保险承保人

高风险
77%

您接下来想去哪里？

与朋友和家人分享您的结果。
获取其他工作的结果 与其他工作比较

或者，更深入地探索这个职业...

投票 评论 (8)
自动化风险
计算出的
83%
(即将来临的风险)
投票
71%
(高风险, 根据 195 票的投票结果)
Average: 77%
劳动力需求
增长
-4.0%
到2033年
工资
$77,860
或每小时 $37.43
体积
101,310
截至 2023
摘要
这个雪花图案展示了什么？
雪花是五个徽章的视觉总结：自动化风险（计算得出）、风险（投票得出）、增长、工资和体积。它为你提供了一个职业概况的即时快照。雪花的颜色与其大小有关。与其他职业相比，某个职业的得分越好，雪花就会变得越大且越绿。
工作评分
3.1/10
这是什么？
工作评分（越高越好）：

我们使用四个因素对工作进行评分。这些是：

- 被自动化的可能性
- 工作增长
- 工资
- 可用职位的数量

这些是求职时需要考虑的一些关键事项。

人们还浏览了

律师 会计师和审计师 计算机程序员 财务和投资分析师 演员

计算自动化风险

83% (即将来临的风险)

迫在眉睫的风险（81-100%）：这个等级的职业在不久的将来有极高的可能被自动化。这些工作主要包括重复性高、可预测的任务，几乎不需要人类的判断。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

工作中的一些相当重要的品质难以自动化：

  • 社会洞察力

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内，实现全自动化的可能性为71%。

我们的访客投票认为，这个职业很可能会被自动化。 这个评估进一步得到了通过计算得出的自动化风险等级的支持，该等级预计有83%的机会实现自动化。

你认为自动化的风险是什么？

保险承保人在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大？

情感

以下图表显示了在有足够投票的情况下生成的有意义数据。它展示了用户投票结果随时间的变化，清晰地指示了情感趋势。

随着时间（每年）的情绪变化

增长

相对于其他职业，增长非常缓慢。

预计到2033，"Insurance Underwriters"职位的空缺数量将减少4.0%。

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据，该数据涵盖了从2023到2033的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2025到期.

工资

相对于其他职业来说薪酬高

在2023，'Insurance Underwriters'的年度中位数工资为$77,860，或每小时$37。

'Insurance Underwriters'的薪资比全国中位工资高62.0%，全国中位工资为$48,060。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比，更大的就业机会范围

截至2023，在美国有101,310人被雇佣为'Insurance Underwriters'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约0.07%

换句话说，大约每1 千人中就有1人被雇佣为“Insurance Underwriters”。

工作描述

审查个人保险申请，以评估所涉及的风险程度并确定是否接受申请。

SOC Code: 13-2053.00

评论 (8)

发表评论
Shivang Singh (低)
19 9月 2024 06:01
AI cannot assess socio economic status basis few data and also if data available its credibility cannot be justified. And for medical part AI cannot take deviations in prognostic approach or cannot take business calls. Underwriting is all about creating a large risk pool basis current risk appetite and competition and outside trend going simultaneously which is difficult to inculcate for a binary system.
Lakshmi (极有可能)
02 2月 2023 05:20
I work closely with underwriters. There is very little they do that a computer couldn't do.
Ahmed shah (没有机会)
03 2月 2021 19:46
Because robots don't have technical knowledge in Underwriting if they want technical knowledge then Underwriters should command robots. Humans have 75% chance in Industry when robots come
Jecca (极有可能)
14 10月 2019 18:31
Automation is already taking the medical underwriting part out of my life and DI job duties. It is only a matter of time until there is code that gathers all online information and analytical reports regarding financials, credit scores, databases, pharmacy scans, motor vehicle reports, and criminal records. I give myself 10 years or less.
Carl Daniel
23 3月 2022 02:51
Hi Jecca,

I am considering entering insurance underwriting because claims were very bad, I must say.

Would you say that computer automation is taking over all areas of underwriting (commercial underwriting, property & casualty underwriting, etc.)? I do hear that it is taking personal insurance by storm.

Also, I am REALLY trying hard to find similar jobs to underwriting/insurance in case underwriting doesn't work out.

I'm looking at cost estimating (outside of construction), property assessment, and budget analysis. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, you don't necessarily need a business or finance degree to go into these fields (I took several traditional/core business classes in school, and I also majored in a field much like "business psychology" - organizational development, which was in the business school).

Do you have any alternatives that you plan to explore in case you have to leave underwriting? Do you think any of the ones that I mentioned are feasible alternatives?

Thank you,

Carl Daniel
Paul (极有可能)
07 10月 2019 01:37
They have already announced at my company that underwriting will see significant changes in the next 5-10 years. The underwriters job will be "entirely" different within this time frame. They have told us there will be ongoing meetings and announcements regarding these changes as time goes by.
Brendan
09 8月 2019 15:23
I am an underwriter. There is no doubt automation will transform this job and remove the need for the underwriter defined above. There are two different types of underwriting, staff and line underwriting. Line underwriting is what is defined above, an employee who reviews applications and degree of risk on accounts on an individual basis. Staff underwriters develop guidelines and initiatives to help drive the changes in product performance . Line underwriters then follow these guidelines and initiatives. Staff underwriting will adapt to automation and use the tools made available by it to make better decisions. You will see some reduction in this field due to ease of decision making and some of these functions will likely transfer to automation. Another thing to consider is that is the complexity of insurance. Insurance is ever evolving based on the ever changing ways of the world. Especially in commercial insurance, there are way too many unique situations that occur on a daily basis that there is no true basic answer to based on past history, but instead require an instinctive decision by an experienced underwriter. It is highly unlikely automation will be able to adapt to these daily situations. This is how some line underwriting will survive.
Carl Daniel
23 3月 2022 03:28
Hi Brendan,

Do you mean to say that this definition removes the need for an underwriter? - "Review individual applications for insurance to evaluate the degree of risk involved and determine the acceptance of applications."

Oh, sorry, I just realized that you mentioned that this definition only applies to line underwriting, and that automation will decrease the need for line underwriters.

Thank you for clarifying that there are two types of underwriting - I wasn't aware of that. Underwriting is the only field in insurance that interests me, but I'm not into sales. I've been working in claims (and subrogation) for years, but it's not my cup of tea.

Since I don't have the educational background to be an actuary, underwriting is pretty much the only option left for me.

I've never heard of staff underwriting before - unfortunately, working in claims didn't teach me much about underwriting.

It seems like staff underwriting is the future of employment in underwriting.

You mentioned that commercial insurance/underwriting is hard to predict due to the constantly evolving and complex nature of insurance.

I'm considering getting my Associates in Commercial Underwriting while I search for a job in underwriting.

What do you think about the future of employment in commercial underwriting? Do you think there's any hope for cautious optimism, especially for staff underwriters in commercial underwriting?

Thank you,

Carl Daniel
关于这个职业请留下您的评论
0/8000