Programadores de Computadoras

70% (Alto Riesgo)

Alto Riesgo (61-80%): Los trabajos en esta categoría enfrentan una amenaza significativa por la automatización, ya que muchas de sus tareas pueden ser fácilmente automatizadas utilizando tecnologías actuales o de un futuro cercano.

Más información sobre qué es esta puntuación y cómo se calcula está disponible aquí.

Encuesta de usuarios

Sentimiento

El siguiente gráfico se incluye siempre que haya una cantidad sustancial de votos para generar datos significativos. Estas representaciones visuales muestran los resultados de las encuestas de usuarios a lo largo del tiempo, proporcionando una indicación importante de las tendencias de sentimiento.

Salarios

Muy bien remunerado en comparación con otras profesiones

En 2023, el salario anual mediano para 'Computer Programmers' fue de 99.700 $, o 47 $ por hora.

'Computer Programmers' recibieron un salario 107,4% más alto que el salario medio nacional, que se situó en 48.060 $

Salarios a lo largo del tiempo

Comentarios

Leave a comment

Name (Bajo) 17 days ago

AIs kind of suck at programming and logic they always add more bugs into my code

5 0 Reply

A 2 days ago

Currently. What about in 10 years though

0 0 Reply

John 19 days ago

Just as a few other professions, I’d say it would simply be limited to reducing unspecialized, entry-level positions. Those who find a niche would find that programming with chatbots are like lugging a junior dev that doesn’t learn around.

1 0 Reply

Everyone’s in denial 1 month ago

I am not saying I support the automation of everything, it’s just that in reality no one is safe as it accelerates. This is not just an assistant, nor just a displacement of humans, it is the complete replacement of the human mind. Pandora’s box was opened, now we have no idea if we will enter dystopia or utopia...

5 4 Reply

Jordan 1 day ago

No it is not. LLM's don't replicate how human brains work at all.

0 0 Reply

Tony B (Bajo) 1 month ago

AI has so far been good for created standard well known solutions. It is not good at all at understanding large amounts of existing code.

7 1 Reply

Jersey Jim 21 days ago

Getting better every week. MCP. Augment Code. LLM rules.

0 1 Reply

Mu (Bajo) 2 months ago

They will be reduced but not entirely replaced. This can be in ai research to improve the programming or new novel types of Research

1 1 Reply

Jacob (Bajo) 2 months ago

It will change a sofware engineer is still going to be required to check the code. You aren't going to want this to automated that's crazy.

4 0 Reply

Timothy (Moderado) 2 months ago

"For example, tasks or task components that appeal to capacities in which AI systems excel, will have to be less (or less fully) mastered by people, so that less training will probably be required. AI systems are already much better than people at logically and arithmetically correct gathering (selecting) and processing (weighing, prioritizing, analyzing, combining) large amounts of data. They do this quickly, accurately and reliably. They are also more stable (consistent) than humans, have no stress and emotions and have a great perseverance and a much better retention of knowledge and skills than people. As a machine, they serve people completely and without any “self-interest” or “own hidden agenda.”"

0 0 Reply

Michał (Muy probablemente) 3 months ago

Without knowing programming at this point you can easily write a good program with the help of AI. I completely agree that this work can be automated.

0 6 Reply

Jordan 1 day ago

There's a serious difference between it works and it works correctly. Without understanding the code and testing it, all you've done is make a polished turd.

0 0 Reply

TAmzid2872 (Incierto) 3 months ago

Programming isnt just about writing code, its about problem solving

8 0 Reply

Sven H. (Muy probablemente) 3 months ago

AI can already code extremely well; there will be no need for human programmers in the future.

1 6 Reply

Doubtful (Bajo) 4 months ago

AI is horrible at following instructions, and bad at understanding architecture. Also, as context grows it tends to forget instructions.

7 1 Reply

Jersey Jim 2 months ago

Model Context Protocol helps give AI better context. AI can work across many files now (way better IDE integration has happened in the past 6 months). The limits of AI have dwindled and will continue to dwindle as time goes on. Vibe coding is now a thing and AI can follow directions to build complete mvp's in under an hour.

0 1 Reply

Jordan 1 day ago

MVPs are not working reliable software that solves a real problem.

0 0 Reply

Michael Bohn (Incierto) 4 months ago

For the AI to work properly, you need people who know how to write the prompts and how to evaluate the written code.

5 2 Reply

Pavel 3 months ago

But if AI becomes as good as humans then why programmers would be ever needed if not those who work on AI itself? Maybe for some complex and big programms people would still be needed.

0 0 Reply

... 4 months ago

How does this relate to programmers? Programmers program not write prompts. Evaluation to code is already possible

0 0 Reply

J 5 months ago

Robots aint gonna code themselves, if we get to that point then that's Skynet/matrix. Aka end of the world for everyone so who cares

8 2 Reply

PossiblyUnemployed 3 months ago

My worry is if future code-generating models can modify itself or the programs it works on towards a specific goal, sort of like an intelligent self-modifying quine.

0 0 Reply

John pork (Sin posibilidad) 5 months ago

it is because AI and robots require programming and without programmers, they cannot function

1 2 Reply

PotentiallyJobless 3 months ago

It is true that programmers were necessary to create and train the models, but at this point what may be more necessary is just making sure the systems and hardware that keep the AI running don't malfunction. As it is, modern AI is finding ways to modify itself and its environment.

0 0 Reply

Emy (Muy probablemente) 5 months ago

Even though programming can demand thinking sometimes, 70% of the work is repetitive or the same across different business. Not only that, but 80% of the time you are not solving any complex problem that demands creativity or deep thinking.

7 3 Reply

Jersey Jim 5 months ago

You can convert from one language to another with AI and a developer is not protected by knowing Java vs C#. This further erodes job protection. Recreating the wheel will drastically stop in programming and I'd imagine known problems will converge to one solution.

0 3 Reply

rick 3 months ago

programming is problem resolution. there is not a single solution. lol.

0 0 Reply

@irton (Sin posibilidad) 6 months ago

Why do they already develop this, and AI is not smart enough to do more? To complement, it is good.

1 5 Reply

Cessna (Incierto) 6 months ago

Some AI can program or help a person program like chatgpt

3 2 Reply

Siddhant Tambe (Incierto) 6 months ago

In order for AI to truly replace a Human computer programmer job, they will need to be "human" enough to handle the multiple complexities of building a whole ecosystem of a software product, along with defining clients who has accurately specify requirement.
For instance, I asked ChatGPT to write me a simple code that creates a "conversation" with OpenAI's APIs. It could not even do that accurately.
Current likelihood of replacing a computer programmer is laughable at best. Maybe over 20 years there might be "some" progress.

8 3 Reply

pleb 5 months ago

To be honest, it's quite scary that most people think this job will be entirely replaced. If AI ever fully becomes "human enough" (as you said! That's a brilliant way to put it) to take over every single Computer Programmer job... well, I don't think we have to worry about whether CS Majors will get employed.

3 2 Reply

Some Programmer (Bajo) 6 months ago

We need programmers to make AI, the programmers themselves propel AI ahead by making new ideas, AI cannot do that it is simply using the knowledge it has to gen a quick answer for the user based on training, however i do believe that there is a chance that AI will replace humans if its way of thinking becomes completely identical as to a human would think and if quantum computing gets invented.

4 2 Reply

half-full 5 months ago

a good example of this would be asking an ai to generate a wineglass thats full to the brim; it cant because all the pictures online are half-full, lmao

2 2 Reply

Arsh (Moderado) 6 months ago

Some concepts like orginaltity and thinking can not be replicated, but base code is in danger

1 2 Reply