Stewardesy/Stewardzi

Niskie ryzyko
37%

Dokąd chciałbyś się udać dalej?

Podziel się wynikami z przyjaciółmi i rodziną.

Lub, zbadaj ten zawód bardziej szczegółowo...

RYZYKO AUTOMATYZACJI
OBLICZONY
38%
(Niskie ryzyko)
ANKIETOWANIE
37%
(Niskie ryzyko, Na podstawie 499 głosów)
Average: 37%
POPYT NA PRACĘ
WZROST
9,9%
do roku 2033
PŁACE
68 370 $
lub 32,87 $ za godzinę
Objętość
126 020
od 2023
STRESZCZENIE
Co przedstawia ten płatek śniegu?
Płatek Śniegu to graficzne podsumowanie pięciu odznak: Ryzyko Automatyzacji (obliczane), Ryzyko (sondażowe), Wzrost, Płace i Wolumen. Daje Ci natychmiastowy obraz profilu zawodu. Kolor Płatka Śniegu odnosi się do jego rozmiaru. Im lepiej zawód wypada w porównaniu do innych, tym Płatek Śniegu staje się większy i bardziej zielony.
WYNIK PRACY
6,9/10
Co to jest?
Wynik pracy (im wyższy, tym lepszy):

Oceniamy prace, biorąc pod uwagę cztery czynniki. Są to:

- Szansa na automatyzację
- Wzrost zatrudnienia
- Wynagrodzenie
- Liczba dostępnych stanowisk

Są to kluczowe rzeczy, o których warto pomyśleć podczas poszukiwania pracy.

Ludzie również oglądali

Adwokaci Programiści komputerowi Aktorzy Piloci komercyjni Projektanci grafiki

Obliczone ryzyko automatyzacji

38% (Niskie ryzyko)

Niskie ryzyko (21-40%): Zawody na tym poziomie mają ograniczone ryzyko automatyzacji, ponieważ wymagają połączenia umiejętności technicznych i skoncentrowanych na człowieku.

Więcej informacji na temat tego, czym jest ten wynik i jak jest obliczany, jest dostępne tutaj.

Niektóre bardzo ważne cechy pracy są trudne do zautomatyzowania:

  • Ciasna Przestrzeń Pracy, Niezręczne Pozycje

  • Pomaganie i opieka nad innymi

Niektóre dość ważne cechy pracy są trudne do zautomatyzowania:

  • Spostrzegawczość Społeczna

  • Perswazja

Ankieta użytkownika

37% szansa na pełną automatyzację w ciągu najbliższych dwóch dekad

Nasi goście zagłosowali, że jest małe prawdopodobieństwo, iż ten zawód zostanie zautomatyzowany. To ocena jest dodatkowo wspierana przez obliczony poziom ryzyka automatyzacji, który szacuje 38% szansę na automatyzację.

Jakie są Twoje zdanie na temat ryzyka automatyzacji?

Jakie jest prawdopodobieństwo, że Stewardesy/Stewardzi zostanie zastąpione przez roboty lub sztuczną inteligencję w ciągu najbliższych 20 lat?

Nastroje

Poniższy wykres jest wyświetlany tam, gdzie jest wystarczająca liczba głosów, aby uzyskać znaczące dane. Przedstawia wyniki ankiet użytkowników w czasie, dając wyraźny obraz trendów nastrojów.

Nastroje w czasie (rocznie)

Wzrost

Bardzo szybki wzrost względem innych profesji

Liczba ofert pracy na stanowisku 'Flight Attendants' ma wzrosnąć 9,9% do 2033

Całkowite zatrudnienie oraz szacowane oferty pracy

* Dane z Biura Statystyki Pracy za okres pomiędzy 2023 a 2033
Zaktualizowane prognozy mają być dostępne 09-2025.

Płace

Wysoko opłacany w porównaniu do innych profesji

W 2023, mediana rocznej pensji dla 'Flight Attendants' wynosiła 68 370 $, czyli 33 $ za godzinę.

'Flight Attendants' otrzymali wynagrodzenie wyższe o 42,3% od średniej krajowej, która wynosiła 48 060 $

Płace z biegiem czasu

* Dane z Biura Statystyki Pracy

Objętość

Większy zakres możliwości pracy w porównaniu do innych zawodów

Od 2023 roku zatrudnionych było 126 020 osób na stanowisku 'Flight Attendants' w Stanach Zjednoczonych.

To oznacza około 0,08% zatrudnionej siły roboczej w całym kraju.

Inaczej mówiąc, około 1 na 1 tysiąc osób jest zatrudnionych jako 'Flight Attendants'.

Opis stanowiska pracy

Monitoruj bezpieczeństwo w kabinie samolotu. Świadcz usługi dla pasażerów linii lotniczych, wyjaśniaj informacje dotyczące bezpieczeństwa, podawaj jedzenie i napoje oraz reaguj na incydenty awaryjne.

SOC Code: 53-2031.00

Komentarze (30)

Dodaj komentarz
z
08 lis 2025 02:26
Flight Attendants go through a long training process to learn about safety, evacuations, CPR, medical procedures, and how to handle emergencies. It’s not a job that AI can just replace easily. AI might be able to help with small stuff in planes, but it can’t fully replace Flight Attendants. If I was a nervous passenger on a plane, I don’t think I would feel comforted by an emotionless robot compared to if an actual person was helping me calm down.
Kevin (Nie ma szans)
23 sie 2025 15:31
Just imagine a metal robot in a tube during severe turbulence, helping injured passengers off a broken plane, resolving conflict, etc. One kick and it would be on its back out of commission
PY (Nie ma szans)
22 sie 2025 08:28
Only few flight attendants on each flight, you can't reply on robot during sudden emergency
annie (Nie ma szans)
25 paź 2024 03:04
because companies wont be willing to pay for that amount of robots and the maintenince that is needed on them, real people would be cheaper
trained as flight attendant
07 mar 2025 23:01
For real people need to pay for hotels and meals, and sometimes flight attendants are transported as passengers if the flight is from another city. Their holidays can last two months to prevent overwork. People are always more expensive, need just the higher level of technology.
Anonymous (Bardzo prawdopodobne)
23 mar 2024 12:38
You automate the plane to give instructions during turbulence and emergencies. Ease passengers into by updating the seats, rows, and overhead panels with attendants still onboard. From a safety perspective what is 2 attendants per class going to do for 20+ people, nothing other than give instruction and help 1 or 2 women and children. After introducing passengers to those improvements kick it up a notch and introduce 1 robot attendant for every 1 human attendant. This robot would initially be programmed to serve drinks and snacks. You would order it prior to the flight and on your phone or TV during the flight. Now that you have safety and procedures programmed right in to the plane and passengers have interacted with it over the last 10 years with a few iterations to their programming over time and passengers have been able to be served by a robot, the in cabin experience can now be fully automated. You could even design the robots to be smaller in size to fit more than two attendants in the class. Ultimately decreasing burnout by human staff, boarding times, the time it takes to get to the customer, etc.
passionate FA
11 kwi 2025 04:34
This proves to me you have a very low understanding of what Flight Attendants actually do. Our main priority is not serving drinks and snacks, its safety. We are trained in water evacuation, fire evacuations, to preflight all our equipment, memorize the detail of every aircraft, ect. There is a greater risk/safety breach with AI being in these positions than a human. It is not simply “customer service”, it is problem solving and ensuring safety of all passengers. If anything would be replaced, potentially gate agents. But FAs and pilots are crucial.
D. H.
06 lip 2025 13:52
More than tens of thousands would need to be spent per robot just to create and maintain it. The airplane would need more fuel and more space for your plan. You would need super advanced plus millions of dollars in technology for a first responder robot.
PK (Nie ma szans)
29 sty 2024 02:41
FAA requires a crew member 1 for every 50. Flight attendant position is based on safety and security designated by FAA not customer service!!!
tony (Niski)
02 cze 2023 20:39
You're still going to need human intervention in an emergency. There are too many changes on a moments notice during flight to completely trust it to AI.
Philip (Niepewny)
12 maj 2023 18:40
I think aspects of the job could be automated but parts of the job won't be
Sofie (Bardzo prawdopodobne)
08 sie 2022 18:37
Humans can decide quicker in an emergency situation, but robots can take a while.

Plus, robots can't do such things as CPR or use a first aid kit, for example. So, it's pretty risky.
h (Niski)
31 gru 2021 01:27
AI and robots could mess up emergencies and need a connection to stay "alive"
A flight attendant (Niski)
06 gru 2021 16:31
By federal law (FAA), there needs to be 1 flight attendant per 50 seats on a plane. The number can never decrease even with robots. Good luck getting those robots to handle medical emergencies or breaking up fights between ignorant passengers or helping all you ungrateful passengers evacuate during an emergency in 90 seconds or less with no ability of rational thought LOL
Collin Tredo (Niski)
17 maj 2021 17:00
This job requires a friendly human face, people will be less comfortable having to talk to and trust a robot/AI when they get on a plane.
A (Nie ma szans)
10 kwi 2021 10:07
Flight attendants use their knowledge to solve a situation given the surprise factor... it’s impossible to programme a robot that knows how to act in front of a surprise factor situation. And by the way flight attendants are there to save u not to make u happy. First priority is safety the If it’s possible the service time will come.
Spiros (Nie ma szans)
10 kwi 2021 01:55
Flight attendants are there for one specific reason: safety. For this, human presence is important
Erebus (Niski)
24 mar 2021 17:52
It involves emotional labour which only a human is capable of.
JP (Umiarkowany)
02 sie 2020 16:53
With the global pandemic focusing minds on the amount of human contact passengers have on flights, I could see cabin crew being reduced in number to improve safety, with a Purser and assistant at each end of the aircraft being supplemented by robots which would handle more of the non-emergency workload. Robots would reduce the expense of accommodating cabin crew at destinations and would be able to clean the cabin autonomously using UV lights to disinfect the cabin air and surfaces.
A flight attendant (Nie ma szans)
22 lip 2020 08:27
Will absolutely not happen. What most do not realize is that flight attendants are on board for safety. It's just not something that can be replaced by robots.
Ebork (Bardzo prawdopodobne)
03 sty 2020 11:48
Flight attendants make or break flying. They'll be robots soon enough.
THM
27 cze 2020 09:20
Flight attendants make your flying safe you ignorant.
Izme;-;
31 mar 2021 08:21
I think that is wrong you see robots can also break easy, if there is a drunk passenger or causing harm robots can break with their wires. In medical procedures or any emergency humans would be faster than the robots having to mechanically bend down taking longer than humans.
JD (Bardzo prawdopodobne)
20 kwi 2019 05:36
With the lousy customer service and the awfully attitudes these "air stewards(esses)" possess nowadays, I wouldn't be surprised that a machine will end up doing their job not only more quickly and efficiently, but for little to no cost of maintenance on said droids compared to paying salaries w/ benefits, retirement, etc & dealing with greedy unions, to people who don't do their job properly and are not even qualified to in the first place. Given the recent horrific experiences passengers had to endure from these "flight attendants", I see machines replacing these incompetent humans in the future. It'll save the airlines plenty of revenue and avoid lawsuits and having to pay these poorly trained service attendants for mediocre to dismal services provided. The only ones to blame would be the flight attendants themselves, because a machine did a better job than they ever would.
Karen
05 maj 2019 06:17
When you have a heart attack on the plane who’s going to administer first aid to you? A robot? A flight attendant is there to save your ass not kiss it and their customer service is based on your attitude. It goes both ways
Ordinary Internet User
04 wrz 2019 13:28
They will hire some flight attendants for those situations. For example, Today : 10 human flight attendants Future: 1-3 human flight attendants, 7+ robot flight attendants. Capish? :P
Eternity
22 maj 2020 04:27
With COVID, it would be ideal if airlines used robots instead. We'd rather not use flight attendant "services".
GG
09 maj 2019 16:11
JD deserves the most awful flying experiences after the rudeness he showcased here.
MC
16 lip 2023 10:31
JD I don't know what airline you have been flying on. I have been involved in the airline industry for over forty years, have traveled on numerous air carriers, and have never experienced what you have described in terms of lacking flight attendant professionalism, training, emergency, and medical preparedness.

I have witnessed a decline in the manners and decorum of the passengers traveling. Possibly, the added stress to passengers of airport safety procedures has taken a toll on their nerves. I remember when friends and family could accompany passengers to the gate. Now, the seats are packed in like sardines in a can.

Airline competition made the way for no-frills service and more passengers in smaller seats on airplanes. This has taken a toll on everyone's stress levels. Still, I see friendly FAs who are doing their best to accommodate everyone onboard and assuage those who are already frazzled by the time they take their seats.

A robot may make the dispersion of in-flight commodities easier but it can never take care of all of the emergencies that FAs are trained to handle, the medical emergencies, the duplicate and other seating problems, the myriad of human interactions that FA's handle, unaccompanied children, wheelchair passengers, interaction with cockpit and ground staff, etc., etc. the list goes on, not even considering a major emergency like a hijack incident.

You have vastly underestimated the uber-selective hiring, initial and ongoing training that FAs have. Did you know that they have to take FAA-mandated emergency testing yearly on every airplane which they are qualified to work and pass the test with a 90-100% grade. This includes physical testing in airplane simulators., first aide, resuscitation and cardio procedures etc.

If you see an FA behaving in the unprofessional manner you have described, you should write a letter to the airline about that employee.
Dolly
22 gru 2024 16:31
Your ex a flight attendant?

Zostaw odpowiedź na temat tego zawodu
0/8000