地球科学家(除水文学家和地理学家外)

低风险
26%
您接下来想去哪里?
与朋友和家人分享您的结果。
投票 评论 (9)
或者,更深入地探索这个职业...
自动化风险
计算出的
20%
(最小风险)
投票
31%
(低风险)
Average: 26%
劳动力需求
增长
5.5%
到2033年
工资
$92,580
或每小时 $44.51
体积
24,620
截至 2023
摘要
工作评分
6.8/10

人们还浏览了

计算自动化风险

20% (最小风险)

最小风险(0-20%):这一类别的职业被自动化的可能性较低,因为它们通常需要复杂的问题解决能力,创造力,强大的人际交往能力和高度的手动灵巧。这些工作通常涉及复杂的手部动作和精确的协调,使得机器难以复制所需的任务。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

工作中的一些相当重要的品质难以自动化:

  • 原创性

  • 社会洞察力

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内,实现全自动化的可能性为31%

我们的访客投票表示,这个职业被自动化的可能性很低。 这个评估进一步得到了通过计算得出的自动化风险等级的支持,该等级预计有20%的机会实现自动化。

你认为自动化的风险是什么?

地球科学家(除水文学家和地理学家外)在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大?






情感

以下图表在有大量投票数据时会显示。这些可视化图表展示了用户投票结果随时间的变化,提供了情感趋势的重要指示。

随着时间(每年)的情绪变化

增长

相对于其他职业的快速增长

预计"Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers"的工作空缺数量将在2033内增长5.5%

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据,该数据涵盖了从2021到2031的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2024到期.

工资

相对于其他职业来说薪酬高

在2023,'Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers'的年度中位数工资为$92,580,或每小时$44。

'Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers'的薪资比全国中位工资高92.6%,全国中位工资为$48,060。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比,就业机会的下限范围较低。

截至2023,在美国有24,620人被雇佣为'Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约< 0.001%

换句话说,大约每6 千人中就有1人被雇佣为“Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers”。

工作描述

研究地球的组成、结构和其他物理方面。可以运用地质学、物理学和数学知识来探索石油、天然气、矿物或地下水;或者用于废物处理、土地复垦或其他环境问题。可以研究地球的内部组成、大气层和海洋,以及其磁场、电场和重力力量。包括矿物学家、古生物学家、地层学家、大地测量学家和地震学家。

SOC Code: 19-2042.00

资源

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯,或者想要换工作,我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具,它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

评论

Nonono (低) 1 month ago
There are some tasks than could be automated, but AI is still inaccurate and incomplete. Geoscientists need to incorporate knowledge and skills from several different disciplines within geoscience.
0 0 Reply
Ajdin (低) 6 months ago
Whilst AI or just simply computers play a crucial role in the industry, the human factor is definitely here to stay
0 0 Reply
N.M. (低) 6 months ago
It requires doing things that I believe robots will not be advanced enough to do in 20 years.
0 0 Reply
Eliana (没有机会) 1 year ago
to be a geoscientist you need to travel in the field, collect rocks, analyze sequences, understand and interpret what are you seeing. Maybe AI can help, but you really need to build a full terminator to replace a geologist.
1 0 Reply
Rui Bernardino (没有机会) 1 year ago
Geologists don't work with numbers, they work with human common sense, theoretical geology ofen doesn't apply in the real world, so you can program a robot that knows everything and it will be dumbfounded when it finds a yellow basalt (yes they exist). Some tasks we do may be automated, sutch as calculations and rock thin section descriptions, that will only allow us to be more productive and focous on the aspects that really matter. There is no replacement for human geometric thinking and thus no way geologists will be replaced by robots
0 0 Reply
Moyin Ade 4 years ago
As a student Geologist I agree but I think you’ll still need a Geologist to program the robot. Even in Car manufacturing assembly line still has engineers. Correct/advise me if I’m wrong.👍
0 0 Reply
Faisal Ali 4 years ago
When your talking about a (Geologist) this occupation isn't really going to be ''automated'' cause' this work needs to be done by a human not really by computerized bots. I disagree with that but let's say an archaeologist place it'll be possible to replace the work of an archaeologist by AI cause recently AI has discovered some archaeological data that was yrs ago.

I believe that this occupation will still live. It will not most likely be taken by AI I'm 100% confident.
0 0 Reply
E 5 years ago
Paleontologists probably not. While robots can have extreme precision, humans can see things which AI programs can't
0 0 Reply
leo 4 years ago
AI can see things that human can't see, not the opposite.
0 0 Reply

关于这个职业请留下您的评论

此网站受到reCAPTCHA和Google的隐私政策以及服务条款的保护。