Genel Bakış
Otomasyon Riski
2. Kullanıcı Anketi
3. Büyüme
4. Ücretler
5. Hacim
Tanım
Kaynaklar
Yorumlar

Uçuş Görevlileri

OTOMASYON RİSKİ
HESAPLANAN
38%
risk seviyesi
ANKET YAPMA
39%
418 oy üzerinden
İŞGÜCÜ TALEBİ
BÜYÜME
20,8%
yıl 2032 itibariyle
ÜCRETLER
63.760 $
veya saat başına 30,65 $
Hacim
108.480
2022 itibariyle
ÖZET
İŞ SKORU
6,7/10

Bu özeti sitenizde ister misiniz? Gömme kodu:

Oy Verin
Yorumlar (22)

Otomasyon riski

38% (Düşük Risk)

Düşük Risk (21-40%): Bu seviyedeki işlerin otomasyona geçme riski sınırlıdır, çünkü teknik ve insan odaklı becerilerin bir karışımını talep ederler.

Bu puanın ne olduğu ve nasıl hesaplandığına dair daha fazla bilgi burada 'da mevcuttur.

İşin bazı çok önemli nitelikleri otomatikleştirmek zordur:

  • Dar Çalışma Alanı, Rahatsız Edici Pozisyonlar

  • Diğerlerine Yardım Etme ve Onlara Bakma

İşin bazı oldukça önemli özellikleri otomatikleştirmek için zordur:

  • Sosyal Algılama

  • İkna

Kullanıcı anketi

Önümüzdeki iki on yıl içinde tam otomasyona geçme şansı 39%

Ziyaretçilerimiz, bu mesleğin otomatikleşme şansının düşük olduğunu belirtmişlerdir. Bu değerlendirme, otomasyon risk seviyesinin hesaplanması ile daha da desteklenmektedir, bu da otomasyonun %38% olasılığını tahmin eder.

Otomasyonun riski hakkında ne düşünüyorsunuz?

Uçuş Görevlileriın önümüzdeki 20 yıl içinde robotlar veya yapay zeka tarafından değiştirilme olasılığı nedir?






Duygu

Aşağıdaki grafik(ler), anlamlı veri oluşturmak için önemli miktarda oy olduğu her yerde dahil edilmiştir. Bu görsel temsiller, zaman içinde kullanıcı anket sonuçlarını göstererek, duygu eğilimleri hakkında önemli bir gösterge sağlar.

Zaman içindeki duygu durumu (yıllık)

Büyüme

Diğer mesleklere göre çok hızlı büyüme

'Flight Attendants' iş ilanlarının sayısının 2032 yılına kadar 20,8% artması bekleniyor.

Toplam istihdam ve tahmini iş açılışları

* 2021 ve 2031 arasındaki dönem için İşgücü İstatistikleri Bürosu'ndan alınan veriler. Lütfen çevirinin mantıklı ve web sitesi kullanımı için uygun olduğundan emin olun.
Güncellenmiş projeksiyonlar 09-2023 tarihinde teslim edilmelidir..

Ücretler

Diğer mesleklere göre yüksek maaşlı

2022 yılında, 'Flight Attendants' için medyan yıllık ücret 63.760 $ idi, yani saat başına 30 $.

'Flight Attendants' ulusal medyan ücretin, 46.310 $ olduğu yerde, %37,7% daha yüksek bir ücret aldılar.

Zaman içindeki ücretler

* İşgücü İstatistikleri Bürosu'ndan alınan veriler.

Hacim

Diğer mesleklere kıyasla daha geniş iş olanakları yelpazesi

2022 itibariyle Amerika Birleşik Devletleri'nde 108.480 kişi 'Flight Attendants' olarak istihdam edilmiştir.

Bu, ülke genelindeki istihdam edilen iş gücünün yaklaşık olarak %0,07%'ını temsil eder.

Başka bir deyişle, her 1 bin kişiden biri 'Flight Attendants' olarak istihdam edilmektedir.

İş tanımı

Uçak kabininin güvenliğini izleyin. Havayolu yolcularına hizmetler sunun, güvenlik bilgilerini açıklayın, yiyecek ve içecek servisi yapın ve acil durum olaylarına yanıt verin.

SOC Code: 53-2031.00

Kaynaklar

Yeni bir kariyere başlama veya iş değiştirme düşünceniz varsa, size mükemmel yeni rolü bulmanızda yardımcı olabilecek kullanışlı bir iş arama aracı oluşturduk.

Yerel bölgenizde iş arayın

Yorumlar

Yorum bırakın

"Anonymous (Son derece muhtemel) diyor ki"
You automate the plane to give instructions during turbulence and emergencies. Ease passengers into by updating the seats, rows, and overhead panels with attendants still onboard. From a safety perspective what is 2 attendants per class going to do for 20+ people, nothing other than give instruction and help 1 or 2 women and children. After introducing passengers to those improvements kick it up a notch and introduce 1 robot attendant for every 1 human attendant. This robot would initially be programmed to serve drinks and snacks. You would order it prior to the flight and on your phone or TV during the flight. Now that you have safety and procedures programmed right in to the plane and passengers have interacted with it over the last 10 years with a few iterations to their programming over time and passengers have been able to be served by a robot, the in cabin experience can now be fully automated. You could even design the robots to be smaller in size to fit more than two attendants in the class. Ultimately decreasing burnout by human staff, boarding times, the time it takes to get to the customer, etc.
Mar 23, 2024 at 12:38 ÖS
"PK (Hiç şansı yok) diyor ki"
FAA requires a crew member 1 for every 50. Flight attendant position is based on safety and security designated by FAA not customer service!!!
Jan 29, 2024 at 02:41 ÖÖ
"tony (Düşük) diyor ki"
You're still going to need human intervention in an emergency. There are too many changes on a moments notice during flight to completely trust it to AI.
Jun 02, 2023 at 08:39 ÖS
"Philip (Belirsiz) diyor ki"
I think aspects of the job could be automated but parts of the job won't be
May 12, 2023 at 06:40 ÖS
"Sofie (Son derece muhtemel) diyor ki"
Humans can decide quicker in an emergency situation, but robots can take a while.

Plus, robots can't do such things as CPR or use a first aid kit, for example. So, it's pretty risky.
Aug 08, 2022 at 06:37 ÖS
"h (Düşük) diyor ki"
AI and robots could mess up emergencies and need a connection to stay "alive"
Dec 31, 2021 at 01:27 ÖÖ
"A flight attendant (Düşük) diyor ki"
By federal law (FAA), there needs to be 1 flight attendant per 50 seats on a plane. The number can never decrease even with robots. Good luck getting those robots to handle medical emergencies or breaking up fights between ignorant passengers or helping all you ungrateful passengers evacuate during an emergency in 90 seconds or less with no ability of rational thought LOL
Dec 06, 2021 at 04:31 ÖS
"Collin Tredo (Düşük) diyor ki"
This job requires a friendly human face, people will be less comfortable having to talk to and trust a robot/AI when they get on a plane.
May 17, 2021 at 05:00 ÖS
"A (Hiç şansı yok) diyor ki"
Flight attendants use their knowledge to solve a situation given the surprise factor... it’s impossible to programme a robot that knows how to act in front of a surprise factor situation.

And by the way flight attendants are there to save u not to make u happy.

First priority is safety the If it’s possible the service time will come.
Apr 10, 2021 at 10:07 ÖÖ
"Spiros (Hiç şansı yok) diyor ki"
Flight attendants are there for one specific reason: safety. For this, human presence is important
Apr 10, 2021 at 01:55 ÖÖ
"Erebus (Düşük) diyor ki"
It involves emotional labour which only a human is capable of.
Mar 24, 2021 at 05:52 ÖS
"JP (Ilımlı) diyor ki"
With the global pandemic focusing minds on the amount of human contact passengers have on flights, I could see cabin crew being reduced in number to improve safety, with a Purser and assistant at each end of the aircraft being supplemented by robots which would handle more of the non-emergency workload. Robots would reduce the expense of accommodating cabin crew at destinations and would be able to clean the cabin autonomously using UV lights to disinfect the cabin air and surfaces.
Aug 02, 2020 at 04:53 ÖS
"A flight attendant (Hiç şansı yok) diyor ki"
Will absolutely not happen. What most do not realize is that flight attendants are on board for safety. It's just not something that can be replaced by robots.
Jul 22, 2020 at 08:27 ÖÖ
"Ebork (Son derece muhtemel) diyor ki"
Flight attendants make or break flying. They'll be robots soon enough.
Jan 03, 2020 at 11:48 ÖÖ
"THM diyor ki"
Flight attendants make your flying safe you ignorant.
Jun 27, 2020 at 09:20 ÖÖ
"Izme;-; diyor ki"
I think that is wrong you see robots can also break easy, if there is a drunk passenger or causing harm robots can break with their wires. In medical procedures or any emergency humans would be faster than the robots having to mechanically bend down taking longer than humans.
Mar 31, 2021 at 08:21 ÖÖ
"JD (Son derece muhtemel) diyor ki"
With the lousy customer service and the awfully attitudes these "air stewards(esses)" possess nowadays, I wouldn't be surprised that a machine will end up doing their job not only more quickly and efficiently, but for little to no cost of maintenance on said droids compared to paying salaries w/ benefits, retirement, etc & dealing with greedy unions, to people who don't do their job properly and are not even qualified to in the first place.

Given the recent horrific experiences passengers had to endure from these "flight attendants", I see machines replacing these incompetent humans in the future. It'll save the airlines plenty of revenue and avoid lawsuits and having to pay these poorly trained service attendants for mediocre to dismal services provided.

The only ones to blame would be the flight attendants themselves, because a machine did a better job than they ever would.
Apr 20, 2019 at 05:36 ÖÖ
"Karen diyor ki"
When you have a heart attack on the plane who’s going to administer first aid to you? A robot? A flight attendant is there to save your ass not kiss it and their customer service is based on your attitude. It goes both ways
May 05, 2019 at 06:17 ÖÖ
"GG diyor ki"
JD deserves the most awful flying experiences after the rudeness he showcased here.
May 09, 2019 at 04:11 ÖS
"MC diyor ki"
JD I don't know what airline you have been flying on. I have been involved in the airline industry for over forty years, have traveled on numerous air carriers, and have never experienced what you have described in terms of lacking flight attendant professionalism, training, emergency, and medical preparedness.

I have witnessed a decline in the manners and decorum of the passengers traveling. Possibly, the added stress to passengers of airport safety procedures has taken a toll on their nerves. I remember when friends and family could accompany passengers to the gate. Now, the seats are packed in like sardines in a can.

Airline competition made the way for no-frills service and more passengers in smaller seats on airplanes. This has taken a toll on everyone's stress levels. Still, I see friendly FAs who are doing their best to accommodate everyone onboard and assuage those who are already frazzled by the time they take their seats.

A robot may make the dispersion of in-flight commodities easier but it can never take care of all of the emergencies that FAs are trained to handle, the medical emergencies, the duplicate and other seating problems, the myriad of human interactions that FA's handle, unaccompanied children, wheelchair passengers, interaction with cockpit and ground staff, etc., etc. the list goes on, not even considering a major emergency like a hijack incident.

You have vastly underestimated the uber-selective hiring, initial and ongoing training that FAs have. Did you know that they have to take FAA-mandated emergency testing yearly on every airplane which they are qualified to work and pass the test with a 90-100% grade. This includes physical testing in airplane simulators., first aide, resuscitation and cardio procedures etc.

If you see an FA behaving in the unprofessional manner you have described, you should write a letter to the airline about that employee.
Jul 16, 2023 at 10:31 ÖÖ

Bu meslek hakkında bir yanıt bırakın

Bu site, reCAPTCHA ve Google Gizlilik Politikası ve Hizmet Şartları tarafından korunmaktadır.

İnsanlar ayrıca inceledi

Avukatlar
Bilgisayar Programcıları
Oyuncular
Havayolu Pilotları, Yardımcı Pilotlar ve Uçuş Mühendisleri
Grafik Tasarımcılar