Flygvärdinnor

Låg risk
37%

Vart vill du åka härnäst?

Dela dina resultat med vänner och familj.

Eller, utforska detta yrke i större detalj...

RISK FÖR AUTOMATISERING
BERÄKNAD
38%
(Låg risk)
UNDERSÖKNING
37%
(Låg risk, Baserat på 499 röster)
Average: 37%
ARBETSMARKNADSBEHOV
TILLVÄXT
9,9%
från år 2033
LÖNER
68 370 $
eller 32,87 $ per timme
Volym
126 020
från och med 2023
SAMMANFATTNING
Vad visar denna snöflinga?
Snöflingan är en visuell sammanfattning av de fem emblemerna: Automatiseringsrisk (beräknad), Risk (omröstad), Tillväxt, Löner och Volym. Den ger dig en omedelbar översikt av en yrkesprofil. Snöflingans färg relaterar till dess storlek. Ju bättre yrket presterar i förhållande till andra, desto större och grönare blir Snöflingan.
JOBBPOÄNG
6,9/10
Vad är detta?
Jobbpoäng (högre är bättre):

Vi betygsätter jobb med hjälp av fyra faktorer. Dessa är:

- Risken för att bli automatiserad
- Jobbtillväxt
- Löner
- Volymen av tillgängliga positioner

Dessa är några viktiga saker att tänka på när man söker jobb.

Personer tittade också på

Advokater Datorprogrammerare Skådespelare Kommersiella piloter Grafiska formgivare

Beräknad automatiseringsrisk

38% (Låg risk)

Låg risk (21-40%): Jobb på denna nivå har en begränsad risk för automatisering, eftersom de kräver en blandning av tekniska och människocentrerade färdigheter.

Mer information om vad detta betyg är, och hur det beräknas finns tillgängligt här.

Vissa mycket viktiga egenskaper hos jobbet är svåra att automatisera:

  • Trång arbetsyta, obekväma positioner

  • Att hjälpa och ta hand om andra

Vissa ganska viktiga egenskaper hos jobbet är svåra att automatisera:

  • Social Perceptiveness - Social Förståelse

  • Övertalning

Användarundersökning

37% procent chans för full automatisering inom de närmaste två decennierna

Våra besökare har röstat att det är en låg chans att detta yrke kommer att automatiseras. Detta bedömning stöds ytterligare av den beräknade automationsrisknivån, som uppskattar 38% chans för automation.

Vad tror du är risken med automatisering?

Vad är sannolikheten att Flygvärdinnor kommer att ersättas av robotar eller artificiell intelligens inom de närmaste 20 åren?

Känsla

Följande graf visas där det finns tillräckligt med röster för att producera meningsfull data. Den visar användaromröstningsresultat över tid och ger en tydlig indikation på sentimenttrender.

Känslor över tid (årligen)

Tillväxt

Väldigt snabb tillväxt jämfört med andra yrken

Antalet 'Flight Attendants' lediga jobb förväntas att öka med 9,9% till 2033

Total sysselsättning och uppskattade jobböppningar

* Data från Bureau of Labor Statistics för perioden mellan 2023 och 2033
Uppdaterade prognoser beräknas 09-2025.

Löner

Högavlönad jämfört med andra yrken

I 2023 var den medianårliga lönen för 'Flight Attendants' 68 370 $, eller 33 $ per timme.

'Flight Attendants' betalades 42,3% högre än den nationella medianlönen, som låg på 48 060 $

Löner över tid

* Data från Byrån för arbetsstatistik

Volym

Större utbud av jobbmöjligheter jämfört med andra yrken

Från och med 2023 var det 126 020 personer anställda som 'Flight Attendants' inom USA.

Detta representerar cirka 0,08% av den anställda arbetskraften i hela landet

Sagt på ett annat sätt, runt 1 av 1 tusen personer är anställda som 'Flight Attendants'.

Arbetsbeskrivning

Övervaka säkerheten i flygkabinen. Tillhandahålla tjänster till flygpassagerare, förklara säkerhetsinformation, servera mat och dryck, och svara på nödsituationer.

SOC Code: 53-2031.00

Kommentarer (30)

Lämna en kommentar
z
08 nov. 2025 02:26
Flight Attendants go through a long training process to learn about safety, evacuations, CPR, medical procedures, and how to handle emergencies. It’s not a job that AI can just replace easily. AI might be able to help with small stuff in planes, but it can’t fully replace Flight Attendants. If I was a nervous passenger on a plane, I don’t think I would feel comforted by an emotionless robot compared to if an actual person was helping me calm down.
Kevin (Ingen chans)
23 aug. 2025 15:31
Just imagine a metal robot in a tube during severe turbulence, helping injured passengers off a broken plane, resolving conflict, etc. One kick and it would be on its back out of commission
PY (Ingen chans)
22 aug. 2025 08:28
Only few flight attendants on each flight, you can't reply on robot during sudden emergency
annie (Ingen chans)
25 okt. 2024 03:04
because companies wont be willing to pay for that amount of robots and the maintenince that is needed on them, real people would be cheaper
trained as flight attendant
07 mars 2025 23:01
For real people need to pay for hotels and meals, and sometimes flight attendants are transported as passengers if the flight is from another city. Their holidays can last two months to prevent overwork. People are always more expensive, need just the higher level of technology.
Anonymous (Mycket troligt)
23 mars 2024 12:38
You automate the plane to give instructions during turbulence and emergencies. Ease passengers into by updating the seats, rows, and overhead panels with attendants still onboard. From a safety perspective what is 2 attendants per class going to do for 20+ people, nothing other than give instruction and help 1 or 2 women and children. After introducing passengers to those improvements kick it up a notch and introduce 1 robot attendant for every 1 human attendant. This robot would initially be programmed to serve drinks and snacks. You would order it prior to the flight and on your phone or TV during the flight. Now that you have safety and procedures programmed right in to the plane and passengers have interacted with it over the last 10 years with a few iterations to their programming over time and passengers have been able to be served by a robot, the in cabin experience can now be fully automated. You could even design the robots to be smaller in size to fit more than two attendants in the class. Ultimately decreasing burnout by human staff, boarding times, the time it takes to get to the customer, etc.
passionate FA
11 apr. 2025 04:34
This proves to me you have a very low understanding of what Flight Attendants actually do. Our main priority is not serving drinks and snacks, its safety. We are trained in water evacuation, fire evacuations, to preflight all our equipment, memorize the detail of every aircraft, ect. There is a greater risk/safety breach with AI being in these positions than a human. It is not simply “customer service”, it is problem solving and ensuring safety of all passengers. If anything would be replaced, potentially gate agents. But FAs and pilots are crucial.
D. H.
06 juli 2025 13:52
More than tens of thousands would need to be spent per robot just to create and maintain it. The airplane would need more fuel and more space for your plan. You would need super advanced plus millions of dollars in technology for a first responder robot.
PK (Ingen chans)
29 jan. 2024 02:41
FAA requires a crew member 1 for every 50. Flight attendant position is based on safety and security designated by FAA not customer service!!!
tony (Låg)
02 juni 2023 20:39
You're still going to need human intervention in an emergency. There are too many changes on a moments notice during flight to completely trust it to AI.
Philip (Osäker)
12 maj 2023 18:40
I think aspects of the job could be automated but parts of the job won't be
Sofie (Mycket troligt)
08 aug. 2022 18:37
Humans can decide quicker in an emergency situation, but robots can take a while.

Plus, robots can't do such things as CPR or use a first aid kit, for example. So, it's pretty risky.
h (Låg)
31 dec. 2021 01:27
AI and robots could mess up emergencies and need a connection to stay "alive"
A flight attendant (Låg)
06 dec. 2021 16:31
By federal law (FAA), there needs to be 1 flight attendant per 50 seats on a plane. The number can never decrease even with robots. Good luck getting those robots to handle medical emergencies or breaking up fights between ignorant passengers or helping all you ungrateful passengers evacuate during an emergency in 90 seconds or less with no ability of rational thought LOL
Collin Tredo (Låg)
17 maj 2021 17:00
This job requires a friendly human face, people will be less comfortable having to talk to and trust a robot/AI when they get on a plane.
A (Ingen chans)
10 apr. 2021 10:07
Flight attendants use their knowledge to solve a situation given the surprise factor... it’s impossible to programme a robot that knows how to act in front of a surprise factor situation. And by the way flight attendants are there to save u not to make u happy. First priority is safety the If it’s possible the service time will come.
Spiros (Ingen chans)
10 apr. 2021 01:55
Flight attendants are there for one specific reason: safety. For this, human presence is important
Erebus (Låg)
24 mars 2021 17:52
It involves emotional labour which only a human is capable of.
JP (Måttlig)
02 aug. 2020 16:53
With the global pandemic focusing minds on the amount of human contact passengers have on flights, I could see cabin crew being reduced in number to improve safety, with a Purser and assistant at each end of the aircraft being supplemented by robots which would handle more of the non-emergency workload. Robots would reduce the expense of accommodating cabin crew at destinations and would be able to clean the cabin autonomously using UV lights to disinfect the cabin air and surfaces.
A flight attendant (Ingen chans)
22 juli 2020 08:27
Will absolutely not happen. What most do not realize is that flight attendants are on board for safety. It's just not something that can be replaced by robots.
Ebork (Mycket troligt)
03 jan. 2020 11:48
Flight attendants make or break flying. They'll be robots soon enough.
THM
27 juni 2020 09:20
Flight attendants make your flying safe you ignorant.
Izme;-;
31 mars 2021 08:21
I think that is wrong you see robots can also break easy, if there is a drunk passenger or causing harm robots can break with their wires. In medical procedures or any emergency humans would be faster than the robots having to mechanically bend down taking longer than humans.
JD (Mycket troligt)
20 apr. 2019 05:36
With the lousy customer service and the awfully attitudes these "air stewards(esses)" possess nowadays, I wouldn't be surprised that a machine will end up doing their job not only more quickly and efficiently, but for little to no cost of maintenance on said droids compared to paying salaries w/ benefits, retirement, etc & dealing with greedy unions, to people who don't do their job properly and are not even qualified to in the first place. Given the recent horrific experiences passengers had to endure from these "flight attendants", I see machines replacing these incompetent humans in the future. It'll save the airlines plenty of revenue and avoid lawsuits and having to pay these poorly trained service attendants for mediocre to dismal services provided. The only ones to blame would be the flight attendants themselves, because a machine did a better job than they ever would.
Karen
05 maj 2019 06:17
When you have a heart attack on the plane who’s going to administer first aid to you? A robot? A flight attendant is there to save your ass not kiss it and their customer service is based on your attitude. It goes both ways
Ordinary Internet User
04 sep. 2019 13:28
They will hire some flight attendants for those situations. For example, Today : 10 human flight attendants Future: 1-3 human flight attendants, 7+ robot flight attendants. Capish? :P
Eternity
22 maj 2020 04:27
With COVID, it would be ideal if airlines used robots instead. We'd rather not use flight attendant "services".
GG
09 maj 2019 16:11
JD deserves the most awful flying experiences after the rudeness he showcased here.
MC
16 juli 2023 10:31
JD I don't know what airline you have been flying on. I have been involved in the airline industry for over forty years, have traveled on numerous air carriers, and have never experienced what you have described in terms of lacking flight attendant professionalism, training, emergency, and medical preparedness.

I have witnessed a decline in the manners and decorum of the passengers traveling. Possibly, the added stress to passengers of airport safety procedures has taken a toll on their nerves. I remember when friends and family could accompany passengers to the gate. Now, the seats are packed in like sardines in a can.

Airline competition made the way for no-frills service and more passengers in smaller seats on airplanes. This has taken a toll on everyone's stress levels. Still, I see friendly FAs who are doing their best to accommodate everyone onboard and assuage those who are already frazzled by the time they take their seats.

A robot may make the dispersion of in-flight commodities easier but it can never take care of all of the emergencies that FAs are trained to handle, the medical emergencies, the duplicate and other seating problems, the myriad of human interactions that FA's handle, unaccompanied children, wheelchair passengers, interaction with cockpit and ground staff, etc., etc. the list goes on, not even considering a major emergency like a hijack incident.

You have vastly underestimated the uber-selective hiring, initial and ongoing training that FAs have. Did you know that they have to take FAA-mandated emergency testing yearly on every airplane which they are qualified to work and pass the test with a 90-100% grade. This includes physical testing in airplane simulators., first aide, resuscitation and cardio procedures etc.

If you see an FA behaving in the unprofessional manner you have described, you should write a letter to the airline about that employee.
Dolly
22 dec. 2024 16:31
Your ex a flight attendant?

Lämna ett svar om detta yrke
0/8000