항공우주 공학자

Nirmal Teja (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

It's almost impossible to any type of artificial intelligence to think out of the box as a human thoughts go there is no limit to human creativity but the artificial intelligence is limited even after decades..

James (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

Needs innovation and creativity

Aero (낮은)이 말합니다.

Required novel application of physics

L.M. (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

the risk of even a slight failure could prevent an ai that could replace this job from ever leaving development

duck (불확실한)이 말합니다.

Engineering is a difficult job and with the precision of present machines, they could make things more accurate than human hands. The only downside is a machine/robot can't make full decisions, Humans are able to go through options and choose the best one based on circumstance. Robots can't do that... yet

Kauã (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

No way people trust building ROCKETS to A.I.S

Sawle (불확실한)이 말합니다.

It really depends on how we see it, if we as engineers use AI to our advantage and adapt it's positives we can easily stay in the field, but if we step aside then you know what will happen eventually.
World now is not waiting for us to improve it WILL improve.

BibirMengkeroet (낮은)이 말합니다.

Applying for a position as an Aerospace Engineer is already challenging. It's also a job where, if something goes wrong even in the slightest, the financial losses could be enormous.

Take a look at the 2013 Proton rocket crash. It occurred because the engineer installed the rotation sensors upside down, causing it to plummet to the ground. Such a small mistake resulted in $65 million dollars in losses.

However, it could be possible that AI will create more efficient propulsion designs in the future.

A (적당한)이 말합니다.

Because we could use robots to design and build the aircraft and do the calculations for us.

Saltine (불확실한)이 말합니다.

Some aspects like assembly could be covered by robots but idk if the design and testing process can

Bret (낮은)이 말합니다.

It's a complex job. Many constraints need to be accounted for. A computer just may not be as good at it.

N (Small Chance)이 말합니다.

I personally do not believe that rocket scientists/aerospace engineers will be overthrown by AI/robots because it requires complex math, complex designing, and building. I do understand that AI will improve over the years, but I don't see robots doing a job like this. Though I do see them helping around. This scares me as they could probably move up a position.

G (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

This job designs vehicles that are specifically made for aeronautical and astronautical transportation. It is a highly creative job that requires thinking outside the box.

Nicolas (기회 없음)이 말합니다.

aerospace engineering is an area that needs innovation and creativity, always discovering new things and not always doing the same task, testing new materials and things that have never been used are constant tasks, etc.

Apoorva이 말합니다.

As it is a very risk taking job, the one working in this sector has to have a clear mindset of what is right and what is wrong. Whereas robots take decisions according to the way they are programmed. Adding to this, robots are machines so even if they can impress yet they cannot express. Flying or operating a spacecraft or a missile or a rover needs some emotional attachments with hard work, dedication and dreams. Just completing a task within a short span of time won't give happiness 🙂

katie이 말합니다.

Clever minds. Aerospace engineers need to come up with clever solutions, which robots cannot (at least with today foreseen technology). Think about all different trade studies which were sometimes counter intuitive and required completely surprising and innovative solutions. This would drive robots crazy, right?

Teamwork. Aerospace engineers are required to help each other during product creations, which robots can not do properly. Either you guided someone younger, or you gave a hand on CAD or FEA software tips to a bloke close to retirement. Most of the time you did not care if this person is different skin colour, religion, gender or beliefs. Well this pays off in the end.

No tight space requirement. Unless you are working in a design or manufacturing sweat shop, aerospace engineers do not require squeezing into small spaces which is strong point of robotics.

Negotiation. Aerospace design requires negotiation skills, robots cannot do this properly. Think about all interface and supplier and customer meetings you have ever been to. Or even meetings with different functions like manufacturing and maybe stress analysis.

Cody T. (낮은)이 말합니다.

I just don't think it is realistic to replace this job within the next 20 years. It seems it take at least a little longer, as this job requires extremely difficult math, and hands on experience engineering. It also requires the capable human mind. Therefore it is unlikely that this job is replaced soon.

Julien이 말합니다.

The occupation will not be replaced any time soon because it requires critical and creative thinking, which AI or robots do not possess currently.

Julien (낮은)이 말합니다.

Aerospace Engineers will not be replaced any time soon because robots and AI are not technologically advanced yet.

Bobby (낮은)이 말합니다.

I know this can be said about most jobs, but I think Artificial Intelligence will be used as a tool instead of a replacement.