Arkitekter, förutom landskaps- och marinarkitekter

Låg risk
21%

Vart vill du åka härnäst?

Dela dina resultat med vänner och familj.
Få resultat för ett annat jobb Jämför med ett annat jobb

Eller, utforska detta yrke i större detalj...

Rösta Kommentarer (24)
RISK FÖR AUTOMATISERING
BERÄKNAD
0,0%
(Minimal risk)
UNDERSÖKNING
42%
(Måttlig Risk, Baserat på 972 röster)
Average: 21%
ARBETSMARKNADSBEHOV
TILLVÄXT
7,8%
från år 2033
LÖNER
93 310 $
eller 44,86 $ per timme
Volym
111 170
från och med 2023
SAMMANFATTNING
Vad visar denna snöflinga?
Snöflingan är en visuell sammanfattning av de fem emblemerna: Automatiseringsrisk (beräknad), Risk (omröstad), Tillväxt, Löner och Volym. Den ger dig en omedelbar översikt av en yrkesprofil. Snöflingans färg relaterar till dess storlek. Ju bättre yrket presterar i förhållande till andra, desto större och grönare blir Snöflingan.
JOBBPOÄNG
7,8/10
Vad är detta?
Jobbpoäng (högre är bättre):

Vi betygsätter jobb med hjälp av fyra faktorer. Dessa är:

- Risken för att bli automatiserad
- Jobbtillväxt
- Löner
- Volymen av tillgängliga positioner

Dessa är några viktiga saker att tänka på när man söker jobb.

Personer tittade också på

Datorprogrammerare Advokater Civilingenjörer Grafiska formgivare Webbutvecklare

Beräknad automatiseringsrisk

0,0% (Minimal risk)

Minimal risk (0-20%): Yrken i denna kategori har en låg sannolikhet att automatiseras, eftersom de vanligtvis kräver komplex problemlösning, kreativitet, starka mellanmänskliga färdigheter och en hög grad av manuell skicklighet. Dessa jobb involverar ofta komplexa handrörelser och exakt koordination, vilket gör det svårt för maskiner att replikera de nödvändiga uppgifterna.

Mer information om vad detta betyg är, och hur det beräknas finns tillgängligt här.

Vissa mycket viktiga egenskaper hos jobbet är svåra att automatisera:

  • Originalitet

Vissa ganska viktiga egenskaper hos jobbet är svåra att automatisera:

  • Social Perceptiveness - Social Förståelse

  • Bildkonst

  • Övertalning

  • Förhandling

Användarundersökning

42% procent chans för full automatisering inom de närmaste två decennierna

Våra besökare har röstat att de är osäkra på om detta yrke kommer att automatiseras. Däremot kan anställda kanske hitta trygghet i den automatiserade risknivå vi har genererat, vilket visar 0,0% chans för automatisering.

Vad tror du är risken med automatisering?

Vad är sannolikheten att Arkitekter, förutom landskaps- och marinarkitekter kommer att ersättas av robotar eller artificiell intelligens inom de närmaste 20 åren?

Känsla

Följande graf visas där det finns tillräckligt med röster för att producera meningsfull data. Den visar användaromröstningsresultat över tid och ger en tydlig indikation på sentimenttrender.

Känslor över tid (årligen)

Tillväxt

Väldigt snabb tillväxt jämfört med andra yrken

Antalet 'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval' lediga jobb förväntas att öka med 7,8% till 2033

Total sysselsättning och uppskattade jobböppningar

* Data från Bureau of Labor Statistics för perioden mellan 2023 och 2033
Uppdaterade prognoser beräknas 09-2025.

Löner

Mycket högt betald jämfört med andra yrken

I 2023 var den medianårliga lönen för 'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval' 93 310 $, eller 45 $ per timme.

'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval' betalades 94,2% högre än den nationella medianlönen, som låg på 48 060 $

Löner över tid

* Data från Byrån för arbetsstatistik

Volym

Större utbud av jobbmöjligheter jämfört med andra yrken

Från och med 2023 var det 111 170 personer anställda som 'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval' inom USA.

Detta representerar cirka 0,07% av den anställda arbetskraften i hela landet

Sagt på ett annat sätt, runt 1 av 1 tusen personer är anställda som 'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval'.

Arbetsbeskrivning

Planera och designa strukturer, såsom privata bostäder, kontorsbyggnader, teatrar, fabriker och andra strukturella egendomar.

SOC Code: 17-1011.00

Kommentarer (24)

Lämna en kommentar
Sawyer (Låg)
10 sep. 2024 22:41
It needs to pour your soul into it to really make a breakthrough. Robots don't have souls
sama
23 dec. 2022 19:30
An architect is more than a concept or a few words. It's about thinking, conceptualizing, and making it a reality.
Michael E. (Låg)
08 dec. 2025 01:00
A low chance for full automation of the profession itself because of the significant risk to human health, safety, and welfare involved -- people are generally less willing to accept a computer program as the ultimate responsible party for their safety. However, a high chance for partial automation of certain aspects of the profession, especially repetitive low-risk tasks such as detail selection (from a library of previously drawn details, not freshly AI-generated ones) and high-volume design iterations.
x (Låg)
27 nov. 2025 10:54
law. someone needs to be responsible financially and legally for the outcome and possible mistakes + some projects [military] are secret and even cannot be made on computer with internet
oscar walker (Ingen chans)
02 apr. 2025 00:59
blend of creativity and problem solving to design spaces that align with the environment surrounding. Very low to no chance of being replaced by robots and AI in comparison to other industries.
Ben Bailey (Osäker)
21 feb. 2024 21:15
I would love to have AI assist in automating the aspects of Architecture that are tedious, like making sure everything is up to code or automatically adjusting things after moving something else, but I fear that people will become lazy and let AI do the job for them.
Yoshimata R
25 apr. 2023 17:55
This will not be popular, but our firm already uses AI: clients type in or speak their ideas and examples The programs we use come up with a myriad of solutions that the clients themselves can then configure and reconfigure at will with all structural processes, including loadbearing etc. built-in throughout the process. 16 of the 38 people at our firm have been laid off since this started.
:))) (Måttlig)
03 aug. 2022 00:16
Currently, as a student at one of the top architecture schools, I can observe how the most successful students utilize AI. It's clear to see how it improves their workflow and design progress, even as early as 2022.

Already, AI can handle most of the work for an architect. I believe that the next 20 years will further popularize AI within the profession, reducing the amount of work done manually.
Sebastian from Argentina (Låg)
14 nov. 2019 12:33
Creativity from architects mind couldn't be replaced by AI, But some typical architecture room plans, could be systematized by machine learning on cad programs, like actual libraries of equipment, it could be library of rooms, baths, etc.
Lilly (Låg)
12 aug. 2019 22:55
I think it would be quite hard for robots to take clients ideas for architecture and turn it into a floorplan since there are billions of ways to build a house.
David J Gill
24 apr. 2019 22:43
More effective design software will raise productivity and reduce the number of staff required to complete project documents.
Marta (Osäker)
15 feb. 2023 23:56
I totally agree. Students and young professionals may have problem with finding a job. Nowadays, they usually do repetitive CAD drawings/models (the main concept was designed by e.g. senior architect), and it all can be automated, especially with BIM
Dean B
26 mars 2019 03:54
This is an art form that’s practical so I don’t see it going
Mark (Ingen chans)
08 juli 2024 18:20
There is no possible way for AI to take over architecture. To start, a computer cannot hold legal liability. AI doesn’t create; it only copies and reproduces. On a regular basis, my job requires unique solutions and details that cannot be pulled from other sources.

We need to take too many unrelated factors into account for any particular design, versus the cost and time it would take for an AI to be developed to take the job. It would never be profitable for the AI developer. Besides, they wouldn't want the liability risk we have for a mistake that can cost lives.
HMS (Ingen chans)
15 mars 2023 06:49
Architects are a lot like an artist. AI cannot create cannot something that requires human originality. No two architects are the same, just as two pieces of art are not the same. Architecture requires you to put creativity, originality, emotion, and the social aspect into your work.
J (Osäker)
15 okt. 2019 03:22
Depends on the kind of architecture, the way that the industry itself thinks about what architecture means (an engineering/optimization problem versus art, desire to rapidly customize vs work on the process with other humans) and what clients demand.
pgm777
29 aug. 2019 12:26
computerisation will help and not hinder the architectural profession. Automisation is something that has no place
Mark (Osäker)
02 maj 2023 19:29
Until recently (through March and April 2023), and after having seen the work that Dall-e 2 had produced, I thought it incredibly likely. The argument that architects would still be required seemed to hinge on "you need to interface with a human to get a building built", but I don't think that's true (if a client could save tens of thousands of dollars by inputting their requests on a keyboard, rather than talking to a person, they'd opt for the latter). However, the one aspect of the job that's overlooked is LIABILITY. Currently architects are legally liable for the work they produce, and any failings over that work. AI offers no LIABILITY -- and I highly doubt the software design companies who are producing that AI are willing to accept liability -- and until someone, or a team of someones, is willing to accept that legal responsibility, AI shouldn't be able to threaten that job. However, I said "could go either way" because it's highly possible that people are so stupid, that they would sign a contract that frees the AI architect of liability if it meant they could save a few dollars on fees.
phamiliar
08 mars 2024 20:19
It is likely that AI could be the architectural designer and code checker while a civil engineer is responsible for the life and safety of the overall design. I think the job won't necessarily go away its just that there will be many production staff jobs that will be eliminated.
king rocker (Mycket troligt)
24 feb. 2022 14:51
LOL it's already dead. Almost no one hires architects now, there are so many tools that already do their job. Wake up, it's game over for this one. The site is way behind the times.
I'dRatherNotInputAName (Ingen chans)
27 okt. 2023 20:41
"LOL it's already dead."
Source? Or did it come to you in a dream?
Sameer
29 feb. 2024 12:01
AI isn’t that capable to satisfy the client with the structure design… however it could help to make the work easy but it can’t overtake the profession.
Aleksandra (Måttlig)
17 maj 2023 14:43
Projects' created by humans will be for the 1% of richest people who will have a fantasy and need to show off that their projects was done the "expensive way" by a human and not 80/20 rule by AI. What people don't understand is that atm 80% of society is more faulty than AI. Working with AI is a bliss comparing to working with a majority of employees as well as moody specialists on the market is simply a bliss. And we're only starting here...
Architect Downow
10 feb. 2023 14:34
Architectural and Interior Design are both iterative processes.
AI will improve this process, detail all the structural draws, and create layouts and floorplans more efficiently than ever.

With solar, water, food and waste visions that now only a few architects embrace in projects.
Leed will be integrated in AI and civil engineering as well.

I guess in the future, anyone can design a house with the help of AI.

Architects, Lawyers and Doctors, the tríade of "good money" will fall.
And me and my boys are working to achieve this as soon as possible.

Lämna ett svar om detta yrke
0/8000