Luchtvaartpiloten, Copiloten en Vluchttechnici

Matig Risico
48%

Waar Wilt U Hierna Heen Gaan?

Of, verken dit beroep in meer detail...

RISICO VAN AUTOMATISERING
BEREKEND
65%
(Hoog Risico)
PEILING
31%
(Laag Risico, Gebaseerd op 1.445 stemmen)
Average: 48%
VRAAG NAAR ARBEID
GROEI
5,0%
tegen het jaar 2033
LONEN
$ 219.140
of $ 105,35 per uur
Volume
93.670
vanaf 2023
SAMENVATTING
Wat laat deze sneeuwvlok zien?
De Sneeuwvlok is een visuele samenvatting van de vijf badges: Automatiseringsrisico (berekend), Risico (gepeild), Groei, Salarissen en Volume. Het geeft je een directe momentopname van een beroepsprofiel. De kleur van de Sneeuwvlok hangt samen met de grootte ervan. Hoe beter het beroep scoort in vergelijking met anderen, hoe groter en groener de Sneeuwvlok wordt.
BAANSCORE
6,3/10
Wat is dit?
Functiebeoordeling (hoe hoger, hoe beter):

We beoordelen banen op basis van vier factoren. Deze zijn:

- Kans op automatisering
- Banengroei
- Salarissen
- Aantal beschikbare posities

Dit zijn enkele belangrijke zaken om over na te denken bij het zoeken naar een baan.

Mensen bekeken ook

Commerciële Piloten Advocaten Acteurs Computerprogrammeurs Webontwikkelaars

Berekend automatiseringsrisico

65% (Hoog Risico)

Hoge Risico (61-80%): Banen in deze categorie lopen een aanzienlijk risico door automatisering, aangezien veel van hun taken gemakkelijk kunnen worden geautomatiseerd met behulp van huidige of nabije toekomstige technologieën.

Meer informatie over wat deze score is en hoe deze wordt berekend, is beschikbaar hier.

Enkele vrij belangrijke kwaliteiten van de baan zijn moeilijk te automatiseren:

  • Handvaardigheid

  • Sociale Waarneming

  • Vingerbehendigheid

Gebruikerspeiling

31% kans op volledige automatisering binnen de komende twee decennia

Onze bezoekers hebben gestemd dat er een kleine kans is dat dit beroep zal worden geautomatiseerd. De automatiseringsrisicograad die we echter hebben gegenereerd, suggereert een veel hogere kans op automatisering: 65% kans op automatisering.

Wat denk je dat het risico van automatisering is?

Wat is de kans dat Luchtvaartpiloten, Copiloten en Vluchttechnici binnen de komende 20 jaar vervangen zal worden door robots of kunstmatige intelligentie?

Gevoel

De volgende grafiek wordt weergegeven waar er voldoende stemmen zijn om betekenisvolle gegevens te produceren. Het toont de resultaten van gebruikerspeilingen in de loop van de tijd en biedt een duidelijk beeld van sentimenttrends.

Gevoel over tijd (jaarlijks)

Groei

Matige groei ten opzichte van andere beroepen

Het aantal 'Airline Pilots, Copilots, and Flight Engineers' vacatures zal naar verwachting stijgen met 5,0% tegen 2033

Totale werkgelegenheid en geschatte vacatures

* Gegevens van het Bureau of Labor Statistics voor de periode tussen 2023 en 2033
Bijgewerkte prognoses zijn verschuldigd 09-2025.

Lonen

Zeer hoog betaald vergeleken met andere beroepen

In 2023 was het mediane jaarloon voor 'Airline Pilots, Copilots, and Flight Engineers' $ 219.140, of $ 105 per uur

'Airline Pilots, Copilots, and Flight Engineers' werden 356,0% hoger betaald dan het nationale mediane loon, dat op $ 48.060 stond.

Lonen in de loop van de tijd

* Gegevens van het Bureau voor Arbeidsstatistieken

Volume

Matige reeks van werkmogelijkheden in vergelijking met andere beroepen

Vanaf 2023 waren er 93.670 mensen in dienst als 'Airline Pilots, Copilots, and Flight Engineers' binnen de Verenigde Staten.

Dit vertegenwoordigt ongeveer 0,06% van de werkende bevolking in het hele land.

Anders gezegd, ongeveer 1 op de 1 duizend mensen is werkzaam als 'Airline Pilots, Copilots, and Flight Engineers'.

Functieomschrijving

Bestuur en navigeer de vlucht van vaste-vleugelvliegtuigen, meestal op geplande luchtvaartroutes, voor het vervoer van passagiers en vracht. Vereist een Federaal Luchttransportcertificaat en een beoordeling voor het specifieke type vliegtuig dat wordt gebruikt. Inclusief regionale, nationale en internationale luchtvaartpiloten en vlieginstructeurs van luchtvaartpiloten.

SOC Code: 53-2011.00

Opmerkingen (87)

Laat een reactie achter
John (Laag)
05 dec. 2024 21:56
A computer can only do so many algorithms. Let's say a situation happens and the computer/AI is there to slove the problem and it does.... but what happens when the problem is outside of the box and the algorithm doesn't know what to do. This is where is can turn catastrophic. This is where pilots come in to play and think outside the box plus their fighting for their lives so they will do everything to get home to their families and their passengers also.

20 years it will start with cargo flights.

Another 10 years after maybe commercial flights.

If an accident happens like where two planes go down due to MCAS designed by boeing. This probably set it back years for automation.

Look at Sully landing on the Hudson can a computer do that?

Miracle on the Hudson that was down to skill and knowledge and a brilliant Captain and First Office.
Jayden Hua
14 jul. 2025 18:12
The FAA will not allow this, they wont even allow 1 person only in the cockpit. If it takes 3-5 years in flight school, there's a low possibility that they can replace pilots that need to learn for 5 years.
Mason Braswelle (Geen kans)
28 okt. 2024 20:28
The amount of things pilots have to do in order to ensure safe flights is astounding, not to mention that if something were to go wrong, what would the robot even do?
Carson Gill (Laag)
12 jan. 2026 20:48
Within the upcoming years, robots might be developed enough to completely fly planes. Actually, some planes already can. The issue with this is that many people will likely never trust a robot to control something that is thousands of feet in the air because if something were to happen, there would be no professionals to manage the issue or take control if the computer fails.
Pilot | 737 max (Laag)
12 sep. 2025 18:15
That's an airplane! It flies upto 40000ft no one can trust a machine flying airplane, carrying 200+ passengers without pilot... Even auto pilot is in under control of pilot, they are watching it!
Dan (Matig)
26 jan. 2025 16:08
I'm a commercial pilot, I work in the industry for the last 20 years.
Capacity to AI takeover already exist but passanger trust will take longer to be achieved.
rorik
07 sep. 2024 00:27
consider that nothing manufactured by humans are perfect, with such a reality, you cannot assume that a robot/ai could do it's job flawlessly. there are ethical decisions in emergencies that must be made in the cockpit that an ai simply cannot do. furthermore, redundancy is a core value in aviation, and until human manufacturing is perfect (arguably wont ever be), a pilot will always be needed in the cockpit as a form of redundancy in case the manufactured systems malfunction.
criag (Geen kans)
02 jul. 2024 00:33
There are many airlines that want soft, silky landings and not slammy, hard, ai- landings
Michael (Zeer waarschijnlijk)
21 jan. 2023 14:47
AI is advancing rapidly and is on track to replace pilots within 10 years.
Unlikely
16 jun. 2022 05:14
Unlikely for a long time. First of all, there’s the technology which is there. Currently, automation has to be set and monitored by the pilots. It is extremely accurate and does fly the plane better than a person can, but it has limitations.

Most emergencies or abnormal events are known about and there are checklists to deal with them, but not every situation is the same or black and white. My specialty is flying airplanes, not computer science, but I find it hard to imagine current AI being able to properly handle a plane in an emergency, especially if it is a new situation.

There is also public opinion. I don’t like the idea because it takes a lot of jobs away, and I know many others don’t like the idea of a couple of hundred people being flown in an airplane completely controlled by AI.

The FAA is also notoriously slow with changing and adapting the rules. They have plenty of rules that are outdated and strange policies, but most of it is in the interest of safety. They prohibit people from flying unless they meet specific physical and mental health criteria. To my knowledge, pilots aren’t allowed to have any form of mental illness, and can’t take antidepressants or other similar things which could easily be treated.

The point I’m making here is that they’re slow to change and this big change would certainly take a while.
E (I prefer not to say)
10 sep. 2023 18:48
That's a relief I because I want to be a pilot and to be honest I also don't want an AI flying a plane I'm in on it's own
Michael (Zeer waarschijnlijk)
14 mei 2022 08:19
Airbus already has an airplane that can fly all phases of flight by itself.
Asher (Laag)
26 apr. 2022 16:23
People aren’t trustworthy of artificial intelligence it could take 50 years+ for them to start being used alone and you’d still need a pilot just in case
Adam (Zeer waarschijnlijk)
20 apr. 2022 11:54
I think it will be partially automated before fully, but that will have an impact on how many jobs there are by about half. If things can be automated enough to remove the co-pilot, then that will happen first. Then single pilots will be flying from home just like the military flies drones now. Over time, with the increase in AI that can make decisions in real time about outside factors, the planes will become fully automated.
Sean (Geen kans)
09 apr. 2022 01:25
Everything moves very, very slowly in the world of aviation. We still use technology from the 90s. There is no way it will be automated in my lifetime.
Thomas ( not yet)
01 feb. 2022 17:18
The average lifespan of an airliner is 20 years. Even if they started producing fully automated aircraft tomorrow, most of the planes would be manned for many, many years to come.
Joakim (Geen kans)
05 okt. 2025 21:50
Because humans will probably be better at decision making and certificaton for full AI control will likely take a long time.
EES (Geen kans)
11 mei 2025 14:03
we already have autopilots and they havent been replaced, yes, there is automation, but when the automation is already here and there's still demand for pilots, why would it go away
Jeremy (Laag)
09 okt. 2024 17:42
Although the actual flight operation can be managed by AI, there is always the chance that the AI will fail at controlling the plane. Also there is always different situations for landing and takeoff, AI won't always be able to predict and maneuver the next move.
dan (Laag)
07 sep. 2024 00:22
ask yourself this question, how would you feel if the most beloved person to you was on a plane controlled by a robot that could be hacked, glitch, or malfunction
Captam (Zeer waarschijnlijk)
23 jun. 2023 01:59
The “need for the human touch“ when things “go wrong“ with a flight is arguably correct However this function can be provided perfectly adequately from a remote control room. The human does not need to be sitting in the cockpit. The ability to fly precision drone operarions from control rooms thousands of miles away proves this. Flights can be totally automated but when an abnormality occurs, the controllers (who oversee multiple flights)can be alerted, and intervene renotely if necessaey.
AJ
15 aug. 2024 20:51
Those are heavy assumptions that there is strong two way communication between the aircraft and the ground station controlling it. Not a lot of the areas that airplanes are flying over will be able to maintain a constant communication (such as war zones, the arctic, or the Atlantic or Pacific Ocean) and before you say GPS keep in mind it works by sending low bit data so that doesn’t exactly work well when complicated or heavy computing conditions exist. Plus if you can control it remotely so can someone else looking to cause trouble.

Laat een reactie achter over dit beroep
0/8000