Jueces, Jueces Magistrados y Magistrados

18% (Riesgo Mínimo)

Riesgo Mínimo (0-20%): Las ocupaciones en esta categoría tienen una baja probabilidad de ser automatizadas, ya que generalmente requieren solución compleja de problemas, creatividad, fuertes habilidades interpersonales y un alto grado de destreza manual. Estos trabajos a menudo implican movimientos de manos intrincados y coordinación precisa, lo que dificulta que las máquinas repliquen las tareas requeridas.

Más información sobre qué es esta puntuación y cómo se calcula está disponible aquí.

Encuesta de usuarios

Sentimiento

El siguiente gráfico se incluye siempre que haya una cantidad sustancial de votos para generar datos significativos. Estas representaciones visuales muestran los resultados de las encuestas de usuarios a lo largo del tiempo, proporcionando una indicación importante de las tendencias de sentimiento.

Salarios

Muy bien remunerado en comparación con otras profesiones

En 2023, el salario anual mediano para 'Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates' fue de 148.910 $, o 71 $ por hora.

'Judges, Magistrate Judges, and Magistrates' recibieron un salario 209,8% más alto que el salario medio nacional, que se situó en 48.060 $

Salarios a lo largo del tiempo

Comentarios

Leave a comment

David Lee (Muy probablemente) 16 days ago

Most of the Judges work is determining the outcome of a case, using the factual similarities with other cases verdict. This is repetitive work.

0 0 Reply

Infernus (Bajo) 22 days ago

Because Robots cant understand and have empathy, only logic

0 0 Reply

Exactlyyyy (Sin posibilidad) 5 months ago

You need to have empathy and be humane in addition to understanding the law itself. I also dont think society would allow a computer to pass a verdict.

0 0 Reply

Y (Incierto) 2 years ago

I think it really just depends on our ethics. We could either go dystopic or continue to be semi-nice humans.

0 0 Reply

Rei (Sin posibilidad) 2 years ago

Unless AI can develop what you call "feeling", "empathy", and "decisiveness", it's quite hard to change how judges work. The job is not only about guilty or not, or who is right, but also about how the people around your place evaluate what is a crime and what is right.

0 0 Reply

I ate your burger that you left in the fridge (Incierto) 3 years ago

Honestly, I'm leaning towards no, but I'm already seeing some robot lawyers. And if lawyers are replaced, won't judges be replaced as well? But yet again, judges make laws. And it is a bit hard to imagine a robot making laws.

0 0 Reply

N (Small Chance) 3 years ago

I don't think judges will be replaced by AI/robots. Like someone else said, judges do not only follow laws, they also help make them. Imagine a robot help make a law, it's hard to imagine for me. I also feel that sure, technology will improve later, and robots will be more like humans, and possibly be better than many of them. But I feel like judges are in an OKAY, spot.

0 0 Reply

john (Muy probablemente) 3 years ago

At least a robot will be impartial and cannot be bribed

0 0 Reply

marc (Bajo) 3 years ago

Sentencing is grounded on choice.

0 0 Reply

K (Bajo) 4 years ago

small chance because when judges will be automated then lawyer need to be automated

0 0 Reply

Darp (Sin posibilidad) 4 years ago

Why are you argumenting the percentage with the grey area of the job? It's
an argument for why they won't be replaced in my opinion. Just imagine a drug dealer and a
person having the drug because they believe it would help their dying grandmother, how can they both serve the same sentance for possesion?

0 0 Reply

Judgemental (Muy probablemente) 5 years ago

Judges are people who have prejudices based upon experience and are unconsciously biased. The same case tried by all judges would never produce the same outcome. It’s a flawed system, and a lottery. Good luck to those who are innocent and falsely accused.

0 0 Reply

jac 5 years ago

judges dont just follow laws. they change laws and base decisions on moral grey area and circumstance. perhaps traffic court will have robot judges but i doubt we will ever see a robot in federal or supreme courts. mercy, compassion, and social understanding should never be expected from a machine.

0 0 Reply

Elliott (Muy probablemente) 5 years ago

Laws are very easy to interpret, I'm very sure the Internet already has the answer to 99.9% of all questions regarding whether something should be categorized as a felony or not. The United States has made up its mind on almost everything, I don't think judges really use their imagination to do this job, they just follow instructions as guided in the rules book.That's why I think the chances are much higher than 40%.

That's why I think the judges' probability of automation is closer to 95% than 40%, much like the accountants.

0 0 Reply

Legal Services (Extremely unlikely) 5 years ago

Laws by definition are not very easy to interpret. Hence the necessity to have lawyers and Judges deliberate in court over the interpretation of different laws and Acts and is why, for example, in Australia we have the Acts Interpretation Act.

I agree with jac. I think it's highly unlikely Judges will be replaced by robots/A.I. anytime in the near or distant future if at all not only because of the complicated nature of what their jobs entails, secondly, the human touch required to do so as jac touched upon and, thirdly, because on a deeper, more philosophical but also more tantamount level, to do so would, essentially, be surrendering our core and fundamental power as human beings to govern our own kind. If we were to hand over judiciary powers and control to A.I. we would effectively be putting mankind on the bench forever. It would tear the core fabric of our humanity and everything the human race has achieved thus far in all antiquity and hopes to achieve in all future and for those reasons and more, I believe, simply could not and would not ever happen.

So, realistically, I think the automation risk level of this particular category should be reassessed to almost zero because anyone in their right mind with any semblance of logic and understanding of the justice system couldn't possibly surmise that it could realistically be awarded a percentile score that such could happen higher than that.

0 0 Reply