Politie- en Sheriffspatrouilleofficieren

6% (Minimaal Risico)

Minimaal Risico (0-20%): Beroepen in deze categorie hebben een lage kans op automatisering, omdat ze doorgaans complexe probleemoplossing, creativiteit, sterke interpersoonlijke vaardigheden en een hoge mate van handvaardigheid vereisen. Deze banen omvatten vaak ingewikkelde handbewegingen en precieze coördinatie, waardoor het moeilijk is voor machines om de vereiste taken te repliceren.

Meer informatie over wat deze score is en hoe deze wordt berekend, is beschikbaar hier.

Gebruikerspeiling

Gevoel

De volgende grafiek wordt opgenomen waar er een aanzienlijke hoeveelheid stemmen is om zinvolle gegevens weer te geven. Deze visuele weergaven tonen de resultaten van gebruikerspeilingen in de loop van de tijd en bieden een belangrijke indicatie van sentimenttrends.

Lonen

Hoog betaald in vergelijking met andere beroepen

In 2023 was het mediane jaarloon voor 'Police and Sheriff's Patrol Officers' $ 72.280, of $ 34 per uur

'Police and Sheriff's Patrol Officers' werden 50,4% hoger betaald dan het nationale mediane loon, dat op $ 48.060 stond.

Lonen in de loop van de tijd

Opmerkingen

Leave a comment

Damanpreet Singh (Geen kans) 6 months ago

How is supposed to change Because it’s a human kind of human can feel about the person

0 2 Reply

Kevin 7 months ago

It would work great because the AI would know the law and wouldn't retaliate against people they don't like.

0 2 Reply

matthew fitzgerald (Laag) 10 months ago

robo cops wouldn't work because you would have to program them to have emotions, so they don't go into overdrive and kill or destroy everything.

3 3 Reply

Deputy Dredd (Laag) 11 months ago

the question is would people find an automated law enforcement officer more credible than a human police officer. I think there will be more Artificial intelligence added to the job but not all automation as we currently understand computers

0 0 Reply

Sam 1 year ago

The public will likely never allow it to pass the legislature due to lack of trust for the technology.

0 0 Reply

Caleb (Laag) 1 year ago

Many aspects of this profession require a human element (i.e., emotional intelligence, de-escalation, interviewing, rapport building, etc.) that current AI technology is incapable of reproducing at this time.

0 0 Reply

Philip Low (Laag) 1 year ago

Although unlikely I do believe that more technology will be Implemented into day to day policing and such tasks as processing criminals may become automated but a lot of the human elements will never be automated.

0 0 Reply

Kirsten 1 year ago

Where I am from, they have automated speed radars and red light traffic cameras. Both of which will capture the vehicle registration and issue a ticket. Just saying. I agree it's safe from full take-over, but some changes will present.

0 0 Reply

Martin 3 years ago

Partially replaced for sure. There will likely always be some people, but you can replace a lot of the monotonous work with machines. Cameras and sensors can spot speeders and light runners. The new Boston Dynamics robots can do backhand springs. One cop could send a host of A.I. swarm bots to a crack house and handle it like a video game. Quadcopters, mechanical mice with cameras and microphones, armed dog bots, humanoid arrest bots, and self-driving cars.

0 0 Reply

Will 3 years ago

Over a year and NOBODY made a "Robocop" reference? The internet has disappointed me once again.

0 0 Reply

Steve W. 3 years ago

Imagine a cop that doesn't get emotional, doesn't have an ego, doesn't care about politics, and never uses the excuse, "I was afraid for my life."

Yes, we need AI-controlled robotic cops immediately. Many lives will be saved.

0 1 Reply

Metrixfr 5 months ago

Ok so if a criminal is about to boot your head off and send u 6ft under u would just allow that to happen. Your response is u just being completely delulu and do u really think a robot would be able to arrest a criminal with out humans help like I'm pretty sure a criminal would just destroy it and run away bruv.

1 0 Reply

Antonio 9 months ago

Ok buddy 😂

0 0 Reply

Sam 1 year ago

“Many lives”

In 2022 only about 1,000 deaths caused by police officers occurred and most were justified. There’s over 700,000 police officers to date, which comes out to less than 1% of all police officers in the entire USA.

You’re being completely ridiculous.

1 0 Reply

Angel Vollant (Geen kans) 3 years ago

No chance. Policing requires critical thinking, logic, situational assessment and decision-making which can’t fit into a program. When a police officer sees someone committing a crime, it’s up to them to decide what to do. If a man’s smoking pot alone in the park, do they deserve to be arrested? The cop will go up to them, talk a bit, leave a warning and may or may not leave a ticket depending on how the man acts. If he’s polite and cooperative, the officer will probably let him off with a warning. If he’s erratic and violent, he’ll arrest him. A robot, however, won’t think that far. Sees someone committing a crime (smoking pot) and simply arrest him. If he doesn’t comply, use violence. They’re programmed to do what the programmer put into it. If someone has a knife, take them out. Simple as that. Doesn’t matter if it’s a woman defending herself against an abuser. The robot’ll see a knife and shoot her. Robocop explained it very well. Police officers need compassion and emotions. If you could program a robot to do that, you’ve got yourself a human.

0 0 Reply

Anon 10 months ago

It's over 3 years since your post. AI has greatly progressed. I don't think anyone in 2020 thought AI would be where it is now. AI can easily do all the critical thinking, logic, situational assessment and decision-making, and it might not be available yet, but it is apparent that it can fit inside a program. What is more difficult is that policing requires a physical presence. Robotics just isn't there yet, and even if it ever does get there, you'd basically need a highly expensive robot to replace each individual officer. Whereas AI on a single server with access to multiple phone lines (and ai voice automation) can easily replace a 100+ person office.

It's not impossible for AI to take over policing, but due to economic factors, it is likely one of the least at-risk professions to be taken over by AI

0 0 Reply

mister sir 4 years ago

I think it's good that they have a low chance of being replaced by robots because although humans can be biased, humans make better decisions and can pick up on clues or emotions better.

0 0 Reply

My name isn't your bidness. (Onzeker) 4 years ago

There is a lot of talk about things like the androids from D:BH so I think it could go either way if artificial intelligence is improved.

0 0 Reply

Khan (Laag) 4 years ago

Competent police officers require human communication skills and human coordination (for the later see the old “robots struggle to walk up stairs” problem)

0 0 Reply

frankie (Laag) 4 years ago

as police need to have good decision making skills as robots do not

0 0 Reply

Anonomous (Laag) 4 years ago

THAT IS CRAZY HOW WOULD THEY GET COPS REPLACED!??!!?

0 0 Reply

A 3 months ago

It will be like Robocop, but the human is replaced with AI.

0 0 Reply

Meep (Onzeker) 4 years ago

Because if you only go up to 20 years from now it may change past then.

0 0 Reply

Lachlan Beck (Geen kans) 5 years ago

Because Robots lack the feeling of emotions and aren't able to be empathetic to other humans or robots therefore they lack a key skill of being an officer

0 0 Reply

Hope Pringle 5 years ago

Yeah, I want to see a person behind the badge, not some dumb robot who can feel for the victims or people in general! I want to be a police officer when I grow up NO robot will take my job. I will not let that happen!

0 0 Reply

Ben 5 years ago

A computer has the capacity to think thousands of times faster than a human. When AI and robotics reach the level of performing the job... People can't compete. Almost perfect job performance...or a human... You choose. Computers aren't stressed out, they have no bias... They are, in every way capable of being better at the job...

0 0 Reply