개요
자동화 위험
2. 사용자 설문조사
3. 성장
4. 임금
5. 볼륨
설명
자원
댓글

승무원

자동화 위험
계산된
38%
위험 수준
투표 조사
39%
418 표를 기준으로
노동 수요
성장
20.8%
년도별 2032
임금
$63,760
또는 시간당 $31
볼륨
108,480
2022 기준으로
요약
직업 점수
6.7/10

이 요약을 사이트에 원하시나요? 임베드 코드:

투표
댓글 (22)

자동화 위험

38% (낮은 위험)

저위험 (21-40%): 이 수준의 직업은 기술적인 능력과 인간 중심의 기술을 모두 요구하기 때문에 자동화 위험이 제한적입니다.

이 점수가 무엇인지, 그리고 어떻게 계산되는지에 대한 자세한 정보는 여기에 있습니다.

일부 매우 중요한 직무 특성은 자동화하기 어렵습니다:

  • 제한된 작업 공간, 불편한 자세

  • 다른 사람들을 돕고 돌보는 것

일부 중요한 직무 특성은 자동화하기 어렵습니다:

  • 사회적 인식력

  • 설득

사용자 설문조사

다음 두 십년 안에 완전 자동화될 39%의 확률

우리의 방문자들은 이 직업이 자동화될 가능성이 낮다고 투표했습니다. 이 평가는 계산된 자동화 위험 수준에 의해 더욱 지지받고 있으며, 이는 자동화의 38% 확률을 추정합니다.

자동화의 위험성에 대해 어떻게 생각하십니까?

승무원이 다음 20년 이내에 로봇이나 인공지능에 의해 대체될 가능성은 얼마나 됩니까?






감정

다음 그래프는 의미있는 데이터를 제공할 수 있는 상당한 양의 투표가 있을 때마다 포함되어 있습니다. 이러한 시각적 표현은 시간에 따른 사용자 설문조사 결과를 보여주어, 감정 추세의 중요한 지표를 제공합니다.

시간별 감정 (연간)

성장

다른 직업에 비해 매우 빠른 성장

'Flight Attendants' 직업 분야의 공석은 2032년까지 20.8% 증가할 것으로 예상됩니다.

총 고용량 및 예상 직업 공석

* 2021년부터 2031년까지의 기간에 대한 노동통계국의 데이터
업데이트된 예상치가 09-2023에 제출될 예정입니다..

임금

다른 직업에 비해 높은 급여를 받는

2022년에 'Flight Attendants'의 중앙값 연간 급여는 $63,760이며, 시간당 $30입니다.

'Flight Attendants'은 전국 중위임금인 $46,310보다 37.7% 더 높은 금액을 지불받았습니다.

시간에 따른 임금

* 노동통계국의 데이터

볼륨

다른 직업에 비해 더 넓은 직업 기회 범위

2022년 현재, 미국 내에서 'Flight Attendants'로 고용된 사람들의 수는 108,480명이었습니다.

이는 전국의 고용 노동력 중 약 0.07%를 대표합니다.

다시 말해, 약 1 천명 중 1명이 'Flight Attendants'로 고용되어 있습니다.

직무 설명

항공기 선실의 안전을 감시합니다. 항공사 승객에게 서비스를 제공하며, 안전 정보를 설명하고, 음식과 음료를 제공하며, 긴급 사태에 대응합니다.

SOC Code: 53-2031.00

자원

새로운 커리어를 시작하려고 생각하거나 직장을 바꾸려는 계획이 있다면, 우리가 만든 편리한 채용 검색 도구를 사용해보세요. 이 도구를 통해 완벽한 새로운 역할을 찾을 수 있을지도 모릅니다.

당신의 지역에서 일자리를 검색하세요

댓글

댓글을 남겨주세요.

Anonymous (매우 가능성이 높음)이 말합니다.
You automate the plane to give instructions during turbulence and emergencies. Ease passengers into by updating the seats, rows, and overhead panels with attendants still onboard. From a safety perspective what is 2 attendants per class going to do for 20+ people, nothing other than give instruction and help 1 or 2 women and children. After introducing passengers to those improvements kick it up a notch and introduce 1 robot attendant for every 1 human attendant. This robot would initially be programmed to serve drinks and snacks. You would order it prior to the flight and on your phone or TV during the flight. Now that you have safety and procedures programmed right in to the plane and passengers have interacted with it over the last 10 years with a few iterations to their programming over time and passengers have been able to be served by a robot, the in cabin experience can now be fully automated. You could even design the robots to be smaller in size to fit more than two attendants in the class. Ultimately decreasing burnout by human staff, boarding times, the time it takes to get to the customer, etc.
Mar 23, 2024 at 12:38 오후
PK (기회 없음)이 말합니다.
FAA requires a crew member 1 for every 50. Flight attendant position is based on safety and security designated by FAA not customer service!!!
Jan 29, 2024 at 02:41 오전
tony (낮은)이 말합니다.
You're still going to need human intervention in an emergency. There are too many changes on a moments notice during flight to completely trust it to AI.
Jun 02, 2023 at 08:39 오후
Philip (불확실한)이 말합니다.
I think aspects of the job could be automated but parts of the job won't be
May 12, 2023 at 06:40 오후
Sofie (매우 가능성이 높음)이 말합니다.
Humans can decide quicker in an emergency situation, but robots can take a while.

Plus, robots can't do such things as CPR or use a first aid kit, for example. So, it's pretty risky.
Aug 08, 2022 at 06:37 오후
h (낮은)이 말합니다.
AI and robots could mess up emergencies and need a connection to stay "alive"
Dec 31, 2021 at 01:27 오전
A flight attendant (낮은)이 말합니다.
By federal law (FAA), there needs to be 1 flight attendant per 50 seats on a plane. The number can never decrease even with robots. Good luck getting those robots to handle medical emergencies or breaking up fights between ignorant passengers or helping all you ungrateful passengers evacuate during an emergency in 90 seconds or less with no ability of rational thought LOL
Dec 06, 2021 at 04:31 오후
Collin Tredo (낮은)이 말합니다.
This job requires a friendly human face, people will be less comfortable having to talk to and trust a robot/AI when they get on a plane.
May 17, 2021 at 05:00 오후
A (기회 없음)이 말합니다.
Flight attendants use their knowledge to solve a situation given the surprise factor... it’s impossible to programme a robot that knows how to act in front of a surprise factor situation.

And by the way flight attendants are there to save u not to make u happy.

First priority is safety the If it’s possible the service time will come.
Apr 10, 2021 at 10:07 오전
Spiros (기회 없음)이 말합니다.
Flight attendants are there for one specific reason: safety. For this, human presence is important
Apr 10, 2021 at 01:55 오전
Erebus (낮은)이 말합니다.
It involves emotional labour which only a human is capable of.
Mar 24, 2021 at 05:52 오후
JP (적당한)이 말합니다.
With the global pandemic focusing minds on the amount of human contact passengers have on flights, I could see cabin crew being reduced in number to improve safety, with a Purser and assistant at each end of the aircraft being supplemented by robots which would handle more of the non-emergency workload. Robots would reduce the expense of accommodating cabin crew at destinations and would be able to clean the cabin autonomously using UV lights to disinfect the cabin air and surfaces.
Aug 02, 2020 at 04:53 오후
A flight attendant (기회 없음)이 말합니다.
Will absolutely not happen. What most do not realize is that flight attendants are on board for safety. It's just not something that can be replaced by robots.
Jul 22, 2020 at 08:27 오전
Ebork (매우 가능성이 높음)이 말합니다.
Flight attendants make or break flying. They'll be robots soon enough.
Jan 03, 2020 at 11:48 오전
THM이 말합니다.
Flight attendants make your flying safe you ignorant.
Jun 27, 2020 at 09:20 오전
Izme;-;이 말합니다.
I think that is wrong you see robots can also break easy, if there is a drunk passenger or causing harm robots can break with their wires. In medical procedures or any emergency humans would be faster than the robots having to mechanically bend down taking longer than humans.
Mar 31, 2021 at 08:21 오전
JD (매우 가능성이 높음)이 말합니다.
With the lousy customer service and the awfully attitudes these "air stewards(esses)" possess nowadays, I wouldn't be surprised that a machine will end up doing their job not only more quickly and efficiently, but for little to no cost of maintenance on said droids compared to paying salaries w/ benefits, retirement, etc & dealing with greedy unions, to people who don't do their job properly and are not even qualified to in the first place.

Given the recent horrific experiences passengers had to endure from these "flight attendants", I see machines replacing these incompetent humans in the future. It'll save the airlines plenty of revenue and avoid lawsuits and having to pay these poorly trained service attendants for mediocre to dismal services provided.

The only ones to blame would be the flight attendants themselves, because a machine did a better job than they ever would.
Apr 20, 2019 at 05:36 오전
Karen 이 말합니다.
When you have a heart attack on the plane who’s going to administer first aid to you? A robot? A flight attendant is there to save your ass not kiss it and their customer service is based on your attitude. It goes both ways
May 05, 2019 at 06:17 오전
GG이 말합니다.
JD deserves the most awful flying experiences after the rudeness he showcased here.
May 09, 2019 at 04:11 오후
MC이 말합니다.
JD I don't know what airline you have been flying on. I have been involved in the airline industry for over forty years, have traveled on numerous air carriers, and have never experienced what you have described in terms of lacking flight attendant professionalism, training, emergency, and medical preparedness.

I have witnessed a decline in the manners and decorum of the passengers traveling. Possibly, the added stress to passengers of airport safety procedures has taken a toll on their nerves. I remember when friends and family could accompany passengers to the gate. Now, the seats are packed in like sardines in a can.

Airline competition made the way for no-frills service and more passengers in smaller seats on airplanes. This has taken a toll on everyone's stress levels. Still, I see friendly FAs who are doing their best to accommodate everyone onboard and assuage those who are already frazzled by the time they take their seats.

A robot may make the dispersion of in-flight commodities easier but it can never take care of all of the emergencies that FAs are trained to handle, the medical emergencies, the duplicate and other seating problems, the myriad of human interactions that FA's handle, unaccompanied children, wheelchair passengers, interaction with cockpit and ground staff, etc., etc. the list goes on, not even considering a major emergency like a hijack incident.

You have vastly underestimated the uber-selective hiring, initial and ongoing training that FAs have. Did you know that they have to take FAA-mandated emergency testing yearly on every airplane which they are qualified to work and pass the test with a 90-100% grade. This includes physical testing in airplane simulators., first aide, resuscitation and cardio procedures etc.

If you see an FA behaving in the unprofessional manner you have described, you should write a letter to the airline about that employee.
Jul 16, 2023 at 10:31 오전

이 직업에 대한 답글을 남겨주세요.

이 사이트는 reCAPTCHA와 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 이용약관에 의해 보호됩니다.

사람들이 또한 조회했습니다

변호사들
컴퓨터 프로그래머
배우들
항공사 파일럿, 부 파일럿 및 비행 엔지니어
그래픽 디자이너