概述
自动化风险
2. 用户投票
3. 增长
工资
5. 体积
描述
资源
评论

商业飞行员

中等风险
47%
您接下来想去哪里？
与朋友和家人分享您的结果。
投票 评论 (85)
或者，更深入地探索这个职业...
自动化风险
计算出的
55%
(中等风险)
投票
39%
(低风险)
Average: 47%
劳动力需求
增长
5.7%
到2033年
工资
$113,080
或每小时 $54.36
体积
52,750
截至 2023
摘要
工作评分
6.2/10

人们还浏览了

计算机程序员
律师
演员
网页开发者
其他所有外科医生

计算自动化风险

55% (中等风险)

中等风险（41-60%）：中等风险的职业通常涉及常规任务，但仍需要一些人类的判断和交互。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

工作中的一些相当重要的品质难以自动化：

  • 狭窄的工作空间，尴尬的姿势

  • 手工熟练度

  • 手指灵巧

  • 帮助和照顾他人

  • 社会洞察力

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内，实现全自动化的可能性为39%。

我们的访客投票表示，这个职业被自动化的可能性很低。 然而，我们生成的自动化风险等级暗示了更高的自动化可能性：55%的自动化机会。

你认为自动化的风险是什么？

商业飞行员在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大？






情感

以下图表在有大量投票数据时会显示。这些可视化图表展示了用户投票结果随时间的变化，提供了情感趋势的重要指示。

随着时间的推移的情绪（季度）

随着时间（每年）的情绪变化

增长

相对于其他职业的快速增长

预计"Commercial Pilots"的工作空缺数量将在2033内增长5.7%

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据，该数据涵盖了从2021到2031的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2024到期.

工资

相对于其他职业，薪酬非常高。

在2023，'Commercial Pilots'的年度中位数工资为$113,080，或每小时$54。

'Commercial Pilots'的薪资比全国中位工资高135.3%，全国中位工资为$48,060。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比，工作机会的适中范围。

截至2023，在美国有52,750人被雇佣为'Commercial Pilots'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约< 0.001%

换句话说，大约每2 千人中就有1人被雇佣为“Commercial Pilots”。

工作描述

驾驶并导航固定翼飞机在非定期航空运输线路上的飞行，或直升机。需要商业飞行员证书。包括具有相似认证的包机飞行员，以及空中救护和空中旅游飞行员。不包括地区，国家和国际航空公司的飞行员。

SOC Code: 53-2012.00

资源

如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯，或者想要换工作，我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具，它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

评论

Leave a comment

Aranyak Maitra (适度) 21 days ago
The development of automated and remote flying technology for military equipment can be a game changer for civil aviation industry. Automation has already reduced the number of pilots from 3 to 2.
0 0 Reply
Luke (没有机会) 30 days ago
Pilots can do things robots can't. Somtimes you can't follow the rules and need to break them. Think about the gimli glider. The pilot had no landing gear, he was way too high and way too fast. He did a side slip menuveur, only able to be completed in glider aircraft. It was a risky move but it would have to be done if they wanted to land. They succeded by breaking the rules and testing the limits. That is somthing that can nevery be done by a robot.
2 0 Reply
Lucas 19 days ago
true
0 0 Reply
someone (低) 1 month ago
because there is still going to be someone watching over the ai to make sure it doesn't make mistakes and also someone needs to take over in an emergency
0 0 Reply
Mohammad 1 month ago
That is true but i don't think the AI will move to commercial planes any time soon, but for military planes, they will take 90% for sure soon
0 0 Reply
Lisa (不确定) 2 months ago
This one is tricky! I do not doubt AI could learn to proficiently drive a plane, though I do doubt if they're reliable in terms of safety. I foresee companies using this to cut costs, only to receive public outcry in return. I think the real question here is: Do we want artificial intelligence driving our planes?
2 0 Reply
Matheus (低) 3 months ago
The competent regulatory body, (FAA) is VERY conservative. So even if we had the technology, I doubt that they would allow autonomous commercial planes.
In this case, regulation is the hold-up, not the technology.
2 0 Reply
Hayden (没有机会) 4 months ago
I am training to become a pilot. Knowing how complicated everything is and how many things can go wrong, I would never step foot on an AI-flown plane. What will AI do when an emergency that it hasn't been programmed for occurs? If you go look through the history of incidents, you'll find that there are way more complicated issues than a simple engine failure that can occur. Not to mention the concern of hacking.
1 2 Reply
Not important 2 months ago
Remember that AI is able to think. It's not like a random program that runs to control the plane. AI will have ALL the information on the internet. So, it is difficult for you but not for AI.

And mind you, most plane accidents happen due to pilot error. :) AI can eliminate that.
0 1 Reply
Lisa 2 months ago
I'm not sure if the term "think" would be best for the situation. I say AI uses logic and percentile to decide what is best, based off of what humans have done before. Looking at the success rates, artificial intelligence picks out which route is safest and goes with it.

I agree with you, although there are some concerns with how AI could work in unique emergencies that have never occurred in the past, and how AI would work with the human crew members.
3 0 Reply
Ryan (没有机会) 4 months ago
It's already dangerous enough as it is so I don't think it'll be wise to let AI take control of planes, especially with all its faults. Maybe in 50 years at least.
0 2 Reply
Anonymous 14 days ago
You are in more danger driving your car to work then taking a flight to Chicago.
0 0 Reply
.. 4 months ago
planes are the single safest form of transportation there is but i agree it will take atleast 50 yrs
0 1 Reply
asdf (低) 4 months ago
people don't trust em
0 0 Reply
Bao Nam (没有机会) 5 months ago
Because flying airplanes is very hard to do, if done not correctly, the plane could crash, the A.I is smart but some times the A.I will have errors that cannot be fixed. I think just that.
2 0 Reply
Sina (没有机会) 6 months ago
A human being is required to accept legal responsibility
1 0 Reply
grummangrouse45 (不确定) 6 months ago
The technology required to do it is almost here, the only significant hurdle is the trust of passengers. Once the general population trusts AI/robots enough to put their lives in it's hands, pilots won't be as needed. However, that day may never come, and there are still things which technology can't do yet (respond to emergencies, handle passengers, aircraft repairs, etc.).
2 0 Reply
Dee Snuts (没有机会) 7 months ago
If the automated system went down because of a storm or someone forgetting to turn their phone on airplane mode then every passenger is screwed
2 0 Reply
luhenba (低) 7 months ago
the reason why i have voted 'low' because anyone will not be willing to sit in a plane operated by computer or A.I without any human input and will you be comfortable to travel in a plane with only A.I inputs?
0 0 Reply
Anonymous (低) 10 months ago
People would not trust robots, which are feared, to fly them, especially when flying is also feared by most people. They would much rather trust humans who can reassure them and are experienced. Also, companies would also be hesitant to incorporate robots as many of them do not have the money required and any lawsuits following a crash would be devastating and would end the whole industry potentially.
2 0 Reply
Rip (低) 11 months ago
No flight is the same. No robot could do what sully did.
2 0 Reply
LeftE81 (没有机会) 12 months ago
They can't handle emergencies
0 0 Reply
Autofill (没有机会) 12 months ago
I can’t even trust robots driving my car let alone flying my airplane. It might also be easier to hack a robot.
0 0 Reply
Sumik Chhaliwal (低) 1 year ago
I don't think robots will fully take over the "Commercial Pilot" job 'cause you always need human intelligence instead of artificial intelligence for a safe journey.
0 0 Reply
Sai rithwik (低) 1 year ago
I don't believe robots can take on the role of commercial pilots due to the potential risks involved.

Allowing robots to operate planes that carry varying numbers of passengers, such as smaller regional jets accommodating around 50 to 100 passengers, and larger airliners like the Boeing 737 or Airbus A320 series carrying between 140 to 240 passengers, or wide-body aircraft like the Boeing 777 or Airbus A380 with capacities ranging from around 300 to over 800 passengers, could pose significant risks to people's lives.

The possibility of robot malfunctions raises concerns about placing full trust in their abilities.
1 0 Reply
Etienne (低) 1 year ago
While yes there is an auto pilot in the cockpit now a days that is not ai this is a program at this stage AI is trying to guess what will come next. So while automation will be of assistance it will not be able to handle emergencies well. Meaning there is still human intervention needed at some point
0 0 Reply

关于这个职业请留下您的评论

此网站受到reCAPTCHA和Google的隐私政策以及服务条款的保护。