개요
자동화 위험
2. 사용자 설문조사
3. 성장
4. 임금
5. 볼륨
설명
자원
댓글

수학자들

낮은 위험
25%
다음으로 어디로 가고 싶으신가요?
결과를 친구 및 가족과 공유하세요.
투표 댓글 (22)
또는, 이 직업을 더 자세히 탐구해보세요...
자동화 위험
계산된
28%
(낮은 위험)
투표 조사
21%
(낮은 위험)
Average: 25%
노동 수요
성장
3.7%
년도별 2033
임금
$116,440
또는 시간당 $55.98
볼륨
2,220
2023 기준으로
요약
직업 점수
7.0/10

사람들이 또한 조회했습니다

컴퓨터 프로그래머
변호사들
웹 개발자
기계 공학자
물리학자

계산된 자동화 위험

28% (낮은 위험)

저위험 (21-40%): 이 수준의 직업은 기술적인 능력과 인간 중심의 기술을 모두 요구하기 때문에 자동화 위험이 제한적입니다.

이 점수가 무엇인지, 그리고 어떻게 계산되는지에 대한 자세한 정보는 여기에 있습니다.

일부 중요한 직무 특성은 자동화하기 어렵습니다:

  • 독창성

사용자 설문조사

다음 두 십년 안에 완전 자동화될 21%의 확률

우리의 방문자들은 이 직업이 자동화될 가능성이 낮다고 투표했습니다. 이 평가는 계산된 자동화 위험 수준에 의해 더욱 지지받고 있으며, 이는 자동화의 28% 확률을 추정합니다.

자동화의 위험성에 대해 어떻게 생각하십니까?

수학자들이 다음 20년 이내에 로봇이나 인공지능에 의해 대체될 가능성은 얼마나 됩니까?






감정

다음 그래프는 의미 있는 데이터를 제공할 수 있을 만큼 충분한 투표 수가 있을 때마다 포함됩니다. 이러한 시각적 표현은 시간 경과에 따른 사용자 투표 결과를 보여주며, 감정 추세에 대한 중요한 지표를 제공합니다.

시간별 감정 (연간)

성장

다른 직업에 비해 적당한 성장

'Mathematicians' 직업 분야의 공석은 2033년까지 3.7% 증가할 것으로 예상됩니다.

총 고용량 및 예상 직업 공석

* 2021년부터 2031년까지의 기간에 대한 노동통계국의 데이터
업데이트된 예상치가 09-2024에 제출될 예정입니다..

임금

다른 직업에 비해 매우 높은 급여를 받는다.

2023년에 'Mathematicians'의 중앙값 연간 급여는 $116,440이며, 시간당 $55입니다.

'Mathematicians'은 전국 중위임금인 $48,060보다 142.3% 더 높은 금액을 지불받았습니다.

시간에 따른 임금

* 노동통계국의 데이터

볼륨

다른 직업에 비해 현저히 낮은 범위의 채용 기회

2023년 현재, 미국 내에서 'Mathematicians'로 고용된 사람들의 수는 2,220명이었습니다.

이는 전국의 고용 노동력 중 약 < 0.001%를 대표합니다.

다시 말해, 약 68 천명 중 1명이 'Mathematicians'로 고용되어 있습니다.

직무 설명

기본 수학에 대한 연구를 수행하거나 수학 기법을 과학, 관리, 그리고 다른 분야에 적용하는 연구를 수행합니다. 수학적 방법을 사용하여 다양한 분야의 문제를 해결합니다.

SOC Code: 15-2021.00

자원

새로운 커리어를 시작하려고 생각하거나 직장을 바꾸려는 계획이 있다면, 우리가 만든 편리한 채용 검색 도구를 사용해보세요. 이 도구를 통해 완벽한 새로운 역할을 찾을 수 있을지도 모릅니다.

당신의 지역에서 일자리를 검색하세요

댓글

Leave a comment

Guest 4 months ago
Aaaand Google DeepMind invented AI (AlphaGeometry 2 and AlphaProof) that solves IMO on silver medal. That escalated quickly...
1 1 Reply
Kevin Gonzalez Gordillo 4 months ago
Lately, I have been studying Gödel's Incompleteness theorems, and I was thinking, could an AI, or even an AGI, discover that in a consistent system of arithmetic, there are true statements that cannot be proven (incomplete system)? I mean the level of self-awareness and nuance that it would take to discover such a theorem and prove it true would be astounding since not even the best mathematicians of Gödel's times were convinced that was the case. So at this level of logic, I would really doubt an AI would take the jobs of people responsible for opening the heart of mathematics and showing the gaping hole of its fundamental flaw; for any mathematician reading this: Let's keep proving the true, the false, and the unprovable truths, and let's "embrace the unknown at the heart of any quest for truth" -(TED-Ed).
1 0 Reply
papo (기회 없음) 5 months ago
Mathematics is a science that is still in discovery, AI will not be able to understand this context
0 0 Reply
skyss0fly (적당한) 7 months ago
Robots have to utilise logic in their programming using arithmetic skills and therefore use mathematics to perform tasks and as such can compute mathematical tasks quite easily
0 0 Reply
Chickenlover69 4 months ago
Being a mathematician is researching math itself, like science. It needs creativity and human intelligence. For example, I certainly don't think AI can discover or invent complex numbers such as i, i = sqrt(-1). But I think you misunderstood the job of a mathematician as you probably thought that they just solve regular math questions that we already know how to solve, no it's not. Math is part of science and will always will be. Science will never be able to be taken over by AI. Remember that.
0 0 Reply
Anon (불확실한) 11 months ago
Logic can be programmed, so they may be able to eventually prove theorems
0 0 Reply
Europe2048 (적당한) 1 year ago
Maybe WolframAlpha is taking over?
0 0 Reply
Me (기회 없음) 1 year ago
Mathematical insights rely on human originality.
0 0 Reply
Anish (매우 가능성이 높음) 1 year ago
It will simply outclass us in every field.
0 0 Reply
Probabilist 1 year ago
Mathematicians generally find new ideas to solve problems, they also find new questions, whereas AI is just able to copy what already exists and to adapt it to classical situations. But maybe mathematicians will be able to create themself a new AI which will be able to replace them !!
0 0 Reply
Andre (매우 가능성이 높음) 1 year ago
People saying this is unlikely are silly. The progress in the field of computer generated proofs has been faster than the progress in AI art. I don't expect any of the Millennium Prize problems to be solved by humans, and I expect them all solved by 2030.
0 0 Reply
Jason 4 months ago
I find it equally silly when you say that none of the Millennium Prize problems will be solved by Humans and all of them will be solved by 2030 (I consider myself an amateur mathematician at best, but from what I understand, the Poincare conjecture has been solved, and the solver, Grigori Perelman I think he's human?) I've hanged out in some mathematics communities and from what I've seen ai has proved some competitive math questions, I guess the four color theorem requires computer assistance, and I've seen Terrence Tao say that Ai could be used to help give Ideas to mathematicians? I've tried searching up ai replacing mathematicians and i only get results of lean which from what i know really only checks if a theorem is right or not. Overall I find the statement that Ai will complete all of the Millennium problems by 2030 to be ridiculous Ai does not seem to be anywhere close to proving some of the most fundamental century old problems in essentially 6 years
2 0 Reply
Carlos (기회 없음) 2 years ago
I believe that even general AI will require a lot of time to reach a level where it can be compared on a full basis to a human in regards to maths.
0 0 Reply
Saurabh Sarkar (기회 없음) 3 years ago
AI was created from Math. Its development is dependent on the development of new Math. It will be next to impossible for AI to develop new functional math.
0 0 Reply
James (불확실한) 3 years ago
Because, AI and supercomputer can overtake the common knowledge
0 0 Reply
Jo 3 years ago
If you've ever done college level math and the number of ways you've been told to "Do it by inspection" and the unconventional method that every solution takes, Math is very unlikely to become automated.
0 0 Reply
AK (기회 없음) 3 years ago
Mathematics can go so far, there are literally so infinite possibilities. That may sound extreme but there are so many number systems out there that mathematicians are uncovering everyday as a team and they still can not find all of them. A computer may be faster but since there are so many possibilities both mathematicians and computers must work TOGETHER.
0 0 Reply
Alex (낮은) 3 years ago
Mathematics requires quite a bit of creativity, which AI is not capable of.
0 0 Reply
Faisal Ali Al-Zharani 4 years ago
Mathematicians being replaced by AI technology is not a bad idea. But this still upsets some people. Like me yes I'm a little upset but I don't I'll be thinking about creating jobs for mathematicians that hasn't bee in the (mathematics society) something like a direct career path for full time mathematicians. If is that secondary school teaching alright but not other job opportunities provided for mathematicians. I'm still thinking about the medicine field & how are experts in the field medicine are going to be replaced by artificial intelligence (AI) & also occupations like engineers or scientists.
0 0 Reply
Mon 2 years ago
Which career is most persistent to be replaced by AI according to you?
0 0 Reply
kevin (낮은) 5 years ago
Mathematics at its core requires a lot of creativity, something which AI is as of yet not good at. However AI will of course play a big role in defining potential research and we already see AI being used to find interesting mathematical patterns that we as humans have overlooked. It will be an aid to us, at least for the short/medium term.
0 0 Reply
seojin (기회 없음) 5 years ago
well at first you need creativity to think about what should he do,
and AI does not have creativity!
so AI could be assistant not mathematicians.
0 0 Reply

이 직업에 대한 답글을 남겨주세요.

이 사이트는 reCAPTCHA와 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 이용약관에 의해 보호됩니다.