Facteurs du service postal

100% (Risque Imminent)

Risque Imminent (81-100%) : Les professions à ce niveau ont une probabilité extrêmement élevée d'être automatisées dans un avenir proche. Ces emplois consistent principalement en des tâches répétitives et prévisibles, nécessitant peu de jugement humain.

Plus d'informations sur ce que représente ce score et comment il est calculé sont disponibles ici.

Sondage utilisateur

Sentiment

Le graphique suivant est inclus chaque fois qu'il y a un nombre substantiel de votes pour rendre les données significatives. Ces représentations visuelles affichent les résultats des sondages utilisateurs au fil du temps, fournissant une indication significative des tendances de sentiment.

Salaires

Rémunéré de manière modérée par rapport à d'autres professions

En 2023, le salaire annuel médian pour 'Postal Service Mail Carriers' était de 56 330 $, soit 27 $ par heure.

'Postal Service Mail Carriers' ont été payés 17,2% de plus que le salaire médian national, qui était de 48 060 $

Salaires au fil du temps

Commentaires

Leave a comment

genya 2 months ago

while other postal jobs are at higher risk of automation, it would be extremely difficult to automate the actual task of delivering on the street. while there are repetitive aspects to the job, there are simply far too many complicated, ever-changing variables for a machine to replicate the work. from working in all weather conditions, to driving in unpredictable traffic and road conditions, to specific customer and delivery needs that require complex thinking. a lot of problem-solving and risk-assessment involved in the job that cannot be easily replicated by automated technology. consider even a variable that is small and simple like a mailbox being moved or replaced in a new spot - an issue that would be easy for a human to problem-solve, but nearly-impossible for any artificial intelligence we could conceive in the foreseeable future.

0 0 Reply

mbailey (Aucune chance) 4 months ago

Will there be less, yes. Will it be replaced by robots in 20 years? NO WAY.

0 0 Reply

Nate (Aucune chance) 5 months ago

Clerk work might get automated, but delivering mail can not be automated in the next 20 years. They can't even get self driving right, walking up to a house is way beyond what a robot can do let alone sort and place mail. New technology might be invited to aid a carrier in delivering, but will not be replaced.

1 0 Reply

Philip Low (Très probable) 11 months ago

its a highly repetitive job and easy to replicate although some delivery areas will be automated faster than others

0 0 Reply

Jacob Green (Faible) 1 year ago

Being a mail carrier is harder than than it might seem. There is more to it than just putting things in boxes. We deliver in severe weather conditions like blizzards where am AI would have shard time seeing the road.

0 0 Reply

grinch (Incertain) 1 year ago

Doubt all jobs would suddenly be cut especially because of unions etc. In my country the roads are really rubbish and weather can be especially nasty, not to mention the import costs would likely be high for such technology. Maybe further in future I could see less and less postmen but I highly doubt this would happen for a long time, in any case if this happens then sign me up for the dole and I will live in my parents basement like an incel while watching the world go to ruin.

0 0 Reply

Jack (Aucune chance) 1 year ago

Not feasible in rural areas where requirements and routes are variable and non-standard.

0 0 Reply

J (Faible) 1 year ago

I work for USPS as a letter carrier. I can’t imagine management being able to maintain robots when they can hardly update equipment and vehicles as is.

1 0 Reply

Sujoi (Très probable) 2 years ago

As the development of autonomous drones and self-driving cars continues to improve, the role of the postal man will greatly shrink. I believe that even in the span of a single decade, the job will be considerably automated.

0 0 Reply

3 years ago

Not sure but it's a lot of hurdles to overcome. Drones flying around with big boxes everywhere. Sounds cool but realistically in our modern society even is it going to be too much liability? If something falls or destroys packages and people's property then people of course will try and steal from them.

0 0 Reply

Dennis 3 years ago

Even rural mail carriers?

0 0 Reply

Charlie(No chance) (Aucune chance) 3 years ago

I doubt postal mail carriers will be replaced by robots because of strong labor unions.

0 0 Reply

Angus (Très probable) 4 years ago

There is already post delivery robots in Brisbane suburbs in Queensland, Australia

0 0 Reply

NO (Modéré) 4 years ago

Drone based delivery

0 0 Reply

Nancy 1 year ago

There is human quality to this job that can't be replaced.

0 0 Reply

Tony (Modéré) 4 years ago

It's pretty likely that we will find ways to deliver physical mail to people using machines in the next 20 years. :/

0 0 Reply

Jak Aser (Incertain) 5 years ago

Depends on a few things:
how much does it takes to develop an autodriven car.
how much it costs.
how much it takes to develop an auto-driven drone.
how to make it to get it directly to your home or mailbox, specially big packages.
how to make it less costly than a human delivering the package.
we have been waiting to the electric car like.... 40 years. it was said we would have it by the year 2000 and... still to many costs.

0 0 Reply

Patrik (Incertain) 5 years ago

Machines already sort most mail, only needs refinement. Selfdriving cars are on the horizon. We only need to combine the two.

0 0 Reply

Nilay (Très probable) 5 years ago

This job will be taken over due to the coming of drone delivery.

0 0 Reply

Steve Jennings (Très probable) 5 years ago

Small robots would be faster and more efficient

0 0 Reply

THE DUDE 1 year ago

Yeah until kids on the street light them on fire, break them etc. imagine the repair cost of a couple 100,000 robots. Better off paying people that actually care about customers. You think a mail delivery robot would save an elderly woman from a house fire or notify police of a burglary.

0 0 Reply