탐정 및 범죄 수사관

Concerned 이 말합니다.

MY Father Works as a FBI agent and much if the work is criminal investigation which can involve needing to talk to suspects and witnesses and also visit crime scenes. An AI could never replace a human investigator

Izzy이 말합니다.

Highly unlikely. Detectives are required to process physical evidence and witness testimony and then use critical thinking skills and analytical skills to identify a suspect. Many times, with lack of evidence, a detective will have to be creative and use human insight into who could have been involved, and then use “outside the box” strategies to find the evidence needed to identify the suspect. Then there is the human insight, empathy, psychology, and emotional cues needed during a dynamic interrogation that is required to get someone to admit or confess to their actions. Detectives often have to use these interpersonal skills to persuade uncooperative witnesses to provide information. You need a human that understands humanity to deal with other humans.

Val이 말합니다.

AI can't replace this job, but they can assist. You need to know that humans can be very unpredictable. Sometimes, they think or act out of the box or the system.

An AI is programmed and can't process something out of its system. This is when a detective or CSI comes in. Basically, a human can understand another human being the most.

Chuck E Cheese (낮은)이 말합니다.

AI can't replace homicide detectives, they may replace parts of the CSI, but not the actual detectives. They are unable to feel compassion. Imagine a grieving family, human detectives show compassion to make them feel better. Robots are unable. I do believe that they will assist the detectives, though.

Theo (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

Investigators and detectives will not be taken over by AI. As long there is judges and lawyers to help solve what is going on. There will be no reason to stop them. Besides they already use some AI like wire tapping , hidden video cameras devices and sound devices. So AI can not replace this job. Tech ceo's use detectives and investigators. If there is no investigators people will have kids, divorce and never to pay the price. Rapest will cause std and aids. What a world we will be living in if this job will be taken over by AI.

Hunter Danuk (매우 가능성이 높음)이 말합니다.

I Believe AIs should replace Human Detectives; AIs have less flaws then humans, when the humans write the code, and there is a flaw, the AIs will patch said flaw, making itself for efficient and less likely to fail. If the failure rate was so little with AIs, they would be more likely to catch the right criminal.

AIs have more ability for thoughts, meaning they can run multiple outcomes at once to decide the best way to arrest the convict, in the least amount of time. Since AIs are supercomputers, they can expand their think far beyond the human mind, allowing for more correct convictions.

If AIs replaced detectives, we wouldn’t have to worry about paying the detectives, we already pay an IT guy so it would be easier and more affordable to call in an AI IT guy to do work, then to pay someone daily 9-5 even when they have no work to do.

AIs can render thoughts and ideas quicker than humans can think them, so if you need a crime report the AI has one completed before a human can even think of where to start, and AIs go more inadept then human, because they can store more knowledge, and retain it longer without losing fragments.

kaito이 말합니다.

I believe that robots wont take over all jobs because robots can't do tactile perception. Another reason is that human reasoning. And the last one is control of manipulation.

Walker이 말합니다.

No they may be good at analysing but what happens when faced in an impulse situation???

They do not have common sense and may not ever

Jitespol (매우 가능성이 높음)이 말합니다.

Artificial Intelligence is more analytical and intelligent than a human ever could be.

RV (낮은)이 말합니다.

There is very very little chance detectives can be replaced by AI. We don't know how exactly technology will advance but true detectives (in my personal opinion) are humans. But data detectives will still be created due to AI. I, as a 13 year old girl, want to be a data detective in the future and this is my dream job ever since I have read Sherlock Holmes and Hercule Poirot. So, no AI can stop me.

Rachel Probert (낮은)이 말합니다.

Detectives with human characteristics are always going to be needed in the workforce, as they will be working with victims of crimes, friends and family members who need human beings to walk them through certain procedures and be sensitive to their feelings, something robots cannot do.

Elijah (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

Well AI will most likely assist detectives and replace some types of criminal investigators but not all of us, that can't be done because if you are a homicide detective, for example, as a homicide detective you will have to analyze the scene of the case you are working on, analyze it psychologically in order to see how you should investigate, figure out who you need to talk to, decide who are suspicious, interrogate the suspects which isn't as easy as it looks in the movies ( I've been studying criminal psychology for some time ).

The only occupations in this field that AI can replace in the future ( if the robots look human and can blend in ). The detectives who investigate cheating spouses and similar detectives are the ones who will most likely lose their jobs, homicide and organized crime detectives will never be replaced.

Fred이 말합니다.

I do not think that cops should get replaced because what if the robots malfunction also hackers will be able to get into their programming systems.

Ace (낮은)이 말합니다.

I believe being a detective and criminal investigator won't be taken over by AI because I think humans are able to understand humans better and we share the same emotions, such as some people kill because of the feeling, AI wouldn't be able to feel this. But there is a chance that they will with such high tech these days it wouldn't surprise me if robots had sensors for lying, feelings, mental health, etc...

Rita (낮은)이 말합니다.

I think tecnology will help us, not replace us.