필름 및 비디오 편집자

고위험
62%
다음으로 어디로 가고 싶으신가요?
결과를 친구 및 가족과 공유하세요.
투표 댓글 (31)
또는, 이 직업을 더 자세히 탐구해보세요...
자동화 위험
계산된
72%
(고위험)
투표 조사
53%
(중간 위험)
Average: 62%
노동 수요
성장
4.7%
년도별 2033
임금
$66,600
또는 시간당 $32.02
볼륨
29,240
2023 기준으로
요약
직업 점수
4.1/10

사람들이 또한 조회했습니다

계산된 자동화 위험

72% (고위험)

고위험 (61-80%): 이 범주에 속하는 직업은 현재 또는 가까운 미래의 기술을 사용하여 쉽게 자동화될 수 있는 많은 업무를 수행하므로 자동화로부터 중대한 위협을 받고 있습니다.

이 점수가 무엇인지, 그리고 어떻게 계산되는지에 대한 자세한 정보는 여기에 있습니다.

일부 매우 중요한 직무 특성은 자동화하기 어렵습니다:

  • 미술

일부 중요한 직무 특성은 자동화하기 어렵습니다:

  • 독창성

사용자 설문조사

다음 두 십년 안에 완전 자동화될 53%의 확률

우리의 방문객들은 이 직업이 자동화될지 확신이 없다고 투표했습니다. 그러나 우리가 생성한 자동화 위험 수준은 훨씬 높은 자동화 가능성을 제안합니다: 자동화 가능성 72%%.

자동화의 위험성에 대해 어떻게 생각하십니까?

필름 및 비디오 편집자이 다음 20년 이내에 로봇이나 인공지능에 의해 대체될 가능성은 얼마나 됩니까?






감정

다음 그래프는 의미 있는 데이터를 제공할 수 있을 만큼 충분한 투표 수가 있을 때마다 포함됩니다. 이러한 시각적 표현은 시간 경과에 따른 사용자 투표 결과를 보여주며, 감정 추세에 대한 중요한 지표를 제공합니다.

시간별 감정 (연간)

성장

다른 직업에 비해 적당한 성장

'Film and Video Editors' 직업 분야의 공석은 2033년까지 4.7% 증가할 것으로 예상됩니다.

총 고용량 및 예상 직업 공석

* 2021년부터 2031년까지의 기간에 대한 노동통계국의 데이터
업데이트된 예상치가 09-2024에 제출될 예정입니다..

임금

다른 직업에 비해 적당히 지급되는

2023년에 'Film and Video Editors'의 중앙값 연간 급여는 $66,600이며, 시간당 $32입니다.

'Film and Video Editors'은 전국 중위임금인 $48,060보다 38.6% 더 높은 금액을 지불받았습니다.

시간에 따른 임금

* 노동통계국의 데이터

볼륨

다른 직업에 비해 낮은 범위의 직업 기회

2023년 현재, 미국 내에서 'Film and Video Editors'로 고용된 사람들의 수는 29,240명이었습니다.

이는 전국의 고용 노동력 중 약 < 0.001%를 대표합니다.

다시 말해, 약 5 천명 중 1명이 'Film and Video Editors'로 고용되어 있습니다.

직무 설명

필름, 비디오 또는 다른 매체에서 움직이는 이미지를 편집합니다. 프로듀서 또는 감독과 함께 이미지를 최종 제작을 위해 구성할 수 있습니다. 이미지와 사운드트랙을 편집하거나 동기화할 수 있습니다.

SOC Code: 27-4032.00

자원

새로운 커리어를 시작하려고 생각하거나 직장을 바꾸려는 계획이 있다면, 우리가 만든 편리한 채용 검색 도구를 사용해보세요. 이 도구를 통해 완벽한 새로운 역할을 찾을 수 있을지도 모릅니다.

당신의 지역에서 일자리를 검색하세요

댓글

Leave a comment

Demitri (매우 가능성이 높음) 27 days ago
with the rise of artificial intelligence art is getting easier to copy by the day and a few short sentences can get you a photo in a few moments which would take a human weeks along with being cheaper
0 0 Reply
patrizio (낮은) 1 month ago
AI will never have the imagination that is a characteristic of humans.
0 0 Reply
Kenyon Ladson Jr. (적당한) 2 months ago
I think that robots will be built to have the knowledge and technical skills to be able to start being capable of editing anything with the most beautiful, highest quality you will ever see in a movie theater. It would be better than ever before. They may just get rid of humans all together.
0 0 Reply
nuts44 (낮은) 7 months ago
I work for a film company that does local video editing for companies and movies all over the USA , unless AI software can adapt to network execs, producers and writers constantly changing their minds every other day, then I think the field is safe. I think at some point AI will be able to replace video editors once it gets more complex but I cannot see it happening for 20-30+ years at least.
0 0 Reply
Clee Torres (적당한) 10 months ago
"good enough" video editing will be the death of video content on the internet, and of most video editing jobs. not all video editors work on netflix shows. high production tv is not in danger of automation
0 0 Reply
Sane-Human-In-Insane-World (적당한) 1 year ago
Most people on this planet do not understand that 'Video Editing' is NOT just arranging clips on a timeline like in those typical talking heads YouTube videos but basically, it is storytelling in a creative manner.

Think of Film Editing or a Documentary. So many elements like different shots, camera angles, sfx, music, etc. need to be arranged creatively to tell a story in the best possible way. A lot of decision making is involved in every step.
This is purely art form and something which AI cannot replace...yet. Human brain is far more powerful for this type of task.

Repetitive tasks, yes...they can be automated with AI and it will help editors to reach their goal faster.
0 0 Reply
Craig C (매우 가능성이 높음) 1 year ago
There are already examples of AI systems doing editing. see: Autopod.fm. it's only a matter of time until they are able to do more complex editing projects.
0 1 Reply
Antonio (불확실한) 1 year ago
I work in post, and unless AI software can adapt to network execs, producers and writers constantly changing their minds on an edit ranging from entire scenes to the most minute of things like a graphic or music placement, then I think the field is safe
0 0 Reply
will previdi (낮은) 1 year ago
Different people like different things. Although a lot of the field can be automated away today for short content like where people dont care too much like tiktoks, but as for narrative content, spatial reasoning is a requirement and the computer would have to derive spatial context from video clips.
0 0 Reply
Bob (불확실한) 1 year ago
I work as a Video Editor, in some ways we already use AI to assist our work but for it to completely replace the role - it could go either way, in my opinion. If AI continues advancing at the speed it is now, with no restrictions from outside parties, AI could definitely replace video editing as well as many other creative positions. If AI is based off a deep learning model of video editing techniques and studying workflows, it is frighteningly possible.
0 0 Reply
Jay (적당한) 1 year ago
AI will only get better and better.
0 0 Reply
Tyler Thompson (낮은) 1 year ago
Yes, you can automate a computer to skim through video and make the correct cuts/put them in sequence, but I highly doubt it will go anywhere any time soon.

Watson made a Horror trailer a decade ago, and we haven't seen another AI cut trailer since then or seen any AI even attempt to make anything longer or more complex than a trailer.

Hey maybe by the time I retire we'll finally see a big, AAA studio AI edited movie, but that would be the entire marketing point and when the movie flops because it's just poorly put together (or hell just not a good movie) the suits will shift all the blame to AI technology, which they'll drop faster than 2D animation and relegate it to the 2060 equivalent of Direct to DvD movies.
0 0 Reply
Shivam Pandey (낮은) 1 year ago
Because video editing is a job that involves feelings, we can sense the sound and the story being told.

We also know which clip fits better in a certain place, and which music and sound effect to use in the video.

AI has no emotions or feelings, so there's a very small chance, I think.
0 0 Reply
Gabe (기회 없음) 2 years ago
Robots aren’t sophisticated enough to put together entire movies, let alone 10 minute big budget films. We’re probably safe until.. let’s say February 2nd, 2222
0 0 Reply
Preston (매우 가능성이 높음) 2 years ago
We now have somewhat capable AI tools that can generate unique images and seemingly infinite permutations based on spoken or text inputs. The permutations take little time for AI to do on a single-image basis, and eventually, they will be able to do this at one image per 1/24th of a second, or 24 frames per second.

This will be challenging for a while, but eventually, the machine learning will have enough data to be able to reliably do this quickly. It will not replace anyone in Hollywood, except perhaps for certain classes of visual effects artists. However, it will replace over half of the video marketing industry.

As Google releases business-class versions of its Google Assistant that can have a conversation with a small business owner, find out what they want, and generate images and video creative for that business owner to serve in purchased digital advertisements. This will be an included service in order to sell more advertising to people who would have never had the funds to both purchase advertising and hire expensive marketing teams to create digital ads and videos.

Furthermore, the AI will be better at placing these ad buys than any human ever could. Already, we are almost there. And thus, all but the most expensive brands, primarily national brands, will replace their social media person or their small marketing team or even their regional marketing agency with one savvy person whose job it is to talk to an AI and get it to create the ads with the creative assets.

We are five years away from AI being able to create images at 24 frames per second, another two years from those videos being usable, another two years for them to be reliable, and then another one to three years for Google to figure out how to seamlessly integrate these learned machines into their ad platform.

It's not a total, across-the-board AI replacement, but the market for user-generated video will shrink dramatically.
0 0 Reply
Hritik Sethi (기회 없음) 2 years ago
I don't think video editing is a skill that AI can ever master or even learn cause it requires creativity and anything that requires creativity can be best performed by humans at least for the upcoming 50 years or so...
0 0 Reply
Omar Guitouni (기회 없음) 2 years ago
I don't think it will be templates to do all the work. Because in the end, it's your vision. A robot can't do it by itself.
0 0 Reply
Dusty (기회 없음) 3 years ago
I don't think computer will be able to make magic in editing for a long time so for someone working CGI and big films are totally safe
0 0 Reply
An Amateur Artist (기회 없음) 3 years ago
Art can only be done through approximation and not accuracy. The human mind is the only fit for this job. Except of course rotoscope and other non-thinking jobs can be done by automation.
0 0 Reply
Scottie Yang 4 years ago
There will be a certain percentage that will be automated. Will AI take over the film editor, features, shorts etc, I don’t believe so.

However I do believe AI will take over editing jobs in the digital content space. There’s already services out there doing this. When you need short micro content pieces for social, this is where I see it taking over.
0 0 Reply

이 직업에 대한 답글을 남겨주세요.

이 사이트는 reCAPTCHA와 Google 개인정보처리방침서비스 이용약관에 의해 보호됩니다.