概述
自动化风险
2. 用户投票
3. 增长
工资
5. 体积
描述
资源
评论

航空公司飞行员、副驾驶和飞行工程师

中等风险
52%
您接下来想去哪里？
与朋友和家人分享您的结果。
投票 评论 (78)
或者，更深入地探索这个职业...
自动化风险
计算出的
65%
(高风险)
投票
38%
(低风险)
Average: 52%
劳动力需求
增长
5.0%
到2033年
工资
$219,140
或每小时 $105.35
体积
93,670
截至 2023
摘要
工作评分
5.9/10

人们还浏览了

商业飞行员
律师
计算机程序员
演员
学前教师，小学教师，初中教师，高中教师，特殊教育教师

计算自动化风险

65% (高风险)

高风险（61-80%）：这个类别的工作面临着来自自动化的重大威胁，因为他们的许多任务可以使用当前或近期的技术轻松自动化。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

工作中的一些相当重要的品质难以自动化：

  • 手工熟练度

  • 社会洞察力

  • 手指灵巧

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内，实现全自动化的可能性为38%。

我们的访客投票表示，这个职业被自动化的可能性很低。 然而，我们生成的自动化风险等级表明自动化的可能性要高得多：有65%的机会会被自动化。

你认为自动化的风险是什么？

航空公司飞行员、副驾驶和飞行工程师在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大？






情感

以下图表在有大量投票数据时会显示。这些可视化图表展示了用户投票结果随时间的变化，提供了情感趋势的重要指示。

随着时间（每年）的情绪变化

增长

相对于其他职业，呈现适度增长。

预计"Airline Pilots, Copilots, and Flight Engineers"的工作空缺数量将在2033内增长5.0%

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据，该数据涵盖了从2021到2031的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2024到期.

工资

相对于其他职业，薪酬非常高。

在2023，'Airline Pilots, Copilots, and Flight Engineers'的年度中位数工资为$219,140，或每小时$105。

'Airline Pilots, Copilots, and Flight Engineers'的薪资比全国中位工资高356.0%，全国中位工资为$48,060。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比，工作机会的适中范围。

截至2023，在美国有93,670人被雇佣为'Airline Pilots, Copilots, and Flight Engineers'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约0.06%

换句话说，大约每1 千人中就有1人被雇佣为“Airline Pilots, Copilots, and Flight Engineers”。

工作描述

驾驶并导航固定翼飞机的飞行，通常在预定的航空运输路线上，用于运输乘客和货物。需要联邦航空运输证书和对所使用的特定飞机类型的评级。包括地区，全国和国际航空公司飞行员以及航空公司飞行员的飞行教练。

SOC Code: 53-2011.00

资源

如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯，或者想要换工作，我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具，它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

评论

Leave a comment

Mason Braswelle (没有机会) 23 days ago
The amount of things pilots have to do in order to ensure safe flights is astounding, not to mention that if something were to go wrong, what would the robot even do?
0 0 Reply
Jeremy (低) 1 month ago
Although the actual flight operation can be managed by AI, there is always the chance that the AI will fail at controlling the plane. Also there is always different situations for landing and takeoff, AI won't always be able to predict and maneuver the next move.
0 0 Reply
rorik 3 months ago
consider that nothing manufactured by humans are perfect, with such a reality, you cannot assume that a robot/ai could do it's job flawlessly. there are ethical decisions in emergencies that must be made in the cockpit that an ai simply cannot do. furthermore, redundancy is a core value in aviation, and until human manufacturing is perfect (arguably wont ever be), a pilot will always be needed in the cockpit as a form of redundancy in case the manufactured systems malfunction.
1 0 Reply
dan (低) 3 months ago
ask yourself this question, how would you feel if the most beloved person to you was on a plane controlled by a robot that could be hacked, glitch, or malfunction
0 0 Reply
Anonymous 4 months ago
The technology exists, but is it socially acceptable? It’s similar to how self driving cars have been a thing since the late 90s (couldn’t believe it either), and have become more mainstream in the last few years. Pilots will probably lose their jobs when people become comfortable flying in fully autonomous aircraft. However, emergencies can still happen, so it will probably take even longer for machines to take over.
1 1 Reply
bob (极有可能) 5 months ago
1 word autopilot
1 4 Reply
L 3 months ago
Who said that an autopilot is more reliable than a human captain?
0 0 Reply
Anonymous (适度) 5 months ago
Because pilots even today have a sizeable portion of the piloting during flight cut out for them with autopilot and it is already so trustworthy and efficient that they can sleep around a half hour while autopilot is on before being woken up by an alarm. Though this is balanced out by takeoff and landing which is much more tricky to automate and there is still the need for pilot input during emergencies
0 1 Reply
LBFEBNL (适度) 5 months ago
If wanted, the aircraft manufacturer could easily develop a computer to follow all the instructions that pilots need to follow too, like taxiing, departure (still needs human help), cruising (already taken over by autopilot but still needs human help if an emergency happens), and landing.

That is for the pilot. For the co-pilot, it is highly likely because the A.I. doesn't need to do all the instructions; they just do half of it, and the rest the pilot will handle.

For the flight engineer, I think it has a lower chance of getting replaced by A.I. or some sort of computer.

But this is overall just my opinion.
0 1 Reply
p 4 months ago
flight engineers arent a thing anymore... they havent been very common since like 90s
1 0 Reply
James (适度) 5 months ago
Yeah the 64% chance scares my freind who is a pilot
0 1 Reply
criag (没有机会) 5 months ago
There are many airlines that want soft, silky landings and not slammy, hard, ai- landings
1 0 Reply
Josh (低) 5 months ago
It is a very complex job that requires concentration and multitasking of witch a robot can't di
1 0 Reply
1 4 months ago
although i agree a robot cant do everything a pilot has to do robots are still much better at multitasking than humans ever will be
0 0 Reply
. (低) 9 months ago
you will always need humans incase something happened. its possible but not in the next 20 years
0 0 Reply
Luca (极有可能) 12 months ago
Automated flight is already a well-established reality, the pilot on board serves only to reassure passengers who are not yet accustomed to the idea of a completely automated flight.
0 1 Reply
Oxtin Poss 6 months ago
We are no where near completely autonomous flight. We barely have self-driving cars, which are normally confined to certain parameters. There are so many variables and things that could go wrong, that it simply isn’t viable yet.
1 0 Reply
boo (低) 12 months ago
Automation has the ability to control events in a certain context, and wouldn't be able to handle an emergency or malfunction, considering the usual age of aircraft computers.
0 0 Reply
Harry (低) 1 year ago
Landing and take off needs accurate readings and a lot of man power we also need to understand the runway so it my not be
0 0 Reply
KickinTyres (低) 1 year ago
The public's perception of safety is intrinsically connected to having human pilots in the cockpit.
0 0 Reply
Ayden (没有机会) 1 year ago
New plane can fly it self but they still need pilot or co pilot to make sure nothing is going wrong especially when it is landing
0 0 Reply
Alneez (适度) 1 year ago
Airbus Project Dragonfly
0 0 Reply
C.L.M. (没有机会) 1 year ago
It is not a technological issue, it is a sociological, legislative, and regulatory one.

People are too anxious to get on a plane without another human being up front with their life and safety on the line. This will be even more true as we move through the inevitable accidents during automation of ground transportation. At least that's what I heard as an FAA research scientist working on future drone airspace research projects.
0 0 Reply
Captam (极有可能) 1 year ago
The “need for the human touch“ when things “go wrong“ with a flight is arguably correct However this function can be provided perfectly adequately from a remote control room. The human does not need to be sitting in the cockpit. The ability to fly precision drone operarions from control rooms thousands of miles away proves this. Flights can be totally automated but when an abnormality occurs, the controllers （who oversee multiple flights）can be alerted, and intervene renotely if necessaey.
0 0 Reply
AJ 3 months ago
Those are heavy assumptions that there is strong two way communication between the aircraft and the ground station controlling it. Not a lot of the areas that airplanes are flying over will be able to maintain a constant communication (such as war zones, the arctic, or the Atlantic or Pacific Ocean) and before you say GPS keep in mind it works by sending low bit data so that doesn’t exactly work well when complicated or heavy computing conditions exist. Plus if you can control it remotely so can someone else looking to cause trouble.
1 0 Reply

关于这个职业请留下您的评论

此网站受到reCAPTCHA和Google的隐私政策以及服务条款的保护。