Grafiska formgivare
Vill du ha denna sammanfattning på din webbplats? Bädda in kod:
Risk för automatisering
Låg risk (21-40%): Jobb på denna nivå har en begränsad risk för automatisering, eftersom de kräver en blandning av tekniska och människocentrerade färdigheter.
Mer information om vad detta betyg är, och hur det beräknas finns tillgängligt här.
Användarundersökning
Våra besökare har röstat att de är osäkra på om detta yrke kommer att automatiseras. Däremot kan anställda kanske hitta trygghet i den automatiserade risknivå vi har genererat, vilket visar 34% chans för automatisering.
Vad tror du är risken med automatisering?
Vad är sannolikheten att Grafiska formgivare kommer att ersättas av robotar eller artificiell intelligens inom de närmaste 20 åren?
Känsla
Följande diagram inkluderas överallt där det finns ett betydande antal röster för att ge meningsfull data. Dessa visuella representationer visar användarundersökningars resultat över tid, vilket ger en betydande indikation på sentimenttrender.
Känsla över tid (kvartalsvis)
Känslor över tid (årligen)
Tillväxt
Antalet 'Graphic Designers' lediga jobb förväntas att öka med 2,6% till 2032
Total sysselsättning och uppskattade jobböppningar
Uppdaterade prognoser beräknas 09-2023.
Löner
I 2022 var den medianårliga lönen för 'Graphic Designers' 57.990 $, eller 27 $ per timme.
'Graphic Designers' betalades 25,2% högre än den nationella medianlönen, som låg på 46.310 $
Löner över tid
Volym
Från och med 2022 var det 211 890 personer anställda som 'Graphic Designers' inom USA.
Detta representerar cirka 0,14% av den anställda arbetskraften i hela landet
Sagt på ett annat sätt, runt 1 av 697 personer är anställda som 'Graphic Designers'.
Arbetsbeskrivning
Designa eller skapa grafik för att möta specifika kommersiella eller marknadsföringsbehov, såsom förpackningar, skyltar eller logotyper. Kan använda en mängd olika medier för att uppnå konstnärliga eller dekorativa effekter.
SOC Code: 27-1024.00
Resurser
Om du funderar på att starta en ny karriär, eller vill byta jobb, har vi skapat ett praktiskt jobbsökverktyg som kanske kan hjälpa dig att hitta den perfekta nya rollen.
Kommentarer
Lämna en kommentar
Graphic design is too broad of a term in my opinion. There's logo design, web design, package design, wayfinding design, branding, mobile design, t-shirt design, print design, poster design, and much more.
Digital art and illustrations I think are already under threat. When the art being generated is general and the boundaries of art are more forgiving, then the general nature of AI will thrive. But for more exacting work like logo design, web design, and package design, AI struggles from my experience.
I have played around with Adobe's built-in AI tools for Illustrator and Photoshop. While they're cool to play with, I often find myself wasting time playing prompt engineering, when I could have created something on my own faster. If I as a designer don't have patience to prompt-engineer my way into a design, I'm certain clients won't either.
There's also levels to graphic design. Maybe AI will get rid of the bad designers and the bad clients! But the precise, custom, unique work that many clients look for is hard to replace.
Lastly, being a graphic designer is more than just the technical skills. It's about directing a vision for the design. Even if AI is 100% perfect, it may not understand the client's needs.
For example, composite specialized designers have already taken a toll. Sure AI generated composites are still funky, but with enough time all their flaws WILL be perfected.
I can't imagine a future that AI doesn't learns proper design theory and starts applying it, rendering mostly generalist graphic designers useless. More niche skills requiring a human to take decisions such as "Is this appropriate for the brand?" will still be needed, but I'm not sure still.
A few years ago there was a website that said "Artists can't be replaced because AI can't draw", and here we are. For as much as we try to guess AI will keep outperforming in ways we can't expect, until it happens.
The problem that people don't seem to understand is that all the generative ai programs right now produce art that's very cool to look at and art that no one would ever pay for, because they don't understand the point of paying for art in the first place.
There are billions of cool images you get get for free online right now. Graphic designers already compete against that, and yet, they're still paid.
Why?
The reason why artists are paid is because people want something very specific, and all generative AI right now, and in the future, will fail the specificity requirement because it by nature has to give probabilistic (aka common) answers, and as people adapt to AI art existing, the demands on specificity will increase.
—
As a design educator at a university with a well respected communication design program who has embraced AI use by my junior/senior level students over the last two semesters, I have watched our students aided by AI, produce more strategic, well researched and well executed advertising and brand designs that far exceed their peers who are not using AI. I have seen the most progress in:
- organization
- accuracy
- time management
- writing skills
- iterative idea generation
- clarity of communication
- audience insights
- persona building
- animation
- automation of manual task
Their approach is more efficient and and happens much quicker allowing them more time for a more irrational process foe problem solving and concept generation and in turn allowing more time for refinement of initial design exploration, which lead to outcomes they far exceeded their expectations.
—-
In my 25-years as a design educator I have never seen this kind of student improvement and quality of outcomes in the above categories/areas.
—-
These students will — with a high degree of certainty— enter the market with a baseline knowledge of AI that will far exceed most of the more senior employees and management of the firms that will employ them. Most likely they will demonstrate better time management, process and modality engagement and organizational proficiency. Aided by AI and with an in-depth knowledge of AI they will be highly valued for their efficiency by offloading manual and time absorbing task like research, composing emails, etc. allowing them to be hyper focused on create problem-solving and more strategy solutions and outcomes.
—
We would reserve class time to discuss the ethics and implications of using AI covering, authenticity, originality, IP volitions, copyright violations. Additionally, In compliance with our University’s Code of Academic Honesty they include citations and attributions to what AI sources were used.
—-
Like most of us, I’m both excited and a bit apprehensive about AI. I’m optimistic that AI can help elevate and augment a designer’s approach and creative outcomes. The difficulty I face and an educator is the unprecedented pace at which AI is expanding. There is no doubt they AI will get abused and it will require guidelines and policies that are currently non existent.
Lämna ett svar om detta yrke