空乘人员

低风险
38%

您接下来想去哪里?

与朋友和家人分享您的结果。

或者,更深入地探索这个职业...

自动化风险
计算出的
38%
(低风险)
投票
38%
(低风险, 根据 498 票的投票结果)
Average: 38%
劳动力需求
增长
9.9%
到2033年
工资
$68,370
或每小时 $32.87
体积
126,020
截至 2023
摘要
这个雪花图案展示了什么?
雪花是五个徽章的视觉总结:自动化风险(计算得出)、风险(投票得出)、增长、工资和体积。它为你提供了一个职业概况的即时快照。雪花的颜色与其大小有关。与其他职业相比,某个职业的得分越好,雪花就会变得越大且越绿。
工作评分
6.9/10
这是什么?
工作评分(越高越好):

我们使用四个因素对工作进行评分。这些是:

- 被自动化的可能性
- 工作增长
- 工资
- 可用职位的数量

这些是求职时需要考虑的一些关键事项。

人们还浏览了

律师 演员 计算机程序员 商业飞行员 平面设计师

计算自动化风险

38% (低风险)

低风险(21-40%):这个级别的工作面临的自动化风险较低,因为它们需要技术和以人为中心的技能的混合。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

工作中的一些非常重要的品质很难实现自动化:

  • 狭窄的工作空间,尴尬的姿势

  • 帮助和照顾他人

工作中的一些相当重要的品质难以自动化:

  • 社会洞察力

  • 说服

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内,实现全自动化的可能性为38%

我们的访客投票表示,这个职业被自动化的可能性很低。 这个评估进一步得到了通过计算得出的自动化风险等级的支持,该等级预计有38%的机会实现自动化。

你认为自动化的风险是什么?

空乘人员在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大?

情感

以下图表显示了在有足够投票的情况下生成的有意义数据。它展示了用户投票结果随时间的变化,清晰地指示了情感趋势。

随着时间(每年)的情绪变化

增长

相对于其他职业,非常快速的增长。

预计"Flight Attendants"的工作空缺数量将在2033内增长9.9%

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据,该数据涵盖了从2023到2033的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2025到期.

工资

相对于其他职业来说薪酬高

在2023,'Flight Attendants'的年度中位数工资为$68,370,或每小时$33。

'Flight Attendants'的薪资比全国中位工资高42.3%,全国中位工资为$48,060。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比,更大的就业机会范围

截至2023,在美国有126,020人被雇佣为'Flight Attendants'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约0.08%

换句话说,大约每1 千人中就有1人被雇佣为“Flight Attendants”。

工作描述

监控飞机舱内的安全。为航空公司的乘客提供服务,解释安全信息,提供食物和饮料,并对紧急事件做出响应。

SOC Code: 53-2031.00

评论 (30)

发表评论
z
08 11月 2025 02:26
Flight Attendants go through a long training process to learn about safety, evacuations, CPR, medical procedures, and how to handle emergencies. It’s not a job that AI can just replace easily. AI might be able to help with small stuff in planes, but it can’t fully replace Flight Attendants. If I was a nervous passenger on a plane, I don’t think I would feel comforted by an emotionless robot compared to if an actual person was helping me calm down.
Kevin (没有机会)
23 8月 2025 15:31
Just imagine a metal robot in a tube during severe turbulence, helping injured passengers off a broken plane, resolving conflict, etc. One kick and it would be on its back out of commission
PY (没有机会)
22 8月 2025 08:28
Only few flight attendants on each flight, you can't reply on robot during sudden emergency
annie (没有机会)
25 10月 2024 03:04
because companies wont be willing to pay for that amount of robots and the maintenince that is needed on them, real people would be cheaper
trained as flight attendant
07 3月 2025 23:01
For real people need to pay for hotels and meals, and sometimes flight attendants are transported as passengers if the flight is from another city. Their holidays can last two months to prevent overwork. People are always more expensive, need just the higher level of technology.
Anonymous (极有可能)
23 3月 2024 12:38
You automate the plane to give instructions during turbulence and emergencies. Ease passengers into by updating the seats, rows, and overhead panels with attendants still onboard. From a safety perspective what is 2 attendants per class going to do for 20+ people, nothing other than give instruction and help 1 or 2 women and children. After introducing passengers to those improvements kick it up a notch and introduce 1 robot attendant for every 1 human attendant. This robot would initially be programmed to serve drinks and snacks. You would order it prior to the flight and on your phone or TV during the flight. Now that you have safety and procedures programmed right in to the plane and passengers have interacted with it over the last 10 years with a few iterations to their programming over time and passengers have been able to be served by a robot, the in cabin experience can now be fully automated. You could even design the robots to be smaller in size to fit more than two attendants in the class. Ultimately decreasing burnout by human staff, boarding times, the time it takes to get to the customer, etc.
passionate FA
11 4月 2025 04:34
This proves to me you have a very low understanding of what Flight Attendants actually do. Our main priority is not serving drinks and snacks, its safety. We are trained in water evacuation, fire evacuations, to preflight all our equipment, memorize the detail of every aircraft, ect. There is a greater risk/safety breach with AI being in these positions than a human. It is not simply “customer service”, it is problem solving and ensuring safety of all passengers. If anything would be replaced, potentially gate agents. But FAs and pilots are crucial.
D. H.
06 7月 2025 13:52
More than tens of thousands would need to be spent per robot just to create and maintain it. The airplane would need more fuel and more space for your plan. You would need super advanced plus millions of dollars in technology for a first responder robot.
PK (没有机会)
29 1月 2024 02:41
FAA requires a crew member 1 for every 50. Flight attendant position is based on safety and security designated by FAA not customer service!!!
tony (低)
02 6月 2023 20:39
You're still going to need human intervention in an emergency. There are too many changes on a moments notice during flight to completely trust it to AI.
Philip (不确定)
12 5月 2023 18:40
I think aspects of the job could be automated but parts of the job won't be
Sofie (极有可能)
08 8月 2022 18:37
Humans can decide quicker in an emergency situation, but robots can take a while.

Plus, robots can't do such things as CPR or use a first aid kit, for example. So, it's pretty risky.
h (低)
31 12月 2021 01:27
AI and robots could mess up emergencies and need a connection to stay "alive"
A flight attendant (低)
06 12月 2021 16:31
By federal law (FAA), there needs to be 1 flight attendant per 50 seats on a plane. The number can never decrease even with robots. Good luck getting those robots to handle medical emergencies or breaking up fights between ignorant passengers or helping all you ungrateful passengers evacuate during an emergency in 90 seconds or less with no ability of rational thought LOL
Collin Tredo (低)
17 5月 2021 17:00
This job requires a friendly human face, people will be less comfortable having to talk to and trust a robot/AI when they get on a plane.
A (没有机会)
10 4月 2021 10:07
Flight attendants use their knowledge to solve a situation given the surprise factor... it’s impossible to programme a robot that knows how to act in front of a surprise factor situation. And by the way flight attendants are there to save u not to make u happy. First priority is safety the If it’s possible the service time will come.
Spiros (没有机会)
10 4月 2021 01:55
Flight attendants are there for one specific reason: safety. For this, human presence is important
Erebus (低)
24 3月 2021 17:52
It involves emotional labour which only a human is capable of.
JP (适度)
02 8月 2020 16:53
With the global pandemic focusing minds on the amount of human contact passengers have on flights, I could see cabin crew being reduced in number to improve safety, with a Purser and assistant at each end of the aircraft being supplemented by robots which would handle more of the non-emergency workload. Robots would reduce the expense of accommodating cabin crew at destinations and would be able to clean the cabin autonomously using UV lights to disinfect the cabin air and surfaces.
A flight attendant (没有机会)
22 7月 2020 08:27
Will absolutely not happen. What most do not realize is that flight attendants are on board for safety. It's just not something that can be replaced by robots.
Ebork (极有可能)
03 1月 2020 11:48
Flight attendants make or break flying. They'll be robots soon enough.
THM
27 6月 2020 09:20
Flight attendants make your flying safe you ignorant.
Izme;-;
31 3月 2021 08:21
I think that is wrong you see robots can also break easy, if there is a drunk passenger or causing harm robots can break with their wires. In medical procedures or any emergency humans would be faster than the robots having to mechanically bend down taking longer than humans.
JD (极有可能)
20 4月 2019 05:36
With the lousy customer service and the awfully attitudes these "air stewards(esses)" possess nowadays, I wouldn't be surprised that a machine will end up doing their job not only more quickly and efficiently, but for little to no cost of maintenance on said droids compared to paying salaries w/ benefits, retirement, etc & dealing with greedy unions, to people who don't do their job properly and are not even qualified to in the first place. Given the recent horrific experiences passengers had to endure from these "flight attendants", I see machines replacing these incompetent humans in the future. It'll save the airlines plenty of revenue and avoid lawsuits and having to pay these poorly trained service attendants for mediocre to dismal services provided. The only ones to blame would be the flight attendants themselves, because a machine did a better job than they ever would.
Karen
05 5月 2019 06:17
When you have a heart attack on the plane who’s going to administer first aid to you? A robot? A flight attendant is there to save your ass not kiss it and their customer service is based on your attitude. It goes both ways
Ordinary Internet User
04 9月 2019 13:28
They will hire some flight attendants for those situations. For example, Today : 10 human flight attendants Future: 1-3 human flight attendants, 7+ robot flight attendants. Capish? :P
Eternity
22 5月 2020 04:27
With COVID, it would be ideal if airlines used robots instead. We'd rather not use flight attendant "services".
GG
09 5月 2019 16:11
JD deserves the most awful flying experiences after the rudeness he showcased here.
MC
16 7月 2023 10:31
JD I don't know what airline you have been flying on. I have been involved in the airline industry for over forty years, have traveled on numerous air carriers, and have never experienced what you have described in terms of lacking flight attendant professionalism, training, emergency, and medical preparedness.

I have witnessed a decline in the manners and decorum of the passengers traveling. Possibly, the added stress to passengers of airport safety procedures has taken a toll on their nerves. I remember when friends and family could accompany passengers to the gate. Now, the seats are packed in like sardines in a can.

Airline competition made the way for no-frills service and more passengers in smaller seats on airplanes. This has taken a toll on everyone's stress levels. Still, I see friendly FAs who are doing their best to accommodate everyone onboard and assuage those who are already frazzled by the time they take their seats.

A robot may make the dispersion of in-flight commodities easier but it can never take care of all of the emergencies that FAs are trained to handle, the medical emergencies, the duplicate and other seating problems, the myriad of human interactions that FA's handle, unaccompanied children, wheelchair passengers, interaction with cockpit and ground staff, etc., etc. the list goes on, not even considering a major emergency like a hijack incident.

You have vastly underestimated the uber-selective hiring, initial and ongoing training that FAs have. Did you know that they have to take FAA-mandated emergency testing yearly on every airplane which they are qualified to work and pass the test with a 90-100% grade. This includes physical testing in airplane simulators., first aide, resuscitation and cardio procedures etc.

If you see an FA behaving in the unprofessional manner you have described, you should write a letter to the airline about that employee.
Dolly
22 12月 2024 16:31
Your ex a flight attendant?

关于这个职业请留下您的评论
0/8000