空乘人员
人们还浏览了
计算自动化风险
低风险（21-40%）：这个级别的工作面临的自动化风险较低，因为它们需要技术和以人为中心的技能的混合。
有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。
用户投票
我们的访客投票表示，这个职业被自动化的可能性很低。 这个评估进一步得到了通过计算得出的自动化风险等级的支持，该等级预计有38%的机会实现自动化。
你认为自动化的风险是什么？
空乘人员在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大？
情感
以下图表在有大量投票数据时会显示。这些可视化图表展示了用户投票结果随时间的变化，提供了情感趋势的重要指示。
随着时间（每年）的情绪变化
增长
预计"Flight Attendants"的工作空缺数量将在2033内增长9.9%
总就业人数和预计的职位空缺
更新的预测将在09-2024到期.
工资
在2023，'Flight Attendants'的年度中位数工资为$68,370，或每小时$32。
'Flight Attendants'的薪资比全国中位工资高42.3%，全国中位工资为$48,060。
随着时间推移的工资
体积
截至2023，在美国有126,020人被雇佣为'Flight Attendants'。
这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约0.08%
换句话说，大约每1 千人中就有1人被雇佣为“Flight Attendants”。
工作描述
监控飞机舱内的安全。为航空公司的乘客提供服务，解释安全信息，提供食物和饮料，并对紧急事件做出响应。
SOC Code: 53-2031.00
资源
在您的本地区搜索工作岗位
如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯，或者想要换工作，我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具，它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。
评论
Leave a comment
Plus, robots can't do such things as CPR or use a first aid kit, for example. So, it's pretty risky.
And by the way flight attendants are there to save u not to make u happy.
First priority is safety the If it’s possible the service time will come.
Given the recent horrific experiences passengers had to endure from these "flight attendants", I see machines replacing these incompetent humans in the future. It'll save the airlines plenty of revenue and avoid lawsuits and having to pay these poorly trained service attendants for mediocre to dismal services provided.
The only ones to blame would be the flight attendants themselves, because a machine did a better job than they ever would.
I have witnessed a decline in the manners and decorum of the passengers traveling. Possibly, the added stress to passengers of airport safety procedures has taken a toll on their nerves. I remember when friends and family could accompany passengers to the gate. Now, the seats are packed in like sardines in a can.
Airline competition made the way for no-frills service and more passengers in smaller seats on airplanes. This has taken a toll on everyone's stress levels. Still, I see friendly FAs who are doing their best to accommodate everyone onboard and assuage those who are already frazzled by the time they take their seats.
A robot may make the dispersion of in-flight commodities easier but it can never take care of all of the emergencies that FAs are trained to handle, the medical emergencies, the duplicate and other seating problems, the myriad of human interactions that FA's handle, unaccompanied children, wheelchair passengers, interaction with cockpit and ground staff, etc., etc. the list goes on, not even considering a major emergency like a hijack incident.
You have vastly underestimated the uber-selective hiring, initial and ongoing training that FAs have. Did you know that they have to take FAA-mandated emergency testing yearly on every airplane which they are qualified to work and pass the test with a 90-100% grade. This includes physical testing in airplane simulators., first aide, resuscitation and cardio procedures etc.
If you see an FA behaving in the unprofessional manner you have described, you should write a letter to the airline about that employee.
For example,
Today : 10 human flight attendants
Future: 1-3 human flight attendants, 7+ robot flight attendants.
Capish? :P
关于这个职业请留下您的评论