Stewardesy/Stewardzi

Niskie ryzyko
32%
Dokąd chciałbyś się udać dalej?
Podziel się wynikami z przyjaciółmi i rodziną.
Lub, zbadaj ten zawód bardziej szczegółowo...
RYZYKO AUTOMATYZACJI
OBLICZONY
38%
(Niskie ryzyko)
ANKIETOWANIE
26%
(Niskie ryzyko)
Average: 32%
POPYT NA PRACĘ
WZROST
9,9%
do roku 2033
PŁACE
68 370 $
lub 32,87 $ za godzinę
Objętość
126 020
od 2023
STRESZCZENIE
WYNIK PRACY
7,3/10

Ludzie również oglądali

Obliczone ryzyko automatyzacji

38% (Niskie ryzyko)

Niskie ryzyko (21-40%): Zawody na tym poziomie mają ograniczone ryzyko automatyzacji, ponieważ wymagają połączenia umiejętności technicznych i skoncentrowanych na człowieku.

Więcej informacji na temat tego, czym jest ten wynik i jak jest obliczany, jest dostępne tutaj.

Niektóre bardzo ważne cechy pracy są trudne do zautomatyzowania:

  • Ciasna Przestrzeń Pracy, Niezręczne Pozycje

  • Pomaganie i opieka nad innymi

Niektóre dość ważne cechy pracy są trudne do zautomatyzowania:

  • Spostrzegawczość Społeczna

  • Perswazja

Ankieta użytkownika

26% szansa na pełną automatyzację w ciągu najbliższych dwóch dekad

Nasi goście zagłosowali, że jest małe prawdopodobieństwo, iż ten zawód zostanie zautomatyzowany. To ocena jest dodatkowo wspierana przez obliczony poziom ryzyka automatyzacji, który szacuje 38% szansę na automatyzację.

Jakie są Twoje zdanie na temat ryzyka automatyzacji?

Jakie jest prawdopodobieństwo, że Stewardesy/Stewardzi zostanie zastąpione przez roboty lub sztuczną inteligencję w ciągu najbliższych 20 lat?






Nastroje

Poniższy wykres jest zamieszczany wszędzie tam, gdzie istnieje znaczna liczba głosów, aby przedstawić istotne dane. Te wizualne reprezentacje pokazują wyniki ankiet użytkowników w czasie, dostarczając istotnych wskazówek dotyczących trendów nastrojów.

Nastroje w czasie (rocznie)

Wzrost

Bardzo szybki wzrost względem innych profesji

Liczba ofert pracy na stanowisku 'Flight Attendants' ma wzrosnąć 9,9% do 2033

Całkowite zatrudnienie oraz szacowane oferty pracy

* Dane z Biura Statystyki Pracy za okres pomiędzy 2021 a 2031
Zaktualizowane prognozy mają być dostępne 09-2024.

Płace

Wysoko opłacany w porównaniu do innych profesji

W 2023, mediana rocznej pensji dla 'Flight Attendants' wynosiła 68 370 $, czyli 32 $ za godzinę.

'Flight Attendants' otrzymali wynagrodzenie wyższe o 42,3% od średniej krajowej, która wynosiła 48 060 $

Płace z biegiem czasu

* Dane z Biura Statystyki Pracy

Objętość

Większy zakres możliwości pracy w porównaniu do innych zawodów

Od 2023 roku zatrudnionych było 126 020 osób na stanowisku 'Flight Attendants' w Stanach Zjednoczonych.

To oznacza około 0,08% zatrudnionej siły roboczej w całym kraju.

Inaczej mówiąc, około 1 na 1 tysiąc osób jest zatrudnionych jako 'Flight Attendants'.

Opis stanowiska pracy

Monitoruj bezpieczeństwo w kabinie samolotu. Świadcz usługi dla pasażerów linii lotniczych, wyjaśniaj informacje dotyczące bezpieczeństwa, podawaj jedzenie i napoje oraz reaguj na incydenty awaryjne.

SOC Code: 53-2031.00

Zasoby

Jeśli myślisz o rozpoczęciu nowej kariery lub szukasz zmiany pracy, stworzyliśmy przydatne narzędzie do wyszukiwania pracy, które może Ci pomóc zdobyć tę idealną nową rolę.

Szukaj pracy w swojej lokalnej okolicy

Komentarze

Leave a comment

annie (Nie ma szans) 29 days ago
because companies wont be willing to pay for that amount of robots and the maintenince that is needed on them, real people would be cheaper
0 0 Reply
Anonymous (Bardzo prawdopodobne) 8 months ago
You automate the plane to give instructions during turbulence and emergencies. Ease passengers into by updating the seats, rows, and overhead panels with attendants still onboard. From a safety perspective what is 2 attendants per class going to do for 20+ people, nothing other than give instruction and help 1 or 2 women and children. After introducing passengers to those improvements kick it up a notch and introduce 1 robot attendant for every 1 human attendant. This robot would initially be programmed to serve drinks and snacks. You would order it prior to the flight and on your phone or TV during the flight. Now that you have safety and procedures programmed right in to the plane and passengers have interacted with it over the last 10 years with a few iterations to their programming over time and passengers have been able to be served by a robot, the in cabin experience can now be fully automated. You could even design the robots to be smaller in size to fit more than two attendants in the class. Ultimately decreasing burnout by human staff, boarding times, the time it takes to get to the customer, etc.
0 1 Reply
PK (Nie ma szans) 10 months ago
FAA requires a crew member 1 for every 50. Flight attendant position is based on safety and security designated by FAA not customer service!!!
2 0 Reply
tony (Niski) 1 year ago
You're still going to need human intervention in an emergency. There are too many changes on a moments notice during flight to completely trust it to AI.
2 0 Reply
Philip (Niepewny) 1 year ago
I think aspects of the job could be automated but parts of the job won't be
0 0 Reply
Sofie (Bardzo prawdopodobne) 2 years ago
Humans can decide quicker in an emergency situation, but robots can take a while.

Plus, robots can't do such things as CPR or use a first aid kit, for example. So, it's pretty risky.
0 0 Reply
h (Niski) 2 years ago
AI and robots could mess up emergencies and need a connection to stay "alive"
1 0 Reply
A flight attendant (Niski) 2 years ago
By federal law (FAA), there needs to be 1 flight attendant per 50 seats on a plane. The number can never decrease even with robots. Good luck getting those robots to handle medical emergencies or breaking up fights between ignorant passengers or helping all you ungrateful passengers evacuate during an emergency in 90 seconds or less with no ability of rational thought LOL
0 0 Reply
Collin Tredo (Niski) 3 years ago
This job requires a friendly human face, people will be less comfortable having to talk to and trust a robot/AI when they get on a plane.
0 0 Reply
A (Nie ma szans) 3 years ago
Flight attendants use their knowledge to solve a situation given the surprise factor... it’s impossible to programme a robot that knows how to act in front of a surprise factor situation.

And by the way flight attendants are there to save u not to make u happy.

First priority is safety the If it’s possible the service time will come.
0 0 Reply
Spiros (Nie ma szans) 3 years ago
Flight attendants are there for one specific reason: safety. For this, human presence is important
0 0 Reply
Erebus (Niski) 3 years ago
It involves emotional labour which only a human is capable of.
0 0 Reply
JP (Umiarkowany) 4 years ago
With the global pandemic focusing minds on the amount of human contact passengers have on flights, I could see cabin crew being reduced in number to improve safety, with a Purser and assistant at each end of the aircraft being supplemented by robots which would handle more of the non-emergency workload. Robots would reduce the expense of accommodating cabin crew at destinations and would be able to clean the cabin autonomously using UV lights to disinfect the cabin air and surfaces.
0 0 Reply
A flight attendant (Nie ma szans) 4 years ago
Will absolutely not happen. What most do not realize is that flight attendants are on board for safety. It's just not something that can be replaced by robots.
1 0 Reply
Ebork (Bardzo prawdopodobne) 4 years ago
Flight attendants make or break flying. They'll be robots soon enough.
0 0 Reply
Izme;-; 3 years ago
I think that is wrong you see robots can also break easy, if there is a drunk passenger or causing harm robots can break with their wires. In medical procedures or any emergency humans would be faster than the robots having to mechanically bend down taking longer than humans.
0 0 Reply
THM 4 years ago
Flight attendants make your flying safe you ignorant.
1 0 Reply
JD (Bardzo prawdopodobne) 5 years ago
With the lousy customer service and the awfully attitudes these "air stewards(esses)" possess nowadays, I wouldn't be surprised that a machine will end up doing their job not only more quickly and efficiently, but for little to no cost of maintenance on said droids compared to paying salaries w/ benefits, retirement, etc & dealing with greedy unions, to people who don't do their job properly and are not even qualified to in the first place.

Given the recent horrific experiences passengers had to endure from these "flight attendants", I see machines replacing these incompetent humans in the future. It'll save the airlines plenty of revenue and avoid lawsuits and having to pay these poorly trained service attendants for mediocre to dismal services provided.

The only ones to blame would be the flight attendants themselves, because a machine did a better job than they ever would.
0 1 Reply
MC 1 year ago
JD I don't know what airline you have been flying on. I have been involved in the airline industry for over forty years, have traveled on numerous air carriers, and have never experienced what you have described in terms of lacking flight attendant professionalism, training, emergency, and medical preparedness.

I have witnessed a decline in the manners and decorum of the passengers traveling. Possibly, the added stress to passengers of airport safety procedures has taken a toll on their nerves. I remember when friends and family could accompany passengers to the gate. Now, the seats are packed in like sardines in a can.

Airline competition made the way for no-frills service and more passengers in smaller seats on airplanes. This has taken a toll on everyone's stress levels. Still, I see friendly FAs who are doing their best to accommodate everyone onboard and assuage those who are already frazzled by the time they take their seats.

A robot may make the dispersion of in-flight commodities easier but it can never take care of all of the emergencies that FAs are trained to handle, the medical emergencies, the duplicate and other seating problems, the myriad of human interactions that FA's handle, unaccompanied children, wheelchair passengers, interaction with cockpit and ground staff, etc., etc. the list goes on, not even considering a major emergency like a hijack incident.

You have vastly underestimated the uber-selective hiring, initial and ongoing training that FAs have. Did you know that they have to take FAA-mandated emergency testing yearly on every airplane which they are qualified to work and pass the test with a 90-100% grade. This includes physical testing in airplane simulators., first aide, resuscitation and cardio procedures etc.

If you see an FA behaving in the unprofessional manner you have described, you should write a letter to the airline about that employee.
1 0 Reply
GG 5 years ago
JD deserves the most awful flying experiences after the rudeness he showcased here.
1 0 Reply
Karen 5 years ago
When you have a heart attack on the plane who’s going to administer first aid to you? A robot? A flight attendant is there to save your ass not kiss it and their customer service is based on your attitude. It goes both ways
1 0 Reply
Eternity 4 years ago
With COVID, it would be ideal if airlines used robots instead. We'd rather not use flight attendant "services".
0 0 Reply
Ordinary Internet User 5 years ago
They will hire some flight attendants for those situations.
For example,
Today : 10 human flight attendants
Future: 1-3 human flight attendants, 7+ robot flight attendants.
Capish? :P
0 0 Reply

Zostaw odpowiedź na temat tego zawodu

Ta strona jest chroniona przez reCAPTCHA oraz obowiązują na niej Polityka prywatności i Warunki korzystania Google.