下午
Eyebrow说
Much of the tech world keeps their documentation private, for customers only. If you are handing explanations to ChatGPT, you are going to lose your job for breaking confidentiality.
Mar 12, 2024 at 02:26 下午
Fabian (适度)说
Technical writing only works if the resulting texts fit the target group.

As technical writers we understand complex systems (as well as the engineer's gibberish that often comes with it) and are able to translate this into a form that is easily understood by the respective user groups, i.e. operators or maintenance personnel.

In my opinion AI nowadays can provide draft text to the technical writers. But it takes a human to process that into understandable content, because only a human can know what is necessary for others to profit from precise instructions and related warnings. Also when it comes to jurisdiction.

Who will be held accountable for injury or death caused by automated AI that simply pretends to be human-like but has otherwise no conscience? I mean, an AI can tell you that a stove is hot, but does this mean it really knows the consequences of touching it?

Some learned it the hard way, I doubt an AI can.
Jan 15, 2024 at 05:57 下午
Pawel (适度)说
While the promise of AGI is still remote, and LLM AIs are not great at giving accurate responses, we cannot rule out that there is a toolset which could do this job and one that somebody can come up with within the next 20 years. 20 years is a lonb time to refine a toolset.
Nov 17, 2023 at 07:47 上午
tech writer adjacent (适度)说
Because management/shareholders care more about dollars than quality, and apparently customers are getting used to it. Technical writers constantly fail to prove their value (with data), and are thus seen as not adding value. Technical documentation is seen as a 'gimme' (expectation of free resource that comes with the product), and thus valueless or worse.
Jun 08, 2023 at 10:28 下午
writer? (低)说
When I came to this profession I was actually surprised how little writing it involved. Even if AI replaced the writing bit of my work completely (say, it would be able to create perfect content from whatever input I feed it - at which point most white collar jobs are doomed anyway, btw), I'd still have like 80% of my current workload to deal with myself. Coining job titles is elusive nowadays, but I'd say think bigger: technical communicator, information architect, information designer, content strategist, etc. I've done things from under those labels and much more - from simple coding to graphic design and basic video editing. It is kind of a 'jack of all trades' profession, or at least it can be, but in a good way - opens up many doors, and you could easily switch your focus elsewhere once part of your job is automated. Nobody is safe from automation, but here at least you have flexibility and transferable skills. '79%' is a joke. I transitioned to tech writing from a profession rated much lower, for the very reason that said profession is being automated out of the market right before my eyes. So take info on this website with a grain of salt. ;)
May 05, 2023 at 11:35 上午
David H. 说
This confirms that most people do not know what technical writers do. There is a lot of interdepartmental discussions and planning that cannot be automated.
I don’t see this role being completely automated in 10 years.
May 04, 2023 at 09:31 上午
shaan (适度)说
I asked ChatGPT few questions. From the responses i got from it, i feel its likely to replace Tech Writers in near future. As it will take less time to convert complex technical articles into simple language or vice versa.
Feb 27, 2023 at 07:09 上午
Psalm (适度)说
If AI can perform well enough and at a lower cost, our expertise will lose its value. In many offices, we are already considered a luxury. It will be even harder to justify our worth if AI can make the writing process less time-consuming and painful for engineers. Many jobs, not just technical writing, are seen as luxuries by employers who lack the necessary skills or time to do them properly. If AI can reduce time and costs while producing reasonable content with minimal input, what will be left for technical writers to do?

More importantly, why would anyone pay for a professional to do it?
Mar 09, 2022 at 02:43 下午
guest (低)说
It's like saying teachers won't be needed because we will have textbooks to study from. Except we are talking here about replacing authors of textbooks (not to mention the fact that textbooks already exist and teachers are still there).
Aug 08, 2021 at 11:15 下午
Alen (不确定)说
Writing requires creativity and contextual understanding of a particular work. Also, the audience of the written work is humans and it requires a certain sense of being able to understand another human to produce work that the humans can understand. So, I'm not really sure if robots would be able to do that unless they reach the level of intelligence that humans have.
Jan 20, 2021 at 04:24 下午
Liu Qin (适度)说
More and more technical documentation has become structural writing. Writing documentation is more and more like writing a code. AI will learn writing a code easily in the future.
Nov 22, 2020 at 03:26 上午
Mike说
We are already using robotics to automatically generate software video demos from structured written content. Robotic writing will be a huge help initially, followed by even more.

We are already implementing automated structured reuse on a large scale. People should not underestimate the potential of computational linguistics when combined with machine learning and a knowledge graph-rich future.

Although intelligent content (structured content with human-declared intent) cannot be automated yet, we are already auto-classifying content with additional semantic metadata (taxonomies). AI/ML will continue to assist and eventually replace a significant portion of low-level content development, which will elevate the writer's role to that of an information architect/designer.

Object-oriented content will then become a service called Content-as-a-Service (CaaS), much like an electrical distribution grid.

In TechComm and MarComm, we have been evolving towards this model for many years.
Feb 11, 2022 at 08:37 下午
Mick Davidson (不确定)说
There’s a massive human element to tech writing, but never underestimate technology and where it might be in five years time. Also don’t ignore wishful thinking and subject ignorance.
Jul 11, 2020 at 05:09 上午
Janet说
Who will write about AI systems? AI itself?
Apr 26, 2020 at 12:28 上午
Mathew (没有机会)说
Technical writing goes well beyond just writing the actual sentences.

I cannot fathom how AI would somehow be able to do all the things that are required to be done in order to complete a technical writing piece.

AI has already taken over the writing niche . . . people no longer need education to write, software helps them do it. That is all AI could ever do for a writer.
Jan 14, 2020 at 04:24 上午
Tad说
Until both the end-user and the engineer are both automated there is no feasible way to fully automate this job. You can have some IT tech writer positions that become more efficient through perhaps some auto-text generation but expecting this to translate into any hardware based product is extremely difficult to automate
Aug 06, 2019 at 11:08 下午
Anthony 说
We already have artificial intelligence which is capable of blogging and reporting news articles without human beings being capable of detecting that this information has been written by what is effectively an algorithm, so it is incomprehensible (to me) that within the coming decades, for the concept of what it is to be a “writer” to remain unphased. I myself have worked as a writer and author and I can emphatically state that artificial intelligence is going to usher in a paradigm shift for those who are currently connected to the field of written work. The profession will remain intact until the end of the century, but swift and vast changes are to be had; this is an inevitability which we must accept, embrace, and use to empower modern day writers
Jul 16, 2019 at 09:50 下午
Mother (低)说
Every company has their own standards for writing. The more successful writers are able to inject some personality into their writing.
Apr 26, 2019 at 05:34 下午
SEBASTIAN ARBOLEDA说
How will they take the job if you need to know the systems that you are writing about?
Apr 01, 2019 at 12:17 上午

关于这个职业请留下您的评论

此网站受到reCAPTCHA和Google的隐私政策以及服务条款的保护。

人们还浏览了

作家和作者
计算机程序员
平面设计师
律师
网页开发者