음악 감독 및 작곡가

자동화 위험
계산된
9%
위험 수준
투표 조사
37%
347 표를 기준으로
노동 수요
성장
4.9%
년도별 2032
임금
$62,940
또는 시간당 $30
볼륨
11,690
2022 기준으로
요약
직업 점수
5.9/10

이 요약을 사이트에 원하시나요? 임베드 코드:

자동화 위험

9% (최소한의 위험)

최소 위험 (0-20%): 이 범주에 속하는 직업은 복잡한 문제 해결, 창의성, 강한 대인 관계 능력, 그리고 높은 수준의 수동적 능력을 요구하기 때문에 자동화될 확률이 낮습니다. 이러한 일자리는 종종 복잡한 손동작과 정밀한 조정을 포함하며, 이는 기계가 필요한 작업을 복제하기 어렵게 만듭니다.

이 점수가 무엇인지, 그리고 어떻게 계산되는지에 대한 자세한 정보는 여기에 있습니다.

일부 매우 중요한 직무 특성은 자동화하기 어렵습니다:

  • 미술

일부 중요한 직무 특성은 자동화하기 어렵습니다:

  • 독창성

  • 설득

  • 사회적 인식력

  • 협상

사용자 설문조사

다음 두 십년 안에 완전 자동화될 37%의 확률

우리의 방문자들은 이 직업이 자동화될 가능성이 낮다고 투표했습니다. 이 평가는 계산된 자동화 위험 수준에 의해 더욱 지지받고 있으며, 이는 자동화의 9% 확률을 추정합니다.

자동화의 위험성에 대해 어떻게 생각하십니까?

음악 감독 및 작곡가이 다음 20년 이내에 로봇이나 인공지능에 의해 대체될 가능성은 얼마나 됩니까?






감정

다음 그래프는 의미있는 데이터를 제공할 수 있는 상당한 양의 투표가 있을 때마다 포함되어 있습니다. 이러한 시각적 표현은 시간에 따른 사용자 설문조사 결과를 보여주어, 감정 추세의 중요한 지표를 제공합니다.

시간별 감정 (연간)

성장

다른 직업에 비해 적당한 성장

'Music Directors and Composers' 직업 분야의 공석은 2032년까지 4.9% 증가할 것으로 예상됩니다.

총 고용량 및 예상 직업 공석

* 2021년부터 2031년까지의 기간에 대한 노동통계국의 데이터
업데이트된 예상치가 09-2023에 제출될 예정입니다..

임금

다른 직업에 비해 적당히 지급되는

2022년에 'Music Directors and Composers'의 중앙값 연간 급여는 $62,940이며, 시간당 $30입니다.

'Music Directors and Composers'은 전국 중위임금인 $46,310보다 35.9% 더 높은 금액을 지불받았습니다.

시간에 따른 임금

* 노동통계국의 데이터

볼륨

다른 직업에 비해 현저히 낮은 범위의 채용 기회

2022년 현재, 미국 내에서 'Music Directors and Composers'로 고용된 사람들의 수는 11,690명이었습니다.

이는 전국의 고용 노동력 중 약 < 0.001%를 대표합니다.

다시 말해, 약 12 천명 중 1명이 'Music Directors and Composers'로 고용되어 있습니다.

직무 설명

음악가나 그룹들, 예를 들어 오케스트라, 밴드, 합창단, 그리고 글리 클럽 등에 의한 악기 또는 보컬 공연을 지휘, 직접, 계획, 그리고 주도하거나; 또는 원작 음악 작품을 창작합니다.

SOC Code: 27-2041.00

자원

새로운 커리어를 시작하려고 생각하거나 직장을 바꾸려는 계획이 있다면, 우리가 만든 편리한 채용 검색 도구를 사용해보세요. 이 도구를 통해 완벽한 새로운 역할을 찾을 수 있을지도 모릅니다.

당신의 지역에서 일자리를 검색하세요

댓글

댓글을 남겨주세요.

J (낮은)이 말합니다.
The only people are impressed by the music AIVA and other AI technologies create are people who either lack an ability to evaluate music properly (they are not musical themselves and don't actively listen to music) or people who stand to gain if they can replace the creativity of composers with a program.

This is without taking into account all of the interpersonal elements of composition, which are also not well understood by people who don't do this work.

Finally, given that humans are subject to copyright law and that the level of imitation and inspiration from previous works is controlled and limited by these laws, it is unlikely that music created by AI that was not drastically reshaped by a human composer would avoid copyright lawsuits or be subject to copyright itself, as current technology in this field only knows how to aggregate and make stylistic choices based on probability. A human composer is not going to waste time fiddling with AI compositions to "get them there" when they could just write something themselves.

Show me an evangelist who actually produces music and isn't heavily invested in AI themselves in some way, and I'll reconsider.
Jan 06, 2024 at 09:08 오후
Rachel Farina (매우 가능성이 높음)이 말합니다.
AI is already composing and generating music. Algorithms can already curate. There will always be work for the top - John Williams, Hans Zimmer won't find their work gone. But for indie films and anyone on a budget, AI composing will be the thing within the next few years. The technology grows at an exponential pace. Though stuff sounds embarrassing now, six months from now, that will not be the case.
Mar 28, 2023 at 10:43 오후
Marcus (매우 가능성이 높음)이 말합니다.
As we already see everything can be done by sophisticated software. It started with pictures, then text and next is music. We all thought Software can never replace artists, but as we see that was a wrong assupmtion and in fact got hit first by the "AI" hype. With enough data and "training" any sort of music will be possible. Using a DAW will be obsolete.
Mar 04, 2023 at 02:49 오후
Fl studio 20 (매우 가능성이 높음)이 말합니다.
Art like graphic design is already being synthesized with superb detail using AI. What's to say that music isn't next?
Sep 18, 2022 at 11:47 오후
yo lads (적당한)이 말합니다.
i seen some robots making chunes and people saying they bussin beats
bye bye dutse, hesh and koot
Sep 16, 2021 at 06:14 오전
Zac (기회 없음)이 말합니다.
Even if they could it wouldn't be the same as a person composing and putting their input and ideas into the composition. The feeling and emotion has to come from within to create something astonishing in my opinion. Because of this, they wouldn't fully replace humans in music writing/composing.
Jun 16, 2021 at 04:48 오전
John (매우 가능성이 높음)이 말합니다.
There are already many ai composers like AIVA, so I am pretty sure in the next 15-20 years ai composers will replace human music composers.
May 07, 2021 at 08:39 오후
DJ (기회 없음)이 말합니다.
Produce own style of music, create melody you like, there is just no way AI could replace it
Mar 20, 2021 at 05:00 오후
Gadgetsz이 말합니다.
The act of composing will not be replaced BUT it will definitely change and maybe become more easy and accessible for all people. Maybe one day, everyone is a composer because you don't even need to learn score writing, DAW, playing or singing. Maybe just by thinking, you can create masterworks.. We will see?
Mar 05, 2021 at 06:34 오후
EdwinBrophy이 말합니다.
Composing pop music is already nearly completely automated but serious music will continue to require human composers.
Jul 07, 2020 at 01:34 오후
EdwinBrophyIsAClown이 말합니다.
Composing pop music is not automated. Just because it is created on a computer doesn't mean it is automated, you still need human to create the ideas.
Dec 08, 2020 at 11:57 오전
nathanuppnext이 말합니다.
I'm a trap producer and its true
Apr 11, 2021 at 07:12 오후
Dave이 말합니다.
Not true, and there is no such thing as 'serious music'
Sep 20, 2022 at 11:32 오후
Joshua이 말합니다.
People who learn the same music theories write different songs, so do robots. Robots are rarely likely to replace human beings in the field of composition.
Jun 01, 2020 at 03:19 오후
Natalie (낮은)이 말합니다.
Music would be awful of it was automated. Music requires feelings to be any good.
May 22, 2020 at 01:00 오전
Joel (기회 없음)이 말합니다.
Music, or the act of composing music, has no formula of equation to it. Music is the expression of one's emotions, often called the outburst of the soul. A robot or machine is literally incapable of having emotions or a soul, therefore a robot will never be able to replace a human composer.
Jun 26, 2019 at 03:40 오전
Jason이 말합니다.
You are wrong. A big part of AI works by spotting patterns. Patterns is relatively simple given that there are only so many notes and scales in music. It can even come out with sounds that arent be able to be produced by normal instruments. AI can already write articles somewhat. They can already compose music (see link below). Playing music is trivial and doesnt even require AI. There are only 2 things that an AI may have trouble with.

1. Which is understanding which part of what they created did a human like and thus may have trouble using reinforced learning.

2. Lyrics have meaning behind the words. Its much more complex than just a melody. Its these lyrics and building melody in combination with lyrics which is going to be rather difficult but not impossible. Lyric writing is going to be one of the Last things AI will be able to do.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYb3Wimn01s
Sep 01, 2019 at 10:23 오전
Anomius Maximus (기회 없음)이 말합니다.
No way a robot would have ever been able to create a song as great, innovative, inspiring and culture changing as the masterpiece that is known as 'All Star' by Smash Mouth.
Apr 29, 2019 at 11:34 오후
Matt 이 말합니다.
:)
Apr 30, 2019 at 08:28 오후
Someone (매우 가능성이 높음)이 말합니다.
Sad but very likely. Many projects (e.g. Jukedeck and Aiva) have already proven this by analyzing works made by humans and creating their own pieces.
Apr 26, 2019 at 06:54 오후
Nikola이 말합니다.
But just because a robot can "make" music or "write" a book, i.e. create a composite of what's already out there, it doesn't mean that these professions will be overtaken by AI. People gravitate towards works of art created by humans, because reading a good book or gives you insight into the mind of the person who created it, in addition to possibly being relatable to you on a personal level.

Art is deeply individual, both from the perspective of the artist and the consumer of art. I'd say it's very hard to imagine that any creative profession that's grounded in relaying the sensory, emotional, intellectual, and philosophical experiences of the world would ever cease to exist. People will always feel the need to tell stories and express themselves through art, and other people will always want to hear those stories and consume that art. It's because art gives more meaning to our lives. It elevates our experience of living to another level.

There's a difference between automating jobs like assembly line work or driving and automating creative work. The former can arguably be perfected through automation, while the latter becomes devoid of meaning through automation.

Only one way I can imagine this happening is if all humans cease to exist, and we're replaced by machines. But if that happens, I won't be around to care.
Jul 13, 2020 at 12:54 오후
Zaran Jathaul (기회 없음)이 말합니다.
You can't automate music. Unless it is dub step but even then people have to make that. After hundreds of years why has classical music always stayed popular? Because it is an advanced form of music that people understand once they get an advanced understanding of music and that is why people will always pay to see it live.
Apr 09, 2019 at 02:27 오후

이 직업에 대한 답글을 남겨주세요.

이 사이트는 reCAPTCHA와 Google 개인정보처리방침서비스 이용약관에 의해 보호됩니다.

사람들이 또한 조회했습니다

음악가와 가수들
컴퓨터 프로그래머
그래픽 디자이너
변호사들
배우들