호흡 치료사

27% (낮은 위험)

저위험 (21-40%): 이 수준의 직업은 기술적인 능력과 인간 중심의 기술을 모두 요구하기 때문에 자동화 위험이 제한적입니다.

이 점수가 무엇인지, 그리고 어떻게 계산되는지에 대한 자세한 정보는 여기에 있습니다.

사용자 설문조사

감정

다음 그래프는 의미 있는 데이터를 제공할 수 있을 만큼 충분한 투표 수가 있을 때마다 포함됩니다. 이러한 시각적 표현은 시간 경과에 따른 사용자 투표 결과를 보여주며, 감정 추세에 대한 중요한 지표를 제공합니다.

임금

다른 직업에 비해 높은 급여를 받는

2023년에 'Respiratory Therapists'의 중앙값 연간 급여는 $77,960이며, 시간당 $37입니다.

'Respiratory Therapists'은 전국 중위임금인 $48,060보다 62.2% 더 높은 금액을 지불받았습니다.

시간에 따른 임금

댓글

Rt (기회 없음) 1 year ago

Jobs which requires more patient interaction cannot be replaced fastly

0 0 Reply

Duh (낮은) 1 year ago

Lots to do that only a human can do.

0 0 Reply

RT (매우 가능성이 높음) 4 years ago

AI is already being utilized in many companies. Human error in the ICU are the reasons behind AI Mechanical Ventilators. PRVC and VC+ are examples. Ignorant to think AI Mechanical Ventilators aren't plausible.

0 0 Reply

RT 7 months ago

What does AI mechanical ventilators have to do with RT replacement? sure it would make operating ventilators easier and even untrained people can operate them, but someone has to intubate patients, extubate them, take care of them while they're intubated. Even if the role of RTs decrease in the mechanical ventilation department, there are many other aspects of the job that's hands on work.

0 0 Reply

Better RT 3 years ago

PRVC and VC+ is the same thing, just different names due to copyrights. It is a completely different way of breath delivery and has nothing to do with AI. If that were the case, then I wouldn't have to adjust the flow or ramp %. You can have just as big, if not bigger, error with a pressure breathe than you can a volume breathe. So it still comes down to who is checking the vent.

0 0 Reply

Larry 3 years ago

Do you realize respiratory therapists do more than respiration and ventilation?

0 0 Reply

Ken Wilson 3 years ago

RT's (especially in ICU, PICU, NICU, ED, Burn Units, etc*) deal with rapidly changing patient conditions and situations, and are involved in a wide variety of invasive procedures, requiring flexibility amid constantly shifting priorities. I can't see AI doing intubations, ABGs, bronchoscopy, ECMO, codes, or actually doing any bedside procedure or patient interaction. I'd give it less than the predicted 7%.

*And yes, I've worked in all of these in my 42 years as an RRT

0 0 Reply