건축가, 경관 및 해군을 제외하고

최소한의 위험
16%
다음으로 어디로 가고 싶으신가요?
결과를 친구 및 가족과 공유하세요.
투표 댓글 (21)
또는, 이 직업을 더 자세히 탐구해보세요...
자동화 위험
계산된
0.0%
(최소한의 위험)
투표 조사
32%
(낮은 위험)
Average: 16%
노동 수요
성장
7.8%
년도별 2033
임금
$93,310
또는 시간당 $45
볼륨
111,170
2023 기준으로
요약
직업 점수
8.3/10

사람들이 또한 조회했습니다

계산된 자동화 위험

0.0% (최소한의 위험)

최소 위험 (0-20%): 이 범주에 속하는 직업은 복잡한 문제 해결, 창의성, 강한 대인 관계 능력, 그리고 높은 수준의 수동적 능력을 요구하기 때문에 자동화될 확률이 낮습니다. 이러한 일자리는 종종 복잡한 손동작과 정밀한 조정을 포함하며, 이는 기계가 필요한 작업을 복제하기 어렵게 만듭니다.

이 점수가 무엇인지, 그리고 어떻게 계산되는지에 대한 자세한 정보는 여기에 있습니다.

일부 매우 중요한 직무 특성은 자동화하기 어렵습니다:

  • 독창성

일부 중요한 직무 특성은 자동화하기 어렵습니다:

  • 사회적 인식력

  • 미술

  • 협상

  • 설득

사용자 설문조사

다음 두 십년 안에 완전 자동화될 32%의 확률

우리의 방문자들은 이 직업이 자동화될 가능성이 낮다고 투표했습니다. 이 평가는 계산된 자동화 위험 수준에 의해 더욱 지지받고 있으며, 이는 자동화의 0.0% 확률을 추정합니다.

자동화의 위험성에 대해 어떻게 생각하십니까?

건축가, 경관 및 해군을 제외하고이 다음 20년 이내에 로봇이나 인공지능에 의해 대체될 가능성은 얼마나 됩니까?






감정

다음 그래프는 의미 있는 데이터를 제공할 수 있을 만큼 충분한 투표 수가 있을 때마다 포함됩니다. 이러한 시각적 표현은 시간 경과에 따른 사용자 투표 결과를 보여주며, 감정 추세에 대한 중요한 지표를 제공합니다.

시간별 감정 (연간)

성장

다른 직업에 비해 매우 빠른 성장

'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval' 직업 분야의 공석은 2033년까지 7.8% 증가할 것으로 예상됩니다.

총 고용량 및 예상 직업 공석

* 2021년부터 2031년까지의 기간에 대한 노동통계국의 데이터
업데이트된 예상치가 09-2024에 제출될 예정입니다..

임금

다른 직업에 비해 매우 높은 급여를 받는다.

2023년에 'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval'의 중앙값 연간 급여는 $93,310이며, 시간당 $44입니다.

'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval'은 전국 중위임금인 $48,060보다 94.2% 더 높은 금액을 지불받았습니다.

시간에 따른 임금

* 노동통계국의 데이터

볼륨

다른 직업에 비해 더 넓은 직업 기회 범위

2023년 현재, 미국 내에서 'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval'로 고용된 사람들의 수는 111,170명이었습니다.

이는 전국의 고용 노동력 중 약 0.07%를 대표합니다.

다시 말해, 약 1 천명 중 1명이 'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval'로 고용되어 있습니다.

직무 설명

개인 주택, 사무실 건물, 극장, 공장 등의 구조물을 계획하고 디자인합니다.

SOC Code: 17-1011.00

자원

새로운 커리어를 시작하려고 생각하거나 직장을 바꾸려는 계획이 있다면, 우리가 만든 편리한 채용 검색 도구를 사용해보세요. 이 도구를 통해 완벽한 새로운 역할을 찾을 수 있을지도 모릅니다.

당신의 지역에서 일자리를 검색하세요

댓글

Leave a comment

Sawyer (낮은) 2 months ago
It needs to pour your soul into it to really make a breakthrough. Robots don't have souls
0 0 Reply
Mark (기회 없음) 4 months ago
There is no possible way for AI to take over architecture. To start, a computer cannot hold legal liability. AI doesn’t create; it only copies and reproduces. On a regular basis, my job requires unique solutions and details that cannot be pulled from other sources.

We need to take too many unrelated factors into account for any particular design, versus the cost and time it would take for an AI to be developed to take the job. It would never be profitable for the AI developer. Besides, they wouldn't want the liability risk we have for a mistake that can cost lives.
0 0 Reply
Ben Bailey (불확실한) 9 months ago
I would love to have AI assist in automating the aspects of Architecture that are tedious, like making sure everything is up to code or automatically adjusting things after moving something else, but I fear that people will become lazy and let AI do the job for them.
0 0 Reply
Aleksandra (적당한) 1 year ago
Projects' created by humans will be for the 1% of richest people who will have a fantasy and need to show off that their projects was done the "expensive way" by a human and not 80/20 rule by AI. What people don't understand is that atm 80% of society is more faulty than AI. Working with AI is a bliss comparing to working with a majority of employees as well as moody specialists on the market is simply a bliss. And we're only starting here...
0 0 Reply
Mark (불확실한) 1 year ago
Until recently (through March and April 2023), and after having seen the work that Dall-e 2 had produced, I thought it incredibly likely. The argument that architects would still be required seemed to hinge on "you need to interface with a human to get a building built", but I don't think that's true (if a client could save tens of thousands of dollars by inputting their requests on a keyboard, rather than talking to a person, they'd opt for the latter). However, the one aspect of the job that's overlooked is LIABILITY. Currently architects are legally liable for the work they produce, and any failings over that work. AI offers no LIABILITY -- and I highly doubt the software design companies who are producing that AI are willing to accept liability -- and until someone, or a team of someones, is willing to accept that legal responsibility, AI shouldn't be able to threaten that job. However, I said "could go either way" because it's highly possible that people are so stupid, that they would sign a contract that frees the AI architect of liability if it meant they could save a few dollars on fees.
0 0 Reply
phamiliar 8 months ago
It is likely that AI could be the architectural designer and code checker while a civil engineer is responsible for the life and safety of the overall design. I think the job won't necessarily go away its just that there will be many production staff jobs that will be eliminated.
0 0 Reply
Yoshimata R 1 year ago
This will not be popular, but our firm already uses AI: clients type in or speak their ideas and examples The programs we use come up with a myriad of solutions that the clients themselves can then configure and reconfigure at will with all structural processes, including loadbearing etc. built-in throughout the process. 16 of the 38 people at our firm have been laid off since this started.
0 0 Reply
HMS (기회 없음) 1 year ago
Architects are a lot like an artist. AI cannot create cannot something that requires human originality. No two architects are the same, just as two pieces of art are not the same. Architecture requires you to put creativity, originality, emotion, and the social aspect into your work.
0 0 Reply
Architect Downow 1 year ago
Architectural and Interior Design are both iterative processes.
AI will improve this process, detail all the structural draws, and create layouts and floorplans more efficiently than ever.

With solar, water, food and waste visions that now only a few architects embrace in projects.
Leed will be integrated in AI and civil engineering as well.

I guess in the future, anyone can design a house with the help of AI.

Architects, Lawyers and Doctors, the tríade of "good money" will fall.
And me and my boys are working to achieve this as soon as possible.

0 0 Reply
sama 1 year ago
An architect is more than a concept or a few words. It's about thinking, conceptualizing, and making it a reality.
0 0 Reply
:))) (적당한) 2 years ago
Currently, as a student at one of the top architecture schools, I can observe how the most successful students utilize AI. It's clear to see how it improves their workflow and design progress, even as early as 2022.

Already, AI can handle most of the work for an architect. I believe that the next 20 years will further popularize AI within the profession, reducing the amount of work done manually.
0 0 Reply
king rocker (매우 가능성이 높음) 2 years ago
LOL it's already dead. Almost no one hires architects now, there are so many tools that already do their job. Wake up, it's game over for this one. The site is way behind the times.
0 0 Reply
Sameer 8 months ago
AI isn’t that capable to satisfy the client with the structure design… however it could help to make the work easy but it can’t overtake the profession.
1 0 Reply
I'dRatherNotInputAName 1 year ago
"LOL it's already dead."
Source? Or did it come to you in a dream?
0 0 Reply
Sebastian from Argentina (낮은) 4 years ago
Creativity from architects mind couldn't be replaced by AI, But some typical architecture room plans, could be systematized by machine learning on cad programs, like actual libraries of equipment, it could be library of rooms, baths, etc.
0 0 Reply
J (불확실한) 5 years ago
Depends on the kind of architecture, the way that the industry itself thinks about what architecture means (an engineering/optimization problem versus art, desire to rapidly customize vs work on the process with other humans) and what clients demand.
0 0 Reply
pgm777 5 years ago
computerisation will help and not hinder the architectural profession. Automisation is something that has no place
0 0 Reply
Lilly (낮은) 5 years ago
I think it would be quite hard for robots to take clients ideas for architecture and turn it into a floorplan since there are billions of ways to build a house.
0 0 Reply
David J Gill 5 years ago
More effective design software will raise productivity and reduce the number of staff required to complete project documents.
0 0 Reply
Marta 1 year ago
I totally agree. Students and young professionals may have problem with finding a job. Nowadays, they usually do repetitive CAD drawings/models (the main concept was designed by e.g. senior architect), and it all can be automated, especially with BIM
0 0 Reply
Dean B 5 years ago
This is an art form that’s practical so I don’t see it going
0 0 Reply

이 직업에 대한 답글을 남겨주세요.

이 사이트는 reCAPTCHA와 Google 개인정보처리방침서비스 이용약관에 의해 보호됩니다.