概述
自动化风险
2. 用户投票
3. 增长
工资
5. 体积
描述
资源
评论

中学教师（特殊教育和职业/技术教育除外）

自动化风险
计算出的
15%
风险等级
投票
27%
根据 462 票的投票结果
劳动力需求
增长
4.6%
到2032年
工资
$62,360
或每小时 $29.98
体积
1,042,090
截至 2022
摘要
工作评分
7.2/10

想在您的网站上显示这个摘要吗？嵌入代码：

投票
评论 (16)

自动化风险

15% (最小风险)

最小风险（0-20%）：这一类别的职业被自动化的可能性较低，因为它们通常需要复杂的问题解决能力，创造力，强大的人际交往能力和高度的手动灵巧。这些工作通常涉及复杂的手部动作和精确的协调，使得机器难以复制所需的任务。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

工作中的一些相当重要的品质难以自动化：

  • 社会洞察力

  • 原创性

  • 帮助和照顾他人

  • 谈判

  • 说服

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内，实现全自动化的可能性为27%。

我们的访客投票表示，这个职业被自动化的可能性很低。 这个评估进一步得到了通过计算得出的自动化风险等级的支持，该等级预计有15%的机会实现自动化。

你认为自动化的风险是什么？

中学教师（特殊教育和职业/技术教育除外）在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大？






情感

以下图表会在有大量投票数据可以呈现有意义的数据时包含在内。这些视觉表示显示了用户投票结果随时间的变化，提供了对情绪趋势的重要指示。

随着时间（每年）的情绪变化

增长

相对于其他职业，呈现适度增长。

预计"Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education"的工作空缺数量将在2032内增长4.6%

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据，该数据涵盖了从2021到2031的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2023到期.

工资

相对于其他职业，薪酬适中

在2022，'Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education'的年度中位数工资为$62,360，或每小时$29。

'Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education'的薪资比全国中位工资高34.7%，全国中位工资为$46,310。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比，明显更多的工作机会范围。

截至2022，在美国有1,042,090人被雇佣为'Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约0.7%

换句话说，大约每141人中就有1人被雇佣为“Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education”。

工作描述

在中学级别教授学生一个或多个科目。

SOC Code: 25-2031.00

资源

如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯，或者想要换工作，我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具，它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

评论

留下评论

Kate (低)说
Online learning was really difficult for almost all students
Jun 19, 2023 at 11:45 下午
IAmTired (低)说
I have worked as a teacher for 20 years and understand how much of my job requires interpersonal skills and creative problem solving that would be difficult to replace with AI/robotics.
May 10, 2023 at 04:32 上午
Aaron (适度)说
Large parts of the job are already being automated. When the pushback from parent and teacher groups is outweighed by the cost savings, schools will be staffed at a 200:1 ratio and lessons will be delivered by AI.
May 08, 2023 at 03:34 下午
Korey Bradley (低)说
I think Covid has proven that pupils left to their own devices will not progress without a steady hand at the wheel. Computers and Chatbots can't provide that stability without true human interactions.
May 04, 2023 at 05:31 下午
Lesley (低)说
After the Covid-19 pandemic, I think we saw how important human relations are for developing young minds. The human touch is needed to help students reach their full potential. Furthermore, schools are a fairly safe place to leave children throughout the school day.
Apr 20, 2023 at 03:57 下午
Greg H. (低)说
There are already automated plagiarism checkers in operation (Turnitin on our campus), and I've heard some school districts have piloted automated writing scoring software.
Sep 23, 2021 at 11:22 下午
Angela Roe (不确定)说
Due to COVID, many students now opt for online education rather than in person. Especially those students who want or need to work full-time. However, there has been quantitative data on how online school hasn't done much for students learning. At least 75% of my current enrolled students have complained that they don't learn anything online. But this could be more of a discipline issue rather than a curriculum issue. Either way, if students begin online at an early age, it will become the "norm" of learning.
Sep 12, 2021 at 06:17 下午
배서영说
I think my dream job is very safe because teacher contributes to students' emotional development and interacts with students by having complex relationships.
Nov 16, 2020 at 11:55 下午
Catalin M A (没有机会)说
AI will not get this smart in the next 150 years, unless we are all going to have bionic implants from birth and then we would talk about augmented reality but that's something else.
Aug 03, 2020 at 01:01 下午
Former Teacher说
Has COVID-19 changed any projections about the future of teaching? There are already software applications more efficient and responsive than classroom teachers, who are restricted in one-on-one instruction by space, time, and opportunity. If COVID-19 stretches into 2020-21, many of the instructional technology tools being used by teachers will need to be automated further to prevent teachers from having to recreate content over and over again. Why not replace the teacher altogether and have learning software that responds to a student's input (both answers and facial expressions, pressure on keys, distracted browsing, etc.) and builds a customized plan for them? If we know a student has characteristics X, Y, and Z, plus deficiencies, a, b, and c, why not have an automated course of study that accounts for those and delivers the best instruction possible? We do need teachers to be the adults in the room, for sure, but if there's no room, that function dissipates.
Jul 13, 2020 at 04:54 下午
TV说
Obviously you are not a teacher.

Due to remote learning and using similar designs that you mentioned, we have seen a 210% spike in high school drop outs, a 600% up shot of kids having at least 2-3 failing grades, and a gap between students who do not have access to tutors, internet or computers (or all three). A robot cannot tell an elementary student to reengage their students, let alone the sheer horror of classroom discipline being thrown out. Also, lets be real honest with secondary students, if they are given a generic problem trust me they will plagiarize and copy that down (just look at quizlet, or "write my paper" for proof). A human being needs to see if a student "gets" what is going on. A Teacher needs to have group interactions (and trust me you cannot do any sort of interactions with remote even with current programs- students just shut their cameras and mute themselves). Unless you are suggesting that a "few" will benefit from this dystopia, if so thank you Nancy Devos for your insight, but we educate everyone, and not the 1%.
Nov 25, 2020 at 09:21 下午
high school student说
Under the assumption that society will return to normal, students will undoubtedly prefer to learn with a quality teacher over self-learning.

Learning with a teacher can mean a number of scenarios, including utilizing the learning software you mentioned.

The assurance of having someone who knows more than you, or at least knows where to find answers and explain them, will result in teachers have a very secure job.

I haven't even mentioned the emotional support and connection that makes a learning environment better, something I don't foresee AI replacing because seeing assuring words pop up on my screen is not the same as hearing it from a teacher, who is making eye contact with me and using body language.
Dec 29, 2020 at 07:44 下午
Cheryl Ng (低)说
High school seniors still need the human element of guidance and encouragement- or we will be seeing more dropouts.
May 13, 2020 at 12:57 下午
Seaslug999 (极有可能)说
AI is self learning and therefore self teaching.
May 28, 2019 at 04:26 下午
JustADuDe说
Dude we talking about teaching other dumb humans like the two of us.
Mar 17, 2020 at 05:54 下午

关于这个职业请留下您的评论

此网站受到reCAPTCHA和Google的隐私政策以及服务条款的保护。

人们还浏览了

律师
计算机程序员
学前教师，小学教师，初中教师，高中教师，特殊教育教师
会计师和审计师
平面设计师