항공우주 공학자

wefjiboeu (기회 없음) 14 days ago

The engineering of this kind of stuff requires sudden changes and the human mind

0 0 Reply

Felipe Duarte Padilha (기회 없음) 7 months ago

Airplanes or general aircraft are extremely complicated machinery that would need AI inside of the craft to be engineered. It is also extremely costly and would most likely not be able for it to be replaced.

0 0 Reply

Nirmal Teja (기회 없음) 9 months ago

It's almost impossible to any type of artificial intelligence to think out of the box as a human thoughts go there is no limit to human creativity but the artificial intelligence is limited even after decades..

0 0 Reply

James (기회 없음) 1 year ago

Needs innovation and creativity

0 0 Reply

Aero (낮은) 1 year ago

Required novel application of physics

0 0 Reply

L.M. (기회 없음) 1 year ago

the risk of even a slight failure could prevent an ai that could replace this job from ever leaving development

0 0 Reply

duck (불확실한) 1 year ago

Engineering is a difficult job and with the precision of present machines, they could make things more accurate than human hands. The only downside is a machine/robot can't make full decisions, Humans are able to go through options and choose the best one based on circumstance. Robots can't do that... yet

0 0 Reply

Kauã (기회 없음) 1 year ago

No way people trust building ROCKETS to A.I.S

0 0 Reply

Sawle (불확실한) 1 year ago

It really depends on how we see it, if we as engineers use AI to our advantage and adapt it's positives we can easily stay in the field, but if we step aside then you know what will happen eventually.
World now is not waiting for us to improve it WILL improve.

0 0 Reply

BibirMengkeroet (낮은) 2 years ago

Applying for a position as an Aerospace Engineer is already challenging. It's also a job where, if something goes wrong even in the slightest, the financial losses could be enormous.

Take a look at the 2013 Proton rocket crash. It occurred because the engineer installed the rotation sensors upside down, causing it to plummet to the ground. Such a small mistake resulted in $65 million dollars in losses.

However, it could be possible that AI will create more efficient propulsion designs in the future.

0 0 Reply

A (적당한) 2 years ago

Because we could use robots to design and build the aircraft and do the calculations for us.

0 0 Reply

Saltine (불확실한) 2 years ago

Some aspects like assembly could be covered by robots but idk if the design and testing process can

0 0 Reply

Bret (낮은) 3 years ago

It's a complex job. Many constraints need to be accounted for. A computer just may not be as good at it.

0 0 Reply

N (Small Chance) 3 years ago

I personally do not believe that rocket scientists/aerospace engineers will be overthrown by AI/robots because it requires complex math, complex designing, and building. I do understand that AI will improve over the years, but I don't see robots doing a job like this. Though I do see them helping around. This scares me as they could probably move up a position.

0 0 Reply

G (기회 없음) 3 years ago

This job designs vehicles that are specifically made for aeronautical and astronautical transportation. It is a highly creative job that requires thinking outside the box.

0 0 Reply

Nicolas (기회 없음) 3 years ago

aerospace engineering is an area that needs innovation and creativity, always discovering new things and not always doing the same task, testing new materials and things that have never been used are constant tasks, etc.

0 0 Reply

Apoorva 3 years ago

As it is a very risk taking job, the one working in this sector has to have a clear mindset of what is right and what is wrong. Whereas robots take decisions according to the way they are programmed. Adding to this, robots are machines so even if they can impress yet they cannot express. Flying or operating a spacecraft or a missile or a rover needs some emotional attachments with hard work, dedication and dreams. Just completing a task within a short span of time won't give happiness 🙂

0 0 Reply

katie 3 years ago

Clever minds. Aerospace engineers need to come up with clever solutions, which robots cannot (at least with today foreseen technology). Think about all different trade studies which were sometimes counter intuitive and required completely surprising and innovative solutions. This would drive robots crazy, right?

Teamwork. Aerospace engineers are required to help each other during product creations, which robots can not do properly. Either you guided someone younger, or you gave a hand on CAD or FEA software tips to a bloke close to retirement. Most of the time you did not care if this person is different skin colour, religion, gender or beliefs. Well this pays off in the end.

No tight space requirement. Unless you are working in a design or manufacturing sweat shop, aerospace engineers do not require squeezing into small spaces which is strong point of robotics.

Negotiation. Aerospace design requires negotiation skills, robots cannot do this properly. Think about all interface and supplier and customer meetings you have ever been to. Or even meetings with different functions like manufacturing and maybe stress analysis.

1 0 Reply

Cody T. (낮은) 4 years ago

I just don't think it is realistic to replace this job within the next 20 years. It seems it take at least a little longer, as this job requires extremely difficult math, and hands on experience engineering. It also requires the capable human mind. Therefore it is unlikely that this job is replaced soon.

0 0 Reply

Julien 4 years ago

The occupation will not be replaced any time soon because it requires critical and creative thinking, which AI or robots do not possess currently.

0 0 Reply