특수 효과 아티스트 및 애니메이터

Gojo 7 days ago

No chance, anime is way better and ai will never replace what we love

0 0 Reply

Awang razak (불확실한) 7 days ago

Ai generated videos were kinda bad and a person with mediocre movements and they lack the capacity developements hell nah just think about alan beckers developements for youtube animatings he did a good job on that imagine asking ai to make a stick figure how will do it? instead they draw a litteral stick and can they do tom and jerry? instead they draw a real human person named tom and jerry or could be a cat and a mouse it depends.

0 0 Reply

Ele (Low) 5 months ago

As an artist, I'd give some doubt to this because I've seen the ropes done behind animation. Sure, AI can recreate animation, but at the same time it will not hold a candle to the quality human-made animation has. The way it constantly shifts between several art styles because it farms stolen media it's been fed which leads to major inconsistencies. Much more, it's rather impossible to make an "original" animated short made entirely out of AI. Why? Consistency (and originality) are the reason. I find that AI "generalizes" images to be able to create an image, which is difficult especially when it comes to pushing facial expressions because AI needs to farm hundreds of images to "understand" how to recreate the image. I don't think it's possible in the long run either because at some point in time IF society and the industry as a whole decides to just USE AI for everything, there's gonna be a lot of "inbreeding" happening. AI will feed on other AI because there's not gonna be anymore human-made images it can freely farm off of which results to the most whacked quality you'd think of. AI will make the most general looking animation that can ever exist, but that thing will lack the soul, the humanity, human-made animations have.

12 0 Reply

Sundew (적당한) 5 months ago

Because a.i can already generate videos n stuff

0 5 Reply

August Nelson (적당한) 5 months ago

With all the art AIs we already have, it is inevitable.

0 4 Reply

human (낮은) 5 months ago

originality and high quality

4 1 Reply

Moss (불확실한) 6 months ago

Ai is smart, but also stupid. In time it could, but we dont know for sure.

1 3 Reply

bob (적당한) 6 months ago

ai is getting better at making automated vidseos

0 3 Reply

Aaron (기회 없음) 6 months ago

This requires soul and robots can’t replicate the soul that humans produce. Bad or otherwise.

8 1 Reply

Aizen 6 months ago

I saw a lot of highly likely comments, so as an artist I thought I should give my point of view.
I don’t think ai can replace these types of jobs as if you wanted to actually make a movie or series, you would still need a good plot and a storyboard and color for at least one frame and for the ending and beginning scene or else how would you make a movie that follows the exact plot and looks that you want. (if your an in-between artists.. uhhhh-)
an example would be any ghibli film. even if ai were to create a movie and make it look exactly the same, it’s not as appealing because every ghibli film not only takes years to make but uses traditional animation and hand draw each frame and that’s what makes it appealing and different from other films not because an ai made it in just 5 seconds.

7 0 Reply

Ahmed (매우 가능성이 높음) 6 months ago

Simply because of the hyper realistic AI that’s making these videos it’s becoming hard to tell what is real and what isn’t personally I think it’s going to be worse but it’s a high chance it may take over

0 4 Reply

Jason Chen (매우 가능성이 높음) 6 months ago

sora ai and generative video models can have a text input create any video or film imagery now, hence no need for armies of humans creating these works of digital art.

0 4 Reply

P3S4NT (매우 가능성이 높음) 6 months ago

ai art, it steals pieces of art without permission and merges them into something else.

1 3 Reply

Max Sky (적당한) 7 months ago

ai animation could become super avalible from OpenAI Sora, ngl its scary, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YEX4t79e0Q

0 3 Reply

no >:( (낮은) 8 months ago

copyright and laws and stuff

4 0 Reply

Bryan (student) 8 months ago

With the amount of new technology and AI coming through the years, people may think about robotic replacement in the industry of artists/designers. I don’t completely agree with them (maybe because I do want to make it my job in the future) but there will always have a limit and as we all know, technology, AI, computer, programming, etc… are made by humans. For me, technology should assist humans, doing daily task for example. But not replace them. And as we all says, they don’t have the originality, creativity of human being.

1 0 Reply

Ro (매우 가능성이 높음) 10 months ago

Sora AI

0 3 Reply

james adamson 11 months ago

Everyone here is looking at this from the perspective of a creative. I am also in that bucket, but when the bean counters see something cheaper and more efficient the little nuances and facets of human beauty and creativity will not be considered.
A powerful and forceful director/CEO/MD on board could swing that in human creativity's favour, but look at all the areas in production where the money goes for the lowest common denominator.
Art and money are not good bedfellows and AI art like plastic and industrial streamlining are where we are headed unfortunately.( IMHO.)While we got a bit cleverer at being efficient we will also get A LOT cheaper a lot saddder and A LOT more unpleasant on the eye!

From DaVinci to plastic impressions and AI interpretations of beauty.
I'm thinking of the film Brazil and a horrendous retail park I visited in LA! Gaudy gossip magazines cheap toy shops and the show Black Mirror!

0 0 Reply

armando camero 11 months ago

you'll be replaced by AI if the client is okay with 'good enough' . but you won't if the client needs minor detail adjustments and lots of precision and control

0 0 Reply

Navarone (매우 가능성이 높음) 1 year ago

Im a 3D rigging artist with 5+ years in the industry and if things keep going the way they are, i think that by 2040, 3D art is going to be just a few directors and producers using AI instead of a pipeline.
Art is dead.

0 2 Reply