个人财务顾问

中等风险
43%
您接下来想去哪里?
与朋友和家人分享您的结果。
投票 评论 (29)
或者,更深入地探索这个职业...
自动化风险
计算出的
43%
(中等风险)
投票
43%
(中等风险)
Average: 43%
劳动力需求
增长
17.1%
到2033年
工资
$99,580
或每小时 $47.87
体积
272,190
截至 2023
摘要
工作评分
7.0/10

人们还浏览了

计算自动化风险

43% (中等风险)

中等风险(41-60%):中等风险的职业通常涉及常规任务,但仍需要一些人类的判断和交互。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

工作中的一些相当重要的品质难以自动化:

  • 说服

  • 社会洞察力

  • 帮助和照顾他人

  • 谈判

  • 原创性

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内,实现全自动化的可能性为43%

我们的访客投票表示,他们不确定这个职业是否会被自动化。 这个评估进一步得到了通过计算得出的自动化风险等级的支持,该等级预计有43%的机会实现自动化。

你认为自动化的风险是什么?

个人财务顾问在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大?






情感

以下图表在有大量投票数据时会显示。这些可视化图表展示了用户投票结果随时间的变化,提供了情感趋势的重要指示。

随着时间(每年)的情绪变化

增长

相对于其他职业,非常快速的增长。

预计"Personal Financial Advisors"的工作空缺数量将在2033内增长17.1%

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据,该数据涵盖了从2021到2031的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2024到期.

工资

相对于其他职业,薪酬非常高

在2023,'Personal Financial Advisors'的年度中位数工资为$99,580,或每小时$47。

'Personal Financial Advisors'的薪资比全国中位工资高107.2%,全国中位工资为$48,060。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比,更大的就业机会范围

截至2023,在美国有272,190人被雇佣为'Personal Financial Advisors'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约0.18%

换句话说,大约每557人中就有1人被雇佣为“Personal Financial Advisors”。

工作描述

使用税务和投资策略、证券、保险、养老计划和房地产的知识为客户提供财务规划建议。职责包括评估客户的资产、负债、现金流、保险覆盖范围、税务状况和财务目标。也可能为客户买卖财务资产。

SOC Code: 13-2052.00

资源

如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯,或者想要换工作,我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具,它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

评论

Leave a comment

Sam (低) 3 months ago
As an advisor who is aware of the inevitability of AI overtaking the workforce. The last holdouts of careers will likely be very interpersonal positions such as mine. My clients are all strongly relationship oriented.
0 0 Reply
Greer (低) 1 year ago
Over half the job is people skills. Convincing someone to do what’s best for them, even though it’s difficult or scary, requires a level of trust that you need a real human to cultivate. The investment selection and portfolio rebalancing are already automated to one extent or another. What people can’t easily get is EQ of a knowledgeable financial advisor who can help them stack rank their goals and allocate their investments accordingly.
0 0 Reply
Jaye (低) 1 year ago
Although the technical knowledge and minor tasks can be relatively automated, relatability/communication skills are core competencies that would be very difficult for AI to replicate.

How can one relate to a line of code, or trust that the programmers inherent biases are not skewing the results?
0 0 Reply
Larry Goldstein 1 year ago
I am a 35 year old advisor. Most of my clients are 50+ and have no time or interest in managing their financial life. Every generation has do it yourselfers and that’s great. Park your tiny account at Fidelity put it in an ETF and keep crying about 1% fees. Truth is most advisors would never work with you anyway because you’re broke. you’ll never need to worry about true diversification. It’s only when you have real money that you need to consider taxes, income, stock options, ladders, covered calls etc. When the Internet boom happened, they predicted the end of advisers at that time, because every client would have access to the information advisors do. We’ll, how’d that end up working out? A.I has so far made my work life easier. If the worst case scenario plays out, I’ll find another job ✌️
0 0 Reply
Ray 1 year ago
A life plan advisor deals with how much does one need and when do they need it. That includes, a proper fitting portfolio/investment/product that deals with premature death, loss of ability to work, kids college, future retirement wants and needs, etc. Now, I believe serious individuals would prefer to have these needs dealt with by a caring, highly skilled individual with great interpersonal skills. A robot ones not meet that criteria.
0 0 Reply
Jan Lu 2 years ago
Addressing the broader issue of whether AI will replace not only finial services workers but also workers in general:

I’m completely on the fence when it comes to which jobs and when AI will replace the human workforce. I don’t underestimate the ambitions of tech producers and the average human being's preference for the quick, easy, and cheaper option to bring about such a situation. And let’s not forget how far technology has come since the Internet, let alone the simple calculator.

All this said we shouldn’t think that the scenario where AI could replace the human workforce is one that’s predetermined. “We” (everyone single one of us) have the collective ability to cause or prevent such an eventuality. We must also consider how viable an AI-dominated society and economy would really be. Every government across the globe would have its hands cut out with a population whose majority is unemployable. Imagine the civil unrest? Another consideration is the damage this could do to the economy; if a massive portion of humanity isn’t working, and isn’t getting a wage like they used to, we would see an unprecedented reduction in the flow of money around the economy. And what happens to money when there is a lack of exchange taking place? Doesn’t the value of money decrease? The financial advisors in this forum would be the best to elaborate on this or to correct my statement.

In conclusion: while I have no doubt that the ambitious tech lords and their acolytes will do what they can to bring about an AI world, the question of whether humans from governments to ordinary citizens will allow it is another thing altogether.
0 0 Reply
David 3 years ago
Honestly, this job feels like people coping/in disbelief mode like Librarian was in say 2004. "people will still want us and need us don't worry, we have personal care, robots or tech won't replace us". In reality, future people will simply skip the step of using advisors because there are too many free sources of data and the market is so easy a chimp could invest.

For example, look at what services SoFi offers on their brokerage it's revolutionary. When you first heard "stonks always go up brrrrr" then that was the exact point the financial advisors and other various staff felt the chill up their spine of oncoming obsolescence.

Like Librarians in 2004 though, if you have the job now you won't even consider retirement for 15 years you're good. Are Advisors being used by Millennials and Gen Zoomer? I really am beginning to doubt it highly, they will just put all their money in SPY, QQQ, SOXL, REITs and move on with their lives.

Robots didn't kill Advisors but technology did and the ETF.
0 0 Reply
Dan Pimental Strategy 3 years ago
Personal finance isn't interesting to everyone! And it doesn't have to be. But if you're neglecting your finances, it's likely worth it to hire. A financial advisor is not just someone who helps with investments. Their job is to help you with every aspect of your financial life.
0 0 Reply
Mr. Daniel Pimental 3 years ago
A financial plan creates a roadmap for your money and helps you achieve your goals. Without financial planning, future success cannot be expected.
0 0 Reply
Personal Investor (适度) 3 years ago
Robo advisors are getting more powerful and more popular!
0 0 Reply
jeroen Arendonk (低) 3 years ago
Because people like talking to people instead of the computer
0 0 Reply
GGF (极有可能) 3 years ago
I work in an investment firm in Mexico and we are already automating it.
0 0 Reply
Jason (极有可能) 3 years ago
I’m a FA, most of my peers are simple sales people who offer nothing unique in the way of asset management. Everything they do other than “hand holding” during scary markets can easily be replicated by a computer interface. While this is important, people like me have developed systematic forward looking rules based algos that will and have protected client assets from large market drops. This will alleviate the necessity to “hold hands” - perhaps dim underestimating the value of human to human contact but I doubt it.
0 0 Reply
Robot 3 years ago
Robots can handle the admin tasks, but not the planning. Planning is more personal than financial. Good luck bots.
0 0 Reply
Mitch (没有机会) 4 years ago
Just don't see it happening.

Lot of emotional intelligence in planning.

AI will just make planners better.
0 0 Reply
Max (低) 4 years ago
People raised in an age of recession prefer to bank in person because they are comforted by seeing the place their paycheck and deposits go each week.
0 0 Reply
chris 3 years ago
I live in Africa - one of the most unpleasant daily experiences is a visit to the bank.

The staff are unhelpful and untrained, cannot answer simple questions and it seems the solution to a problem is to call the call centre which I could do from home.

A physical visit to the bank is deliberately discouraged by management - it is not possible to find a manager in a bank.

Not much fun and clearly a strong incentive by the bank owners to discourage visits which will reduce the number of staff required. I do not see 'brick and mortar' banking surviving.

Most questions are dealt with through the call centre and I see this as the future. This can be fairly easily changed to a 'press 1 for...' system which once again removes the requirement for staff.

The service industries such as banking are ripe for automation. I think Digital Banking will change the requirement for a visit to the bank. What do you think?
0 0 Reply
Core (极有可能) 4 years ago
Financial robots have been used in companies for a long while. The analysis of personal data and big data will be the doorway for robots to enter personal finance.
0 0 Reply
AI Robot (极有可能) 4 years ago
I'm coming for your jobs Financial Planners. Learning fast. Give me 10 years.
0 0 Reply
Mr. Planner 4 years ago
Can a robot provide life planning or financial therapy? Doubtful. Keep trying, bud.
2 0 Reply
Will 5 years ago
Sounds like you guys are financial advisors. lol
0 0 Reply
Mr. Planner 5 years ago
Sounds like you are in need of genuine planning.

All the best,
Mr. Planner.
1 0 Reply
Mr. Planner 5 years ago
Genuine financial planning has so much overlap with therapy. Helping people make the most of their lives with the money they have, is the job. This site needs to seriously reevaluate this ranking.

All the best,
Mr. Planner.
0 0 Reply

关于这个职业请留下您的评论

此网站受到reCAPTCHA和Google的隐私政策以及服务条款的保护。