Concierges et Nettoyeurs, à l'exception des Femmes de Ménage et des Nettoyeurs d'Entretien Ménager

Haut Risque
67%
Où souhaitez-vous aller ensuite ?
Partagez vos résultats avec vos amis et votre famille.
Ou, explorez cette profession en détail...
RISQUE D'AUTOMATISATION
CALCULÉ
76%
(Haut Risque)
SONDAGE
59%
(Risque Modéré)
Average: 67%
DEMANDE DE TRAVAIL
CROISSANCE
3,1%
par l'année 2033
SALAIRES
35 020 $
ou 16,84 $ par heure
Volume
2 172 500
à partir du 2023
RÉSUMÉ
SCORE DE TRAVAIL
2,9/10

Les gens ont également vu

Risque d'automatisation calculé

76% (Haut Risque)

Risque Élevé (61-80%) : Les emplois dans cette catégorie font face à une menace significative de l'automatisation, car beaucoup de leurs tâches peuvent être facilement automatisées en utilisant les technologies actuelles ou proches du futur.

Plus d'informations sur ce que représente ce score et comment il est calculé sont disponibles ici.

Certaines qualités assez importantes du travail sont difficiles à automatiser :

  • Dextérité manuelle

Sondage utilisateur

59% chance de pleine automatisation au cours des deux prochaines décennies

Nos visiteurs ont voté qu'ils ne sont pas sûrs si cette profession sera automatisée. Cependant, le niveau de risque d'automatisation que nous avons généré suggère une probabilité beaucoup plus élevée d'automatisation : 76% de chances d'automatisation.

Que pensez-vous du risque de l'automatisation?

Quelle est la probabilité que Concierges et Nettoyeurs, à l'exception des Femmes de Ménage et des Nettoyeurs d'Entretien Ménager soit remplacé par des robots ou l'intelligence artificielle dans les 20 prochaines années ?






Sentiment

Le graphique suivant est inclus chaque fois qu'il y a un nombre substantiel de votes pour rendre les données significatives. Ces représentations visuelles affichent les résultats des sondages utilisateurs au fil du temps, fournissant une indication significative des tendances de sentiment.

Sentiment au fil du temps (annuellement)

Croissance

Une croissance lente par rapport à d'autres professions.

On s'attend à ce que le nombre de postes vacants pour 'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners' augmente 3,1% d'ici 2033

Emploi total, et estimations des offres d'emploi

* Données de la Bureau of Labor Statistics pour la période entre 2021 et 2031
Les prévisions mises à jour sont attendues 09-2024.

Salaires

Très mal payé par rapport à d'autres professions

En 2023, le salaire annuel médian pour 'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners' était de 35 020 $, soit 16 $ par heure.

'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners' ont été payés 27,1% de moins que le salaire médian national, qui s'élevait à 48 060 $

Salaires au fil du temps

* Données provenant du Bureau des Statistiques du Travail

Volume

Gamme de possibilités d'emploi nettement plus grande comparée à d'autres professions

À partir de 2023, il y avait 2 172 500 personnes employées en tant que 'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners' aux États-Unis.

Cela représente environ 1,4% de la main-d'œuvre employée à travers le pays

Autrement dit, environ 1 personne sur 69 est employée en tant que 'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners'.

Description du poste

Maintenez les bâtiments dans un état propre et ordonné. Effectuez des tâches de nettoyage intensives, telles que le nettoyage des sols, le shampooinage des tapis, le lavage des murs et des vitres, et l'élimination des déchets. Les tâches peuvent inclure l'entretien de la chaudière et du fourneau, l'exécution d'activités de maintenance de routine, l'informations à la direction de la nécessité de réparations, et le nettoyage de la neige ou des débris sur le trottoir.

SOC Code: 37-2011.00

Ressources

Si vous envisagez de commencer une nouvelle carrière ou de changer de travail, nous avons créé un outil de recherche d'emploi pratique qui pourrait vous aider à décrocher ce nouveau poste parfait.

Recherchez des emplois dans votre région locale

Commentaires

Leave a comment

Jeff (Modéré) 8 days ago
As a janitor, I know from experience automated tech usually breaks down at an equal rate that it works. Case in point, floor scrubbers that are supposed to help us make short work of hallways have problems with keeping charged batteries long enough to run reliably or constantly leak water or fail to pick up the water dispensed on the floor. Also, in a hospital environment when cleaning patient rooms and restrooms, it still takes a human to wipe down furniture, clean sinks and commodes, wash walls, dust, etc.
0 0 Reply
Mike 5 months ago
Lol not even close. Laughably high %. More than a web developer? I'd like to see a robot clean up after a basketball game. Climb the bleachers, go under the bleachers, put away chairs, scoreboard, cords, mics, etc, lock doors, clean glass, scrape gum, auto scrub, spot mop, rinse out a garbage can. There are way too many unique tasks imo.
1 1 Reply
Johan Smitten (Aucune chance) 5 months ago
It's not complicated work, but even tasks like mopping and scrubbing toilets don't seem like something any modern robot can do. Even if Japan whipped something up, it just wouldn't make financial sense to buy and maintain a robot over hiring a minimum wage worker.
0 0 Reply
Bryck (Faible) 8 months ago
Unless a new technological breakthrough occurs, the risk of janitors being replaced are quite low. Vocational academies can earn revenue and employ a major sector of janitors. Above vocational qualifications, though, is the fact that automation in this specific sector does not increase productivity at all. Not only do vocational schools help earn more revenue, but automation costs a lot more than simply employing janitors.
0 0 Reply
Jeff (Incertain) 10 months ago
The technology of AI has a couple or three more decades before it can become reliable enough to do repetitive tasks and the maintenance of such machines is especially high as they have a lot of technical issues so the reliability of such automation is a ways off.
0 0 Reply
Josh (Faible) 1 year ago
I can see automation doing things like cleaning floors and tables but i can't see it being cost effective to have a bot do everything a janitor does in a normal day. everything from taking trash out and throwing it in the dumpsters to shampooing stains out of carpets to removing vandalism and cleaning complex surfaces like toilets and sinks. Not to mention tasks like opening up and refilling toilet paper and paper towel dispensers.

Don't get me wrong, i think it could be done, i just think the cost would be outrageous and that somebody would still often have to step in for unusual messes and vandalism.
0 0 Reply
Kory Hasch (Faible) 1 year ago
Because machines can operate on a basic level, and deep cleaning requires human judgment.
0 0 Reply
Mike (Aucune chance) 1 year ago
In offices, schools, factories, and public spaces like malls and restaurants, I do not believe janitorial is at risk for automation. In order to make the tasks involved more able to be automated, they would have to do two things:

A. Invest significantly in equipment and processes that make the tasks much easier to do, and
B. Put a lot of personal responsibility on the people causing messes, generating the trash, and otherwise making the work that is needed to be done.

For A, restrooms would have to be redesigned with standards for toilets, urinals, sinks, etc where automated brushes could easily reach them. Trash receptacles would also need regular emptying and cleaning. It could be done, and I believe they've even invented self-cleaning restrooms where it basically treats the entire interior like a dishwasher, locking it off and doing high pressure sprays with sanitizing chemicals. It would be very very expensive to redesign them in such a way, not to mention the ongoing maintenance costs of such precision equipment. Similar with locker/shower rooms, kitchenettes, and break areas.

For B, in order for desk waste receptacle collection to be automated, office workers would need to actually throw trash inside the trash can and not beside, behind, or underneath. They would need to have it in a fixed position, and keep the area in front of it clear, and not obstructed with personal items, stacks of paper, or other junk. Similar to automated vacuum robots, they would need the area they're to clean free of obstacles. The best way to clean greasy fingerprints off glass doors is simply not have them there in the first place; train people to put their hands on the handle. Office workers in particular are incredibly inconsiderate of the work they leave for others, and office facilities would rather hire double the amount of cleaning staff to be demeaned and jump through ridiculous and unnecessary hoops.

The amount of investment needed to automate janitorial tasks would be incredibly high. If they really wanted to save money, they could instantly probably cut 25-50% of their workforce budget by being considerate to others. But they'd much rather waste money on digging their heels into classism, ensuring there are "servants" to look down upon.
0 0 Reply
Not a robot (Aucune chance) 1 year ago
cleaning seems automated but its very much not. you may do same tasks, but a robot wont be cheaper to maintain then hiring a person. and you would need like a robot for each specific task then someone to repair robot if it breaks down. Just do not see AI replacing janitors.
0 0 Reply
Max Dragonard (Très probable) 3 years ago
Perfect job for a robot.
0 0 Reply
thao (Très probable) 3 years ago
There is lots of money to be made with automation, robotics, AI. Still, we won't see cleaning robotic or humanoid for a least 10 - 15 yrs, my opinion cause companies are taking ages to make it perfect like human-like, robotic but then I am too old I will be retired anyway.
0 0 Reply
Experienced Cleaner (Aucune chance) 3 years ago
No matter how sophisticated the AI and software, plus the sensing technology a robot has, it will still require humans to train, service, and operate it. Its interface will have to be simplified enough to where its operator can program and run it, while focusing on the less predictable aspects of the cleaning work. AI and automation will only reduce the turnover rate and increase wages in this occupation.
0 0 Reply
Ben (Incertain) 3 years ago
Addressing Peter's comment that states robots and artificial intelligence cannot be made to cope with the unpredictability of dealing with people.

I am currently writing this comment using an artificial intelligence aid. It is called Grammarly. I write rather well on my own, the help though is appreciated. It can improvise upon what I'm going to write.

Does this mean it reads my mind? No, it uses algorithms to prognosticate what is coming based upon my previous writing. From that, it can then access other algorithms that study grammatical rules and policies. That allows it to use an algorithm to assist my writing by editing.

My point being case variables in programmatic instructions can be defined so as to "follow" and "cope" with people. I work as a custodian presently for our county's public schools, which we have from pre-school to grade twelve. Children are the most unpredictable of all humans.

I can easily see how timing schedules, sensors, algorithms could all be put in place to cut my workload by two-thirds, or more. My work can be greatly automated. Still, there would need to be technicians both to repair the physical and mechanical aspects and to repair the computing code at times. So I say it could go either way.
0 0 Reply
Ron Leffers 4 years ago
there will less people working with robots but more people doing other things
0 0 Reply
Jayden (Très probable) 4 years ago
We’ve already got little cleaning technology and I think it would be good to have robots that would just do this
0 0 Reply
Peter (Faible) 5 years ago
This job deal with people and unpredictable action of people make difficult to created AI capable do do it. That was reason why was stopped it development. Job my be changed from actual cleaning to preparing area for robots.
0 0 Reply

Laissez un commentaire sur cette profession

Ce site est protégé par reCAPTCHA et la Politique de Confidentialité et les Conditions d'Utilisation de Google s'appliquent.