警察和警长巡逻官员

最小风险
15%
您接下来想去哪里?
与朋友和家人分享您的结果。
投票 评论 (28)
或者,更深入地探索这个职业...
自动化风险
计算出的
6%
(最小风险)
投票
23%
(低风险)
Average: 15%
劳动力需求
增长
3.9%
到2033年
工资
$72,280
或每小时 $34.75
体积
646,310
截至 2023
摘要
工作评分
7.2/10

人们还浏览了

计算自动化风险

6% (最小风险)

最小风险(0-20%):这一类别的职业被自动化的可能性较低,因为它们通常需要复杂的问题解决能力,创造力,强大的人际交往能力和高度的手动灵巧。这些工作通常涉及复杂的手部动作和精确的协调,使得机器难以复制所需的任务。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

工作中的一些非常重要的品质很难实现自动化:

  • 帮助和照顾他人

工作中的一些相当重要的品质难以自动化:

  • 社会洞察力

  • 说服

  • 谈判

  • 原创性

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内,实现全自动化的可能性为23%

我们的访客投票表示,这个职业被自动化的可能性很低。 这个评估进一步得到了通过计算得出的自动化风险等级的支持,该等级预计有6%的机会实现自动化。

你认为自动化的风险是什么?

警察和警长巡逻官员在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大?






情感

以下图表在有大量投票数据时会显示。这些可视化图表展示了用户投票结果随时间的变化,提供了情感趋势的重要指示。

随着时间(每年)的情绪变化

增长

相对于其他职业,呈现适度增长

预计"Police and Sheriff's Patrol Officers"的工作空缺数量将在2033内增长3.9%

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据,该数据涵盖了从2021到2031的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2024到期.

工资

相对于其他职业来说薪酬高

在2023,'Police and Sheriff's Patrol Officers'的年度中位数工资为$72,280,或每小时$34。

'Police and Sheriff's Patrol Officers'的薪资比全国中位工资高50.4%,全国中位工资为$48,060。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比,明显更多的工作机会范围。

截至2023,在美国有646,310人被雇佣为'Police and Sheriff's Patrol Officers'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约0.43%

换句话说,大约每234人中就有1人被雇佣为“Police and Sheriff's Patrol Officers”。

工作描述

通过执行地方、部落、州或联邦法律和法规,维护秩序并保护生命和财产。执行以下职责的组合:巡逻特定区域;指挥交通;发出交通传票;调查事故;逮捕和拘留嫌疑人,或执行法院的法律程序。包括在教育机构工作的警察。

SOC Code: 33-3051.00

资源

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯,或者想要换工作,我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具,它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

评论

Leave a comment

burt (低) 1 month ago
if a robot pulls me over im driving away
0 0 Reply
Damanpreet Singh (没有机会) 8 months ago
How is supposed to change Because it’s a human kind of human can feel about the person
0 2 Reply
Kevin 8 months ago
It would work great because the AI would know the law and wouldn't retaliate against people they don't like.
0 3 Reply
matthew fitzgerald (低) 12 months ago
robo cops wouldn't work because you would have to program them to have emotions, so they don't go into overdrive and kill or destroy everything.
3 4 Reply
Deputy Dredd (低) 1 year ago
the question is would people find an automated law enforcement officer more credible than a human police officer. I think there will be more Artificial intelligence added to the job but not all automation as we currently understand computers
0 0 Reply
Sam 1 year ago
The public will likely never allow it to pass the legislature due to lack of trust for the technology.
0 0 Reply
Caleb (低) 1 year ago
Many aspects of this profession require a human element (i.e., emotional intelligence, de-escalation, interviewing, rapport building, etc.) that current AI technology is incapable of reproducing at this time.
0 0 Reply
Philip Low (低) 1 year ago
Although unlikely I do believe that more technology will be Implemented into day to day policing and such tasks as processing criminals may become automated but a lot of the human elements will never be automated.
0 0 Reply
Kirsten 1 year ago
Where I am from, they have automated speed radars and red light traffic cameras. Both of which will capture the vehicle registration and issue a ticket. Just saying. I agree it's safe from full take-over, but some changes will present.
0 0 Reply
Martin 3 years ago
Partially replaced for sure. There will likely always be some people, but you can replace a lot of the monotonous work with machines. Cameras and sensors can spot speeders and light runners. The new Boston Dynamics robots can do backhand springs. One cop could send a host of A.I. swarm bots to a crack house and handle it like a video game. Quadcopters, mechanical mice with cameras and microphones, armed dog bots, humanoid arrest bots, and self-driving cars.
0 0 Reply
Will 3 years ago
Over a year and NOBODY made a "Robocop" reference? The internet has disappointed me once again.
0 0 Reply
Steve W. 3 years ago
Imagine a cop that doesn't get emotional, doesn't have an ego, doesn't care about politics, and never uses the excuse, "I was afraid for my life."

Yes, we need AI-controlled robotic cops immediately. Many lives will be saved.
0 1 Reply
Metrixfr 6 months ago
Ok so if a criminal is about to boot your head off and send u 6ft under u would just allow that to happen. Your response is u just being completely delulu and do u really think a robot would be able to arrest a criminal with out humans help like I'm pretty sure a criminal would just destroy it and run away bruv.
1 0 Reply
Antonio 10 months ago
Ok buddy 😂
0 0 Reply
Sam 1 year ago
“Many lives”

In 2022 only about 1,000 deaths caused by police officers occurred and most were justified. There’s over 700,000 police officers to date, which comes out to less than 1% of all police officers in the entire USA.

You’re being completely ridiculous.
1 0 Reply
Angel Vollant (没有机会) 4 years ago
No chance. Policing requires critical thinking, logic, situational assessment and decision-making which can’t fit into a program. When a police officer sees someone committing a crime, it’s up to them to decide what to do. If a man’s smoking pot alone in the park, do they deserve to be arrested? The cop will go up to them, talk a bit, leave a warning and may or may not leave a ticket depending on how the man acts. If he’s polite and cooperative, the officer will probably let him off with a warning. If he’s erratic and violent, he’ll arrest him. A robot, however, won’t think that far. Sees someone committing a crime (smoking pot) and simply arrest him. If he doesn’t comply, use violence. They’re programmed to do what the programmer put into it. If someone has a knife, take them out. Simple as that. Doesn’t matter if it’s a woman defending herself against an abuser. The robot’ll see a knife and shoot her. Robocop explained it very well. Police officers need compassion and emotions. If you could program a robot to do that, you’ve got yourself a human.
0 0 Reply
Anon 11 months ago
It's over 3 years since your post. AI has greatly progressed. I don't think anyone in 2020 thought AI would be where it is now. AI can easily do all the critical thinking, logic, situational assessment and decision-making, and it might not be available yet, but it is apparent that it can fit inside a program. What is more difficult is that policing requires a physical presence. Robotics just isn't there yet, and even if it ever does get there, you'd basically need a highly expensive robot to replace each individual officer. Whereas AI on a single server with access to multiple phone lines (and ai voice automation) can easily replace a 100+ person office.

It's not impossible for AI to take over policing, but due to economic factors, it is likely one of the least at-risk professions to be taken over by AI
0 0 Reply
mister sir 4 years ago
I think it's good that they have a low chance of being replaced by robots because although humans can be biased, humans make better decisions and can pick up on clues or emotions better.
0 0 Reply
My name isn't your bidness. (不确定) 4 years ago
There is a lot of talk about things like the androids from D:BH so I think it could go either way if artificial intelligence is improved.
0 0 Reply
Khan (低) 4 years ago
Competent police officers require human communication skills and human coordination (for the later see the old “robots struggle to walk up stairs” problem)
0 0 Reply
frankie (低) 4 years ago
as police need to have good decision making skills as robots do not
0 0 Reply
Anonomous (低) 4 years ago
THAT IS CRAZY HOW WOULD THEY GET COPS REPLACED!??!!?
0 0 Reply
A 4 months ago
It will be like Robocop, but the human is replaced with AI.
0 0 Reply
Meep (不确定) 4 years ago
Because if you only go up to 20 years from now it may change past then.
0 0 Reply
Lachlan Beck (没有机会) 5 years ago
Because Robots lack the feeling of emotions and aren't able to be empathetic to other humans or robots therefore they lack a key skill of being an officer
0 0 Reply

关于这个职业请留下您的评论

此网站受到reCAPTCHA和Google的隐私政策以及服务条款的保护。