Uçuş Görevlileri

Düşük Risk
37%

Sıradaki Gitmek İstediğiniz Yer Neresi?

Sonuçlarınızı arkadaşlarınız ve ailenizle paylaşın.

Veya, Bu Mesleği Daha Ayrıntılı Keşfedin...

OTOMASYON RİSKİ
HESAPLANAN
38%
(Düşük Risk)
ANKET YAPMA
37%
(Düşük Risk, 499 oy üzerinden)
Average: 37%
İŞGÜCÜ TALEBİ
BÜYÜME
9,9%
yıl 2033 itibariyle
ÜCRETLER
$68.370
veya saat başına $32,87
Hacim
126.020
2023 itibariyle
ÖZET
Bu kar tanesi neyi gösteriyor?
Kar Tanesi, beş rozetin görsel bir özetidir: Otomasyon Riski (hesaplanmış), Risk (anketli), Büyüme, Ücretler ve Hacim. Size bir mesleğin profilinin anlık bir görüntüsünü verir. Kar Tanesi'nin rengi, boyutuyla ilgilidir. Bir meslek, diğerlerine göre daha iyi puan aldıkça, Kar Tanesi daha büyük ve daha yeşil olur.
İŞ SKORU
6,9/10
Bu nedir?
İş Skoru (daha yüksek olan daha iyidir):

İşleri dört faktör kullanarak değerlendiriyoruz. Bunlar:

- Otomatikleştirilme olasılığı
- İş büyümesi
- Ücretler
- Mevcut pozisyonların hacmi

İş ararken düşünülmesi gereken bazı önemli noktalar bunlardır.

İnsanlar ayrıca inceledi

Avukatlar Bilgisayar Programcıları Oyuncular Ticari Pilotlar Grafik Tasarımcılar

Hesaplanmış otomasyon riski

38% (Düşük Risk)

Düşük Risk (21-40%): Bu seviyedeki işlerin otomasyona geçme riski sınırlıdır, çünkü teknik ve insan odaklı becerilerin bir karışımını talep ederler.

Bu puanın ne olduğu ve nasıl hesaplandığına dair daha fazla bilgi burada 'da mevcuttur.

İşin bazı çok önemli nitelikleri otomatikleştirmek zordur:

  • Dar Çalışma Alanı, Rahatsız Edici Pozisyonlar

  • Diğerlerine Yardım Etme ve Onlara Bakma

İşin bazı oldukça önemli özellikleri otomatikleştirmek için zordur:

  • Sosyal Algılama

  • İkna

Kullanıcı anketi

Önümüzdeki iki on yıl içinde tam otomasyona geçme şansı 37%

Ziyaretçilerimiz, bu mesleğin otomatikleşme şansının düşük olduğunu belirtmişlerdir. Bu değerlendirme, otomasyon risk seviyesinin hesaplanması ile daha da desteklenmektedir, bu da otomasyonun %38% olasılığını tahmin eder.

Otomasyonun riski hakkında ne düşünüyorsunuz?

Uçuş Görevlileriın önümüzdeki 20 yıl içinde robotlar veya yapay zeka tarafından değiştirilme olasılığı nedir?

Duygu

Aşağıdaki grafik, anlamlı veriler üretmek için yeterli oy olduğunda gösterilir. Kullanıcı anket sonuçlarını zaman içinde göstererek, duygu eğilimlerinin net bir göstergesini sağlar.

Zaman içindeki duygu durumu (yıllık)

Büyüme

Diğer mesleklere göre çok hızlı büyüme

'Flight Attendants' iş ilanlarının sayısının 2033 yılına kadar 9,9% artması bekleniyor.

Toplam istihdam ve tahmini iş açılışları

* 2023 ve 2033 arasındaki dönem için İşgücü İstatistikleri Bürosu'ndan alınan veriler. Lütfen çevirinin mantıklı ve web sitesi kullanımı için uygun olduğundan emin olun.
Güncellenmiş projeksiyonlar 09-2025 tarihinde teslim edilmelidir..

Ücretler

Diğer mesleklere göre yüksek maaşlı

2023 yılında, 'Flight Attendants' için medyan yıllık ücret $68.370 idi, yani saat başına $33.

'Flight Attendants' ulusal medyan ücretin, $48.060 olduğu yerde, %42,3% daha yüksek bir ücret aldılar.

Zaman içindeki ücretler

* İşgücü İstatistikleri Bürosu'ndan alınan veriler.

Hacim

Diğer mesleklere kıyasla daha geniş iş olanakları yelpazesi

2023 itibariyle Amerika Birleşik Devletleri'nde 126.020 kişi 'Flight Attendants' olarak istihdam edilmiştir.

Bu, ülke genelindeki istihdam edilen iş gücünün yaklaşık olarak %0,08%'ını temsil eder.

Başka bir deyişle, her 1 bin kişiden biri 'Flight Attendants' olarak istihdam edilmektedir.

İş tanımı

Uçak kabininin güvenliğini izleyin. Havayolu yolcularına hizmetler sunun, güvenlik bilgilerini açıklayın, yiyecek ve içecek servisi yapın ve acil durum olaylarına yanıt verin.

SOC Code: 53-2031.00

Yorumlar (30)

Yorum yapın
z
08 Kas 2025 02:26
Flight Attendants go through a long training process to learn about safety, evacuations, CPR, medical procedures, and how to handle emergencies. It’s not a job that AI can just replace easily. AI might be able to help with small stuff in planes, but it can’t fully replace Flight Attendants. If I was a nervous passenger on a plane, I don’t think I would feel comforted by an emotionless robot compared to if an actual person was helping me calm down.
Kevin (Hiç şansı yok)
23 Ağu 2025 15:31
Just imagine a metal robot in a tube during severe turbulence, helping injured passengers off a broken plane, resolving conflict, etc. One kick and it would be on its back out of commission
PY (Hiç şansı yok)
22 Ağu 2025 08:28
Only few flight attendants on each flight, you can't reply on robot during sudden emergency
annie (Hiç şansı yok)
25 Eki 2024 03:04
because companies wont be willing to pay for that amount of robots and the maintenince that is needed on them, real people would be cheaper
trained as flight attendant
07 Mar 2025 23:01
For real people need to pay for hotels and meals, and sometimes flight attendants are transported as passengers if the flight is from another city. Their holidays can last two months to prevent overwork. People are always more expensive, need just the higher level of technology.
Anonymous (Son derece muhtemel)
23 Mar 2024 12:38
You automate the plane to give instructions during turbulence and emergencies. Ease passengers into by updating the seats, rows, and overhead panels with attendants still onboard. From a safety perspective what is 2 attendants per class going to do for 20+ people, nothing other than give instruction and help 1 or 2 women and children. After introducing passengers to those improvements kick it up a notch and introduce 1 robot attendant for every 1 human attendant. This robot would initially be programmed to serve drinks and snacks. You would order it prior to the flight and on your phone or TV during the flight. Now that you have safety and procedures programmed right in to the plane and passengers have interacted with it over the last 10 years with a few iterations to their programming over time and passengers have been able to be served by a robot, the in cabin experience can now be fully automated. You could even design the robots to be smaller in size to fit more than two attendants in the class. Ultimately decreasing burnout by human staff, boarding times, the time it takes to get to the customer, etc.
passionate FA
11 Nis 2025 04:34
This proves to me you have a very low understanding of what Flight Attendants actually do. Our main priority is not serving drinks and snacks, its safety. We are trained in water evacuation, fire evacuations, to preflight all our equipment, memorize the detail of every aircraft, ect. There is a greater risk/safety breach with AI being in these positions than a human. It is not simply “customer service”, it is problem solving and ensuring safety of all passengers. If anything would be replaced, potentially gate agents. But FAs and pilots are crucial.
D. H.
06 Tem 2025 13:52
More than tens of thousands would need to be spent per robot just to create and maintain it. The airplane would need more fuel and more space for your plan. You would need super advanced plus millions of dollars in technology for a first responder robot.
PK (Hiç şansı yok)
29 Oca 2024 02:41
FAA requires a crew member 1 for every 50. Flight attendant position is based on safety and security designated by FAA not customer service!!!
tony (Düşük)
02 Haz 2023 20:39
You're still going to need human intervention in an emergency. There are too many changes on a moments notice during flight to completely trust it to AI.
Philip (Belirsiz)
12 May 2023 18:40
I think aspects of the job could be automated but parts of the job won't be
Sofie (Son derece muhtemel)
08 Ağu 2022 18:37
Humans can decide quicker in an emergency situation, but robots can take a while.

Plus, robots can't do such things as CPR or use a first aid kit, for example. So, it's pretty risky.
h (Düşük)
31 Ara 2021 01:27
AI and robots could mess up emergencies and need a connection to stay "alive"
A flight attendant (Düşük)
06 Ara 2021 16:31
By federal law (FAA), there needs to be 1 flight attendant per 50 seats on a plane. The number can never decrease even with robots. Good luck getting those robots to handle medical emergencies or breaking up fights between ignorant passengers or helping all you ungrateful passengers evacuate during an emergency in 90 seconds or less with no ability of rational thought LOL
Collin Tredo (Düşük)
17 May 2021 17:00
This job requires a friendly human face, people will be less comfortable having to talk to and trust a robot/AI when they get on a plane.
A (Hiç şansı yok)
10 Nis 2021 10:07
Flight attendants use their knowledge to solve a situation given the surprise factor... it’s impossible to programme a robot that knows how to act in front of a surprise factor situation. And by the way flight attendants are there to save u not to make u happy. First priority is safety the If it’s possible the service time will come.
Spiros (Hiç şansı yok)
10 Nis 2021 01:55
Flight attendants are there for one specific reason: safety. For this, human presence is important
Erebus (Düşük)
24 Mar 2021 17:52
It involves emotional labour which only a human is capable of.
JP (Ilımlı)
02 Ağu 2020 16:53
With the global pandemic focusing minds on the amount of human contact passengers have on flights, I could see cabin crew being reduced in number to improve safety, with a Purser and assistant at each end of the aircraft being supplemented by robots which would handle more of the non-emergency workload. Robots would reduce the expense of accommodating cabin crew at destinations and would be able to clean the cabin autonomously using UV lights to disinfect the cabin air and surfaces.
A flight attendant (Hiç şansı yok)
22 Tem 2020 08:27
Will absolutely not happen. What most do not realize is that flight attendants are on board for safety. It's just not something that can be replaced by robots.
Ebork (Son derece muhtemel)
03 Oca 2020 11:48
Flight attendants make or break flying. They'll be robots soon enough.
THM
27 Haz 2020 09:20
Flight attendants make your flying safe you ignorant.
Izme;-;
31 Mar 2021 08:21
I think that is wrong you see robots can also break easy, if there is a drunk passenger or causing harm robots can break with their wires. In medical procedures or any emergency humans would be faster than the robots having to mechanically bend down taking longer than humans.
JD (Son derece muhtemel)
20 Nis 2019 05:36
With the lousy customer service and the awfully attitudes these "air stewards(esses)" possess nowadays, I wouldn't be surprised that a machine will end up doing their job not only more quickly and efficiently, but for little to no cost of maintenance on said droids compared to paying salaries w/ benefits, retirement, etc & dealing with greedy unions, to people who don't do their job properly and are not even qualified to in the first place. Given the recent horrific experiences passengers had to endure from these "flight attendants", I see machines replacing these incompetent humans in the future. It'll save the airlines plenty of revenue and avoid lawsuits and having to pay these poorly trained service attendants for mediocre to dismal services provided. The only ones to blame would be the flight attendants themselves, because a machine did a better job than they ever would.
Karen
05 May 2019 06:17
When you have a heart attack on the plane who’s going to administer first aid to you? A robot? A flight attendant is there to save your ass not kiss it and their customer service is based on your attitude. It goes both ways
Ordinary Internet User
04 Eyl 2019 13:28
They will hire some flight attendants for those situations. For example, Today : 10 human flight attendants Future: 1-3 human flight attendants, 7+ robot flight attendants. Capish? :P
Eternity
22 May 2020 04:27
With COVID, it would be ideal if airlines used robots instead. We'd rather not use flight attendant "services".
GG
09 May 2019 16:11
JD deserves the most awful flying experiences after the rudeness he showcased here.
MC
16 Tem 2023 10:31
JD I don't know what airline you have been flying on. I have been involved in the airline industry for over forty years, have traveled on numerous air carriers, and have never experienced what you have described in terms of lacking flight attendant professionalism, training, emergency, and medical preparedness.

I have witnessed a decline in the manners and decorum of the passengers traveling. Possibly, the added stress to passengers of airport safety procedures has taken a toll on their nerves. I remember when friends and family could accompany passengers to the gate. Now, the seats are packed in like sardines in a can.

Airline competition made the way for no-frills service and more passengers in smaller seats on airplanes. This has taken a toll on everyone's stress levels. Still, I see friendly FAs who are doing their best to accommodate everyone onboard and assuage those who are already frazzled by the time they take their seats.

A robot may make the dispersion of in-flight commodities easier but it can never take care of all of the emergencies that FAs are trained to handle, the medical emergencies, the duplicate and other seating problems, the myriad of human interactions that FA's handle, unaccompanied children, wheelchair passengers, interaction with cockpit and ground staff, etc., etc. the list goes on, not even considering a major emergency like a hijack incident.

You have vastly underestimated the uber-selective hiring, initial and ongoing training that FAs have. Did you know that they have to take FAA-mandated emergency testing yearly on every airplane which they are qualified to work and pass the test with a 90-100% grade. This includes physical testing in airplane simulators., first aide, resuscitation and cardio procedures etc.

If you see an FA behaving in the unprofessional manner you have described, you should write a letter to the airline about that employee.
Dolly
22 Ara 2024 16:31
Your ex a flight attendant?

Bu meslek hakkında bir yanıt bırakın
0/8000