특수 효과 아티스트 및 애니메이터

Ro (매우 가능성이 높음)이 말합니다.

Sora AI

james adamson이 말합니다.

Everyone here is looking at this from the perspective of a creative. I am also in that bucket, but when the bean counters see something cheaper and more efficient the little nuances and facets of human beauty and creativity will not be considered.
A powerful and forceful director/CEO/MD on board could swing that in human creativity's favour, but look at all the areas in production where the money goes for the lowest common denominator.
Art and money are not good bedfellows and AI art like plastic and industrial streamlining are where we are headed unfortunately.( IMHO.)While we got a bit cleverer at being efficient we will also get A LOT cheaper a lot saddder and A LOT more unpleasant on the eye!

From DaVinci to plastic impressions and AI interpretations of beauty.
I'm thinking of the film Brazil and a horrendous retail park I visited in LA! Gaudy gossip magazines cheap toy shops and the show Black Mirror!

armando camero이 말합니다.

you'll be replaced by AI if the client is okay with 'good enough' . but you won't if the client needs minor detail adjustments and lots of precision and control

Navarone (매우 가능성이 높음)이 말합니다.

Im a 3D rigging artist with 5+ years in the industry and if things keep going the way they are, i think that by 2040, 3D art is going to be just a few directors and producers using AI instead of a pipeline.
Art is dead.

JD (매우 가능성이 높음)이 말합니다.

AI art is already being embraced in small ways. the complexity and quality is only going to grow out of convenience to bigger animation companies, and demand from film production studios.

Joe이 말합니다.

If you'd posed this question to me just two years ago, my response would have been a firm "absolutely not." However, given the emergence of advanced AI generative models, my current perspective leans towards a scenario in which the role may not vanish entirely, but instead undergo a substantial reduction in workforce. So the hundreds of visual effects artists typically employed in a film's production might dwindle down to 5-10 individuals

dufhbsf (낮은)이 말합니다.

Originality is valued in animation and now that demand for original animations is growing it is highly unlikely that this job can get automated

Tejas Tarambale (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

Because Animation is not just about videos & art. It needs artistic thinking & different touch which connects you with art & attract you.

People want new things so AI can't give the think which not exist or it can't think its own...

That's why Robot will not get artists place.

Eventually we get Ai for faster processing & giving results to people & by that increases there revenue.
thanks.

It's my personal opening.

Rogério (불확실한)이 말합니다.

Maybe AI could make the in-between animation, but the key frames will still being made by humans.

motiondelacruz (매우 가능성이 높음)이 말합니다.

Bro, ai graphic design is already here. In twenty years, the entire process will have been already fully automated by about 5 or 10 years.

BibirMengkeroet (적당한)이 말합니다.

If you're talking about special effects as VFX, then yes, you'll be replaced. In fact, AI Inpainting for video is currently under development and it will become public soon. Some 3D animators have already been replaced by motion capture. I think 2D animators are safe from AI for about 1-3 years.

However, special FX will never be replaced by AI. But you can count on your fingers the number of movies nowadays that still use special effects.

Santa Claus (매우 가능성이 높음)이 말합니다.

New AI image generators can produce results on par with human artists. While not quite there yet, it is just a matter of time. When art directors can produce high-quality results in minutes for pennies, there will be a strong incentive against hiring professional artists. This will also discourage new artists from spending years honing their skills and perhaps choosing a different profession altogether.

Ale (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

I think it is impossible but even if A.I manage to make animation it won't have much quality because animation requires imagination and originality too which A.I won't be able to give in animation.

Kate (낮은)이 말합니다.

Nowadays, there are already ways of making procedural animations. It might be the case that we will just need programmers to write the code to 'educate' the AI. Consequently, it will be able to learn and animate by itself.

sal이 말합니다.

I do not think that the robot will replace the graphics engine, whether in cartoons or in influential films. This is not a new concept.

Motion capture suits appeared decades ago and they do not eliminate the need for humans in the final product. If that were to happen, they would already be retired.

Jonas (적당한)이 말합니다.

Modelling tools and retopology tools are already being automated. 3d scanning and script writing as well. I think that animators still will supervise but tools will definitely be more and more automated.

ur mom (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

Art can't be made by robots. We've seen this time and time again, especially when people use AI to change a perfectly made 24 fps animation to 60 fps. Animation has to have a human touch to be appealing, so there's no way animation can be automated and still have people interested.

R (매우 가능성이 높음)이 말합니다.

Like any other art form, AI can provide infinite “creative” samples to choose from

j (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

Animation quality would go down by a lot if animation were automated. As an animator, animation needs a human touch. It doesn't look right if it's automated.

Mikael이 말합니다.

Working in visualization of film, I can't see AI. doing what we do in any foreseeable future. The reason for this is that a lot of the 3d process is a creative feedback-loop between the client and the artist. It's just open talk.

Also, would you have an AI do Lookdev when the client is looking for something stylized? The only way this would work would be if the AI. would be able to have that same back and fourth of ideas. It just can't.