음악 감독 및 작곡가

낮은 위험
28%
다음으로 어디로 가고 싶으신가요?
결과를 친구 및 가족과 공유하세요.
투표 댓글 (27)
또는, 이 직업을 더 자세히 탐구해보세요...
자동화 위험
계산된
21%
(낮은 위험)
투표 조사
34%
(낮은 위험)
Average: 28%
노동 수요
성장
2.7%
년도별 2033
임금
$62,590
또는 시간당 $30.09
볼륨
10,770
2023 기준으로
요약
직업 점수
5.3/10

사람들이 또한 조회했습니다

계산된 자동화 위험

21% (낮은 위험)

저위험 (21-40%): 이 수준의 직업은 기술적인 능력과 인간 중심의 기술을 모두 요구하기 때문에 자동화 위험이 제한적입니다.

이 점수가 무엇인지, 그리고 어떻게 계산되는지에 대한 자세한 정보는 여기에 있습니다.

일부 매우 중요한 직무 특성은 자동화하기 어렵습니다:

  • 미술

일부 중요한 직무 특성은 자동화하기 어렵습니다:

  • 독창성

  • 설득

  • 사회적 인식력

  • 협상

사용자 설문조사

다음 두 십년 안에 완전 자동화될 34%의 확률

우리의 방문자들은 이 직업이 자동화될 가능성이 낮다고 투표했습니다. 이 평가는 계산된 자동화 위험 수준에 의해 더욱 지지받고 있으며, 이는 자동화의 21% 확률을 추정합니다.

자동화의 위험성에 대해 어떻게 생각하십니까?

음악 감독 및 작곡가이 다음 20년 이내에 로봇이나 인공지능에 의해 대체될 가능성은 얼마나 됩니까?






감정

다음 그래프는 의미 있는 데이터를 제공할 수 있을 만큼 충분한 투표 수가 있을 때마다 포함됩니다. 이러한 시각적 표현은 시간 경과에 따른 사용자 투표 결과를 보여주며, 감정 추세에 대한 중요한 지표를 제공합니다.

시간별 감정 (연간)

성장

다른 직업에 비해 성장이 느림

'Music Directors and Composers' 직업 분야의 공석은 2033년까지 2.7% 증가할 것으로 예상됩니다.

총 고용량 및 예상 직업 공석

* 2021년부터 2031년까지의 기간에 대한 노동통계국의 데이터
업데이트된 예상치가 09-2024에 제출될 예정입니다..

임금

다른 직업에 비해 적당히 지급되는

2023년에 'Music Directors and Composers'의 중앙값 연간 급여는 $62,590이며, 시간당 $30입니다.

'Music Directors and Composers'은 전국 중위임금인 $48,060보다 30.2% 더 높은 금액을 지불받았습니다.

시간에 따른 임금

* 노동통계국의 데이터

볼륨

다른 직업에 비해 현저히 낮은 범위의 채용 기회

2023년 현재, 미국 내에서 'Music Directors and Composers'로 고용된 사람들의 수는 10,770명이었습니다.

이는 전국의 고용 노동력 중 약 < 0.001%를 대표합니다.

다시 말해, 약 14 천명 중 1명이 'Music Directors and Composers'로 고용되어 있습니다.

직무 설명

음악가나 그룹들, 예를 들어 오케스트라, 밴드, 합창단, 그리고 글리 클럽 등에 의한 악기 또는 보컬 공연을 지휘, 직접, 계획, 그리고 주도하거나; 또는 원작 음악 작품을 창작합니다.

SOC Code: 27-2041.00

자원

당신의 지역에서 일자리를 검색하세요

새로운 커리어를 시작하려고 생각하거나 직장을 바꾸려는 계획이 있다면, 우리가 만든 편리한 채용 검색 도구를 사용해보세요. 이 도구를 통해 완벽한 새로운 역할을 찾을 수 있을지도 모릅니다.

당신의 지역에서 일자리를 검색하세요

댓글

Leave a comment

Bel (낮은) 4 months ago
Robots (IA's) will never match human creativity.
1 0 Reply
Joe (낮은) 5 months ago
It makes sense why some people would use AI for small things, like as background music for a YouTube video. Everywhere else, you'd have to have human minds and human limbs behind it. The way I see it, AI will never be Hans Zimmer or Jacob Collier. Not by a longshot.
1 0 Reply
Jaybird (낮은) 6 months ago
It’s too complex and subjective for individual AI feedback to be effective over the arc of learning
0 0 Reply
J (낮은) 12 months ago
The only people are impressed by the music AIVA and other AI technologies create are people who either lack an ability to evaluate music properly (they are not musical themselves and don't actively listen to music) or people who stand to gain if they can replace the creativity of composers with a program.

This is without taking into account all of the interpersonal elements of composition, which are also not well understood by people who don't do this work.

Finally, given that humans are subject to copyright law and that the level of imitation and inspiration from previous works is controlled and limited by these laws, it is unlikely that music created by AI that was not drastically reshaped by a human composer would avoid copyright lawsuits or be subject to copyright itself, as current technology in this field only knows how to aggregate and make stylistic choices based on probability. A human composer is not going to waste time fiddling with AI compositions to "get them there" when they could just write something themselves.

Show me an evangelist who actually produces music and isn't heavily invested in AI themselves in some way, and I'll reconsider.
3 0 Reply
Rachel Farina (매우 가능성이 높음) 1 year ago
AI is already composing and generating music. Algorithms can already curate. There will always be work for the top - John Williams, Hans Zimmer won't find their work gone. But for indie films and anyone on a budget, AI composing will be the thing within the next few years. The technology grows at an exponential pace. Though stuff sounds embarrassing now, six months from now, that will not be the case.
0 2 Reply
Marcus (매우 가능성이 높음) 1 year ago
As we already see everything can be done by sophisticated software. It started with pictures, then text and next is music. We all thought Software can never replace artists, but as we see that was a wrong assupmtion and in fact got hit first by the "AI" hype. With enough data and "training" any sort of music will be possible. Using a DAW will be obsolete.
0 0 Reply
Fl studio 20 (매우 가능성이 높음) 2 years ago
Art like graphic design is already being synthesized with superb detail using AI. What's to say that music isn't next?
0 1 Reply
yo lads (적당한) 3 years ago
i seen some robots making chunes and people saying they bussin beats
bye bye dutse, hesh and koot
0 1 Reply
Zac (기회 없음) 3 years ago
Even if they could it wouldn't be the same as a person composing and putting their input and ideas into the composition. The feeling and emotion has to come from within to create something astonishing in my opinion. Because of this, they wouldn't fully replace humans in music writing/composing.
1 0 Reply
John (매우 가능성이 높음) 3 years ago
There are already many ai composers like AIVA, so I am pretty sure in the next 15-20 years ai composers will replace human music composers.
0 0 Reply
DJ (기회 없음) 3 years ago
Produce own style of music, create melody you like, there is just no way AI could replace it
0 0 Reply
Gadgetsz 3 years ago
The act of composing will not be replaced BUT it will definitely change and maybe become more easy and accessible for all people. Maybe one day, everyone is a composer because you don't even need to learn score writing, DAW, playing or singing. Maybe just by thinking, you can create masterworks.. We will see?
0 0 Reply
EdwinBrophy 4 years ago
Composing pop music is already nearly completely automated but serious music will continue to require human composers.
0 1 Reply
Dave 2 years ago
Not true, and there is no such thing as 'serious music'
0 0 Reply
nathanuppnext 3 years ago
I'm a trap producer and its true
0 0 Reply
EdwinBrophyIsAClown 4 years ago
Composing pop music is not automated. Just because it is created on a computer doesn't mean it is automated, you still need human to create the ideas.
1 0 Reply
Joshua 4 years ago
People who learn the same music theories write different songs, so do robots. Robots are rarely likely to replace human beings in the field of composition.
0 1 Reply
Natalie (낮은) 4 years ago
Music would be awful of it was automated. Music requires feelings to be any good.
0 0 Reply
Joel (기회 없음) 5 years ago
Music, or the act of composing music, has no formula of equation to it. Music is the expression of one's emotions, often called the outburst of the soul. A robot or machine is literally incapable of having emotions or a soul, therefore a robot will never be able to replace a human composer.
0 0 Reply
Jason 5 years ago
You are wrong. A big part of AI works by spotting patterns. Patterns is relatively simple given that there are only so many notes and scales in music. It can even come out with sounds that arent be able to be produced by normal instruments. AI can already write articles somewhat. They can already compose music (see link below). Playing music is trivial and doesnt even require AI. There are only 2 things that an AI may have trouble with.

1. Which is understanding which part of what they created did a human like and thus may have trouble using reinforced learning.

2. Lyrics have meaning behind the words. Its much more complex than just a melody. Its these lyrics and building melody in combination with lyrics which is going to be rather difficult but not impossible. Lyric writing is going to be one of the Last things AI will be able to do.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYb3Wimn01s
1 0 Reply
Dylan Dukat 5 years ago
I’ll raise you this. Music is a sphere of culture, and as such evolves with culture. Looking throughout music’s history, there are evident reasons why eras change, morph, and evolve. The role of composers is to create a unique voice that resonates with ever-shifting cultural trends. AI can easily analyze music and replicate its patterns, sure. But, that’s not really the foundation of music composition. I could, in writing a work, replicate the unique qualities of Shostakovich or Schoenberg. I could tell you all about how Shostakovich’s music was a rally against the USSR, and balanced nationalism with individualism and a rebellion against the machine. I could tell you how Shoenberg used serialism as a direct counter to Romanticism, and how he managed to create beautiful music mathematically. And I could produce similar work. But doing that without self-stylized inspiration… is it really writing music anymore? And could AI write music as a counter to a political movement while adhering to its demands? Or could it revolutionize an entire artistic culture? That’s the question that forms the crux of the counter.
0 0 Reply
Anomius Maximus (기회 없음) 5 years ago
No way a robot would have ever been able to create a song as great, innovative, inspiring and culture changing as the masterpiece that is known as 'All Star' by Smash Mouth.
0 0 Reply
Matt 5 years ago
:)
0 0 Reply
Someone (매우 가능성이 높음) 5 years ago
Sad but very likely. Many projects (e.g. Jukedeck and Aiva) have already proven this by analyzing works made by humans and creating their own pieces.
0 0 Reply
Nikola 4 years ago
But just because a robot can "make" music or "write" a book, i.e. create a composite of what's already out there, it doesn't mean that these professions will be overtaken by AI. People gravitate towards works of art created by humans, because reading a good book or gives you insight into the mind of the person who created it, in addition to possibly being relatable to you on a personal level.

Art is deeply individual, both from the perspective of the artist and the consumer of art. I'd say it's very hard to imagine that any creative profession that's grounded in relaying the sensory, emotional, intellectual, and philosophical experiences of the world would ever cease to exist. People will always feel the need to tell stories and express themselves through art, and other people will always want to hear those stories and consume that art. It's because art gives more meaning to our lives. It elevates our experience of living to another level.

There's a difference between automating jobs like assembly line work or driving and automating creative work. The former can arguably be perfected through automation, while the latter becomes devoid of meaning through automation.

Only one way I can imagine this happening is if all humans cease to exist, and we're replaced by machines. But if that happens, I won't be around to care.
0 0 Reply
Rachel Farina 1 year ago
You are right. What happens when we no longer can decipher what is and isn't created by AI? There are no regulations in place at the moment, zero laws, no certification or copyright process to say, "This was created by a human." Not a surprise given no one wants to but the brakes on big tech. But I sadly feel like this line will get very blurred, and AI and its billionaire founders will be all the more eager to keep it blurred so people keep using their AI, driving costly human artists and musicians and writers into obsolescence. There will be room for them in the highest realms of the arts and humanities, which still cuts out 90% of working artists.
0 0 Reply
Zaran Jathaul (기회 없음) 5 years ago
You can't automate music. Unless it is dub step but even then people have to make that. After hundreds of years why has classical music always stayed popular? Because it is an advanced form of music that people understand once they get an advanced understanding of music and that is why people will always pay to see it live.
0 0 Reply

이 직업에 대한 답글을 남겨주세요.

이 사이트는 reCAPTCHA와 Google 개인정보처리방침서비스 이용약관에 의해 보호됩니다.