임상 및 상담 심리학자

11% (최소한의 위험)

최소 위험 (0-20%): 이 범주에 속하는 직업은 복잡한 문제 해결, 창의성, 강한 대인 관계 능력, 그리고 높은 수준의 수동적 능력을 요구하기 때문에 자동화될 확률이 낮습니다. 이러한 일자리는 종종 복잡한 손동작과 정밀한 조정을 포함하며, 이는 기계가 필요한 작업을 복제하기 어렵게 만듭니다.

이 점수가 무엇인지, 그리고 어떻게 계산되는지에 대한 자세한 정보는 여기에 있습니다.

사용자 설문조사

감정

다음 그래프는 의미 있는 데이터를 제공할 수 있을 만큼 충분한 투표 수가 있을 때마다 포함됩니다. 이러한 시각적 표현은 시간 경과에 따른 사용자 투표 결과를 보여주며, 감정 추세에 대한 중요한 지표를 제공합니다.

임금

다른 직업에 비해 매우 높은 급여를 받는다.

2023년에 'Clinical and Counseling Psychologists'의 중앙값 연간 급여는 $96,100이며, 시간당 $46입니다.

'Clinical and Counseling Psychologists'은 전국 중위임금인 $48,060보다 100.0% 더 높은 금액을 지불받았습니다.

시간에 따른 임금

댓글

Leave a comment

Amani (낮은) 2 months ago

Psychologist mainly deal with experiences that would involve using or focusing on emotions and this is something that is able to happen only through complex biological responses that only animals or humans have, and I believe cannot be replicated

0 0 Reply

Alberto Longhi (불확실한) 5 months ago

Artificial intelligence is evolving at an extremely rapid pace. As depicted in the film "Her," I hypothesize that in the not-too-distant future, it will be indistinguishable whether one is conversing with an AI or another human being.

I also think that an AI, with sufficient data at its disposal, could be capable of offering satisfactory psychotherapy sessions. These sessions would likely be technical and protocol-driven. On the other hand, it is currently believed that the main therapeutic factor is the psychic interaction between the two human beings, beyond the protocol dimension.

This is an extremely delicate issue that concerns me greatly.

3 0 Reply

Si anya (적당한) 6 months ago

An ai can give a completely unbiased diagnosis-treatment /*with out the risk of personal feelings involved*/ but it can never take over the job unless it can have an understanding of "human" as a whole(which is kinda impossible),cause it would make it better that any human doing the job.

0 0 Reply

asygfeyuwa (기회 없음) 1 year ago

Therapy usually requires talking and it's very personal so there's literally no way robots would be able to take this job

0 0 Reply

Isha Patel (낮은) 1 year ago

i think the job need understanding if emotion and empathetic nature towards dealing with the issues of other which can not be possible with a ai or robot

0 0 Reply

Kitty (기회 없음) 1 year ago

The "talking cure" can't really be a talking cure without human interaction, the work a psychologist does is based on transference and countertransference, a machine cannot mimick such dynamic because it is fundamentally a human phenomenon.

0 0 Reply

Olivia (낮은) 2 years ago

I don't think a robot could ever replace a human in understanding and experiencing emotions. It is one of the very few things that is uniquely human.

Therefore, because this is essential to being a psychologist, I think if AI were ever to replace humans as psychologists, they would not do the job in a similar way.

However, there may be some benefit to seeking help online, through courses, and general emotional support, etc.

0 0 Reply

D (기회 없음) 2 years ago

How can a computer talk to a human about emotions and the human experience?

0 0 Reply

Daniels with an S (기회 없음) 2 years ago

If I needed psychological help, I wouldn't want to talk to a program or machine...

0 0 Reply

Ionel (적당한) 2 years ago

I think that there are some factors that stand in the way of automation, such as morals, religions, fear of losing jobs, politics, and economics.

0 0 Reply

Anonimowy (기회 없음) 2 years ago

This is impossible. Robots don't have feelings.

0 0 Reply