인류학자와 고고학자

0.0% (최소한의 위험)

최소 위험 (0-20%): 이 범주에 속하는 직업은 복잡한 문제 해결, 창의성, 강한 대인 관계 능력, 그리고 높은 수준의 수동적 능력을 요구하기 때문에 자동화될 확률이 낮습니다. 이러한 일자리는 종종 복잡한 손동작과 정밀한 조정을 포함하며, 이는 기계가 필요한 작업을 복제하기 어렵게 만듭니다.

이 점수가 무엇인지, 그리고 어떻게 계산되는지에 대한 자세한 정보는 여기에 있습니다.

사용자 설문조사

감정

다음 그래프는 의미 있는 데이터를 제공할 수 있을 만큼 충분한 투표 수가 있을 때마다 포함됩니다. 이러한 시각적 표현은 시간 경과에 따른 사용자 투표 결과를 보여주며, 감정 추세에 대한 중요한 지표를 제공합니다.

임금

다른 직업에 비해 적당히 지급되는

2023년에 'Anthropologists and Archeologists'의 중앙값 연간 급여는 $63,800이며, 시간당 $30입니다.

'Anthropologists and Archeologists'은 전국 중위임금인 $48,060보다 32.8% 더 높은 금액을 지불받았습니다.

시간에 따른 임금

댓글

David Gang 4 months ago

I am an archaeologist, and while MAYBE AI can do parts, like record research (unlikely as that would require all the documents to be in a digital database, and that's never going to happen), the point where machines can do the analysis, the survey and everything else? So far in the future that my chidren's children's children will be dead before robots are physically capable, and smart enough to do so.

0 0 Reply

Garvesh Jangid (적당한) 8 months ago

i think tools of artificial intelligence and robots alike will aid in the work of anthropology and archaeology rather than directly taking over the jobs. given some technical jobs in this field will be automated, but it is not at a very great risk.

0 0 Reply

Nick (기회 없음) 9 months ago

It's an academia job, it requires strong interpretation skills in both the laboratory and in field excavations. How is a robot going to determine for example whether the burial goods are representative of the entombed person or if it represents some other group in society.

0 0 Reply

Judith Koln (낮은) 1 year ago

Anthropology requires people skills and critical thinking, and AI/machine learning technology is inherently derivative. Also, anthropology involves field work.

0 0 Reply

. (기회 없음) 3 years ago

It is one of the most skilled jobs, that requires the highest levels of original deciphering and interpretation techniques.

0 0 Reply

Jeff (낮은) 3 years ago

I think it is doubtful. Look at the failures of attempts to apply strict nomothetic reasoning to archaeological questions- behavioural laws are next to impossible to generate, especially for past cultures where behaviour has to be inferred through material culture, architecture, settlement, etc. A.I. really does need laws or strict instructions to operate, I can't help but think the fuzzy logic inherent in archaeology is a long ways off.

Plus, I feel like archaeological field investigations need a human touch, at least for the foreseeable future. That said, I think automation can help us recognize patterns in data generated, analyse artefact assemblages, etc.

0 0 Reply

Amanda 4 years ago

Possibly not, because I don't think AI's would be interested in doing this job

0 0 Reply

Levi-Strauss 2 years ago

That's totally true LOL :)

0 0 Reply

Yago 3 years ago

I'm confused, this website talks about being interested or being able to do the jobs?

0 0 Reply

Anna (기회 없음) 5 years ago

While comparison and analysis of related artefacts can be aided by computers I think the excavating and also interpretations of evidence are unlikely to be able to be performed by AI. Then again I'm a student so not qualified yet, and I don't know all that much about AI either

0 0 Reply