작가 및 저자
이 요약을 사이트에 원하시나요? 임베드 코드:
자동화 위험
중간 위험 (41-60%): 자동화의 중간 위험을 가진 직업은 보통 루틴적인 작업을 포함하지만, 여전히 일부 인간의 판단력과 상호작용이 필요합니다.
이 점수가 무엇인지, 그리고 어떻게 계산되는지에 대한 자세한 정보는 여기에 있습니다.
Impact of Chat GPT on this occupation
We've received many comments and emails about Chat GPT and it's impact on this occupation. It's very impressive software, so people are understandably worried and/or excited.
However, something important to note with regards to the score we've calculated here, is that this occupation is comprised of many different types of job roles. Some examples of these include Advertising Writer, Blurb Writer, Copywriter and Screenwriter.
Some roles/tasks are more susceptible than other's to being automated by Chat GPT, but the score we've calculated is one that's an amalgamation of all of them.
Unfortunately, the source for our data (o*net) doesn't split this category up to the individual roles, so we can't calculate a score for each of them. If they do at some point in the future, we'll do the same, and generate scores accordingly.
Writing occupations aren't dead, but they are changing, so the best advice we can offer is to keep up to date with the latest developments, and use the tools available to your advantage.
사용자 설문조사
우리의 방문자들은 이 직업이 자동화될 가능성이 낮다고 투표했습니다. 이 평가는 계산된 자동화 위험 수준에 의해 더욱 지지받고 있으며, 이는 자동화의 49% 확률을 추정합니다.
자동화의 위험성에 대해 어떻게 생각하십니까?
작가 및 저자이 다음 20년 이내에 로봇이나 인공지능에 의해 대체될 가능성은 얼마나 됩니까?
감정
다음 그래프는 의미있는 데이터를 제공할 수 있는 상당한 양의 투표가 있을 때마다 포함되어 있습니다. 이러한 시각적 표현은 시간에 따른 사용자 설문조사 결과를 보여주어, 감정 추세의 중요한 지표를 제공합니다.
시간에 따른 감정 (분기별)
시간별 감정 (연간)
성장
'Writers and Authors' 직업 분야의 공석은 2032년까지 4.1% 증가할 것으로 예상됩니다.
총 고용량 및 예상 직업 공석
업데이트된 예상치가 09-2023에 제출될 예정입니다..
임금
2022년에 'Writers and Authors'의 중앙값 연간 급여는 $73,150이며, 시간당 $35입니다.
'Writers and Authors'은 전국 중위임금인 $46,310보다 58.0% 더 높은 금액을 지불받았습니다.
시간에 따른 임금
볼륨
2022년 현재, 미국 내에서 'Writers and Authors'로 고용된 사람들의 수는 54,010명이었습니다.
이는 전국의 고용 노동력 중 약 < 0.001%를 대표합니다.
다시 말해, 약 2 천명 중 1명이 'Writers and Authors'로 고용되어 있습니다.
직무 설명
스크립트, 이야기, 광고, 그 외 다른 자료 등과 같은 서면 자료를 원작하고 준비합니다.
SOC Code: 27-3043.00
자원
Will Chat GPT spell the end of blogging?
Here's a very informative video from Ricky Kesler from Income School about Chat GPT as it relates to blogging (and SEO). We think it contains great advice, and can be applied to all sorts of writing job roles, not just bloggers.
새로운 커리어를 시작하려고 생각하거나 직장을 바꾸려는 계획이 있다면, 우리가 만든 편리한 채용 검색 도구를 사용해보세요. 이 도구를 통해 완벽한 새로운 역할을 찾을 수 있을지도 모릅니다.
댓글
댓글을 남겨주세요.
Personally, I would hate to see the art of storytelling to be turned over to machines.
ChatGPT is not going to write things that people care about. This isn't because chatgpt is a bad writer - it's because people primarily consume written content because of the person behind it. Since the dawn of the internet, and even before, there have been an infinite number of takes, a vast supply of content. Yet, somehow, people still pay for newspapers, and substacks, and books, and all sorts of things that are seemingly available for free with just a Google search. It's because of the particulars of that person's perspective, not just "story good" or "take good."
There are already far more failed writers than successful ones, and far more failed "in the style of" works than actual successful works. What AI will do is simply raise the stakes for what it takes to be a successful writer or author, since it establishes a baseline commodity. However, that baseline is already very, very high.
it's not gonna replace real writers yet but it is coming like winter.
Humans are still the best storytellers.
Personally I went into this field because I absolutely thought I could write better than the average book, and that the "cream will rise to the top". I still believe this is true.
Where I get worried is if AI can learn to write fiction really well. Can an AI in 10 years learn beyond what it is taught (fed average books) and create amazing stories? That's what really scares me.
Will people want to read a story written by an AI or will people want to read stories written by humans? There's an element of detachment when reading AI writing and the uncanny valley effect might take hold when we read an AI trying to present human emotions through character. We will know - whoever put those words down did not understand them and they will have less meaning. Or will they? If they make sense they make sense. If it has emotional impact it has emotional impact - even if that was replicated through pulp learning and mastered through engagement scores.
Scary times to be a writer - to have any job. But this was always my dream and so I know deep down there's no chance I'll give up on it. Even if I can only build two thousand loyal readers, that is enough to make a living, and I'll do that through being very very human and marketing myself face first.
이 직업에 대한 답글을 남겨주세요.