Politie- en Sheriffspatrouilleofficieren

Minimaal Risico
15%
Waar Wilt U Hierna Heen Gaan?
Deel je resultaten met vrienden en familie.
Of, verken dit beroep in meer detail...
RISICO VAN AUTOMATISERING
BEREKEND
6%
(Minimaal Risico)
PEILING
23%
(Laag Risico)
Average: 15%
VRAAG NAAR ARBEID
GROEI
3,9%
tegen het jaar 2033
LONEN
$ 72.280
of $ 34,75 per uur
Volume
646.310
vanaf 2023
SAMENVATTING
BAANSCORE
7,4/10

Mensen bekeken ook

Berekend automatiseringsrisico

6% (Minimaal Risico)

Minimaal Risico (0-20%): Beroepen in deze categorie hebben een lage kans op automatisering, omdat ze doorgaans complexe probleemoplossing, creativiteit, sterke interpersoonlijke vaardigheden en een hoge mate van handvaardigheid vereisen. Deze banen omvatten vaak ingewikkelde handbewegingen en precieze coördinatie, waardoor het moeilijk is voor machines om de vereiste taken te repliceren.

Meer informatie over wat deze score is en hoe deze wordt berekend, is beschikbaar hier.

Enkele zeer belangrijke kwaliteiten van de baan zijn moeilijk te automatiseren:

  • Anderen Assisteren en Verzorgen

Enkele vrij belangrijke kwaliteiten van de baan zijn moeilijk te automatiseren:

  • Sociale Waarneming

  • Overtuiging

  • Onderhandeling

  • Originaliteit

Gebruikerspeiling

23% kans op volledige automatisering binnen de komende twee decennia

Onze bezoekers hebben gestemd dat er een kleine kans is dat dit beroep zal worden geautomatiseerd. Deze beoordeling wordt verder ondersteund door het berekende automatiseringsrisiconiveau, dat een schatting geeft van 6% kans op automatisering.

Wat denk je dat het risico van automatisering is?

Wat is de kans dat Politie- en Sheriffspatrouilleofficieren binnen de komende 20 jaar vervangen zal worden door robots of kunstmatige intelligentie?






Gevoel

De volgende grafiek wordt opgenomen waar er een aanzienlijke hoeveelheid stemmen is om zinvolle gegevens weer te geven. Deze visuele weergaven tonen de resultaten van gebruikerspeilingen in de loop van de tijd en bieden een belangrijke indicatie van sentimenttrends.

Gevoel over tijd (jaarlijks)

Groei

Matige groei ten opzichte van andere beroepen

Het aantal 'Police and Sheriff's Patrol Officers' vacatures zal naar verwachting stijgen met 3,9% tegen 2033

Totale werkgelegenheid en geschatte vacatures

* Gegevens van het Bureau of Labor Statistics voor de periode tussen 2021 en 2031
Bijgewerkte prognoses zijn verschuldigd 09-2024.

Lonen

Hoog betaald in vergelijking met andere beroepen

In 2023 was het mediane jaarloon voor 'Police and Sheriff's Patrol Officers' $ 72.280, of $ 34 per uur

'Police and Sheriff's Patrol Officers' werden 50,4% hoger betaald dan het nationale mediane loon, dat op $ 48.060 stond.

Lonen in de loop van de tijd

* Gegevens van het Bureau voor Arbeidsstatistieken

Volume

Aanzienlijk groter aanbod van werkgelegenheden vergeleken met andere beroepen

Vanaf 2023 waren er 646.310 mensen in dienst als 'Police and Sheriff's Patrol Officers' binnen de Verenigde Staten.

Dit vertegenwoordigt ongeveer 0,43% van de werkende bevolking in het hele land.

Anders gezegd, ongeveer 1 op de 234 mensen is werkzaam als 'Police and Sheriff's Patrol Officers'.

Functieomschrijving

Handhaaf de orde en bescherm het leven en eigendommen door lokale, stam-, staats- of federale wetten en verordeningen te handhaven. Voer een combinatie van de volgende taken uit: patrouilleren in een specifiek gebied; het verkeer regelen; verkeersbekeuringen uitdelen; ongevallen onderzoeken; verdachten aanhouden en arresteren, of juridische processen van rechtbanken uitvoeren. Dit omvat ook politieagenten die werkzaam zijn bij onderwijsinstellingen.

SOC Code: 33-3051.00

Middelen

Zoek naar banen in uw lokale omgeving

Als u overweegt een nieuwe carrière te beginnen, of van baan wilt veranderen, hebben we een handige zoektool voor banen gemaakt die u mogelijk helpt bij het vinden van die perfecte nieuwe functie.

Zoek naar banen in uw lokale omgeving

Opmerkingen

Leave a comment

burt (Laag) 26 days ago
if a robot pulls me over im driving away
0 0 Reply
Damanpreet Singh (Geen kans) 7 months ago
How is supposed to change Because it’s a human kind of human can feel about the person
0 2 Reply
Kevin 8 months ago
It would work great because the AI would know the law and wouldn't retaliate against people they don't like.
0 3 Reply
matthew fitzgerald (Laag) 12 months ago
robo cops wouldn't work because you would have to program them to have emotions, so they don't go into overdrive and kill or destroy everything.
3 4 Reply
Deputy Dredd (Laag) 1 year ago
the question is would people find an automated law enforcement officer more credible than a human police officer. I think there will be more Artificial intelligence added to the job but not all automation as we currently understand computers
0 0 Reply
Sam 1 year ago
The public will likely never allow it to pass the legislature due to lack of trust for the technology.
0 0 Reply
Caleb (Laag) 1 year ago
Many aspects of this profession require a human element (i.e., emotional intelligence, de-escalation, interviewing, rapport building, etc.) that current AI technology is incapable of reproducing at this time.
0 0 Reply
Philip Low (Laag) 1 year ago
Although unlikely I do believe that more technology will be Implemented into day to day policing and such tasks as processing criminals may become automated but a lot of the human elements will never be automated.
0 0 Reply
Kirsten 1 year ago
Where I am from, they have automated speed radars and red light traffic cameras. Both of which will capture the vehicle registration and issue a ticket. Just saying. I agree it's safe from full take-over, but some changes will present.
0 0 Reply
Martin 3 years ago
Partially replaced for sure. There will likely always be some people, but you can replace a lot of the monotonous work with machines. Cameras and sensors can spot speeders and light runners. The new Boston Dynamics robots can do backhand springs. One cop could send a host of A.I. swarm bots to a crack house and handle it like a video game. Quadcopters, mechanical mice with cameras and microphones, armed dog bots, humanoid arrest bots, and self-driving cars.
0 0 Reply
Will 3 years ago
Over a year and NOBODY made a "Robocop" reference? The internet has disappointed me once again.
0 0 Reply
Steve W. 3 years ago
Imagine a cop that doesn't get emotional, doesn't have an ego, doesn't care about politics, and never uses the excuse, "I was afraid for my life."

Yes, we need AI-controlled robotic cops immediately. Many lives will be saved.
0 1 Reply
Metrixfr 6 months ago
Ok so if a criminal is about to boot your head off and send u 6ft under u would just allow that to happen. Your response is u just being completely delulu and do u really think a robot would be able to arrest a criminal with out humans help like I'm pretty sure a criminal would just destroy it and run away bruv.
1 0 Reply
Antonio 10 months ago
Ok buddy 😂
0 0 Reply
Sam 1 year ago
“Many lives”

In 2022 only about 1,000 deaths caused by police officers occurred and most were justified. There’s over 700,000 police officers to date, which comes out to less than 1% of all police officers in the entire USA.

You’re being completely ridiculous.
1 0 Reply
Angel Vollant (Geen kans) 4 years ago
No chance. Policing requires critical thinking, logic, situational assessment and decision-making which can’t fit into a program. When a police officer sees someone committing a crime, it’s up to them to decide what to do. If a man’s smoking pot alone in the park, do they deserve to be arrested? The cop will go up to them, talk a bit, leave a warning and may or may not leave a ticket depending on how the man acts. If he’s polite and cooperative, the officer will probably let him off with a warning. If he’s erratic and violent, he’ll arrest him. A robot, however, won’t think that far. Sees someone committing a crime (smoking pot) and simply arrest him. If he doesn’t comply, use violence. They’re programmed to do what the programmer put into it. If someone has a knife, take them out. Simple as that. Doesn’t matter if it’s a woman defending herself against an abuser. The robot’ll see a knife and shoot her. Robocop explained it very well. Police officers need compassion and emotions. If you could program a robot to do that, you’ve got yourself a human.
0 0 Reply
Anon 11 months ago
It's over 3 years since your post. AI has greatly progressed. I don't think anyone in 2020 thought AI would be where it is now. AI can easily do all the critical thinking, logic, situational assessment and decision-making, and it might not be available yet, but it is apparent that it can fit inside a program. What is more difficult is that policing requires a physical presence. Robotics just isn't there yet, and even if it ever does get there, you'd basically need a highly expensive robot to replace each individual officer. Whereas AI on a single server with access to multiple phone lines (and ai voice automation) can easily replace a 100+ person office.

It's not impossible for AI to take over policing, but due to economic factors, it is likely one of the least at-risk professions to be taken over by AI
0 0 Reply
mister sir 4 years ago
I think it's good that they have a low chance of being replaced by robots because although humans can be biased, humans make better decisions and can pick up on clues or emotions better.
0 0 Reply
My name isn't your bidness. (Onzeker) 4 years ago
There is a lot of talk about things like the androids from D:BH so I think it could go either way if artificial intelligence is improved.
0 0 Reply
Khan (Laag) 4 years ago
Competent police officers require human communication skills and human coordination (for the later see the old “robots struggle to walk up stairs” problem)
0 0 Reply
frankie (Laag) 4 years ago
as police need to have good decision making skills as robots do not
0 0 Reply
Anonomous (Laag) 4 years ago
THAT IS CRAZY HOW WOULD THEY GET COPS REPLACED!??!!?
0 0 Reply
A 4 months ago
It will be like Robocop, but the human is replaced with AI.
0 0 Reply
Meep (Onzeker) 4 years ago
Because if you only go up to 20 years from now it may change past then.
0 0 Reply
Lachlan Beck (Geen kans) 5 years ago
Because Robots lack the feeling of emotions and aren't able to be empathetic to other humans or robots therefore they lack a key skill of being an officer
0 0 Reply

Laat een reactie achter over dit beroep

Deze site wordt beschermd door reCAPTCHA en het Privacybeleid en de Servicevoorwaarden van Google zijn van toepassing.