지구과학자, 수문학자 및 지리학자를 제외하고

20% (최소한의 위험)

최소 위험 (0-20%): 이 범주에 속하는 직업은 복잡한 문제 해결, 창의성, 강한 대인 관계 능력, 그리고 높은 수준의 수동적 능력을 요구하기 때문에 자동화될 확률이 낮습니다. 이러한 일자리는 종종 복잡한 손동작과 정밀한 조정을 포함하며, 이는 기계가 필요한 작업을 복제하기 어렵게 만듭니다.

이 점수가 무엇인지, 그리고 어떻게 계산되는지에 대한 자세한 정보는 여기에 있습니다.

사용자 설문조사

감정

다음 그래프는 의미 있는 데이터를 제공할 수 있을 만큼 충분한 투표 수가 있을 때마다 포함됩니다. 이러한 시각적 표현은 시간 경과에 따른 사용자 투표 결과를 보여주며, 감정 추세에 대한 중요한 지표를 제공합니다.

임금

다른 직업에 비해 높은 급여를 받는

2023년에 'Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers'의 중앙값 연간 급여는 $92,580이며, 시간당 $44입니다.

'Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers'은 전국 중위임금인 $48,060보다 92.6% 더 높은 금액을 지불받았습니다.

시간에 따른 임금

댓글

Ajdin (낮은) 5 months ago

Whilst AI or just simply computers play a crucial role in the industry, the human factor is definitely here to stay

0 0 Reply

N.M. (낮은) 5 months ago

It requires doing things that I believe robots will not be advanced enough to do in 20 years.

0 0 Reply

Eliana (기회 없음) 1 year ago

to be a geoscientist you need to travel in the field, collect rocks, analyze sequences, understand and interpret what are you seeing. Maybe AI can help, but you really need to build a full terminator to replace a geologist.

1 0 Reply

Rui Bernardino (기회 없음) 1 year ago

Geologists don't work with numbers, they work with human common sense, theoretical geology ofen doesn't apply in the real world, so you can program a robot that knows everything and it will be dumbfounded when it finds a yellow basalt (yes they exist). Some tasks we do may be automated, sutch as calculations and rock thin section descriptions, that will only allow us to be more productive and focous on the aspects that really matter. There is no replacement for human geometric thinking and thus no way geologists will be replaced by robots

0 0 Reply

Moyin Ade 3 years ago

As a student Geologist I agree but I think you’ll still need a Geologist to program the robot. Even in Car manufacturing assembly line still has engineers. Correct/advise me if I’m wrong.👍

0 0 Reply

Faisal Ali 4 years ago

When your talking about a (Geologist) this occupation isn't really going to be ''automated'' cause' this work needs to be done by a human not really by computerized bots. I disagree with that but let's say an archaeologist place it'll be possible to replace the work of an archaeologist by AI cause recently AI has discovered some archaeological data that was yrs ago.

I believe that this occupation will still live. It will not most likely be taken by AI I'm 100% confident.

0 0 Reply

E 5 years ago

Paleontologists probably not. While robots can have extreme precision, humans can see things which AI programs can't

0 0 Reply

leo 4 years ago

AI can see things that human can't see, not the opposite.

0 0 Reply