상업 조종사

Dee Snuts (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

If the automated system went down because of a storm or someone forgetting to turn their phone on airplane mode then every passenger is screwed

luhenba (낮은)이 말합니다.

the reason why i have voted 'low' because anyone will not be willing to sit in a plane operated by computer or A.I without any human input and will you be comfortable to travel in a plane with only A.I inputs?

Anonymous (낮은)이 말합니다.

People would not trust robots, which are feared, to fly them, especially when flying is also feared by most people. They would much rather trust humans who can reassure them and are experienced. Also, companies would also be hesitant to incorporate robots as many of them do not have the money required and any lawsuits following a crash would be devastating and would end the whole industry potentially.

Rip (낮은)이 말합니다.

No flight is the same. No robot could do what sully did.

LeftE81 (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

They can't handle emergencies

Autofill (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

I can’t even trust robots driving my car let alone flying my airplane. It might also be easier to hack a robot.

Sumik Chhaliwal (낮은)이 말합니다.

I don't think robots will fully take over the "Commercial Pilot" job 'cause you always need human intelligence instead of artificial intelligence for a safe journey.

Sai rithwik (낮은)이 말합니다.

I don't believe robots can take on the role of commercial pilots due to the potential risks involved.

Allowing robots to operate planes that carry varying numbers of passengers, such as smaller regional jets accommodating around 50 to 100 passengers, and larger airliners like the Boeing 737 or Airbus A320 series carrying between 140 to 240 passengers, or wide-body aircraft like the Boeing 777 or Airbus A380 with capacities ranging from around 300 to over 800 passengers, could pose significant risks to people's lives.

The possibility of robot malfunctions raises concerns about placing full trust in their abilities.

Etienne (낮은)이 말합니다.

While yes there is an auto pilot in the cockpit now a days that is not ai this is a program at this stage AI is trying to guess what will come next. So while automation will be of assistance it will not be able to handle emergencies well. Meaning there is still human intervention needed at some point

Eli (낮은)이 말합니다.

Most passengers feel like they need at least 1 human pilot to be safe. you can program a robot to do something but it has no clue what to do if something goes wrong.

Michael pare (매우 가능성이 높음)이 말합니다.

It’s only FAA approval and public acceptance that are in the way.

Guilermo (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

Safety and safety perception will make this area to be delayed decades to be fully automated. Government regulations and risk main factors.

Sky World (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

As a student pilot, I need to learn to analyze a chart and do geometry for navigation. (Even tho we have an iPad) Learn air physics, phraseology etc. Make real time critical decision. Probably the last job but AI will enhance us!. Might as well replace 99% of the office workers with automation.

And IT/Engineers? We need them. But 80% less people.

Rhys (적당한)이 말합니다.

Because automation will likely be able to fully automate most systems with human oversight

Boeing 777 (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

First, we will need to make autonomous cars reliable and safe, which is an extremely complicated task. To do the same for airplanes is at least three times more complex.

If autonomous planes fully replace commercial pilots, these pilots will lose their jobs. Furthermore, your once-held childhood dream of flying a big jet above the clouds will be shattered. So, think about that.

Lastly, even if there are fully autonomous planes, there will be many passengers who feel unsafe about flying in a plane without a single pilot.

Altsu (낮은)이 말합니다.

The public view on planes being flown by robots instead of a human at the controls would most likely be negative. I personally wouldn't fly on a robot operated plane

Billy Crews (낮은)이 말합니다.

I feel like there are decisions that can't be made by AI. For instance, situations like 9/11 or Sully and the crash landing.

I 100% agree that AI can fly planes. For instance, in the military, most are drones piloted by people. So, I still think it's possible for it to go either way.

James (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

I think that commercial pilots should not be replaced by robots or AI. There are still people who want to train to be pilots and have the opportunity to fly people across the world. If these robots take over, they are not just taking over the basics of takeoff or landing, but their entire job. There are still so many people who have dreamed of becoming pilots, so don't let the robots or AI take over.

And what about all the pilots who will be flying in 2030? Where will they go? Plus, the pilots who have just started their job, paying a ton of money for training and working really hard, will then realize it was all for a whole lot of rubbish. So don't let the pilots' hard work go to waste. Let the robots be destroyed, and they can be scrapped or used for a different purpose not relating to planes.

Bob (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

Developing an aircraft, its certification process, and the time it takes to be delivered to airliners itself takes at least two decades. Thus, if aircraft manufacturers such as Boeing and Airbus were to start developing such aircraft today, it would take roughly two decades for them to enter service and fly passengers. These companies, as of now, have no plans for such pilotless aircraft. Thus, not only is there no chance of fully automating commercial aircraft within the next two decades, but the chances within the next 50 years are also extremely small.

dbWizard.24.7 (매우 가능성이 높음)이 말합니다.

Increased drone activity by the DoD. Computer-operated fighter aircraft.

Increased positive factors:

- Reliability
- Less cockpit space
- Redesign of aircraft for more efficiency
- Does not get sick
- Does not have family problems

Goodbye, human pilots...