개요
자동화 위험
2. 사용자 설문조사
3. 성장
4. 임금
5. 볼륨
설명
자원
댓글

보험 판매 에이전트

고위험
69%
다음으로 어디로 가고 싶으신가요?
결과를 친구 및 가족과 공유하세요.
투표 댓글 (21)
또는, 이 직업을 더 자세히 탐구해보세요...
자동화 위험
계산된
80%
(임박한 위험)
투표 조사
57%
(중간 위험)
Average: 69%
노동 수요
성장
6.1%
년도별 2033
임금
$59,080
또는 시간당 $28.40
볼륨
457,510
2023 기준으로
요약
직업 점수
4.6/10

사람들이 또한 조회했습니다

컴퓨터 프로그래머
변호사들
회계사와 감사원
보험 사정관<br/>
그래픽 디자이너

계산된 자동화 위험

80% (임박한 위험)

임박한 위험 (81-100%): 이 수준의 직업은 가까운 미래에 자동화될 가능성이 매우 높습니다. 이러한 직업은 대부분 반복적이고 예측 가능한 작업으로, 인간의 판단이 거의 필요하지 않습니다.

이 점수가 무엇인지, 그리고 어떻게 계산되는지에 대한 자세한 정보는 여기에 있습니다.

일부 중요한 직무 특성은 자동화하기 어렵습니다:

  • 설득

  • 협상

  • 사회적 인식력

사용자 설문조사

다음 두 십년 안에 완전 자동화될 57%의 확률

우리의 방문객들은 이 직업이 자동화될지 확신이 없다고 투표했습니다. 그러나 우리가 생성한 자동화 위험 수준은 훨씬 높은 자동화 가능성을 제안합니다: 자동화 가능성 80%%.

자동화의 위험성에 대해 어떻게 생각하십니까?

보험 판매 에이전트이 다음 20년 이내에 로봇이나 인공지능에 의해 대체될 가능성은 얼마나 됩니까?






감정

다음 그래프는 의미 있는 데이터를 제공할 수 있을 만큼 충분한 투표 수가 있을 때마다 포함됩니다. 이러한 시각적 표현은 시간 경과에 따른 사용자 투표 결과를 보여주며, 감정 추세에 대한 중요한 지표를 제공합니다.

시간별 감정 (연간)

성장

다른 직업에 비해 빠른 성장

'Insurance Sales Agents' 직업 분야의 공석은 2033년까지 6.1% 증가할 것으로 예상됩니다.

총 고용량 및 예상 직업 공석

* 2021년부터 2031년까지의 기간에 대한 노동통계국의 데이터
업데이트된 예상치가 09-2024에 제출될 예정입니다..

임금

다른 직업에 비해 적당히 지급되는

2023년에 'Insurance Sales Agents'의 중앙값 연간 급여는 $59,080이며, 시간당 $28입니다.

'Insurance Sales Agents'은 전국 중위임금인 $48,060보다 22.9% 더 높은 금액을 지불받았습니다.

시간에 따른 임금

* 노동통계국의 데이터

볼륨

다른 직업에 비해 훨씬 더 많은 직업 기회 범위

2023년 현재, 미국 내에서 'Insurance Sales Agents'로 고용된 사람들의 수는 457,510명이었습니다.

이는 전국의 고용 노동력 중 약 0.30%를 대표합니다.

다시 말해, 약 331명 중 1명이 'Insurance Sales Agents'로 고용되어 있습니다.

직무 설명

생명, 재산, 사고, 건강, 자동차 등 다양한 종류의 보험을 판매합니다. 고객을 독립 중개인에게 소개할 수도 있고, 독립 중개인으로 일할 수도 있으며, 보험 회사에 고용될 수도 있습니다.

SOC Code: 41-3021.00

자원

새로운 커리어를 시작하려고 생각하거나 직장을 바꾸려는 계획이 있다면, 우리가 만든 편리한 채용 검색 도구를 사용해보세요. 이 도구를 통해 완벽한 새로운 역할을 찾을 수 있을지도 모릅니다.

당신의 지역에서 일자리를 검색하세요

댓글

Leave a comment

Nicolas Luksetich (불확실한) 2 months ago
There are certain details about commercial and private lines that require a humans touch. Most could be put together by AI though
0 0 Reply
Anon (매우 가능성이 높음) 10 months ago
I voted highly likely. The timeframe is 20 years, and AI tools are already highly advanced, and will continue to grow. Voice automation is a thing, and will improve to the point where you won't even know you're talking to AI bot. AI can contextualize the information. As for claims handling, I think that will be taken over by AI, which removes the need for an agent advocate. An AI can read through a policy and fully understand whether or not coverage exists for a claim. If there is a grey area of coverage, it can be sent to a legal department to reword the policy forms for future policies. Additionally, in grey area situations, the AI bot can calculate the risk of lawsuit, and risk of losing, risk of over all cost of denying and fighting a claim, vs settling with the insured - all in an instant.

As for the insurance agent, AI can easily understand and sell a product. One could argue that using AI will increase the risk of E&O. That may be true, but 1) AI will improve and the E&O risk will greatly decrease and 2) The cost to use AI, and pay the salary of one or a team of specialists to maintain the AI will save so much on employee salaries (AI +3-5 people can easily replace 100+ agent departments) that the cost for E&O deductibles and possible E&O premium increase is outweighed. 100 agents making $60k/year = $6,000,000 saved.
0 0 Reply
Jeff (적당한) 10 months ago
This was a year ago, but as "training" we worked with an AI that pretended to be a customer. It was very rudimentary, but with the advances of AI we have seen in the last year I could see it learning what good sales agents do and replicate it. So within 10 years it could basically replicate what a standard agent does or possibly exceed them since it doesn't have feelings and will push the product harder than humans will.
0 0 Reply
Logan (매우 가능성이 높음) 1 year ago
The questions, at least in my country, asked by the insurance agents are the same. How much do you want when you die, is this amount enough for your future offspring, how much is enough to not burden your family, you should get X times your salary for this plan.

An AI can do the same. Key in custom values and voila, a carefully crafted plan will be ready for you. And it may even analyse existing clients and suggest the most suitable plan for you. If you feel unsure about their decision and have more spare cash, you can raise the premium and decide to insure more.
0 0 Reply
Antonio (낮은) 1 year ago
I voted for a small chance. However, as an agent, while what we do in a nutshell may be easy, you lose that human aspect. A robot will have no empathy. I have sold policies where I helped people get certain discounts that a robot wouldn't have done for them.

Also, yes, you can buy insurance online, but I can't tell you how many times I had to go fix a problem or amend a policy because someone did it online and did not fully understand what they were doing.
0 0 Reply
Jim 3 years ago
As an Independent Agent, I have had people leave us and go to a "direct" company for a small savings. It's funny though, when they are involved in an accident or any other type of claim they will call me for help dealing with their company. There is not anyone advocating for them or getting them through the claim process. It is then they understand the need for an agent and usually come back.

Claims are the product we sell. No claims, no need for an Agent or a company for that matter
0 0 Reply
Alejandro Lechere 3 years ago
Esto tiene que ver mucho en donde se desarrolle la practica, en lugares donde la digitalizacion sea cultural, va a avanzar. Hay que ver como impacta en la decision de los clientes, lo que se contrata es algo intangible y es un servicio a futuro a cumplir el contrato. Por lo que la base puntual de esto es la confianza, la solidez de la empresa(imagen), pero lo sociocultural tiene que ver, la infraestructura de cada pais, tambien, si bien puede avanzar en paises desarrollados, puede que tenga trabas por otro lados. La globalizacion genera cambios de por si, pero su entorno juega en contra. Si bien la calidad de servicio personal generalmente es de mejor calidad, no por eso, va a ser mas rapida y eficiente. Creo que pueden ser mejores socios, pero a corto plazo, lo veo mas dificil que a largo.

Si nos quedan 20 años, me quedo contento, con eso. Los que amamos dicha actividad, cuando las empresas en este caso de Argentina, dan un paso para lo virtual, se encuentran con muchos problemas. (El fraude es uno de los principales costos) como tambien el costo operartivo (comisiones estructura de las empresas), pero si la ecuacion es bajar el costo, y esto hace subir los fraudes, no veo la ventaja.

0 0 Reply
Bobby G (낮은) 4 years ago
People can buy any type of insurance without an agent now. And yet, agents still make a living. Unless companies no longer employ or accept applications from agents, there will still be sales by agents
0 0 Reply
Keith 4 years ago
There will always be top companies willing to commission a good insurance broker. The companies that hire on salary and our captive are the ones who make the shift. These companies know good sales people drive revenue. We can use quote tech and other tech to service more people. AI will never sale as fast as a person because? There is zero emotion. As long as you have the ability to get a license, use tech to your advantage, and buy leads you’re safe for decades.
0 0 Reply
Dr. Yo (기회 없음) 4 years ago
You cannot sell life insurance on advertisement, it creates anti-selection. Mostly those who are more likely to die will respond to the sales pitch. The sales PERSON should convince someone who absolutely don't need this product and will never use it for themselves to buy it - then it becomes profitable. The process is too emotional to outsource it to AI.
0 0 Reply
Luiz Antonio (기회 없음) 4 years ago
I voted 'no chance' because insurance sales are very personal and based on trust. The A.I. can have all the technical knowledge to do this. But it can't physically meet with clients, take them to dinner, understand their personal problems, and earn their trust. Although i believe A.I. will help increase insurance sales in the next two decades.
0 0 Reply
Bobby G 4 years ago
There are those people (Group 1) who can understand things by reading and doing for themselves and there are people (Group 2) who hate reading or who read stuff and become more confused or still cannot use what they've read to make a decision. AI will not be able to help many in the 2nd group, so therefore, these people will need someone to explain it to them. Currently, anyone can get any type of insurance on their own, either by using the internet or calling directly to the company and use the company's in house agent. And yet, independent agents are still able to make a living. So, therefore, unless agents will no longer be employed and companies only employ AI, agents, especially independent agents, will still exist. So, Luiz, there will be some loss of Group 2 to AI (maybe 25%), you are partially correct
0 0 Reply
Swifty 5 years ago
Auto, Home, and Travel insurance is already being automated now in Poland. The Polish company LINK4 is already doing it. https://www.link4.pl/o-link4/about-link4

And like another has said referring to Amazon, all Amazon has to do is optimize Alexa so she can talk back to you and ask you all the questions needed to properly underwrite and sell you your policy.

Another company to take a look at is Spixii
https://www.spixii.com/infobot
0 0 Reply
Billy Johnson (낮은) 5 years ago
Robots won't be bright enough to go through the nuances of a specific and unique risk like insurance is. Perhaps for something simple like auto insurance but not for home, business, life, health, etc that is far more personalized to each person walking through the door.
0 0 Reply
Chris Duncan 5 years ago
Where insurance is a commodity with more standardized coverages (BOP, Work Comp, Life, retail property, auto) for personal lines and small commercial, the disintermediation of insurance agents and brokers is already happening in the insurtech world. However, for complex risks and custom insurance for large companies (complex property, liability, product liability, D&O, even "advisor" driven complex decisions like health insurance), it'll be a while. So, rapid change in internet enabled sales and service of routine solutions, but more custom work, still needs advisors.
0 0 Reply
Bill Purmort 5 years ago
The world of risk transfer will continue to be very complex and a artificial replacement may add to the transaction but will never replace it
0 0 Reply
Your Friendly Neighbourhood Insurance Broker 5 years ago
Until it does - look at these online insurer's and brokers. Policy Genius in the US offers quotes across many P&C and Life companies already.

As a client who has unlimited access to information and reviews online, I can spend an hour's time myself comparing 10+ different companies from my couch and never have to step into an insurance office (which face it is extremely dull no matter who you are).

Big players like TD are disrupting the market in Canada with their self serve online P&C products and another of the big ones in Canada, The Co-operators, is pushing their group plans which are completely self serve and offer steep discounts compared to their regular products (I've seen less than half price). Which they can do because they cut out the middle man.

Amazon has also been speculated to start dabbling in the insurance business. Bezos is a conqueror and once he comes for you, it is only a matter of time.

When companies stand to save millions of dollars per year, it will happen. And it will happen quicker than you think.
0 0 Reply
Bobby G 4 years ago
"Your Friendly Neighbourhood Insurance Broker says When companies stand to save millions of dollars per year, it will happen". As if AI doesn't cost money to program. And the changes in prices and regulations have to be programmed in every year. The savings won't be that much. This is not a repetitive procedure like building a car. I think you are oversimplifying the sale of insurance. With competing products, people need to understand or some want someone to simplify it and tell them what is best for them. AI cannot do that.
0 0 Reply
Bryan Cryznski 5 years ago
You're acting like you're smart enough to pick coverage for yourself. Never has there been an industry where people know less than insurance. It's people like you who think you can do it from your couch that are always crying when they have a loss because they chose cheap over adequate coverage on the internet and you'll be complaining to a robot/call center that doesn't care.
0 0 Reply
Ryan 4 years ago
"Never has there been an industry where people know less than insurance." Bold statement there, Bryan. I'd hazard to say that the medical field, in many instances, are far and away more complicated and 'less known' than insurance. But, sure. Let's work with that premise.

Have you worked with AI and algorithms and machine learning before? I can tell you that personal insurance, with as many different factors that there can be, there certainly are solutions for all of the coverage requirements and options. If an insurance company can build in redundancy-proof errors, it wouldn't be a stretch at all to implement those redundancy-proofs to an online, automated, customer-driven platform to purchase insurance.

As soon as a client enters their license number, we can extract their license history, claims history, insurance history and conviction history. AI could easily take out the important information and calculate accordingly.

Who cares if they choose the insurance that isn't the best for them? Is that your personal responsibility to worry about what everyone chooses for every aspect of their life? Caveat emptor. Google it. Read it. Understand it.

There are many, many industries that take advantage of general ignorance. You've made a straw man argument that does not stand up to actual scrutiny. Brokers are on the way out. It is a matter of time, not opinion.
0 0 Reply
Ryan M. 3 years ago
"Brokers are on the way out. It is a matter of time, not opinion." Bold statement there, Ryan. You've identified real threats to a broker's career choice without proving the certainty of your conclusion. I believe a decent term for someone who emphatically predicts the future without appropriate evidence is "fraud". AI will be a viable option for purchasing insurance, and so will brokers. Who will win out? I don't know, but it's a very big space with more than enough room for robots and humans alike.
0 0 Reply

이 직업에 대한 답글을 남겨주세요.

이 사이트는 reCAPTCHA와 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 이용약관에 의해 보호됩니다.