Polis- och Sheriffpatrullerande tjänstemän

Minimal risk
15%
Vart vill du åka härnäst?
Dela dina resultat med vänner och familj.
Eller, utforska detta yrke i större detalj...
RISK FÖR AUTOMATISERING
BERÄKNAD
6%
(Minimal risk)
UNDERSÖKNING
23%
(Låg risk)
Average: 15%
ARBETSMARKNADSBEHOV
TILLVÄXT
3,9%
från år 2033
LÖNER
72 280 $
eller 34,75 $ per timme
Volym
646 310
från och med 2023
SAMMANFATTNING
JOBBPOÄNG
7,4/10

Personer tittade också på

Beräknad automatiseringsrisk

6% (Minimal risk)

Minimal risk (0-20%): Yrken i denna kategori har en låg sannolikhet att automatiseras, eftersom de vanligtvis kräver komplex problemlösning, kreativitet, starka mellanmänskliga färdigheter och en hög grad av manuell skicklighet. Dessa jobb involverar ofta komplexa handrörelser och exakt koordination, vilket gör det svårt för maskiner att replikera de nödvändiga uppgifterna.

Mer information om vad detta betyg är, och hur det beräknas finns tillgängligt här.

Vissa mycket viktiga egenskaper hos jobbet är svåra att automatisera:

  • Att hjälpa och ta hand om andra

Vissa ganska viktiga egenskaper hos jobbet är svåra att automatisera:

  • Social Perceptiveness - Social Förståelse

  • Övertalning

  • Förhandling

  • Originalitet

Användarundersökning

23% procent chans för full automatisering inom de närmaste två decennierna

Våra besökare har röstat att det är en låg chans att detta yrke kommer att automatiseras. Detta bedömning stöds ytterligare av den beräknade automationsrisknivån, som uppskattar 6% chans för automation.

Vad tror du är risken med automatisering?

Vad är sannolikheten att Polis- och Sheriffpatrullerande tjänstemän kommer att ersättas av robotar eller artificiell intelligens inom de närmaste 20 åren?






Känsla

Följande graf inkluderas där det finns en betydande mängd röster för att ge meningsfull data. Dessa visuella representationer visar användaromröstningsresultat över tid och ger en viktig indikation på sentimenttrender.

Känslor över tid (årligen)

Tillväxt

Måttlig tillväxt jämfört med andra yrken

Antalet 'Police and Sheriff's Patrol Officers' lediga jobb förväntas att öka med 3,9% till 2033

Total sysselsättning och uppskattade jobböppningar

* Data från Bureau of Labor Statistics för perioden mellan 2021 och 2031
Uppdaterade prognoser beräknas 09-2024.

Löner

Högavlönad jämfört med andra yrken

I 2023 var den medianårliga lönen för 'Police and Sheriff's Patrol Officers' 72 280 $, eller 34 $ per timme.

'Police and Sheriff's Patrol Officers' betalades 50,4% högre än den nationella medianlönen, som låg på 48 060 $

Löner över tid

* Data från Byrån för arbetsstatistik

Volym

Betydligt större utbud av jobbmöjligheter jämfört med andra yrken

Från och med 2023 var det 646 310 personer anställda som 'Police and Sheriff's Patrol Officers' inom USA.

Detta representerar cirka 0,43% av den anställda arbetskraften i hela landet

Sagt på ett annat sätt, runt 1 av 234 personer är anställda som 'Police and Sheriff's Patrol Officers'.

Arbetsbeskrivning

Upprätthåll ordning och skydda liv och egendom genom att verkställa lokala, stam-, stats- eller federala lagar och förordningar. Utför en kombination av följande uppgifter: patrullera ett specifikt område; dirigera trafik; utfärda trafikförelägganden; utreda olyckor; gripa och arrestera misstänkta, eller verkställa domstolarnas rättsliga processer. Inkluderar polisofficerare som arbetar vid utbildningsinstitutioner.

SOC Code: 33-3051.00

Resurser

Sök jobb i ditt lokala område

Om du funderar på att starta en ny karriär, eller vill byta jobb, har vi skapat ett praktiskt jobbsökverktyg som kanske kan hjälpa dig att hitta den perfekta nya rollen.

Sök jobb i ditt lokala område

Kommentarer

Leave a comment

burt (Låg) 26 days ago
if a robot pulls me over im driving away
0 0 Reply
Damanpreet Singh (Ingen chans) 7 months ago
How is supposed to change Because it’s a human kind of human can feel about the person
0 2 Reply
Kevin 8 months ago
It would work great because the AI would know the law and wouldn't retaliate against people they don't like.
0 3 Reply
matthew fitzgerald (Låg) 12 months ago
robo cops wouldn't work because you would have to program them to have emotions, so they don't go into overdrive and kill or destroy everything.
3 4 Reply
Deputy Dredd (Låg) 1 year ago
the question is would people find an automated law enforcement officer more credible than a human police officer. I think there will be more Artificial intelligence added to the job but not all automation as we currently understand computers
0 0 Reply
Sam 1 year ago
The public will likely never allow it to pass the legislature due to lack of trust for the technology.
0 0 Reply
Caleb (Låg) 1 year ago
Many aspects of this profession require a human element (i.e., emotional intelligence, de-escalation, interviewing, rapport building, etc.) that current AI technology is incapable of reproducing at this time.
0 0 Reply
Philip Low (Låg) 1 year ago
Although unlikely I do believe that more technology will be Implemented into day to day policing and such tasks as processing criminals may become automated but a lot of the human elements will never be automated.
0 0 Reply
Kirsten 1 year ago
Where I am from, they have automated speed radars and red light traffic cameras. Both of which will capture the vehicle registration and issue a ticket. Just saying. I agree it's safe from full take-over, but some changes will present.
0 0 Reply
Martin 3 years ago
Partially replaced for sure. There will likely always be some people, but you can replace a lot of the monotonous work with machines. Cameras and sensors can spot speeders and light runners. The new Boston Dynamics robots can do backhand springs. One cop could send a host of A.I. swarm bots to a crack house and handle it like a video game. Quadcopters, mechanical mice with cameras and microphones, armed dog bots, humanoid arrest bots, and self-driving cars.
0 0 Reply
Will 3 years ago
Over a year and NOBODY made a "Robocop" reference? The internet has disappointed me once again.
0 0 Reply
Steve W. 3 years ago
Imagine a cop that doesn't get emotional, doesn't have an ego, doesn't care about politics, and never uses the excuse, "I was afraid for my life."

Yes, we need AI-controlled robotic cops immediately. Many lives will be saved.
0 1 Reply
Metrixfr 6 months ago
Ok so if a criminal is about to boot your head off and send u 6ft under u would just allow that to happen. Your response is u just being completely delulu and do u really think a robot would be able to arrest a criminal with out humans help like I'm pretty sure a criminal would just destroy it and run away bruv.
1 0 Reply
Antonio 10 months ago
Ok buddy 😂
0 0 Reply
Sam 1 year ago
“Many lives”

In 2022 only about 1,000 deaths caused by police officers occurred and most were justified. There’s over 700,000 police officers to date, which comes out to less than 1% of all police officers in the entire USA.

You’re being completely ridiculous.
1 0 Reply
Angel Vollant (Ingen chans) 4 years ago
No chance. Policing requires critical thinking, logic, situational assessment and decision-making which can’t fit into a program. When a police officer sees someone committing a crime, it’s up to them to decide what to do. If a man’s smoking pot alone in the park, do they deserve to be arrested? The cop will go up to them, talk a bit, leave a warning and may or may not leave a ticket depending on how the man acts. If he’s polite and cooperative, the officer will probably let him off with a warning. If he’s erratic and violent, he’ll arrest him. A robot, however, won’t think that far. Sees someone committing a crime (smoking pot) and simply arrest him. If he doesn’t comply, use violence. They’re programmed to do what the programmer put into it. If someone has a knife, take them out. Simple as that. Doesn’t matter if it’s a woman defending herself against an abuser. The robot’ll see a knife and shoot her. Robocop explained it very well. Police officers need compassion and emotions. If you could program a robot to do that, you’ve got yourself a human.
0 0 Reply
Anon 11 months ago
It's over 3 years since your post. AI has greatly progressed. I don't think anyone in 2020 thought AI would be where it is now. AI can easily do all the critical thinking, logic, situational assessment and decision-making, and it might not be available yet, but it is apparent that it can fit inside a program. What is more difficult is that policing requires a physical presence. Robotics just isn't there yet, and even if it ever does get there, you'd basically need a highly expensive robot to replace each individual officer. Whereas AI on a single server with access to multiple phone lines (and ai voice automation) can easily replace a 100+ person office.

It's not impossible for AI to take over policing, but due to economic factors, it is likely one of the least at-risk professions to be taken over by AI
0 0 Reply
mister sir 4 years ago
I think it's good that they have a low chance of being replaced by robots because although humans can be biased, humans make better decisions and can pick up on clues or emotions better.
0 0 Reply
My name isn't your bidness. (Osäker) 4 years ago
There is a lot of talk about things like the androids from D:BH so I think it could go either way if artificial intelligence is improved.
0 0 Reply
Khan (Låg) 4 years ago
Competent police officers require human communication skills and human coordination (for the later see the old “robots struggle to walk up stairs” problem)
0 0 Reply
frankie (Låg) 4 years ago
as police need to have good decision making skills as robots do not
0 0 Reply
Anonomous (Låg) 4 years ago
THAT IS CRAZY HOW WOULD THEY GET COPS REPLACED!??!!?
0 0 Reply
A 4 months ago
It will be like Robocop, but the human is replaced with AI.
0 0 Reply
Meep (Osäker) 4 years ago
Because if you only go up to 20 years from now it may change past then.
0 0 Reply
Lachlan Beck (Ingen chans) 5 years ago
Because Robots lack the feeling of emotions and aren't able to be empathetic to other humans or robots therefore they lack a key skill of being an officer
0 0 Reply

Lämna ett svar om detta yrke

Denna webbplats skyddas av reCAPTCHA och Googles sekretesspolicy och användarvillkor gäller.