Cajeros
¿Quiere este resumen en su sitio? Código para incrustar:
Riesgo de automatización
Riesgo Inminente (81-100%): Las ocupaciones en este nivel tienen una probabilidad extremadamente alta de ser automatizadas en un futuro cercano. Estos trabajos consisten principalmente en tareas repetitivas y predecibles con poca necesidad de juicio humano.
Más información sobre qué es esta puntuación y cómo se calcula está disponible aquí.
Encuesta de usuarios
Nuestros visitantes han votado que es muy probable que esta ocupación sea automatizada. Esta evaluación se ve respaldada por el nivel de riesgo de automatización calculado, que estima una posibilidad del 88% de automatización.
¿Cuál crees que es el riesgo de la automatización?
¿Cuál es la probabilidad de que Cajeros sea reemplazado por robots o inteligencia artificial en los próximos 20 años?
Sentimiento
El/los siguiente(s) gráfico(s) se incluyen siempre que haya una cantidad sustancial de votos para proporcionar datos significativos. Estas representaciones visuales muestran los resultados de las encuestas de los usuarios a lo largo del tiempo, proporcionando una indicación significativa de las tendencias de opinión.
Sentimiento a lo largo del tiempo (trimestralmente)
Sentimiento a lo largo del tiempo (anualmente)
Crecimiento
Se espera que el número de ofertas de trabajo para 'Cashiers' disminuya 10,0% para 2032
Empleo total y estimaciones de vacantes laborales
Las proyecciones actualizadas se deben 09-2023.
Salarios
En 2022, el salario anual mediano para 'Cashiers' fue de 28.240 $, o 13 $ por hora.
'Cashiers' recibieron un salario 39,0% más bajo que el salario medio nacional, que se situaba en 46.310 $
Salarios a lo largo del tiempo
Volumen
A partir de 2022, había 3.296.040 personas empleadas como 'Cashiers' dentro de los Estados Unidos.
Esto representa alrededor del 2,2% de la fuerza laboral empleada en todo el país.
Dicho de otra manera, alrededor de 1 de cada 44 personas están empleadas como 'Cashiers'.
Descripción del trabajo
Reciba y desembolse dinero en establecimientos que no sean instituciones financieras. Puede usar escáneres electrónicos, cajas registradoras o equipos relacionados. Puede procesar transacciones con tarjetas de crédito o débito y validar cheques.
SOC Code: 41-2011.00
Recursos
Si estás pensando en comenzar una nueva carrera, o buscando cambiar de trabajo, hemos creado una útil herramienta de búsqueda de empleo que podría ayudarte a conseguir ese nuevo rol perfecto.
Comentarios
Deja un comentario
Say Walmart.. These cashiers will be replaced by the customers whom they currently serve. IT is already happening.
McDonalds and the like: These will most likely be replaced by inhuman automation, and most people will not even care as these people are the ones who brought it on themselves thinking that they DESERVE to make more per hour than someone who actually has a skill set. THIS TOO, is already starting to happen, and as I thought, most people are more than happy to do this task on their own.
At Walmart however, people are a little upset that self serve is overtaking jobs. Kinda cool how that works.
Karma Baby!
My position required asking if a customer has an account or the benefits of taking a servey. A person who doesn’t understand English might also misinterpret the robot if it’s not built to accommodate their language. Robots can also misinterpret speech impediments, or even alternative augmented communications. Sudden glitches can exacerbate this.
However, some English native speakers are very skilled in understanding and communicating with ppl who don’t speak English compared to the average English native speaker not familiar with their language. You don’t have to be familiar with a person’s native language in order to precisely interpret accents or charades, that is, better than other English native speakers, with or without writing. I could make some of those non English speaking customers understand that they’re being asked about a store account and that they can win money from a survey, with or without writing, and I don’t share an ethnic background with most of those customers. This can make the buying process quicker and less frustrating with human interaction.
Many of the customers mentioned have English speaking relatives or translators, and PCs have translators in virtually every language. The US has no official languages, so they find a way to maneuver without speaking English. Unlike PCs, store computers only have Spanish and English. (I was exposed to people from all continents.)
Verbal communication and body language are the most vital keys to cashiering with people if all languages, and that’s why we still have human cashiers.
Our inventory computer system renews every night and is thus sometimes not accurate, so an empathetic humanistic voice may calm a customer.
A number of native English speakers fear AI replacing cashiers, whether it’s machine breakdown, misinformation, possible machine complexity, or political motivation later in the future (since they might become more human like but won’t get paid, or have some disadvantageous algorithmic agenda.) In the future, customers may feel more comfortable attacking the machine than another person.
Sorry joke. In fact you're right. Most people quit their job because of a bad boss, not because of the job.
So, there would still need to be at least one human employed in every restaurant to handle complaints by customers who didn't get their orders -- such as the manager.
1. Retail businesses may not have the profit margins to invest in robots/kiosks, the risk of this investment simply does not outweigh potential gains from it.
2. People are stupid and need help. People get frustrated already with kiosks, between finding things, coupon issues, questions about products, getting heavy things to vehicles. In a lot of retail settings cashiers double as customer service. Tech is ever evolving and it is hard for the average person to keep up, you would not believe how often I have to explain to people how to simply use there credit card.
3. Human to Human communication has a very large impact of returning customers. friendliness ratings have a very significant effects on weather or not a customer returns. robots simply cant recreate this.
4. retail businesses are constantly changing hands. When owners change so does the tech solutions, and integrating systems from different companies has caused many costly problems for retailers. Adding robots that run on these complicated inventory systems is just one more thing that can go wrong and potentially cause far more losses than the cost of an employee.
5. Tech is a business and the wouldn't be pushing for automation in retail without the potential for future profits. competition would lead to planned obsolescence and a lack of industry standards. This will mean that automation will not only be a huge investment, but will also come with routine costs to run. In the long run it may not be at all cheaper to replace minimum wage employees, If it made fiscal sense why hasn't macdonalds already done it? Big companies would have made the transition long ago if it was a guaranteed way to raise profits.
Deja una respuesta sobre esta ocupación