Brandmän

0,0% (Minimal risk)

Minimal risk (0-20%): Yrken i denna kategori har en låg sannolikhet att automatiseras, eftersom de vanligtvis kräver komplex problemlösning, kreativitet, starka mellanmänskliga färdigheter och en hög grad av manuell skicklighet. Dessa jobb involverar ofta komplexa handrörelser och exakt koordination, vilket gör det svårt för maskiner att replikera de nödvändiga uppgifterna.

Mer information om vad detta betyg är, och hur det beräknas finns tillgängligt här.

Användarundersökning

Känsla

Följande graf inkluderas där det finns en betydande mängd röster för att ge meningsfull data. Dessa visuella representationer visar användaromröstningsresultat över tid och ger en viktig indikation på sentimenttrender.

Löner

Måttligt betald jämfört med andra yrken

I 2023 var den medianårliga lönen för 'Firefighters' 57.120 $, eller 27 $ per timme.

'Firefighters' betalades 18,9% högre än den nationella medianlönen, som låg på 48.060 $

Löner över tid

Kommentarer

Leave a comment

Olof 30 days ago

Technically robots already do firefighting but only as carriers and sometimes moving rubble and stuff

0 0 Reply

Zar (Låg) 2 months ago

This is an on-site job and AI cannot replace it because fire is a live thing.

0 0 Reply

Idk (Ingen chans) 1 year ago

I think that is impossible the robots become firefighetrs, they combat fires, that can burn robots systems

2 0 Reply

Will (Ingen chans) 1 year ago

As a first responder who has responded to some absolutely weird and unexpected calls I can’t imagine making a robot capable of adapting to the unknown in the same ways a human can. Not in 20 years anyway; no chance.

1 0 Reply

Daniel (Ingen chans) 2 years ago

Too much adaptation to very diverse environments.

0 0 Reply

Lee Edwards Wright (Mycket troligt) 2 years ago

One of the main points of using robots is to do something that isn't safe, robots fighting fire would be highly likely because it's a dangerous job as we all know. Robots would be fearless... quite literally and might have more strength.

0 1 Reply

Enzo (Ingen chans) 2 years ago

I believe that although automated fire prevention systems will help to reduce the need significantly, the environment in a fire is too hostile and changes too quickly for a robot to be able to completely replace humans.

0 0 Reply

V (Ingen chans) 3 years ago

In the next 20 years, there is no chance of technology advancing enough to completely replace firefighters maybe supplement like some departments are using UAVs now but in the next 20 years expect a robot to perform the complex tasks required by firefighting in changing environments that are structurally degraded and in which visibility will be significantly degraded isn't realistic in any way. In 50-100 years... maybe but predicting that far ahead is essentially useless. Who knows what crazy technology we'll have by then.

0 0 Reply

Alvin (Osäker) 3 years ago

As someone who works in the field of machine learning, I can tell you that firefighters absolutely can be replaced. Now whether or not the general population will be ok with their hero’s going away, that’s another question itself. But if people can come off their pedestal and realize the lives automating this progression would save, then yes, it’ll be automated.

0 0 Reply

Will 1 year ago

As a firefighter, I wonder if you’re basing your response on the extinguishment of fires only. Fighting fires is only about 10percent of a firefighters job. The bulk is Medical and Rescue. Creating a robot capable of adapting to the unknown in the same way a first responder is tasked to do is, I would imagine, not something we will be capable of in the near future.

0 0 Reply

Rh (Låg) 3 years ago

Replace firefighters altogether? Most likely not. However, we will definitely see technology and robots as more of an assistant to firefighters. At most, I think the robot would be good for the really hazardous tasks that would require you to be very close to said fire almost to the point of being burned. Everything else is best done by a human.

0 0 Reply

Josef (Måttlig) 3 years ago

Couldn't we make machines to hose down fires automatically? It doesn't seem that unlikely

0 0 Reply

Will 1 year ago

Remember: Fighting fire is a very small part of firefighting.

0 0 Reply

Oscar 3 years ago

a firefighter not only fight the fire ... try to learn a robot traffic rescue. More robots helping the firefighters? ... yes, but no way to replace.

0 0 Reply

Drake (Ingen chans) 3 years ago

It's 2020 and if we haven't been automated yet what makes you think we ever will?

0 0 Reply

Kyle (Mycket troligt) 4 years ago

Improvements in automatic sprinklers and fire suppression systems will replace the need for the fire fighting aspect of the job.

0 0 Reply

☆ 4 months ago

firefighters mostly operate as first responders and the majority of their work consists of first aid and rescue. this requires a lot of thinking on the spot, common sense, and fast decision making as well as the physical dexterity and capabilities needed. robots could be fire extinguishers, but not firefighters.

0 0 Reply

yeah 4 years ago

yeah so lets get rid of firefighters altogether, nothing can go wrong can it?

0 0 Reply

Firefighter manager 4 years ago

Wake up and smell the coffee technology is already impacting on the job ever heard of Boston Robotics https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=boston+robotics+youtube&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-gb&client=safari

0 0 Reply

Jack 4 years ago

I image humans being fire fighters forever, because the robots may be on fire...

0 0 Reply

Kevin (Mycket troligt) 4 years ago

I think that AI should take over this job, because it is dangerous.

0 0 Reply

Nguyen (Ingen chans) 4 years ago

There's not way a robot can preform the Heimlich manoeuvre on someone

0 0 Reply

An Actual Firefighter 5 years ago

If you think this will happen you’re f**king stupid.

0 0 Reply

Em (Ingen chans) 5 years ago

You can't send a robot into a flaming building and expect it to adapt to its surroundings.

0 0 Reply

Cdd 7 months ago

For real, like it's stupid people think robots can actually do that, like???

0 0 Reply