Conserjes y Limpiadores (Excepto Empleadas Domésticas y Limpiadores de Mantenimiento de Casas)
Las personas también vieron
Riesgo de automatización calculado
Alto Riesgo (61-80%): Los trabajos en esta categoría enfrentan una amenaza significativa por la automatización, ya que muchas de sus tareas pueden ser fácilmente automatizadas utilizando tecnologías actuales o de un futuro cercano.
Más información sobre qué es esta puntuación y cómo se calcula está disponible aquí.
Encuesta de usuarios
Nuestros visitantes han votado que no están seguros si esta ocupación será automatizada. Sin embargo, el nivel de riesgo de automatización que hemos generado sugiere una probabilidad mucho mayor de automatización: 76% probabilidad de automatización.
¿Cuál crees que es el riesgo de la automatización?
¿Cuál es la probabilidad de que Conserjes y Limpiadores, Excepto Empleadas Domésticas y Limpiadores de Mantenimiento de Casas sea reemplazado por robots o inteligencia artificial en los próximos 20 años?
Sentimiento
El siguiente gráfico se incluye siempre que haya una cantidad sustancial de votos para generar datos significativos. Estas representaciones visuales muestran los resultados de las encuestas de usuarios a lo largo del tiempo, proporcionando una indicación importante de las tendencias de sentimiento.
Sentimiento a lo largo del tiempo (anualmente)
Crecimiento
Se espera que el número de ofertas de trabajo para 'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners' aumente 3,1% para 2033
Empleo total y estimaciones de vacantes laborales
Las proyecciones actualizadas se deben 09-2024.
Salarios
En 2023, el salario anual mediano para 'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners' fue de 35.020 $, o 16 $ por hora.
'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners' recibieron un salario 27,1% más bajo que el salario medio nacional, que se situaba en 48.060 $
Salarios a lo largo del tiempo
Volumen
A partir de 2023, había 2.172.500 personas empleadas como 'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners' dentro de los Estados Unidos.
Esto representa alrededor del 1,4% de la fuerza laboral empleada en todo el país.
Dicho de otra manera, alrededor de 1 de cada 69 personas están empleadas como 'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners'.
Descripción del trabajo
Mantenga los edificios en condiciones limpias y ordenadas. Realice tareas de limpieza pesada, como limpiar pisos, lavar alfombras, lavar paredes y vidrios, y eliminar basura. Las responsabilidades pueden incluir el cuidado de la caldera y el horno, la realización de actividades de mantenimiento rutinario, la notificación a la gerencia de la necesidad de reparaciones, y la limpieza de nieve o escombros de la acera.
SOC Code: 37-2011.00
Recursos
Si estás pensando en comenzar una nueva carrera, o buscando cambiar de trabajo, hemos creado una útil herramienta de búsqueda de empleo que podría ayudarte a conseguir ese nuevo rol perfecto.
Comentarios
Leave a comment
Don't get me wrong, i think it could be done, i just think the cost would be outrageous and that somebody would still often have to step in for unusual messes and vandalism.
A. Invest significantly in equipment and processes that make the tasks much easier to do, and
B. Put a lot of personal responsibility on the people causing messes, generating the trash, and otherwise making the work that is needed to be done.
For A, restrooms would have to be redesigned with standards for toilets, urinals, sinks, etc where automated brushes could easily reach them. Trash receptacles would also need regular emptying and cleaning. It could be done, and I believe they've even invented self-cleaning restrooms where it basically treats the entire interior like a dishwasher, locking it off and doing high pressure sprays with sanitizing chemicals. It would be very very expensive to redesign them in such a way, not to mention the ongoing maintenance costs of such precision equipment. Similar with locker/shower rooms, kitchenettes, and break areas.
For B, in order for desk waste receptacle collection to be automated, office workers would need to actually throw trash inside the trash can and not beside, behind, or underneath. They would need to have it in a fixed position, and keep the area in front of it clear, and not obstructed with personal items, stacks of paper, or other junk. Similar to automated vacuum robots, they would need the area they're to clean free of obstacles. The best way to clean greasy fingerprints off glass doors is simply not have them there in the first place; train people to put their hands on the handle. Office workers in particular are incredibly inconsiderate of the work they leave for others, and office facilities would rather hire double the amount of cleaning staff to be demeaned and jump through ridiculous and unnecessary hoops.
The amount of investment needed to automate janitorial tasks would be incredibly high. If they really wanted to save money, they could instantly probably cut 25-50% of their workforce budget by being considerate to others. But they'd much rather waste money on digging their heels into classism, ensuring there are "servants" to look down upon.
I am currently writing this comment using an artificial intelligence aid. It is called Grammarly. I write rather well on my own, the help though is appreciated. It can improvise upon what I'm going to write.
Does this mean it reads my mind? No, it uses algorithms to prognosticate what is coming based upon my previous writing. From that, it can then access other algorithms that study grammatical rules and policies. That allows it to use an algorithm to assist my writing by editing.
My point being case variables in programmatic instructions can be defined so as to "follow" and "cope" with people. I work as a custodian presently for our county's public schools, which we have from pre-school to grade twelve. Children are the most unpredictable of all humans.
I can easily see how timing schedules, sensors, algorithms could all be put in place to cut my workload by two-thirds, or more. My work can be greatly automated. Still, there would need to be technicians both to repair the physical and mechanical aspects and to repair the computing code at times. So I say it could go either way.
Deja una respuesta sobre esta ocupación