Hademe ve Temizlikçiler, Hizmetliler ve Ev Temizlikçileri Hariç

Yüksek Risk
67%
Sıradaki Gitmek İstediğiniz Yer Neresi?
Sonuçlarınızı arkadaşlarınız ve ailenizle paylaşın.
Veya, Bu Mesleği Daha Ayrıntılı Keşfedin...
OTOMASYON RİSKİ
HESAPLANAN
76%
(Yüksek Risk)
ANKET YAPMA
59%
(Orta Risk)
Average: 67%
İŞGÜCÜ TALEBİ
BÜYÜME
3,1%
yıl 2033 itibariyle
ÜCRETLER
$35.020
veya saat başına $16,84
Hacim
2.172.500
2023 itibariyle
ÖZET
İŞ SKORU
2,9/10

İnsanlar ayrıca inceledi

Hesaplanmış otomasyon riski

76% (Yüksek Risk)

Yüksek Risk (61-80%): Bu kategorideki işler, görevlerinin çoğu mevcut veya yakın gelecekteki teknolojiler kullanılarak kolayca otomatikleştirilebileceği için otomasyondan önemli bir tehditle karşı karşıyadır.

Bu puanın ne olduğu ve nasıl hesaplandığına dair daha fazla bilgi burada 'da mevcuttur.

İşin bazı oldukça önemli özellikleri otomatikleştirmek için zordur:

  • El Becerisi

Kullanıcı anketi

Önümüzdeki iki on yıl içinde tam otomasyona geçme şansı 59%

Ziyaretçilerimiz, bu mesleğin otomatikleştirilip otomatikleştirilmeyeceğinden emin olmadıklarını belirtmişler. Ancak, oluşturduğumuz otomasyon risk seviyesi, otomasyonun çok daha yüksek bir ihtimal olduğunu öne sürmektedir: %76% otomasyon şansı.

Otomasyonun riski hakkında ne düşünüyorsunuz?

Hademe ve Temizlikçiler, Hizmetliler ve Ev Temizlikçileri Hariçın önümüzdeki 20 yıl içinde robotlar veya yapay zeka tarafından değiştirilme olasılığı nedir?






Duygu

Aşağıdaki grafik, anlamlı veriler sunmak için yeterli miktarda oy bulunduğunda eklenir. Bu görsel temsiller, kullanıcı anket sonuçlarını zaman içinde göstererek duygu eğilimlerine dair önemli bir gösterge sağlar.

Zaman içindeki duygu durumu (yıllık)

Büyüme

Diğer mesleklerle kıyaslandığında yavaş büyüme.

'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners' iş ilanlarının sayısının 2033 yılına kadar 3,1% artması bekleniyor.

Toplam istihdam ve tahmini iş açılışları

* 2021 ve 2031 arasındaki dönem için İşgücü İstatistikleri Bürosu'ndan alınan veriler. Lütfen çevirinin mantıklı ve web sitesi kullanımı için uygun olduğundan emin olun.
Güncellenmiş projeksiyonlar 09-2024 tarihinde teslim edilmelidir..

Ücretler

Diğer mesleklere göre çok düşük ücretli

2023 yılında, 'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners' için medyan yıllık ücret $35.020 idi, yani saat başına $16.

'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners' ulusal medyan ücretin 27,1% altında ödeme aldı, bu da $48.060 olarak belirlendi.

Zaman içindeki ücretler

* İşgücü İstatistikleri Bürosu'ndan alınan veriler.

Hacim

Diğer mesleklere kıyasla önemli ölçüde daha fazla iş fırsatı yelpazesi

2023 itibariyle Amerika Birleşik Devletleri'nde 2.172.500 kişi 'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners' olarak istihdam edilmiştir.

Bu, ülke genelindeki istihdam edilen iş gücünün yaklaşık olarak %1,4%'ını temsil eder.

Başka bir deyişle, her 69 kişiden biri 'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners' olarak istihdam edilmektedir.

İş tanımı

Binaları temiz ve düzenli durumda tutun. Ağır temizlik görevlerini yerine getirin, örneğin zeminleri temizlemek, halıları şampuanlamak, duvarları ve camları yıkamak ve çöpleri çıkarmak. Görevler, fırın ve kazanı idare etmeyi, rutin bakım faaliyetlerini gerçekleştirmeyi, onarım ihtiyacı konusunda yönetimi bilgilendirmeyi ve kaldırımdan kar veya enkazı temizlemeyi içerebilir.

SOC Code: 37-2011.00

Kaynaklar

Yeni bir kariyere başlama veya iş değiştirme düşünceniz varsa, size mükemmel yeni rolü bulmanızda yardımcı olabilecek kullanışlı bir iş arama aracı oluşturduk.

Yerel bölgenizde iş arayın

Yorumlar

Leave a comment

Mike 4 months ago
Lol not even close. Laughably high %. More than a web developer? I'd like to see a robot clean up after a basketball game. Climb the bleachers, go under the bleachers, put away chairs, scoreboard, cords, mics, etc, lock doors, clean glass, scrape gum, auto scrub, spot mop, rinse out a garbage can. There are way too many unique tasks imo.
1 0 Reply
Johan Smitten (Hiç şansı yok) 4 months ago
It's not complicated work, but even tasks like mopping and scrubbing toilets don't seem like something any modern robot can do. Even if Japan whipped something up, it just wouldn't make financial sense to buy and maintain a robot over hiring a minimum wage worker.
0 0 Reply
Bryck (Düşük) 7 months ago
Unless a new technological breakthrough occurs, the risk of janitors being replaced are quite low. Vocational academies can earn revenue and employ a major sector of janitors. Above vocational qualifications, though, is the fact that automation in this specific sector does not increase productivity at all. Not only do vocational schools help earn more revenue, but automation costs a lot more than simply employing janitors.
0 0 Reply
Jeff (Belirsiz) 9 months ago
The technology of AI has a couple or three more decades before it can become reliable enough to do repetitive tasks and the maintenance of such machines is especially high as they have a lot of technical issues so the reliability of such automation is a ways off.
0 0 Reply
Josh (Düşük) 1 year ago
I can see automation doing things like cleaning floors and tables but i can't see it being cost effective to have a bot do everything a janitor does in a normal day. everything from taking trash out and throwing it in the dumpsters to shampooing stains out of carpets to removing vandalism and cleaning complex surfaces like toilets and sinks. Not to mention tasks like opening up and refilling toilet paper and paper towel dispensers.

Don't get me wrong, i think it could be done, i just think the cost would be outrageous and that somebody would still often have to step in for unusual messes and vandalism.
0 0 Reply
Kory Hasch (Düşük) 1 year ago
Because machines can operate on a basic level, and deep cleaning requires human judgment.
0 0 Reply
Mike (Hiç şansı yok) 1 year ago
In offices, schools, factories, and public spaces like malls and restaurants, I do not believe janitorial is at risk for automation. In order to make the tasks involved more able to be automated, they would have to do two things:

A. Invest significantly in equipment and processes that make the tasks much easier to do, and
B. Put a lot of personal responsibility on the people causing messes, generating the trash, and otherwise making the work that is needed to be done.

For A, restrooms would have to be redesigned with standards for toilets, urinals, sinks, etc where automated brushes could easily reach them. Trash receptacles would also need regular emptying and cleaning. It could be done, and I believe they've even invented self-cleaning restrooms where it basically treats the entire interior like a dishwasher, locking it off and doing high pressure sprays with sanitizing chemicals. It would be very very expensive to redesign them in such a way, not to mention the ongoing maintenance costs of such precision equipment. Similar with locker/shower rooms, kitchenettes, and break areas.

For B, in order for desk waste receptacle collection to be automated, office workers would need to actually throw trash inside the trash can and not beside, behind, or underneath. They would need to have it in a fixed position, and keep the area in front of it clear, and not obstructed with personal items, stacks of paper, or other junk. Similar to automated vacuum robots, they would need the area they're to clean free of obstacles. The best way to clean greasy fingerprints off glass doors is simply not have them there in the first place; train people to put their hands on the handle. Office workers in particular are incredibly inconsiderate of the work they leave for others, and office facilities would rather hire double the amount of cleaning staff to be demeaned and jump through ridiculous and unnecessary hoops.

The amount of investment needed to automate janitorial tasks would be incredibly high. If they really wanted to save money, they could instantly probably cut 25-50% of their workforce budget by being considerate to others. But they'd much rather waste money on digging their heels into classism, ensuring there are "servants" to look down upon.
0 0 Reply
Not a robot (Hiç şansı yok) 1 year ago
cleaning seems automated but its very much not. you may do same tasks, but a robot wont be cheaper to maintain then hiring a person. and you would need like a robot for each specific task then someone to repair robot if it breaks down. Just do not see AI replacing janitors.
0 0 Reply
Max Dragonard (Son derece muhtemel) 3 years ago
Perfect job for a robot.
0 0 Reply
thao (Son derece muhtemel) 3 years ago
There is lots of money to be made with automation, robotics, AI. Still, we won't see cleaning robotic or humanoid for a least 10 - 15 yrs, my opinion cause companies are taking ages to make it perfect like human-like, robotic but then I am too old I will be retired anyway.
0 0 Reply
Experienced Cleaner (Hiç şansı yok) 3 years ago
No matter how sophisticated the AI and software, plus the sensing technology a robot has, it will still require humans to train, service, and operate it. Its interface will have to be simplified enough to where its operator can program and run it, while focusing on the less predictable aspects of the cleaning work. AI and automation will only reduce the turnover rate and increase wages in this occupation.
0 0 Reply
Ben (Belirsiz) 3 years ago
Addressing Peter's comment that states robots and artificial intelligence cannot be made to cope with the unpredictability of dealing with people.

I am currently writing this comment using an artificial intelligence aid. It is called Grammarly. I write rather well on my own, the help though is appreciated. It can improvise upon what I'm going to write.

Does this mean it reads my mind? No, it uses algorithms to prognosticate what is coming based upon my previous writing. From that, it can then access other algorithms that study grammatical rules and policies. That allows it to use an algorithm to assist my writing by editing.

My point being case variables in programmatic instructions can be defined so as to "follow" and "cope" with people. I work as a custodian presently for our county's public schools, which we have from pre-school to grade twelve. Children are the most unpredictable of all humans.

I can easily see how timing schedules, sensors, algorithms could all be put in place to cut my workload by two-thirds, or more. My work can be greatly automated. Still, there would need to be technicians both to repair the physical and mechanical aspects and to repair the computing code at times. So I say it could go either way.
0 0 Reply
Ron Leffers 4 years ago
there will less people working with robots but more people doing other things
0 0 Reply
Jayden (Son derece muhtemel) 4 years ago
We’ve already got little cleaning technology and I think it would be good to have robots that would just do this
0 0 Reply
Peter (Düşük) 5 years ago
This job deal with people and unpredictable action of people make difficult to created AI capable do do it. That was reason why was stopped it development. Job my be changed from actual cleaning to preparing area for robots.
0 0 Reply

Bu meslek hakkında bir yanıt bırakın

Bu site, reCAPTCHA ve Google Gizlilik Politikası ve Hizmet Şartları tarafından korunmaktadır.